RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN WIDEBAND CDMA SYSTEMS USING GENETIC ALGORITHMS

Design of non-uniform circular antenna arrays is one of the important optimization problems in electromagnetic domain. While designing a non-uniform circular array the goal of the designer is to achieve minimum side lobe levels with maximum directivity. In contrast to the single-objective methods that attempt to minimize a weighted sum of the four objectives considered here, in this article we consider these as four distinct objectives that are to be optimized simultaneously in a multi-objective (MO) framework using one of the best known Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs) called NSGA-II. This MO approach provides greater flexibility in design by producing a set of final solutions with different trade-offs among the four objective from which the designer can choose one as per requirements. To the best of our knowledge, other than the single objective approaches, no MOEA has been applied to design a non-uniform circular array before. Simulations have been conducted to show that the best compromise solution obtained by NSGA-II is far better than the best results achieved by the single objective approaches by using the differential evolution (DE) algorithm and the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm.

A comparative study of various meta-heuristic techniques applied to the multilevel thresholding problem

A number of authors made the claim that a multiobjective approach preserves genetic diversity better than a single objective approach. Sofar, none of these claims presented a thorough analysis to the effect of multiobjective approaches. In this paper, we provide such analysis and show that a multiobjective approach does preserve reproductive diversity. We make our case by comparing a pareto multiobjective approach against a single objective approach for solving single objective global optimization problems in the absence of mutation. We show that the fitness landscape is different in both cases and the multiobjective approach scales faster and produces better solutions than the single objective approach.

In data mining, nugget discovery is the discovery of interesting classification rules that apply to a target class. In previous research, heuristic methods (genetic algorithms, simulated annealing and tabu search) have been used to optimise a single measure of interest. This paper proposes the use of multi-objective optimisation evolutionary algorithms to allow the user to interactively select a number of interest measures and deliver the best nuggets (an approximation to the Pareto-optimal set) according to those measures. Initial experiments are conducted on a number of databases, using an implementation of the fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA), and two well known measures of interest. Comparisons with the results obtained using modern heuristic methods are presented. Results indicate the potential of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for the task of nugget discovery.

Supervised Neural Network (NN) learning is a process in which input patterns and known targets are presented to a NN while it learns to recognize (classify, map, fit, etc.) them as desired. The learning is mathematically defined as an optimisation problem, i.e., an error function representing the differences between the desired and actual output, is being minimized (Bishop, 1995; Haykin, 1999). Because the most popular supervised learning techniques are gradient based (Backpropagation BP), they suffer from the so-called Local Minima Problem (Bishop, 1995). This has motivated the employment of Global Optimisation (GO) methods for the supervised NN learning. Stochastic and heuristic GO approaches including Evolutionary Algorithms (EA) demonstrated promising performance over the last decades (Smagt, 1994; Sexton et al., 1998; Jordanov & Georgieva, 2007; etc.). EA appeared more powerful than BP and its modifications (Sexton et al., 1998; Alba & Chicone 2004), but hybrid methods that combine the advantages of one or more GO techniques and local searches were proven to be even better (Yao, 1999; Rocha et al., 2003; Alba & Chicano, 2004; Ludemir et al., 2006). Hybrid methods were promoted over local searches and simple population based techniques in Alba & Chicone (2004). The authors compared five methods: two BP implementations (gradient descent and Levenberg-Marquardt), Genetic Algorithms (GA), and two hybrid methods, combining GA with different local methods. The methods were used for NN learning applied to problems arising in medicine. Ludemir et al. (2006) optimized simultaneously NN weights and topology with a hybrid method combining Simulated Annealing (SA), Tabu Search (TS) and BP. A set of new solutions was generated on each iteration by TS rules, but the best solution was only accepted according to the probability distribution as in conventional SA. Meanwhile, the topology of the NN was also optimized and the best solution was kept. Finally, BP was used to train the best NN topology found in the previous stages. The new methodology compared favorably with SA and TS on four classification and one prediction problems. Plaginakos et al. (2001) performed several experiments to evaluate various training methods – six Differential Evolution (DE) implementations (with different mutation operators), BP, BPD (BP with deflection), SA, hybridization of BP and SA (BPSA), and GA. They reported O pe n A cc es s D at ab as e w w w .in te ch w eb .o rg

Evolutionary algorithms, simulated annealing and tabu search: a comparative study

Considering deregulation in power systems and the energy conservation law, power and energy systems require more cost and energy reduction for system planning, operation, and control. Optimization techniques such as linear and nonlinear programming techniques have been utilized as one of the methods for realization of the reduction. Recently, meta-heuristics such as genetic algorithm, simulated annealing, tabu search, and particle swarm optimization have been paid attention as other options for realization of the reduction. In power and energy society, we had one technical committee and one special issue on applications of meta-heuristics for power system. Moreover, panel sessions and tutorials have been held in IEEE and IFAC. This paper presents applications of meta-heuristics to power and energy fields from the practical application point of view.

