Robot Control Using Model-Based Reinforcement Learning With Inverse Kinematics

Deep reinforcement learning is the technology of artificial neural networks in the field of decision-making and control. The traditional model-free reinforcement learning algorithm requires a large amount of environment interactive data to iterate the algorithm. This model’s performance also suffers due to low utilization of training data, while the model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) algorithm improves the efficiency of the data, MBRL locks into low prediction accuracy. Although MBRL can utilize the additional data generated by the dynamic model, a system dynamics model with low prediction accuracy will provide low-quality data and affect the algorithm’s final result. In this paper, based on the A3C (Asynchronous Advantage Actor-Critic) algorithm, an improved model-based deep reinforcement learning algorithm using a learning degree network (MBRL-LDN) is presented. By comparing the differences between the predicted states outputted by the proposed multidynamic model and the original predicted states, the learning degree of the system dynamics model is calculated. The learning degree represents the quality of the data generated by the dynamic model and is used to decide whether to continue to interact with the dynamic model during a particular episode. Thus, low-quality data will be discarded. The superiority of the proposed method is verified by conducting extensive contrast experiments.

Reinforcement learning (RL) is one of the popular methods for intelligent control and decision making in the field of robotics recently. The goal of RL is to learn an optimal policy of the agent by interacting with the environment via trail and error. There are two main algorithms for RL problems, including model-free and model-based methods. Model-free RL is driven by historical trajectories and empirical data of the agent to optimize the policy, which needs to take actions in the environment to collect the trajectory data and may cause the damage of the robot during training in the real environment. The main different between model-based and model-free RL is that a model of the transition probability in the interaction environment is employed. Thus the agent can search the optimal policy through internal simulation. However, the model of the transition probability is usually estimated from historical data in a single environment with statistical errors. Therefore, an issue is faced by the agent is that the optimal policy is sensitive to perturbations in the model of the environment which can lead to serious degradation in performance. Robust RL aims to learn a robust optimal policy that accounts for model uncertainty of the transition probability to systematically mitigate the sensitivity of the optimal policy in perturbed environments. In this overview, we begin with an introduction to the algorithms in RL, then focus on the model uncertainty of the transition probability in robust RL. In parallel, we highlight the current research and challenges of robust RL for robot control. To conclude, we describe some research areas in robust RL and look ahead to the future work about robot control in complex environments.

Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms have been successfully applied to control tasks associated with unmanned aerial vehicles and robotics. In recent years, safe RL has been proposed to allow the safe execution of RL algorithms in industrial and mission-critical systems that operate in closed loops. However, if the system operating conditions change, such as when an unknown fault occurs, typical safe RL algorithms cannot adapt while retaining past knowledge. Continual RL algorithms have been proposed to address this issue. However, the impact of continual adaptation on the system’s safety is an understudied problem. In this paper, we study the intersection of safe and continual RL. First, we empirically demonstrate that a popular continual RL algorithm, elastic weight consolidation, does not satisfy safety constraints in nonlinear systems subject to varying operating conditions. Specifically, we study the MuJoCo HalfCheetah and Ant environments with velocity constraints and sudden joint loss non-stationarity. Then, we show that an agent trained using constrained policy optimization, a safe RL algorithm, experiences catastrophic forgetting in continual learning settings. With this in mind, we explore a simple reward-shaping method to ensure that elastic weight consolidation prioritizes remembering both safety and task performance for safety-constrained, nonlinear, and non-stationary systems.

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has become a trending research topic with great success in outperforming humans on many tasks including video games, board games, and robotics control. By leveraging Deep Learning (DL), RL algorithms can consume a large volume of data without any prior knowledge of the system dynamics. However, requiring a large amount of data also limits the applicability in many fields where data is costly to obtain. Model-based Reinforcement Learning (MBRL) is regarded as a promising way to achieve high data efficiency while maintaining comparable performance. MBRL equips a dynamic transition model to facilitate and speed up the policy searching by learning the system dynamics. But there are no satisfying open-sourced libraries for the RL community to conduct MBRL research. Therefore, to fill the gap, we propose an open-sourced, flexible, and user-friendly MBRL library, Baconian, to facilitate the research on MBRL.

