Reliability based design optimization of coupled acoustic-structure system using generalized polynomial chaos

In this investigation, a decomposition approach is employed for reliability-based design optimization of multidisciplinary systems. In the last few years, a variety of different approaches for reliability-based design optimization have been proposed in the literature. Traditionally, reliability-based design optimization is formulated as a nested optimization problem, where the inner loop, generally involves the solution to an optimization problem for computing the probability of failure corresponding to the failure modes. Such a formulation is by nature computationally intensive, requiring a large numbers of function and constraint evaluations. To alleviate this problem, researchers have developed single level reliability-based optimization formulations. The single level approach is expensive for multidisciplinary systems because of the fact that the complex coupled nature of multidisciplinary systems are likewise computationally intensive requiring iterative solvers. To reduce the computational effort of performing reliability-based design optimization in application to multidisciplinary systems, a decomposition approach for optimization is employed. The method of Simultaneous ANalysis and Design (SAND) is employed as an optimization driver within a single level reliability-based design optimization strategy. The methodology is illustrated in application to multidisciplinary test problems.

To obtain reliable designs, aleatory and epistemic uncertainties are considered recently in the structural analysis and design optimization. The reliability based de-sign optimization (RBDO) method [1] is used when the amount of input data is sufficient enough to create accurate statistical distribution. On the other hand, when the sufficient input data are not available due to limitations in time, human, and facility resources, the optimum design may not be reliable if RBDO method is used. To deal with the situation that input uncertainties have insufficient information, a possibility (or fuzzy set) method can be used for structural analysis and possibility based design optimization (PBDO) [2]. However, in many industry design problems, we may have to deal with design problems that involve with the mixed input statistical random and fuzzy variables simultaneously. For these problems, RBDO may yield unreliable optimum designs because of insufficient data. On the other hand, treating the random variables as fuzzy variables and invoking PBDO to solve the mixed design variable problem may yield too conservative designs with higher optimum costs. This paper proposes a new mixed variable design optimization (MVDO) problem based on the performance measure approach (PMA) [1]. To evaluate the possibilistic constraint in MVDO, a sub-optimization problem for inverse analysis is carried out using a hyper-cylinder domain. To solve this sub-problem efficiently and effectively, a new numerical algorithm, maximum failure search (MFS) method, is proposed in this paper by combining the enhanced hybrid mean value (HMV+) method [3] for the inverse reliability analysis in RBDO and the maximal possibility search (MPS) method [2] for the inverse possibility analysis in PBDO. Some mathematical examples are used to demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed numerical MFS method. Some physical design examples are used to compare the proposed MVDO results with RBDO and PBDO results.

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) is a technique used for engineering design when uncertainty is being considered. A typical RBDO problem can be formulated as a stochastic optimization model where the performance of a system is optimized and the reliability requirements are treated as constraints. One major challenge of RBDO research has been the prohibitive computational expenses. In this research, a new approximation approach, termed the single-loop deterministic method for RBDO (SLDM_RBDO), is proposed to reduce the computational effort of RBDO without sacrificing much accuracy. Based on the first order reliability method, the SLDM_RBDO method converts the probabilistic constraints to approximate deterministic constraints so that the RBDO problems can be transformed to deterministic optimization problems in one step. Three comparison experiments are conducted to show the performance of the SLDM_RBDO. In addition, a reliable forearm crutch design is studied to demonstrate the applicability of SLDM_RBDO to a real industry case.

