Experimental Studies on Community Convergence and Alternative Stable States: Comments on a Paper by Drake et al.
We congratulate Drake and colleagues (Drake et al. 1993) for their creative and elegant experimental study of some critical issues in community ecology; we count ourselves among a minority of ecologists who believe that such 'bottle experiments' (Kareiva 1989) can tell us much about the real world. However, we wish to raise some caveats, involving both technical aspects of Drake et al.'s experimental design, and the interpretations of the results proffered by these authors. It is useful to define some terms. 'Community convergence' occurs when one or more communities reach the same 'state', in terms of identities, absolute and relative abundances of constituent species. Historically, this has usually meant convergence to the same point equilibrium, but more recent thinking on higher order attractors (e.g. limit cycles) and stochastic boundedness (Chesson & Ellner 1989) allows a possibility that species abundances might only converge in terms of some dynamic pattern, e.g. to oscillations with the same frequency spectra, or to random variables with the same probability distributions. Communities could fail to converge if external, abiotic conditions differed. More interestingly, communities with the same external conditions would fail to converge if the state space of the governing dynamical system had 'alternative stable states'-more than one locally stable, point equilibrium, or higher-order attractor. It is useful to distinguish cases where one or more of the alternative stable states is on the boundary of the state space, because such boundary attractors correspond to community states in which one or more species are extinct. Such cases we call 'priority effects': the classical example is provided by the Lotka-Volterra competition equations, when each species suffers more from interspecific than intraspecific competition, and the species with a sufficiently large initial relative abundance excludes the other. If alternative stable states occur only in the interior of the state space, communities have the same species composition, but differ in absolute and relative abundances of species. When priority effects occur, communities fail to converge in the identity of constituent species. These are important issues. In the real world, communities are frequently disturbed in ways that alter species abundances. If a community has alternative stable states, such a disturbance can potentially move the community from one state to another. In such cases, good knowledge of local processes and interactions would at best enable one to catalogue a set of possible community states. More exact prediction of community state would require historical knowledge of disturbances. Despite a number of plausible theoretical models in which alternative'stable states occur (Polis, Myers & Holt 1989; Sinclair 1989; Case 1990; Drake 1990; Jones, Hassell & Pacala 1993), and their reported occurrence, including priority effects, in natural communities (Cole 1983; Kneidel 1983; Barkai & McQuaid 1988; Moss 1989; Sinclair 1989; Dublin, Sinclair & McGlade 1990; Knowlton, Lang & Keller 1990; Pech et al. 1992), the existence of, and mechanisms generating these phenomena in the field remain poorly researched. Occam's razor would assume a single equilibrium until proved otherwise. Parsimony has no logical primacy, however. Invasion experiments in laboratory microcosms are ideal tools to look for alternative stable states in communities, because replicated communities under the same external conditions can be created, and invasions provide radically differing initial relative abundances, from which divergence to alternative states might be revealed. Priority effects would be detected if such experimental communities diverged in species identities, and more generally, alternative stable states would be detected if absolute and relative abundances (or their dynamic patterns) diverged. Of course, a sufficiently long period of undisturbed observation of each community is needed to allow convergence to occur, if it is going to. Several generations of the longest-lived resident organisms, or the time required for achievement of the apparent carrying capacity for total biomass, or of a few turnovers of total biomass, are probably minimum estimates of the time required. Where several invasions are imposed on local communities (as in Drake et al. 1993), the time allowed for potential convergence must be counted from the date of the last invasion, since invasions are a form of disturbance, even if unsuccessful, and may slow convergence. Moreover, if convergence to higherorder attractors, rather than point equilibria, is possible, very long runs of data may be needed to assess whether dynamic patterns of species abundances have converged or not. 484
Read more