Reverse shoulder arthroplasty

What's New in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with preservation of the rotator cuff for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis has similar outcomes to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff arthropathy.

* The most common indication for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is primary rotator cuff tear arthropathy.* Indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty have expanded beyond rotator cuff tear arthropathy to include other pathologies such as irreparable rotator cuff tears, glenohumeral arthritis with an intact rotator cuff, acute proximal humeral fractures, the sequelae of proximal humeral fractures, neoplasms of the proximal part of the humerus, inflammatory arthropathies, and failed total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty.* Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty continues to have high rates of complications, which include instability, infection, scapular notching, neurologic injury, and component loosening, among others.

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty performed for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) with an intact rotator cuff compared with rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data including consecutive patients who underwent primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for GHOA or CTA with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Baseline patient demographics and clinical outcomes including active range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation, and visual analog scale for pain were collected. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of preoperative diagnosis on clinical outcomes. Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of GHOA demonstrated significantly better postoperative active forward elevation (138.6° versus 127.3°; P < 0.01), external rotation (54.2° versus 43.8°; P < 0.01), and change in internal rotation (Δ 2.1 points versus Δ 1.2 points; P < 0.01). Patients with GHOA demonstrated significantly better postoperative ASES (86.8 versus 76.6; P < 0.01), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (89.7 versus 78.5; P < 0.01), and visual analog scale scores (0.63 versus 1.2; P < 0.01). Minimal clinically important difference for ASES score was achieved by 97.5% of patients with GHOA compared with 86.7% of patients with CTA (P < 0.01), whereas substantial clinical benefit was achieved by 90.4% of patients with GHOA and 71.7% of patients with CTA (P < 0.01). After a multivariate linear regression analysis, postoperative ASES scores were independently associated with previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery (P = 0.042), preoperative ASES score (P = 0.01), and primary diagnosis of GHOA (P < 0.01). RTSA performed in patients with GHOA and an intact rotator cuff is associated with improved functional and clinical outcomes compared with those patients treated for CTA. Level III Therapeutic Study.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has higher perioperative implant complications and transfusion rates than total shoulder arthroplasty

Background: Long-term clinical and radiographic outcome data after standard cemented long-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) remain underreported. The aim of this study is to report on medium- to long-term data of patients over 60 years of age. Methods: The same type of RSA (Aequalis Reverse II, Memphis, TN, USA) was implanted in 27 patients with a mean age of 73 years (range 61–84). Indications for RSA were cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) in 25 cases and osteoarthritis (OA) in two cases. Pre- and postoperative Constant Score was assessed and component loosening, polyethylene wear, scapular notching and revision rates were recorded at a mean clinical follow-up (FU) of 127.6 months (SD ± 33.7; range 83–185). Results: The mean-adjusted CS (aCS) improved from 30.0 (range 10–59) to 95.0 (range 33–141) points (p < 0.001). Glenoid loosening was found in two (9.1%) and stem loosening was found in three (13.6%) cases. Polyethylene wear was observed in four (18.2%) cases. Scapular notching appeared in 15 (68.2%) cases but was not associated with poor aCS (p = 0.423), high levels of pain (p = 0.798) or external rotation (p = 0.229). Revision surgery was necessary in three (11.1%) cases. Conclusions: RSA with a cemented standard long stem leads to improvement in forward elevation, abduction and pain after a mean FU of 10 years. However, external rotation does not improve with this prosthetic design. Moreover, scapular notching is observed in the majority of cases, and revision rates (11.1%) as well as humeral loosening rates (13.6%) remain a concern. Level of evidence: Level 4, retrospective cohort study.

Glenoid reconstruction with autologous humeral head for glenoid dysplasia in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUNDThe optimal surgical approach for patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) and an intact rotator cuff remains debated. While anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has traditionally been favoured, reverse TSA (RTSA) is increasingly utilized.AIMTo systematically compare the outcomes of RTSA and TSA in this specific patient population.METHODSA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Retrospective comparative studies evaluating RTSA and TSA in patients with GHOA and intact rotator cuff were included. Key outcomes assessed included complication and reoperation rates, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and range of motion. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool.RESULTSTwelve studies encompassing 1608 patients (580 RTSA, 1028 TSA) met inclusion criteria. RTSA was associated with a lower reoperation rate compared to TSA [odds ratio = 0.37; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14-0.94; P value = 0.04], while no significant difference in overall complication rates was observed (odds ratio = 0.47; 95%CI: 0.19-1.16; P value = 0.10). RTSA patients showed superior outcomes in University of California Los Angeles, Simple Shoulder Test, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores; however, the differences did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference. TSA patients had significantly better external rotation (mean difference= -9.0°; 95%CI: -13.21 to -5.02; P value < 0.0001). No significant differences were found in other range of motion measures or satisfaction scores. The overall methodological quality of included studies was moderate to serious.CONCLUSIONIn patients with GHOA and an intact rotator cuff, RTSA may offer comparable or improved outcomes to TSA with lower reoperation rates and similar complication profiles. Functional outcomes favour RTSA in certain patient-reported outcome measures, while TSA retains an advantage in external rotation. Surgical decision-making should remain individualized based on patient characteristics and functional demands.