Searching secret key of classical ciphers in the keyspace is a challenging NP-complete problem that can be successfully solved using metaheuristic techniques. This article proposes two metaheuristic techniques: improved genetic algorithm (IGA) and a new discrete cuckoo search (CS) algorithm for solving a classical substitution cipher. The efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed techniques are compared to the existing tabu search (TS) and genetic algorithm (GA) techniques using three criteria: (a) average number of key elements correctly detected, (b) average number of keys examined before determining the required key, and (c) the mean performance time. As per the results obtained, the improved GA is comparatively better than the existing GA for criteria (a) and (c), while the proposed CS strategy is significantly better than rest of the algorithms (i.e., GA, IGA, and TS) for all three criteria. The obtained results indicate that the proposed CS technique can be an efficient and effective option for solving other similar NP-complete combinatorial problems also.

Aiming at the disadvantage of premature convergence of basic genetic algorithm, an adaptive simulated annealing genetic tabu search algorithm is proposed. This algorithm fully combines the global convergence and adaptability of simulated annealing algorithm and the strong climbing ability and high efficiency of tabu search strategy. It has strong convergence and adaptability. The simulation results of the adaptive simulated annealing genetic tabu search algorithm are given and compared with the basic genetic algorithm and simulated annealing algorithm. The simulation results show that the algorithm has better convergence and optimization performance, and can better solve the combinatorial optimization problem.

Meta-heuristic Bayesian networks retrieval combined polarization corrected temperature and scattering index for precipitations

This paper is concerned with an overview of the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (RCPSP) and the conventional meta-heuristic solution techniques that have attracted the attention of many researchers in the field. Therefore, researchers have developed algorithms and methods to solve the problem. This paper addresses the single-mode RCPSP where the objective is to optimize and minimize the project duration while the quantities of resources are constrained during the project execution. In this problem, resource constraints and precedence relationships between activities are known to be the most important constraints for project scheduling. In this context, the standard RCPSP is presented. Then, the classifications of the collected papers according to the year of publication and the different meta-heuristic approaches applied are presented. Five weighted articles and their meta-heuristic techniques developed for RCPSP are described in detail and their results are summarized in the corresponding tables. In addition, researchers have developed various conventional meta-heuristic algorithms such as genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization, ant colony optimization, bee colony optimization, simulated annealing, evolutionary algorithms, and so on. It is stated that genetic algorithms are more popular among researchers than other meta-heuristics. For this reason, the various conventional meta-heuristics and their corresponding articles are also presented to give an overview of the conventional meta-heuristic optimizing techniques. Finally, the challenges of the conventional meta-heuristics are explored, which may be helpful for future studies to apply new suitable techniques to solve the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (RCPSP).

The design of Renewable Energy Power Plants (REPPs) is crucial not only for the investments' performance and attractiveness measures, but also for the maximization of resource (source) usage (e.g. sun, water, and wind) and the minimization of raw materials (e.g. aluminum: Al, cadmium: Cd, iron: Fe, silicon: Si, and tellurium: Te) consumption. Hence, several appropriate and satisfactory Multi-Objective Problems (MOPs) are mandatory during the REPPs' design phases. MOPs related tasks can only be managed by very well organized knowledge acquisition on all REPPs' design equations and models. The proposed MOPs need to be solved with one or more multi-objective algorithm, such as Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs). In this respect, the first aim of this research study is to start gathering knowledge on the REPPs' MOPs. The second aim of this study is to gather detailed information about all MOEAs and available free software tools for their development. The main contribution of this research is the initialization of a proposed multi-objective evolutionary algorithm knowledge acquisition system for renewable energy power plants (MOEAs-KAS-F-REPPs) (research and development loopwise process: develop, train, validate, improve, test, improve, operate, and improve). As a simple representative example of this knowledge acquisition system research with two selective and elective proposed standard objectives (as test objectives) and eight selective and elective proposed standard constraints (as test constraints) are generated and applied as a standardized MOP for a virtual small hydropower plant design and investment. The maximization of energy generation (MWh) and the minimization of initial investment cost (million €) are achieved by the Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA), the Niched Sharing Genetic Algorithm/Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-I), and the NSGA-II algorithms in the Scilab 6.0.0 as only three standardized MOEAs amongst all proposed standardized MOEAs on two desktop computer configurations (Windows 10 Home 1709 64 bits, Intel i5-7200 CPU @ 2.7 GHz, 8.00 GB RAM with internet connection and Windows 10 Pro, Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 650 @ 3.20 GHz, 6,00 GB RAM with internet connection). The algorithm run-times (computation time) of the current applications vary between 20.64 and 59.98 seconds.

