• Open Access IconOpen Access
  • https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-113-ac1Copy DOI Icon

Reply on RC1

  • Feb 1, 2022
  • Ilaria Piccoli
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

<strong class="journal-contentHeaderColor">Abstract.</strong> Conservation agriculture (CA) relies on the following three key practices to improve agricultural sustainability: crop rotation, reduced tillage, and cover crop usage. Despite known soil physical benefits (reduced soil compaction and strength, enhanced soil porosity, and permeability), inconsistent reports on short-term CA results have limited its adoption in the European agroecosystems. To elucidate the short-term effects, a 3-year field experiment was undertaken in the low-lying Venetian plain (northern Italy). Bulk density (BD), penetration resistance (PR), soil hydraulic saturated conductivity, and sorptivity were used to evaluate soil quality obtained by combining three tillage intensities (conventional tillage – CT; minimum tillage – MT; no tillage – NT) with three winter soil coverings (bare soil – BS; tillage radish cover crop – TR; winter wheat cover crop – WW). Among the tillage methods, CT, on average, reduced BD by 4 % (from 1.48 to 1.42 g cm<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−3</sup></span>) and PR by 3.1 % (from 1.69 to 1.64 MPa) in the 0–30 cm tilled layer. Across the soil profile, reduced tillage coupled with WW improved soil physical properties even below the tilled layer, as evidenced by root-growth-limiting condition reductions (<span class="inline-formula">−11</span> % in BD values, with BD <span class="inline-formula">&gt;1.55</span> g cm<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−3</sup></span>, and <span class="inline-formula">−7</span> % in PR values, with PR <span class="inline-formula">&gt;2.5</span> MPa). Soil hydraulic measurements confirmed this positive behaviour; NT combined with either BS or WW produced a soil saturated conductivity of <span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M7" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">2.12</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn mathvariant="normal">10</mn><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">4</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="57pt" height="14pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="b2ca4a5373241993583c7055bf442a1e"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="soil-8-213-2022-ie00001.svg" width="57pt" height="14pt" src="soil-8-213-2022-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span> m s<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span> (4 times that of all other treatments). Likewise, sorptivity increased in NT combined with BS vs. other treatments (<span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M9" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">3.64</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn mathvariant="normal">10</mn><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">4</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="57pt" height="14pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="379760655162d2c24a47865d6264da95"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="soil-8-213-2022-ie00002.svg" width="57pt" height="14pt" src="soil-8-213-2022-ie00002.png"/></svg:svg></span></span> m s<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span> vs. an all-treatment average of <span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M11" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">7.98</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn mathvariant="normal">10</mn><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">5</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="57pt" height="13pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="eb46ee331ed69c3570c0ba663863a63e"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="soil-8-213-2022-ie00003.svg" width="57pt" height="13pt" src="soil-8-213-2022-ie00003.png"/></svg:svg></span></span> m s<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>). Our results suggest that, despite the increase in BD and PR due to reduced tillage, the strategy improved soil functioning and particularly soil hydraulic conductivity. In the short term, the WW cover crop moderately increased physical soil parameters, whereas TR had negligible effects. This study demonstrates that, to quantify CA, several soil physical parameters should be monitored.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations15

Behaviour of S-metolachlor and its oxanilic and ethanesulfonic acids metabolites under fresh vs. partially decomposed cover crop mulches: A laboratory study

  • Mar 28, 2018
  • Science of The Total Environment
  • A Cassigneul +8
  • Research Article
  • Citations84

On-farm assessment of organic matter and tillage management on vegetable yield, soil, weeds, pests, and economics in California

  • Mar 10, 2004
  • Agriculture, Ecosystems &amp; Environment
  • L.E Jackson +8
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations58

Cover Crops and Fertilization Alter Nitrogen Loss in Organic and Conventional Conservation Agriculture Systems

  • Jan 22, 2018
  • Frontiers in Plant Science
  • Rebecca E Shelton +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations222

Meta-analysis on atmospheric carbon capture in Spain through the use of conservation agriculture

  • Apr 06, 2012
  • Soil and Tillage Research
  • E.J González-Sánchez +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Adoption of Conservation Agricultural Practices Among Maize Farmers: An Alternative Livelihood to Mitigate Climate Change Impact in Bawku Municipality, Ghana

  • Jan 01, 2022
  • International Journal of Sustainable Development Research
  • Alhassan Bawa +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

Quantification of tillage, plant cover, and cumulative rainfall effects on soil surface microrelief by statistical, geostatistical and fractal indices

  • Jul 23, 2008
  • Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
  • J Paz-Ferreiro +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations21

Outburst of pest populations in rice-based cropping systems under conservation agricultural practices in the middle Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia

  • Mar 08, 2022
  • Scientific Reports
  • Rakesh Kumar +12
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Surface Runoff and Sediment Yield from Various Tillage Systems of Cotton

  • Jan 01, 1988
  • Transactions of the ASAE
  • K H Yoo +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Effect of Tillage Methods and Phosphorus Fertilization on Maize in the Humid Tropics1

  • Mar 01, 1977
  • Agronomy Journal
  • B T Kang +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Growth and Development Responses of Tobacco (&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Nicotiana tabacum&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; L.) to Changes in Physical and Hydrological Soil Properties Due to Minimum Tillage

  • Jan 01, 2011
  • American Journal of Plant Sciences
  • Francesca Orlando +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations31

Temporal stability and patterns of runoff and runon with different cover crops in an olive orchard (SW Andalusia, Spain)

  • Jul 14, 2016
  • CATENA
  • M López-Vicente +5
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations15

Application of Conservation Agriculture Principles for the Management of Field Crops Pests

  • Jan 01, 2018
  • Morris Fanadzo +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Yield, soil Nitrogen content and weed control in six years of conservation agriculture on-farm field trials in Southwest Germany

  • Dec 09, 2022
  • Soil and Tillage Research
  • Carola Pekrun +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations23

A comparison of the effects of minimum-till and conventional-till methods, with and without straw incorporation, on slugs, slug damage, earthworms and carabid beetles in autumn-sown cereals

  • Sep 19, 2012
  • The Journal of Agricultural Science
  • T F Kennedy +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations34

Simulated Effects of Winter Wheat Cover Crop on Cotton Production Systems of the Texas Rolling Plains

  • Jan 01, 2017
  • Transactions of the ASABE
  • Pradip Adhikari +6
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.