Recent evidence in neuroscience and psychology suggests that a single reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm only accounts for less than 60% of the variance of human choice behavior in an uncertain and dynamic environment, where the amount of uncertainty in state-action-state transitions drift over time. The prediction performance further decreases when the size of the state space increases. We proposed a hierarchical context-dependent RL control framework that dynamically exerted control weights on model-based (MB) and multiple model-free (MF) RL strategies associated with different task goals. To properly assess the validity of the proposed method, we considered a two-stage Markov decision task (MDT) in which the three different types of context changed over time. We trained 57 different RL control models on a Caltech MDT data set; then, we assessed their prediction performance using a Bayesian model comparison. This large-scale computer simulation analysis revealed that the model providing the most accurate prediction was the version that implemented the competition between the MB and multiple goal-dependent MF RL strategies. The present study demonstrates the applicability of the goal-driven RL control to a variety of real-world human-robot interaction scenarios.

P2P power trading based on reinforcement learning for nanogrid clusters

Arbitration between model-based (MB) and model-free (MF) reinforcement learning (RL) is key feature of human reinforcement learning. The computational model of arbitration control has been demonstrated to outperform conventional reinforcement learning algorithm, in terms of not only behavioral data but also neural signals. However, this arbitration process does not take full account of contextual changes in environment during learning. By incorporating a Dirichlet process Gaussian mixture model into the arbitration process, we propose a meta-controller for RL that quickly adapts to contextual changes of environment. The proposed model performs better than a conventional model-free RL, model-based RL, and arbitration model.

Energy efficient speed planning of electric vehicles for car-following scenario using model-based reinforcement learning

Reinforcement learning (RL) focuses on an essential aspect of intelligent behavior – how an agent can learn to make good decisions given experience and rewards in a stochastic<br>world. Yet popular RL algorithms that have enabled exciting successes in domains with good simulators (Go, Atari, etc) still often fail to learn in other domains because they rely on<br>simple heuristics for exploration. This provides additional empirical justification for essential questions around RL, specifically around algorithms that learn in a provably efficient manner through strategic exploration in any considered domain. This thesis provides new algorithms<br>and theory that enable good performance with respect to existing theoretical frameworks for evaluating RL algorithms (specifically, probably approximately correct) and introduces new stronger evaluation criteria, that may be particularly of interest as RL is applied to more real world problems.<br>For the first line of work on probably approximately correct (PAC) RL algorithms, we introduce a series of algorithms for episodic tabular domains with substantially better PAC<br>sample complexity bounds that culminate in a new algorithm with close to minimax optimal PAC and regret bounds. Look up tables are required by most sample efficient and computationally tractable algorithms, but cannot represent many practical domains. We therefore also present a new RL algorithm that can learn a good policy in environments with high dimensional observations and hidden deterministic states; unlike predecessors, this algorithm provably<br>explores not only in a statistically but also computationally efficient manner assuming access to function classes with efficient optimization oracles. To make progress it is critical to have the right measures of success. While empirical<br>demonstrations are quite clear, we find that for theoretical properties, two of the most commonly used learning frameworks, PAC guarantees and regret guarantees, each allow undesirable algorithm behavior (e.g. ignoring new observations that could improve the policy). We present<br>a new stronger learning framework called Uniform-PAC that unifies the existing frameworks and prevents undesirable algorithm properties. One caveat of all existing learning frameworks is that for any particular episode, we do not<br>know how well the algorithm will perform. To address this, we introduce the IPOC framework that requires algorithms to provide a certificate before each episode bounding how suboptimal the current policy can be. Such certifications may be of substantial interest in high stakes scenarios when an organization may wish to track or even pause an online RL system should the potential expected performance bound drop below a required expected outcome.