Three heuristic search methods, Genetic Algorithm, Simulated Annealing and Tabu Search are implemented to invert Rayleigh wave phase velocity for shallow S-wave velocity profiling in seismic surface wave surveying. Unlike linearized least-squares inversion, they do not require derivative calculation, or an initial model, only the forward modeling calculation. In this study, the performances of the three heuristic techniques are compared with numerical experiments. With common paramerization and search limits, the three algorithms can accurately reconstruct shallow S-wave profiles with and without a velocity reversal from the synthetic data without any specific initial models. The Genetic Algorithms and the Simulated Annealing show fast convergence. However, the Simulated Annealing can find models with the smallest misfits. It is also found that the decrease of the misfits is the most gradual in the Tabu Search.

This article deals with the comparative performance of some established multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) for structural topology optimization. Four multi-objective problems, having design objectives like structural compliance, natural frequency and mass, and subjected to constraints on stress, etc., are posed for performance testing. The MOEAs include Pareto archive evolution strategy (PAES), population-based incremental learning (PBIL), non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA), strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA), and multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MPSO). The various MOEAs are implemented to solve the problems. The ground element filtering (GEF) technique is used to suppress checkerboard patterns on topologies. The results obtained from the various optimizers are illustrated and compared. It is shown that PBIL is far superior to the others. The optimal topologies from using PBIL can be compared with those obtained by employing the classical gradient-based approach. It can be considered as a powerful tool for structural topological design.

2차원 저장소 적재는 NP-hard 문제로서 그 문제의 정확한 해를 구하는 것이 어려운 것으로 알려져 있으며, 이의 더 좋은 해를 얻기 위해 유전자(genetic) 알고리즘, 시뮬레이티드 어닐링(simulated annealing), 타부서치(tabu search)등과 같은 근사적 접근법이 제안되어 왔다. 하지만 분지한계(branch-and-bound)나 타부서치 기법들을 이용한 기존의 대표적인 근사 알고리즘들은 휴리스틱 알고리즘의 해에 기반을 둠으로 효율성이 낮고 반복수행에 의한 계산시간이 길다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 이러한 근사 알고리즘의 복잡성을 간소화하고, 알고리즘의 효율성을 높이기 위해 적재가능성을 판단하는 적합성 함수(fitness function)를 정의하고 이를 이용하여 어떤 특정 개체의 적재영역을 판단하는데 영향을 주는 적재영역의 수를 계산한다. 또한, 이들을 이용한 새로운 휴리스틱 알고리즘을 제안하였다. 끝으로 기존의 휴리스틱 또는 메타휴리스틱 기법과의 비교실험을 통해 기존의 휴리스틱 알고리즘인 FFF와 FBS에 비해 97%의 결과가 같거나 우수하였으며, 타부서치 알고리즘에 비해 86%의 결과가 같거나 우수한 것으로 나타났다. The two-dimensional bin packing problem(2D-BPP) has been known to be NP-hard, and it is difficult to solve the problem exactly. Many approximation methods, such as genetic algorithm, simulated annealing and tabu search etc, have been also proposed to gain better solutions. However, the existing approximation algorithms, such as branch-and-bound and tabu search, have shown the low efficiency and the long execution time due to a large of iterations. To solve these problems, we first define the fitness function to simplify and increase the utility of algorithm. The function decides whether an item is packed into a given area, and as an important information for a packing strategy, the number of subarea that can accommodate a given item is obtained from the variant of the fitness function. Then we present a heuristic algorithm BF for 2D bin packing, constructed by the fitness function and subarea. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm will be expressed by the comparison experiments with the heuristic and the metaheuristic of the literatures. As comparing with existing heuristic algorithms and metaheuristic algorithms, it has been found that the packing rate of algorithm BP is the same as 97% as existing heuristic algorithms, FFF and FBS, or better than them. Also, it has been shown the same as 86% as tabu search algorithm or better.