RNA polymerase III subunit architecture and implications for open promoter complex formation

Many promoters contain a curved DNA component essential for high levels of transcription activity. The present work approached the study of these unusual DNA structures in a twofold manner. First, promoter binding by RNA polymerase from Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli was examined using a collection of promoters containing DNA curvature. Promoter binding by both RNA polymerases was governed primarily by the nucleotide sequence at the highly conserved $-$10 and $-$35 regions of the promoters. However, the presence of curved DNA, immediately upstream of the $-$35 region of the promoter, predictably increased binding to those promoters which contained curved DNA by the B. subtilis RNA polymerase. Binding by the E. coli RNA polymerase was modestly affected by DNA curvature. The second approach was to characterize the mechanism involved in transcription stimulation by this curve or intrinsically bent DNA. Generally, the proposed mechanisms for transcription initiation include enzyme conformational changes leading to strand separation. Formation of RNA polymerase-promoter complexes that entail significant conformational changes is sensitive to changes in temperature. A goal in the second part of this work was to test if curved DNA influenced a step in transcription initiation that was sensitive to temperature changes. The formation of open promoter complexes was measured using a B. subtilis phage promoter containing curved DNA upstream of the $-$35 region, the Alu156 promoter, and mutants of Alu156 in which the curved DNA sequences were displaced upstream. Open promoter complexes were measured by (1) a run-off transcription assay limited to a single round of initiation and (2) the direct detection of single stranded DNA using potassium permanganate cleavage. Promoters with properly aligned curved DNA formed open promoter complexes at lower temperatures than promoters with misaligned curved DNA. Also, curved DNA enhanced formation of open promoter complexes as measured by actual strand separation. A model describing the effect of curved DNA on open promoter complexes was proposed.

Base-specific interactions between promoter DNA and Escherichia coli RNA polymerase are regulated by a sigma (sigma) protein during transcription initiation. To map spatial relations between evolutionarily conserved regions of the primary sigma (sigma 70) and each DNA strand along the lacUV5 promoter in the transcriptionally active "open" complex, we have used a cysteine-tethered cutting reagent to cleave DNA strands. The chemical nuclease FeBABE [iron (S)-1-(p-bromoacetamidobenzyl)ethylenediaminetetraacetate] was conjugated to single-cysteine mutants of sigma 70 at sites 132C, 376C, 396C, 422C, 496C, 517C, or 581C. After formation of open promoter complexes between lacUV5 DNA and RNA polymerase holoenzymes carrying conjugated sigma 70 subunits, we observed promoter DNA cleavage spanning at least 60 bases, between positions -48 and +12. The results show that sigma 70 region 2.1, otherwise implicated in core enzyme binding, is proximal to the nontemplate strand of lacUV5 DNA between the -10 promoter element and positions as far downstream of the transcription start site as +12. Conserved region 3.2 of sigma 70 is proximal to the template strand near the +1 transcription start site, and region 3.1 is positioned between the lacUV5-10 and -35 promoter elements. We propose a model for the orientation of sigma 70 and DNA in the open complex.

Promoter recognition is the first and the most important step during gene expression. Our studies of the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) mitochondrial (mt) transcription machinery provide mechanistic understandings on the basic problem of how the mt RNA polymerase (RNAP) with the help of the initiation factor discriminates between promoter and non-promoter sequences. We have used fluorescence-based approaches to quantify DNA binding, bending, and opening steps by the core mtRNAP subunit (Rpo41) and the transcription factor (Mtf1). Our results show that promoter recognition is not achieved by tight and selective binding to the promoter sequence. Instead, promoter recognition is achieved by an induced-fit mechanism of transcription factor-dependent differential conformational changes in the promoter and non-promoter DNAs. While Rpo41 induces a slight bend upon binding both the DNAs, addition of the Mtf1 results in severe bending of the promoter and unbending of the non-promoter DNA. Only the sharply bent DNA results in the catalytically active open complex. Such an induced-fit mechanism serves three purposes: 1) assures catalysis at promoter sites, 2) prevents RNA synthesis at non-promoter sites, and 3) provides a conformational state at the non-promoter sites that would aid in facile translocation to scan for specific sites.

