• Home
  • Search
  • Review on solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis
  • Cite Icon533
  • https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-46Copy DOI Icon

Review on solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

BackgroundThe aim of electroencephalogram (EEG) source localization is to find the brain areas responsible for EEG waves of interest. It consists of solving forward and inverse problems. The forward problem is solved by starting from a given electrical source and calculating the potentials at the electrodes. These evaluations are necessary to solve the inverse problem which is defined as finding brain sources which are responsible for the measured potentials at the EEG electrodes.MethodsWhile other reviews give an extensive summary of the both forward and inverse problem, this review article focuses on different aspects of solving the forward problem and it is intended for newcomers in this research field.ResultsIt starts with focusing on the generators of the EEG: the post-synaptic potentials in the apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons. These cells generate an extracellular current which can be modeled by Poisson's differential equation, and Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions. The compartments in which these currents flow can be anisotropic (e.g. skull and white matter). In a three-shell spherical head model an analytical expression exists to solve the forward problem. During the last two decades researchers have tried to solve Poisson's equation in a realistically shaped head model obtained from 3D medical images, which requires numerical methods. The following methods are compared with each other: the boundary element method (BEM), the finite element method (FEM) and the finite difference method (FDM). In the last two methods anisotropic conducting compartments can conveniently be introduced. Then the focus will be set on the use of reciprocity in EEG source localization. It is introduced to speed up the forward calculations which are here performed for each electrode position rather than for each dipole position. Solving Poisson's equation utilizing FEM and FDM corresponds to solving a large sparse linear system. Iterative methods are required to solve these sparse linear systems. The following iterative methods are discussed: successive over-relaxation, conjugate gradients method and algebraic multigrid method.ConclusionSolving the forward problem has been well documented in the past decades. In the past simplified spherical head models are used, whereas nowadays a combination of imaging modalities are used to accurately describe the geometry of the head model. Efforts have been done on realistically describing the shape of the head model, as well as the heterogenity of the tissue types and realistically determining the conductivity. However, the determination and validation of the in vivo conductivity values is still an important topic in this field. In addition, more studies have to be done on the influence of all the parameters of the head model and of the numerical techniques on the solution of the forward problem.

Similar Papers
  • Abstract

P 211. Efficient method for computing the TMS-induced electric field in spherically symmetric head models, the triangle Construction

  • Aug 30, 2013
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • L.M Koponen +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Inverse problems in Cardiovascular Mathematics: toward patient‐specific data assimilation and optimization

  • Jul 01, 2013
  • International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
  • Alessandro Veneziani +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Dipole source analysis for readiness potential and field using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals

  • Jul 01, 2013
  • K G Mideksa +8
  • Research Article
  • Citations69

Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis

  • Mar 10, 2008
  • Physics in Medicine & Biology
  • Hans Hallez +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis

  • Jul 29, 2010
  • Medical Physics
  • Fangmin Chen +2
  • Book Chapter

Forward and Inverse Problems Relating to an Assistive Robotic Manipulator in an Uncertain Environment

  • Jan 08, 2026
  • Priya Rao +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Adjoint Numerical Method for a Multiphysical Inverse Problem of Two-Phase Well Testing in Petroleum Reservoirs

  • Nov 01, 2021
  • Journal of Physics: Conference Series
  • Oa Shishkina +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations106

An inverse geometry problem in identifying irregular boundary configurations

  • Jun 01, 1997
  • International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
  • Cheng-Hung Huang +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations21

Comparison of Iterative Methods for the Solution of Compressible-Fluid Reynolds Equation

  • Mar 18, 2011
  • Journal of Tribology
  • Nenzi Wang +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations31

Acoustoelastic analysis of reflected waves in nearly incompressible, hyper-elastic materials: Forward and inverse problems

  • Feb 01, 2007
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Hirohito Kobayashi +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations129

Neuroelectromagnetic Forward Head Modeling Toolbox

  • May 10, 2010
  • Journal of Neuroscience Methods
  • Zeynep Akalin Acar +1
  • Single Book
  • Citations968

Geophysical Inverse Theory and Regularization Problems

  • Jan 01, 2002
  • Michael S Zhdanov
  • Research Article
  • Citations204

Trends in EEG source localization

  • Feb 01, 1998
  • Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Zoltan J Koles
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

FULLY NONLINEAR MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF PRECISION MEMBRANES

  • Mar 01, 2003
  • International Journal of Computational Engineering Science
  • P Frank Pai +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Forward and inverse problems of optical engineering when a two-dimensional illuminance distribution is being formed

  • Mar 01, 2014
  • Journal of Optical Technology
  • A V Gapeeva +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.