• Open Access IconOpen Access
  • https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2021-98-ac3Copy DOI Icon

Reply on RC2

  • Nov 21, 2021
  • Igor Ognev
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Volgo-Uralia is a Neoarchean easternmost part of the East European craton. Recent seismic studies of the Volgo-Uralian region provided new insights into the crustal structure of this area. In this study, we combine satellite gravity and seismic data in a common workflow to perform a complex study of Volgo-Uralian crustal structure which is useful for further basin analysis of the area. In this light, a new crustal model of the Volgo-Uralian subcraton is presented from a step-wise approach: (1) inverse gravity modeling followed by (2) 3D forward gravity modeling. First, inversion of satellite gravity gradient data was applied to determine the Moho depth for the area. Density contrasts between crust and mantle were varied laterally according to the tectonic units present in the region, and the model is constrained by the available active seismic data. The Moho discontinuity obtained from the gravity inversion was consequently modified and complemented in order to define a complete 3D crustal model by adding information on the sedimentary cover, upper crust, lower crust, and lithospheric mantle layers in the process of forward gravity modeling where both seismic and gravity constraints were respected. The obtained model shows crustal thickness variations from 32 to more than 55 km in certain areas. The thinnest crust with a thickness below 40 km is found beneath the Pericaspian basin, which is covered by a thick sedimentary layer. The thickest crust is located underneath the Ural Mountains as well as in the center of the Volga-Uralian subcraton. In both areas the crustal thickness exceeds 50 km. At the same time, initial forward gravity modeling has shown a gravity misfit of ca. 95 mGal between the measured Bouguer gravity anomaly and the forward calculated gravity field in the central area of the Volga-Uralian subcraton. This misfit was interpreted and modeled as a high-density lower crust which possibly represents underplated material. Our preferred crustal model of the Volga-Uralian subcraton respects the gravity and seismic constraints and reflects the main geological features of the region with Moho thickening in the cratons and under the Ural Mountains and thinning along the Paleoproterozoic rifts, Pericaspian sedimentary basin, and Pre-Urals foredeep.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Crustal structure of the Volgo–Uralian subcraton revealed by inverse and forward gravity modelling

  • Mar 02, 2022
  • Solid Earth
  • Igor Ognev +2
  • Single Book
  • Citations968

Geophysical Inverse Theory and Regularization Problems

  • Jan 01, 2002
  • Michael S Zhdanov
  • Research Article
  • Citations25

A seismic model for crustal structure in North China Craton

  • Jan 01, 2017
  • Earth and Planetary Physics
  • Tianyu Zheng +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations160

Aegean crustal thickness inferred from gravity inversion. Geodynamical implications

  • Nov 20, 2004
  • Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Céline Tirel +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Seismic structures of Zhenbei and Huangyan seamounts and their postspreading volcanic evolution

  • Nov 10, 2023
  • Tectonophysics
  • Enyuan He +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations55

Crustal velocity structure in the southern edge of the Central Alborz (Iran)

  • Oct 01, 2009
  • Journal of Geodynamics
  • A Abbassi +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations69

Seismic velocity structure across the Fennoscandia–Sarmatia suture of the East European Craton beneath the EUROBRIDGE profile through Lithuania and Belarus

  • Dec 01, 1999
  • Tectonophysics
  • M Grad +4
  • Preprint Article

Effects of multi-extensional tectonics in a cratonic area: 3D numerical modeling and implications for the Congo Basin

  • Mar 28, 2022
  • Magdala Tesauro +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Development of a software package for visualization of three-dimensional mass distributions and forward gravity modelling

  • Dec 08, 2006
  • Journal of Geophysics and Engineering
  • Johannes Fellner
  • Research Article
  • Citations18

Active continental deformation and regional metamorphism

  • Jan 20, 1987
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences
  • James Jackson
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

The role of gas flushing on magma reservoir crystallization and its consequences for the growth of planetary crust

  • Nov 01, 2022
  • Lithos
  • Bruno Scaillet
  • Conference Article

A Method to Constrain the Configuration of the Subsurface Structure in 3-D Gravity Inversion

  • May 06, 1996
  • Yanchang Hu +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations53

Mapping crustal thickness and oceanic lithosphere distribution in the Eastern Mediterranean using gravity inversion

  • Nov 01, 2012
  • Petroleum Geoscience
  • Leanne Cowie +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations51

Combined Gravimetric–Seismic Crustal Model for Antarctica

  • Sep 22, 2017
  • Surveys in Geophysics
  • Alexey Baranov +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

Evidence for Proterozoic Collision from Airborne Magnetic and Gravity Studies in Southern Granulite Terrain, India and Signatures of Recent Tectonic Activity in the Palghat Gap

  • Jan 01, 2005
  • Gondwana Research
  • D.C Mishra +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.