This paper presents the development of a motivated learning (ML) agent with symbolic I/O. Our earlier work on the ML agent was enhanced, giving it autonomy for interaction with other agents. Specifically, we equipped the agent with drives and pains that establish its motivations to learn how to respond to desired and undesired events and create related abstract goals. The purpose of this paper is to explore the autonomous development of motivations and memory in agents within a simulated environment. The ML agent has been implemented in a virtual environment created within the NeoAxis game engine. Additionally, to illustrate the benefits of an ML-based agent, we compared the performance of our algorithm against various reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in a dynamic test scenario, and demonstrated that our ML agent learns better than any of the tested RL agents.This paper presents the development of a motivated learning (ML) agent with symbolic I/O. Our earlier work on the ML agent was enhanced, giving it autonomy for interaction with other agents. Specifically, we equipped the agent with drives and pains that establish its motivations to learn how to respond to desired and undesired events and create related abstract goals. The purpose of this paper is to explore the autonomous development of motivations and memory in agents within a simulated environment. The ML agent has been implemented in a virtual environment created within the NeoAxis game engine. Additionally, to illustrate the benefits of an ML-based agent, we compared the performance of our algorithm against various reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in a dynamic test scenario, and demonstrated that our ML agent learns better than any of the tested RL agents.

This paper proposes a reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm for the security problem of state estimation of cyber-physical system (CPS) under denial-of-service (DoS) attacks. The security of CPS will inevitably decline when faced with malicious cyber attacks. In order to analyze the impact of cyber attacks on CPS performance, a Kalman filter, as an adaptive state estimation technology, is combined with an RL method to evaluate the issue of system security, where estimation performance is adopted as an evaluation criterion. Then, the transition of estimation error covariance under a DoS attack is described as a Markov decision process, and the RL algorithm could be applied to resolve the optimal countermeasures. Meanwhile, the interactive combat between defender and attacker could be regarded as a two-player zero-sum game, where the Nash equilibrium policy exists but needs to be solved. Considering the energy constraints, the action selection of both sides will be restricted by setting certain cost functions. The proposed RL approach is designed from three different perspectives, including the defender, the attacker and the interactive game of two opposite sides. In addition, the framework of Q-learning and state–action–reward–state–action (SARSA) methods are investigated separately in this paper to analyze the influence of different RL algorithms. The results show that both algorithms obtain the corresponding optimal policy and the Nash equilibrium policy of the zero-sum interactive game. Through comparative analysis of two algorithms, it is verified that the differences between Q-Learning and SARSA could be applied effectively into the secure state estimation in CPS.

Reinforcement learning, as a branch of machine learning, has been gradually applied in the control field. However, in the practical application of the algorithm, the hyperparametric approach to network settings for deep reinforcement learning still follows the empirical attempts of traditional machine learning (supervised learning and unsupervised learning). This method ignores part of the information generated by agents exploring the environment contained in the updating of the reinforcement learning value function, which will affect the performance of the convergence and cumulative return of reinforcement learning. The reinforcement learning algorithm based on dynamic parameter adjustment is a new method for setting learning rate parameters of deep reinforcement learning. Based on the traditional method of setting parameters for reinforcement learning, this method analyzes the advantages of different learning rates at different stages of reinforcement learning and dynamically adjusts the learning rates in combination with the temporal-difference (TD) error values to achieve the advantages of different learning rates in different stages to improve the rationality of the algorithm in practical application. At the same time, by combining the Robbins–Monro approximation algorithm and deep reinforcement learning algorithm, it is proved that the algorithm of dynamic regulation learning rate can theoretically meet the convergence requirements of the intelligent control algorithm. In the experiment, the effect of this method is analyzed through the continuous control scenario in the standard experimental environment of ”Car-on-The-Hill” of reinforcement learning, and it is verified that the new method can achieve better results than the traditional reinforcement learning in practical application. According to the model characteristics of the deep reinforcement learning, a more suitable setting method for the learning rate of the deep reinforcement learning network proposed. At the same time, the feasibility of the method has been proved both in theory and in the application. Therefore, the method of setting the learning rate parameter is worthy of further development and research.

