• Cite Icon1
  • https://doi.org/10.1049/pbse005e_ch3Copy DOI Icon

Robust iris image segmentation

  • Aug 1, 2017
  • Peter Wild +3 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Despite numerous biometric challenges promoting iris and ocular recognition from less controlled images, iris localization and segmentation are still challenging topics. Examples include the Multiple Biometrics Grand Challenge (MBGC), Face and Ocular Challenge Series (FOCS), Noisy Iris Challenge Evaluation (NICE) and Iris Challenge Evaluation (ICE). For controlled environments and as long as iris segmentation algorithms can be tuned for the employed set, the segmentation problem can be managed. However, independent studies have shown, that algorithms may fail considerably if preconditions are not met. For datasets like FOCS segmentation performance ranging from 51% accuracy (using an integro-differential operator), to 90% (for active contours) is reported. Violations of preconditions or assumptions of controlled conditions such as particular hardware challenge the generalisation of successful segmentation techniques. Especially non-circularity of boundaries, non-frontal acquisition, or blurred images can impose difficulties. On the other hand, very flexible parameterless solutions allowing high degrees of freedom (e.g. off-axis acquisition) are sensitive to noise or reflections. They sometimes deliver inferior results to classical techniques for images where certain preconditions hold. Examples of challenging iris images include weak boundaries or reflections in visible-range iris images, making it harder for iris local- ization and segmentation algorithms to properly segment acquired images. Further undesirable conditions are on-the-move motion blur, out-of-focus images, narrowed eyes to a slit, or images with weak contrast. Besides accuracy, also speed and usability play important factors for efficient iris segmentation. For quick rejection of frames in video streams containing no iris image or unlikely leading to a successful verification, quality measures as predictors of recognition or segmentation accuracy can be used. This is useful to save precious processing time, as processing errors at early stages usually also result in classification errors. This chapter reviews recent approaches of iris segmentation techniques and discusses approaches towards robust segmentation, highlighting the following topics: • Segmentation performance assessment: Performance assessments are usually done with regards to recognition accuracy (thus evaluating an entire processing chain rather than individual algorithms). However, systematic seg- mentation errors can have a minor impact on performance if the same algorithm is used to segment gallery and probe images. This scenario is not realistic in cross-sensor applications. However, ground-truth only evaluations are restrictive, as they do not account for the tolerance of small segmentation in- accuracies by the employed feature extraction and comparison algorithm (e.g. via pooling operations). Different forms of segmentation accuracy evaluation are presented. There are separate segmentation-only challenges (e.g. NICE) and also ground-truth sets available, to which this chapter con- tributes a manual segmentation of the multispectral iris database UTIRIS. • Near infrared (NIR) vs. visible range (VIS) iris segmentation and the tuning problem: Algorithms developed for specific image datasets or character- istics are not agnostic towards the type of imagery used. NIR images, for example, exhibit a pronounced inner pupillary boundary, while VIS images tend to have better outer limbic contrast. This is usually exploited by seg- mentation algorithms to achieve better accuracy on particular datasets. While more generic techniques offering the same processing chain for VIS and NIR images have been suggested, tuning can have a strong impact on perfor- mance. This chapter presents modifications to the open source USIT - Univer- sity of Salzburg Iris Toolkit for better performance, if prior knowledge on iris data characteristics (NIR vs. VIS, iris-to-pupil ratio, size of iris, etc.) is available. Source code of the modifications is released. • Iris fusion at segmentation-level: Instead of developing completely new seg- mentation algorithms, the idea behind segmentation-level fusion is to make efficient use of different existing optimised approaches estimating their ac- curacy. The best individual segmentation technique can be used as the final segmentation result. Techniques can even be combined at a lower level leading to new segmentation results. For example, over- and under-segmentation methods can be fused to balance errors towards more robust iris segmentation. A learning-based approach predicting ground-truth segmentation performance is compared to non-quality based combinations in a multispectral setup assessing the impact of NIR and VIS spectras on performance. New techniques are analysed with regards to a challenging multispectral NIR and VIS iris database involving the same subjects. This allows a direct comparison of robustness of segmentation results (localisation of pupillary and limbic boundaries) across the two spectra and illustrates the high versatility of the proposed methods.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations136

An end to end Deep Neural Network for iris segmentation in unconstrained scenarios

  • Jun 30, 2018
  • Neural Networks
  • Shabab Bazrafkan +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations8

Retracted: Robust Iris Recognition Framework Using Computer Vision Algorithms

  • Aug 18, 2020
  • Nashwan Jasim Hussein
  • Research Article
  • Citations36

OR-Skip-Net: Outer residual skip network for skin segmentation in non-ideal situations

  • Sep 04, 2019
  • Expert Systems with Applications
  • Muhammad Arsalan +3
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations16

Iterative Directional Ray-Based Iris Segmentation for Challenging Periocular Images

  • Jan 01, 2011
  • Xiaofei Hu +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

SAM-Iris: A SAM-Based Iris Segmentation Algorithm

  • Jan 09, 2025
  • Electronics
  • Jian Jiang +2
  • Research Article

Abstract 2454: In vivo binding of chTNT-1/B antibodies (Cotara) to DNA/histone complexes in tumors using near-infrared optical imaging

  • Apr 15, 2012
  • Cancer Research
  • Jian Gong +10
  • Book Chapter

The Characteristics Study on LBP Operator in Near Infrared Facial Image

  • Jan 01, 2011
  • Qiang Chen +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations92

Robust Iris Segmentation Method Based on a New Active Contour Force With a Noncircular Normalization

  • Dec 01, 2017
  • IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems
  • Mohammed A M Abdullah +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations9

Color Recovery from Multi-Spectral NIR Images Using Gray Information

  • Dec 15, 2019
  • Qingtao Fu +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Accurate Iris Localization Using Edge Map Generation and Adaptive Circular Hough Transform for Less Constrained Iris Images

  • Aug 01, 2016
  • International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE)
  • Vineet Kumar +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations50

Diagnostic value of near-infrared or fluorescent indocyanine green guided sentinel lymph node mapping in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

  • Oct 31, 2018
  • Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • Meifeng He +5
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

The study on increasing the equivalent SNR in the certain DOI by adjusting the SD separation in near-infrared brain imaging application

  • Nov 01, 2016
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE
  • Jinhai Wang +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations103

A fusion approach to unconstrained iris recognition

  • Sep 07, 2011
  • Pattern Recognition Letters
  • Gil Santos +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations27

A computational efficient iris extraction approach in unconstrained environments

  • Sep 01, 2009
  • Yu Chen +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Generation of NIR Spectral Band from RGB Image with Wavelet Domain Spectral Extrapolation Generative Adversarial Network

  • Oct 07, 2024
  • Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
  • Genping Zhao +4
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.