Reply.

Introduction: The efficacy and influence of steroids for reducing the incidence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) surgery remain controversial. Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to explore the effect of steroids versus placebo on risk of PVR. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through September 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), assessing the effect of steroid drugs as an adjunct for reducing the incidence of PVR after RRD surgery. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model. Data were extracted by two reviewers independently; the quality of RCTs was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. We calculated risk ratio (RR) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all outcomes and plotted on forest plots. I2 accessed using the χ2 test was applied to quantify the degree of heterogeneity. Results: Four RCTs involving 478 patients (478 eyes) are included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in the incidence of PVR recurrence between steroid groups and control groups (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.70–1.08, p = 0.19). However, the incidence of recurrent PVR was lower in the steroid group (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46–0.99, p = 0.04) than in the control group when only PVR grades A and B were taken into consideration. Besides, steroids could significantly reduce the incidence of macular edema after surgery (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47–0.88, p = 0.007). The steroid group and control group had comparable outcomes of retinal reattachment rate and reoperation rate after primary surgery. Additionally, there was no significant difference of the incidence of epiretinal membrane, and the incidence of surgery required by epiretinal membrane. Conclusion: This meta-analysis reveals that RRD surgery combined with steroid drugs administration could significantly reduce the recurrence in PVR grade A and B subgroup, as well as the incidence of macular edema after surgery.