Introduction Reinforcement learning formalizes the concept of learning from interactions.1 Broadly, reinforcement learning focuses on a setting in which an agent (decision maker) sequentially interacts with an environment that is partially unknown to them. At each stage, the agent takes an action and receives a reward. The objective of the agent is to maximize rewards accumulated in the long run. There are many situations in health care where decisions are made sequentially for which reinforcement learning approaches could prove useful for decision making. Throughout this article, we consider treatment prescription as an archetypical example to connect reinforcement learning concepts to a health care setting. In this setting, the care provider, the prescribed treatment, and the patients can be viewed as the agent, the action, and the environment, respectively, as depicted in Figure 1.Figure 1: Sequential treatment of AKI or CKD complications modeled as a reinforcement learning problem.Background In this section, with the objective of making reinforcement learning literature more accessible to a clinical audience, we briefly introduce related fundamental concepts and approaches. We refer the interested reader to Sutton and Barto1 for a comprehensive introduction to reinforcement learning. Markov Decision Processes Markov decision processes (MDPs) are a formalism of the sequential decision-making problem that has been central to the theoretical and practical advancements of reinforcement learning. In each stage of an MDP, the agent observes the state of the environment and takes an action, which, in turn, results in a change of the state. This change of state is assumed to be probabilistic with the next state being determined only by the preceding state, the chosen action, and the transition probability. The agent also receives a reward that is a function of the taken action, the preceding state, and the subsequent state. In an MDP, the objective of the agent is to maximize the return defined as the reward accumulated over a time horizon. In some applications, it is common to consider the horizon to be infinite, in which case the future rewards are discounted by a factor smaller than one. The selection of action by the agent on the basis of the observed state is known as the policy. More formally, a policy is a probabilistic mapping from states to each possible action. Because the policy and the reward are a function of the state, it is critical to estimate the utility of being in a certain state. More specifically, the value function is defined as the expected return starting from a given state under the chosen policy. Under this formalism, the objective of the agent is to find the optimal policy that maximizes the value function for all states. Reinforcement Learning Methods Action-value methods are a class of reinforcement learning methods in which the actions are chosen on the basis of the estimation of their long-term value. A prominent example of an action-value method is Q-learning in which the agent iteratively takes actions with the highest estimated values and updates the action-state value function on the basis of new observations. Policy gradient methods are another class of reinforcement learning methods that seek to optimize the policy directly instead of choosing actions on the basis of their respective estimated value. Such methods could be advantageous in health care applications that entail a large number of possible actions, e.g., when recommending a wide range of drug dosages or treatment options. Clinical Applications Reinforcement learning frameworks and methods are broadly applicable to clinical settings in which decisions are made sequentially. A prominent clinical application of reinforcement learning is for treatment recommendation, which has been studied across a variety of diseases and treatments including radiation and chemotherapy for cancer, brain stimulation for epilepsy, and treatment strategies for sepsis.2–5 In such treatment recommendation settings, a policy is commonly known as a dynamic treatment regime. There are various other clinical applications of reinforcement learning including diagnosis, medical imaging, and decision support tools (see refs. 2–5 and the references therein). Reinforcement Learning in Nephrology Although there have been recent applications of machine learning in nephrology,6,7 to the best of the authors' knowledge, the application of reinforcement learning to nephrology has been primarily limited to optimizing the erythropoietin dosage in hemodialysis patients.8,9 However, there are other settings where reinforcement learning has the potential to improve patient care in nephrology. For example, reinforcement learning methods can be adopted in the treatment of the complications of AKI or CKD (Figure 1). In this problem, the state models the conditions of the patient (e.g., vital signs, laboratory test results including urine and blood tests, and urine output measurements). The action refers to the treatment options (e.g., the dosage of medications such as sodium polystyrene sulfonate, and hemodialysis). The reward models the improvement in patient conditions. Similarly, reinforcement learning can help automate and optimize the dosage of immunosuppressive drugs in kidney transplants. Challenges and Opportunities Despite the success of reinforcement learning in several simplified clinical settings, their large-scale application to patient care faces several open challenges. The complexity of human biology complicates modeling clinical decision making as a reinforcement learning problem. The state space in such settings is often enormous, which could make a purely computational approach infeasible. Moreover, modeling all potential objectives a priori as a reward function may not be feasible. To overcome these challenges and realize the potential of reinforcement learning, clinical insight can play a pivotal role. More specifically, restricting the state space to only include highly relevant clinical variables could greatly reduce the computational complexity. Furthermore, using inverse reinforcement learning,2 relevant reward functions can be learned from retrospective studies assuming the optimality of clinical decisions. Another critical challenge is addressing moral and ethical concerns. It is imperative to ensure that reinforcement learning methods do not cause harm to the patient. To this end, there exists a need for a thorough validation of such methods before their use in patient care. Hence, there is a need to go beyond retrospective studies that have been used for the proof of concept of most existing reinforcement learning methods in health care applications.2,3 The lessons learned from the success of reinforcement learning in other application areas (e.g., self-driving cars) can help navigate the path to realizing its potential in health care. Accessible open-source simulation environments that enable researchers to compare various approaches are essential to the field of reinforcement learning. OpenAI Gym is currently the leading toolkit containing a wide range of simulated environments, e.g., surgical robotics.10 The development of high-quality and reliable simulation environments for nephrology and other health care applications can facilitate the development and validation of reinforcement learning methods beyond limited retrospective studies. The adoption of methods validated in such simulation environments in actual clinical settings will require clinicians' oversight. Similar to how self-driving cars require a human driver to ensure collision avoidance, clinicians' oversight is critical to ensure the safety of the patients, especially in the early stages of the adoption of reinforcement learning methods. The data from clinicians' decisions (e.g., overruling the automated treatment recommendation) can be used to improve the reliability of autonomous systems over time and reduce the burden of clinicians' oversight.