Indication matters: effect of indication on clinical outcome following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty—a multicenter study

Introduction:Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty provides a surgical alternative to standard total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of cuff tear arthropathy, arthritis and fracture sequelae. This study aimed to assess the short-term outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for patients in a large public hospital in Malaysia.Materials and Methods:We identified and performed five primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasties between 1 May 2019 and 1 June 2020. All patients were contactable and available for analysis. Assessment of functional outcomes was performed using the Constant-Murley score, the patient satisfaction score (PSS), and imaging studies. The mean follow-up from operation to the time of reporting was 9.6 months (range, 3 to 14 months)Results:The median age for our patients was 58 years (±11.91). The most common indication for surgery was post-traumatic arthritis, followed by rotator cuff arthropathy and osteoarthritis. The mean Constant score improved from 9.0 pre-operatively to 52.3 post-operatively at a mean of 9.6 months. The majority of the patients were satisfied with the surgery as the post-operative range of motion, especially anterior elevation and abduction, improved in four of our patients and there were no short-term complications, for example, of infection or revisions, reported at the last follow-up.Conclusion:This study has shown that reverse total shoulder arthroplasty can yield good short-term outcomes for the treatment of complex shoulder problems in addition to cuff tear arthropathy. It should be considered a treatment for rotator cuff tears, severe arthritis and ≥ 3 parts proximal humeral fractures.

Comparison of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty for patients with inflammatory arthritis.

Background: Shoulder arthroplasty is performed for various etiologies, including osteoarthritis, proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), and rotator cuff tears. While previous studies have focused on outcomes based on implant choice, less is known about the independent effects of surgery type, comorbidities, and fracture status on postoperative outcomes. This study evaluates their influence on length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, and postoperative complications. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of 664,545 patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), or hemiarthroplasty (HA) was conducted. Multivariable Poisson and logistic regression models assessed predictors of LOS, mortality, and complications. Results: Among 132,909 patients, 63.3% underwent RTSA, 31.3% underwent ATSA, and 5.4% underwent HA. Mean hospitalization was longest for HA (2.56 days) and RTSA (1.82 days) compared to ATSA (1.39 days; p < 0.001). Poisson regression confirmed that RTSA increased LOS by 24.1% versus ATSA (IRR = 1.24, p < 0.001), while HA had the highest LOS (IRR = 1.58, p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were observed in 8.37% of ATSA, 13.81% of RTSA, and 17.81% of HA cases (overall ~12.3%). Compared with ATSA, RTSA increased the odds of complications (OR = 1.48, p < 0.001), while HA presented the greatest complication risk (OR = 1.51, p < 0.001). Among proximal humerus fracture (PHF) patients (9.9% of the cohort), 84.7% underwent RTSA. PHF independently increased LOS (IRR = 1.61, p < 0.001), mortality (OR = 1.62, p = 0.051), and complications (OR = 2.33, p < 0.001). Conclusions: RTSA is associated with longer hospitalization and higher complication rates, while PHF worsens LOS, mortality, and complication risk.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty changes the lines of action of the shoulder muscles, resulting in increases in the moment arms of the major abductors and flexors of the glenohumeral joint; however, at present little is known about the axial rotation capacity of the musculature after this procedure. The purpose of this study was to measure the instantaneous axial rotation moment arms of all of the major muscles spanning the glenohumeral joint during abduction and flexion after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was performed on eight entire cadaveric upper extremities. Specimens were mounted onto a testing apparatus, and the internal/external rotation moment arms of eighteen major muscle subregions involving the subscapularis, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor, teres major, deltoid, pectoralis major, and latissimus dorsi were measured during abduction and flexion. These muscle moment arms were compared with those measured preoperatively in the anatomical shoulders (i.e., before the arthroplasty). Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty resulted in loss of external rotation function in the posterior deltoid subregion. Postoperatively, the inferior subscapularis subregion had the largest internal rotation moment arm overall, whereas the teres minor and the inferior infraspinatus subregion had the greatest external rotation moment arms. The teres minor, infraspinatus, and deltoid subregions were external rotators during abduction, whereas only the teres minor, infraspinatus, and to a small extent the posterior deltoid subregion were external rotators during flexion. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty results in an overall decrease in the external rotation moment arm of the deltoid and increases in the moment arms of the major internal rotators, including the latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty may result in complete loss of external rotation function if the teres minor and infraspinatus muscles are damaged.

Tuberosity healing is known to be one of the factors that increase functional outcome in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (rTSA). In fragility fractures, tuberosity healing is difficult to be achieved. The fragment stability and bone-forming agent application become strategies to overcome this problem. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefit of teriparatide application to promote tuberosity union in rTSA on four-part proximal humeral fractures to achieve better functional outcome. A retrospective study of a prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty medical record was performed. Eleven patients were included in this analysis and consisted of two groups, teriparatide and no-teriparatide groups. Patients were evaluated on the range of motions and clinical outcome using the American Shoulder Elbow Surgeon (ASES) Shoulder Score and X-ray to determine tuberosity union. The group differences were analyzed by t-test or Mann-Whitney U test with SPSS version 20.0 for Windows. The statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in mean age in both the groups. There were significant differences between teriparatide and no-teriparatide groups in external rotation (29.5° vs. 7.5°; p = 0.004), external rotation in 90° abduction (55° vs. 12.5°; p < 0.020), forward flexion (120° vs. 105°; p = 0.002) range of motions, and ASES (84.5 vs. 74.6; p = 0.019). We found clinical difference between teriparatide and no-teriparatide groups in time to achieve the initial callus (33 ± 18.3 days vs. 150 ± 42.4 days) and tuberosity consolidation (165.8 ± 70.3 days vs. 315 ± 106.1 days). Teriparatide administration supports tuberosity repair results in a high tuberosity healing rate with restoration of external rotation after rTSA in acute complex proximal humeral fractures.

Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years or younger