Discretization of a random field by the generalized polynomial chaos (GPC) begins with selecting a specific type of orthogonal polynomial (e.g. Legendre and Hermite polynomials) (e.g. Ghanem and Spanos, 1991). This selection of a type of orthogonal polynomial can be performed based on the reported experiences (e.g. Xiu and Karniadakis, 2003) or data revealing the distribution of a random field to be discretized. If such data or reported experiences are unavailable, a third way may be generating some pilot tests to study the performance of a specific type of orthogonal polynomial in discretizing this random field. This study tries to develop an evolutionary algorithm-based auxiliary tool for the implementation of such pilot tests. A similar tool (Allaix and Carbone, 2009), which is based on the singleobjective evolutionary algorithm, had been developed for constructing the Karhunen-Loeve (KL) representation of a random field. Both KL and GPC expansions are two of the popular random field discretization methods (Ghanem and Spanos, 1991). But, the KL expansion should be applied under a prerequisite of knowing the covariance matrix of a random field to be discretized (e.g. Ghanem and Spanos, 1991); while, the GPC expansions can be applied without similar prerequisites (e.g. Xiu and Karniadakis, 2003). Therefore, the development of an auxiliary tool for constructing a GPC representation of a random field would be necessary. The succeeding research considers the derivation of an GPC representation of a random field as a multi-objective (MO) problem having two goals: (a) limiting the computational efforts spent in applying the resulting GPC representation; and (b) keeping the resulting GPC representation satisfying all accuracy standards (e.g. getting the sufficiently accurate prediction of statistical parameters of a random field). The former goal will be attained by limiting the highest order of polynomial term and total number of uncorrelated random variables used to construct a GPC representation; while the latter goal will be attained by minimizing multiple error estimators. Since there are multiple goals to be attained, a multiple objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) is required. Among all available MOEAs, the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm II (SPEA 2) (Zitzler, et al., 2001) is chosen. The highest order of polynomial term and total number of uncorrelated random variables used to construct an GPC representation are considered as two parameters to be identified. The remainder of this study is organized into four sections. In Sec. 2, the theoretical backgrounds of GPC expansions (e.g. Xiu and Karniadakis, 2003) are briefly reviewed. In Sec. 3, the SPEA 2 (Zitzler, et al., 2001) is used to construct a parameter identification procedure to identify the aforementioned highest order of orthogonal polynomial and total

A Reliability optimization of a coupled soil structure interaction applied to an offshore wind turbine.

Enhanced sequential approximate programming using second order reliability method for accurate and efficient structural reliability-based design optimization

Reliability-based design optimization of volume fraction distribution in functionally graded composites

The design of reinforced concrete (RC) structures involves several kinds of uncertainties, which are usually considered through the partial safety factors prescribed in the codes of practice. The traditional design optimization of RC structures uses deterministic information of the problem. The partial safety factors are used to consider loading fluctuation and the variability of material properties. The use of these safety factors in deterministic optimization usually leads to over-designing structures, as these safety factors are calibrated for a large class of structures. In the deterministic optimization procedure the reliability cannot be controlled. For this reason, the Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO) is devoted to design economical and reliable structures. However, the RBDO problem involves the evaluation of probabilistic constraints performed by the reliability analysis. The most common RBDO formulations are based on a nested optimization problem, with an outer loop for the design optimization and an inner loop for the reliability analysis. Therefore, an expensive computation effort is required to solve the RBDO problem. In this paper, a new RBDO method of RC structures is proposed. The RBDO problem is decomposed to several cycles of deterministic design optimization (DDO) based on new safety factors called Optimal System Safety Factors (OSSF). At each cycle of the DDO, the system reliability analysis is performed to verify the reliability of the optimal design, the OSSF are computed by a probabilistic method on the basis of the previous system reliability analysis, then the updated OSSF are provided for the next cycle of the DDO. The application to the design of an RC structure shows the interest and the efficiency of the proposed method.

This paper presents a reliability-based analysis of road vehicle accidents and the optimization of roadway radius and speed limit design based on vehicle dynamics, mainly focusing on windy environments. The performance functions are formulated as failure modes of vehicle rollover and sideslip and are defined on a finite set of basic variables with probabilistic characteristics, so-called random variables. The random variables are vehicle speed, steer angle, tire–road friction coefficient, road bank angle, and wind speed. The probability of accident was evaluated using the first-order reliability method (FORM) and numerical studies were conducted using a single-unit truck model. The analysis demonstrates that wind is a significant factor when assessing vehicle safety on roads, and probabilistic studies such as reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) are necessarily required to enhance vehicle safety in windy environments. Accordingly, design optimization of roadway radius and speed limit was conducted, and new designs were proposed satisfying the target reliability. This study suggests that probabilistic mechanics and theory can be of value for analysis and design of wind-related vehicle safety.