Recent advancement on reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms shows that effective learning of parametric action- selection policies can often be achieved through direct opti- mization of a performance lower bound subject to pre-defined policy behavioral constraints. Driven by this understanding, this paper seeks to develop new policy search techniques where RL is achieved through maximizing a performance lower bound ob- tained originally based on an Expectation-Maximization method. For reliable RL, our new learning techniques must also simul- taneously guarantee constrained policy behavioral changes mea- sured through KL divergence. Two separate approaches will be pursued to tackle our constrained policy optimization problems, resulting in two new RL algorithms. The first algorithm utilizes a conjugate gradient technique and a Bayesian learning method for approximate optimization. The second algorithm focuses on minimizing a loss function derived from solving the Lagrangian for constrained policy search. Both algorithms have been experi- mentally examined on several benchmark problems provided by OpenAI GYM. The experiment results clearly demonstrate that our algorithms can be highly effective in comparison to several well-known RL algorithms.

This paper focuses on reactive power optimization based on deep reinforcement learning. A deep reinforcement learning algorithm DQN is selected as an improvement of the reinforcement learning algorithm, this algorithm uses a deep neural network instead of a Q value table in the reinforcement learning algorithm, the method of power flow calculation in the Matlab toolbox is executed to verify the optimization effect. The single-section training results of the 14-BUS IEEE power grid model are tested and the parameters of the power grid model are modified after the optimization is confirmed. The DQN model is trained in a simulated complex environment, and the performance of the optimization effect is tested after the training is completed. Reactive power optimization of the power grid based on deep reinforcement learning is validated by experimental results.