By following the kinetics of abortive and productive synthesis in single-round transcription assays, we confirm the existence of two general classes of initial transcribing complexes (ITCs), which we term "productive ITC" and "unproductive ITC". The productive ITCs are able to escape from the promoter rapidly to produce full-length transcripts, but only after carrying out an obligate series of abortive initiation steps. The unproductive ITCs were found to synthesize mostly abortive transcripts of 2-3 nucleotides and escape from the promoter extremely slowly, if at all. Formation of the unproductive ITC is not due to the inactive RNA polymerase. Instead, RNA polymerase molecules recovered from both the productive and unproductive ITC fractions were shown to carry out abortive and productive synthesis with both the partitioning tendency and transcription kinetics similar to those of the original enzyme. Our results suggest that early transcription complexes are partitioned into the productive and unproductive ITCs most likely during the formation of open promoter complexes. The extent of partitioning varies with individual promoter sequences and is dependent on the nature and concentration of the initiating nucleotide. Thus, multiple classes of ITCs can be formed during promoter binding and transcript initiation.

Central domain of the positive control protein NifA and its role in transcriptional activation

The enhancer-binding protein NIFA is required for transcriptional activation of nif promoters by the alternative holoenzyme form of RNA polymerase, which contains the sigma factor sigma 54 (sigma N). NIFA hydrolyzes nucleoside triphosphates to catalyze the isomerization of closed promoter complexes to transcriptionally competent open complexes. The activity of NIFA is antagonized by the regulatory protein NIFL in response to oxygen and fixed nitrogen in vivo. We have investigated the requirement for nucleotides in the formation and stability of open promoter complexes by NIFA and inhibition of its activity by NIFL at the Klebsiella pneumoniae nifH promoter. Open complexes formed by sigma 54-containing RNA polymerase are considerably more stable to heparin challenge in the presence of GTP than in the presence of ATP. This differential stability is most probably a consequence of GTP being the initiating nucleotide at this promoter. Adenosine nucleosides are specifically required for Azotobacter vinelandii NIFL to inhibit open complex formation by native NIFA, and the nucleoside triphosphatase activity of NIFA is strongly inhibited by NIFL under these conditions. We propose a model in which NIFL modulates the activity of NIFA via an adenosine nucleotide switch.

We have reconstituted human mitochondrial transcription in vitro on DNA oligonucleotide templates representing the light strand and heavy strand-1 promoters using protein components (RNA polymerase and transcription factors A and B2) isolated from Escherichia coli. We show that 1 eq of each transcription factor and polymerase relative to the promoter is required to assemble a functional initiation complex. The light strand promoter is at least 2-fold more efficient than the heavy strand-1 promoter, but this difference cannot be explained solely by the differences in the interaction of the transcription machinery with the different promoters. In both cases, the rate-limiting step for production of the first phosphodiester bond is open complex formation. Open complex formation requires both transcription factors; however, steps immediately thereafter only require transcription factor B2. The concentration of nucleotide required for production of the first dinucleotide product is substantially higher than that required for subsequent cycles of nucleotide addition. In vitro, promoter-specific differences in post-initiation control of transcription exist, as well as a second rate-limiting step that controls conversion of the transcription initiation complex into a transcription elongation complex. Rate-limiting steps of the biochemical pathways are often those that are targeted for regulation. Like the more complex multisubunit transcription systems, multiple steps may exist for control of transcription in human mitochondria. The tools and mechanistic framework presented here will facilitate not only the discovery of mechanisms regulating human mitochondrial transcription but also interrogation of the structure, function, and mechanism of the complexes that are regulated during human mitochondrial transcription.

The prokaryotic enhancer-binding protein NifA stimulates transcription at a distance by binding to sequences upstream of nitrogen fixation (nif) promoters and catalyzing the formation of open promoter complexes by RNA polymerase containing the alternative sigma factor, sigma 54. The activity of NifA in vivo is modulated by the negative regulatory protein NifL in response to environmental oxygen and fixed nitrogen. To date, a detailed biochemical analysis of these proteins from the model diazotroph Klebsiella pneumoniae has been hindered by their insolubility. We have now purified NifA and NifL from Azotobacter vinelandii in their native form. NifA is competent in specific DNA binding, transcriptional activation, and response to negative regulation by NifL in vitro. In contrast to the conserved mechanism of phosphotransfer demonstrated by other two-component regulatory systems, our results support a model in which NifL regulates the activity of NifA via a protein-protein steric block interaction rather than a catalytic modification of NifA.

