• Home
  • Search
  • Risk prediction model for thrombosis in leukemia patients: a systematic review
  • https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1775197Copy DOI Icon

Risk prediction model for thrombosis in leukemia patients: a systematic review

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Thrombosis represents a significant complication in leukemia patients, associated with treatment interruption and reduced survival outcomes. Although multiple risk prediction models have been developed, their methodological quality and applicability remain uncertain. This review aims to evaluate existing risk prediction models for thrombosis in patients with leukemia. We conducted comprehensive literature searches across nine databases from the inception to August 4, 2025. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the CHARMS checklist and PROBAST tool. Of 1825 initially identified records, 14 studies comprising 16 prediction models were included. Development cohorts ranged from 102 to 1252 participants. Model discrimination measured by AUC/C-index varied between 0.641-0.917. Internal validation was performed in nine studies, while only one conducted external validation. Key predictors included central venous catheter placement, prior history of thrombosis, D-dimer levels, platelet count, white blood cell count, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, chemotherapy/radiotherapy, comorbidities, type of leukemia, use of hemostatic drugs, and age. All studies were rated high risk of bias, and five raised major concerns regarding applicability. Sensitivity analyses excluding chronic leukemia studies, excluding non-English publications and excluding dissertations yielded consistent overarching conclusions. In summary, current models often report moderate to good apparent discrimination, but are limited by methodological shortcomings and inadequate validation. All models should be considered exploratory and not ready for routine clinical use without prospective external validation. Future research should prioritize prospective, multicenter cohorts with standardized outcome adjudication and rigorous internal/external validation across diverse leukemia subtypes.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations20

Performance status and in-hospital mortality of elderly patients with community acquired pneumonia

  • Mar 09, 2018
  • Internal and Emergency Medicine
  • Filippo Pieralli +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Score Rather Than Donor Type Impacts Clinical Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Severe Aplastic Anemia Patients Aged 51-60 Years: A Retrospective Study From the Chinese Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry.

  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Clinical transplantation
  • Xin Zhao +27
  • Research Article

Quantifying the changes in body mass index and performance status during androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer in southeast Nigeria

  • Jun 26, 2023
  • African Journal of Urology
  • Louis Tochukwu Okolie +5
  • Research Article

Predictive survival ability of patient-reported in comparison to physician-reported performance status in solid malignancies.

  • May 20, 2020
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Abdulla Al-Rashdan +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective multi-center study

  • Oct 31, 2022
  • Scientific Reports
  • Zijing Liu +8
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Factors associated with in-hospital and outpatient survival of patients with different types of stage IV cancer and venous thromboembolism

  • Dec 01, 2023
  • The Journal of International Medical Research
  • Edgar Julián Reyes +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Clinical and Socioeconomic Factors that Predict Non-completion of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer in a Rural Cancer Center.

  • Jan 04, 2022
  • The American Surgeon™
  • Chelsea Knotts +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Impacts of EGFR 19 exon mutations on brain metastases in treatment-naïve patients with lung adenocarcinoma

  • Oct 23, 2017
  • Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology]
  • Weili Wang +6
  • Abstract
  • Citations1

Extramedullary Disease Is Common In Newly Diagnosed AML But Has No Independent Prognostic Significance, Including CNS Involvement: Analysis Of 3,522 AML Patients Treated On Consecutive ECOG Trials 1980-2008

  • Nov 15, 2013
  • Blood
  • Chezi Ganzel +13
  • Research Article
  • Citations26

ECOG performance score 0 versus 1: impact on efficacy and safety of first-line 5-FU-based chemotherapy among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer included in five randomized trials.

  • Nov 16, 2019
  • International Journal of Colorectal Disease
  • Omar Abdel-Rahman
  • Research Article
  • Citations52

Prognostic Value of Baseline ALBI Score Among Patients With Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized Trials

  • Sep 27, 2018
  • Clinical Colorectal Cancer
  • Omar Abdel-Rahman
  • Research Article

Eligibility criteria in phase 3 randomized controlled trials in gastric cancer

  • Jan 01, 2025
  • Gastric Cancer
  • Katarzyna Marcisz-Grzanka +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations418

Geriatric assessment predicts survival for older adults receiving induction chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia

  • May 23, 2013
  • Blood
  • Heidi D Klepin +7
  • Research Article

Analysis of influencing factors of pulmonary infection during chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma and construction of a nomogram prediction model

  • Jan 01, 2025
  • Clinics
  • Tianxia Deng +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Expression and Prognostic Value of PIK3CA, VEGF, IL-8, IL-10, and RIP2 in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

  • Jan 01, 2022
  • International Journal of Clinical Practice
  • Na Shen +11
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.