This study performed reliability-based robust design optimization (RBRDO) of stator and rotor shape of the IPM type electric motor to reduce the torque ripple considering uncertainties. A metamodel based on the design of experiments results, which was calculated by using 2-D electromagnetic finite element analysis, was used to calculate manufacturing uncertainties and material property distribution. As a result, the mean torque ripple of the optimum electric motor design was reduced by 56.4 % and the robustness was increased by 61.8 % compared with the initial design. The RBRDO design was compared with the designs of deterministic design optimization and reliability-based design optimization, and it was shown that, by using the RBRDO method, the optimum IPMSM can be designed to satisfying not only the minimum torque ripple but also the robustness and the reliability of output torque and torque ripple.

To reduce the cost of prototype and physical test, CAE analysis has been widely used to evaluate the vehicle performance during product development process. Combining CAE analysis and optimization approach, vehicle design process can be implemented more efficiently with affordable cost. Reliability based design optimization (RBDO) formulation considers variations of input variables, such as component gauges and material properties. As a result, the design obtained by using RBDO is more reliable and robust compared to those by deterministic optimization. The RBDO process starts from running simulation at DOE sampling data points, generating surrogate models (response surface) and performing robust and reliability based design optimization on the surrogate models by using Monte Carlo simulation. This paper presents a RBDO framework in Excel enviroment. Within this framework, the engineer can perform DOE sampling, surrogate modeling, robustness assessment, Monte Carlo simulation, robust design and reliability-based optimization with any type of distribution.

An efficient approach for reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) of series systems is presented. A modified formulation of the RBDO problem is employed in which the reliabilities of the failure modes of a system are included in the set of the design variables. This allows for an optimal apportionment of the reliability of a system among its failure modes. A sequential optimization and reliability assessment method is used to efficiently determine the optimum design. Here, the constraints on the reliabilities of the failure modes of the RBDO problem are replaced with approximate deterministic constraints. The proposed approach is demonstrated on two example problems that have been solved in previous studies without optimizing the required reliability levels of the failure modes. The first example performs RBDO to a cantilever beam with a rectangular cross section under lateral and vertical loads. The constraints are on the strength and the maximum allowable displacement. The second example performs RBDO to a cable-stayed box girder with five failure modes. Compared to the designs found by previous studies, the new approach finds designs with lower mass but without reducing the system reliability.

This paper presents a new method for performing reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) of structures based on sequential optimization and reliability assessment (SORA). SORA is an effective method for solving RBDO that separates uncertainty analysis from optimization loops for reducing computational cost. However, SORA has some limitations, such as an inability to deal with problems involving discrete design variables or discontinuity in a domain, the dependency of solutions on the starting point of numerical solutions, and the lack of guarantee that global optimum solutions will be found. In this paper, a global decoupling method is proposed to tackle these limitations and improve the performance of SORA. This method links SORA enhanced with modified chaos control (ESORA) to an improved differential evolution (IDE) to perform RBDO. To deal with RBDO problems with discrete design variables, a rounding method is integrated into IDE. IDE also utilizes an adaptive selection scheme in a mutation step and an elitist strategy in the selection phase. To improve the efficiency of the method for RBDO problems with highly nonlinear performance functions and nonnormal random variables, a modified chaos control is employed to assess reliability constraints. Five numerical examples are considered to investigate the strength of the proposed method, illustrating its appropriate efficiency and accuracy. The proposed method is also extendable to more complex problems such as system reliability-based structural optimization and RBDO of nonlinear structures.

A simulation-based method for reliability based design optimization problems with highly nonlinear constraints

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) of mechanical systems is computationally intensive due to the presence of two types of iterative procedures – design optimization and reliability estimation. Single-loop RBDO algorithms offer tremendous savings in computational effort, but they have so far only been able to consider individual component reliability constraints. This paper presents a single-loop RBDO formulation and an equivalent formulation that can also include system-level reliability constraints. The formulations allow the allocation of optimal reliability levels to individual component limit states in order to satisfy both system-level and component-level reliability requirements. Four solution algorithms to implement the second, more efficient formulation are developed. A key feature of these algorithms is to remove the most probable points from the decision space, thus avoiding the need to calculate Hessians or gradients of limit state gradients. It is shown that with the proposed methods, systems-level RBDO can be accomplished with computational expense equivalent to several cycles of computationally inexpensive singleloop RBDO based on second-moment methods. Examples of this new approach applied to series, parallel, and combined systems are provided. Nomenclature