The rate of formation of transcriptionally competent open complexes between Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) and the lambda PR promoter is extraordinarily sensitive to the nature and concentration of the electrolyte ions in the solution. The pseudo-first-order time constant of open complex formation tau obsd, determined in excess RNAP at 25 degrees C as a function of NaCl concentration, is proportional to the concentration product [Na+]12 [RNAP]-1. Consequently, tau obsd is far more sensitive to changes in the salt concentration than to changes in the concentration of RNAP. The origin of this effect is the release of the thermodynamic equivalent of 12 monovalent ions in the process of closed complex formation at the lambda PR promoter. In more complex ionic mixtures, ion-specific stoichiometric effects on tau obsd are observed. These are not ionic strength effects but are instead both valence and species specific. Both the association and dissociation rate constants of RNAP at the lambda PR promoter are strongly salt dependent, varying (in NaCl) as [Na+]-12 and [Na+]8, respectively. Consequently, the equilibrium constant characterizing open complex formation at this promoter varies with [Na+]-20. Electrostatic interactions and counterion release are the major contributors to the binding free energy driving open complex formation in a dilute salt solution. Since the in vivo ionic environment of E. coli (and other cells) is highly variable, these large salt effects are almost certainly of physiological significance. Variations in the intracellular concentrations of inorganic and organic ions, including polyamines, must exert both global and also promoter-specific regulatory effects on the initiation of transcription, as well as on numerous other protein-nucleic acid interactions.

Modeling Transcription Initiation By Bacterial RNA Polymerase

The MUS81-EME1 endonuclease maintains metazoan genomic integrity by cleaving branched DNA structures that arise during the resolution of recombination intermediates. In humans, MUS81 also forms a poorly characterized complex with EME2. Here, we identify and determine the structure of a winged helix (WH) domain from human MUS81, which binds DNA. WH domain mutations greatly reduce binding of the isolated domain to DNA and impact on incision activity of MUS81-EME1/EME2 complexes. Deletion of the WH domain reduces the endonuclease activity of both MUS81-EME1 and MUS81-EME2 complexes, and incisions made by MUS81-EME2 are made closer to the junction on substrates containing a downstream duplex, such as fork structures and nicked Holliday junctions. WH domain mutation or deletion in Schizosaccharomyces pombe phenocopies the DNA-damage sensitivity of strains deleted for mus81. Our results indicate an important role for the WH domain in both yeast and human MUS81 complexes.

Initiation of transcription occurs through a series of steps starting with the binding of RNA polymerase to a promoter DNA and formation of a closed complex. The closed complexes, then isomerize to open complexes. In the open complexes a portion of the promoter DNA is unwound. Using fluorescence spectroscopy, we have investigated in real-time the mechanism of unwinding of promoter DNA during the transition from closed to open complexes of T7 RNA polymerase. We synthesized DNA templates containing the fluorescent base analog 2-aminopurine in place of adenine at specific positions in a T7 RNA polymerase promoter. We located the 2-aminopurine residues in the presumed melting domain of the promoter at -1, -4, and at -6. The fluorescence of 2-aminopurine increases when the DNA goes from a double-stranded form to a single-stranded form. By spectroscopically monitoring the increase in fluorescence of 2-aminopurine in DNA-T7 RNA polymerase complexes, we obtained kinetic and thermodynamic information for DNA unwinding. In the presence of the initiating nucleotide GTP, conformational transitions in the polymerase-promoter complex leading to strand opening were slower than in its absence. The rate of base pair disruption at -1, -6, and at -4 was also slower in the presence of GTP than in its absence. At 37 degrees C, base pair disruption occurred first at -1 followed by -6 and finally at -4. Open complex formation was temperature-sensitive. Temperature effects at -1, -6, and at -4 were consistent with this order of base pair disruption. The apparent activation energies (Ea) for base pair disruption around -1 and -6 were 14 kcal mol-1 and 50 kcal mol-1, respectively, also suggesting this order of base pair disruption. Transcription initiation assays using G-ladder synthesis revealed that initiation rates were almost the same on all three templates containing the modified base. Unlike strand opening, we did not observe lag times for G-ladder synthesis. We suggest that facile base pair disruption at -1 is sufficient for transcription initiation. Based on these data, it is proposed that the polymerase makes contacts at or near -1 and -6 resulting in untwisting of these base pairs thus creating at least two base pair disruption events at -1 and at -6, which are followed by bidirectional propagation to -4.

Transcription initiation at the Escherichia coli galP1 promoter does not depend on specific nucleotide sequences in the -35 region. Footprint analysis of transcriptionally competent complexes between E. coli RNA polymerase and DNA fragments carrying galP1 shows that RNA polymerase protects sequences as far upstream as -55, whereas sequences around the -35 region are exposed. In contrast, with galP1 derivatives carrying -35 region sequences resembling the consensus, RNA polymerase protects bases as far as -45, and the -35 region is fully protected. Taken together, our data suggest that the overall architecture of RNA polymerase-promoter complexes can vary according to whether or not consensus -35 region sequences are present; in the absence of these sequences, open complex formation requires distortion of the promoter DNA. However, the unwinding of promoter DNA around the transcription start is not affected by the nature of the -35 region sequence. With a galP1 derivative carrying point mutations in the spacer region that greatly reduce promoter activity, the protection of bases by RNA polymerase around the -10 sequence and transcription start site is reduced. In contrast, protection of the region upstream of -25 is unaffected by the spacer mutations, although sequences from -46 to -54 become hypersensitive to attack by potassium permanganate, indicating severe distortion or kinking of this zone. We suggest that, with this galP1 derivative, RNA polymerase is blocked in a complex that is an intermediate on the path to open complex formation.

Only a small proportion (<2%) of RNA polymerase I (pol I) from whole-cell extracts appeared to be competent for specific initiation at the ribosomal gene promoter in a yeast reconstituted transcription system. Initiation-competent pol I molecules were found exclusively in salt-resistant complexes that contain the pol I-specific initiation factor Rrn3p. Levels of initiation-competent complexes in extracts were independent of total Rrn3p content and varied with the growth state of the cells. Although extracts from stationary phase cells contained substantial amounts of Rrn3p and pol I, they lacked the pol I-Rrn3p complex and were inactive in promoter-dependent transcription. Activity was restored by adding purified pol I-Rrn3p complex to extracts from stationary phase cells. The pol I-Rrn3p complex dissociated during transcription and lost its capacity for subsequent reinitiation in vitro, suggesting a stoichiometric rather than a catalytic activity in initiation. We propose that the formation and disruption of the pol I-Rrn3p complex reflects a molecular switch for regulating rRNA synthesis and its growth rate-dependent regulation.

A central component in S. cerevisiae RNA polymerase I (Pol I) pre‐initiation complex (PIC) formation and transcriptional regulation is the evolutionarily conserved initiation factor termed Core Factor (CF). CF is a heterotrimer composed of Rrn6, Rrn11, and the TFIIB‐related factor Rrn7. Recent Cryo‐EM structures of the Pol I initiation complex reveal that CF resembles a right hand grasping promoter DNA in which key contacts are mediated by Rrn11 and Rrn7 (Han et al., eLife, 2017). Similar to its Pol II counterpart TFIIB, CF subunit Rrn7 consists of an N‐terminal zinc ribbon (ZR) domain followed by a linker region and two cyclin fold repeats. We systematically mutagenized the Rrn7 ZR and linker domains to further understand their role in Pol I transcription initiation. We found that ZR and linker mutants are still able to form the CF complex and assemble a PIC, yet are defective in promoter opening. These findings, paired with the Cryo‐EM structure, suggest that CF acts as a ratchet to drive promoter DNA into the active site of Pol I and that the Rrn7 ZR and linker domains play a dynamic role in ATP‐independent promoter opening.Support or Funding InformationThis work was supported by grants awarded to BAK: National Cancer Institute (5K22CA184235), Alexandrine and Alexander L. Sinsheimer Scholar award, and SUNY Research Foundation.This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.