Secondary cancers after breast-conserving therapy in Tokyo database.

Informing Patient Surveillance for the Growing Number of Survivors of Lung Cancer

8039 Background: During the last decades Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) treatment changed towards less toxic chemotherapy schemes and smaller radiation fields. The impact of these changes on second cancer (SC) risk is still unknown. Methods: We calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIR), comparing SC risk after HL treatment with expected risk, based on cancer incidence in the general population, and compared SC risk between treatment modalities, accounting for competing events, in a large Dutch cohort comprising 3,390 5-years HL survivors, aged 15-51 years at HL treatment and diagnosed between 1965-2000. Results: The median follow-up was 18.2 years; 23% of the patients was followed ≥25 years. During follow-up 734 SCs and 92 third cancers (TC) occurred. The SIR for any SC was 4.5 (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 4.1-4.9). SC risk was still elevated after 35 years of follow-up (SIR 3.9; 95%CI 2.5-5.8) and cumulative incidence (CI) reached 47.1% (95%CI 43.6-50.5) at 40 years follow-up. For TCs the SIR was 5.5 (95%CI 4.4-6.9); the 20-year CI was 22.3% (95%CI 17.8-27.2). Risks of NHL and leukemia strongly decreased in more recent treatment periods (P-trend <0.001). The CI of solid tumors (ST) between 5-19 years after HL treatment did not differ for patients treated between 1965-1979, 1980-1989 or 1990-2000 (P=0.21; 19-year CI 9.1%, 11.6% and 11.4%, respectively). Radiotherapy (RT) above the diaphragm increased risk of STs above the diaphragm (hazard ratio (HR) 2.4, P<0.001), while subdiaphragmatic RT was associated with a 1.7-fold increased HR of a subdiaphragmatic ST (P=0.001). An incomplete mantle field was associated with significantly lower breast cancer (BC) risk (hazard ratio (HR) 0.4, 95%CI 0.2-0.8). A cumulative procarbazine dose >4.2 g/m2 yielded a 1.3-fold increased HR (95%CI 1.0-1.7) for non-breast STs and a 2-fold (95%CI 1.2-3.1) increased HR for gastrointestinal STs, but was associated with a strongly decreased BC risk (HR 0.3, 95%CI 0.2-0.6). Conclusions: SC risk after HL has decreased with treatment changes over the last decades, due to strongly decreasing risk of leukemia and NHL. Smaller radiation fields and procarbazine doses >4.2 g/m2 are associated with lower breast cancer risk, while high procarbazine doses increase risk of gastrointestinal STs.

Survivors of childhood cancer are at risk for secondary breast cancer. Other than previous chest radiation therapy, risk factors for secondary breast cancer have not been established. To identify risk factors for breast cancer among female survivors of childhood cancer. Retrospective cohort study. The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS), a multicenter study of persons who survived more than 5 years after childhood cancer diagnosed from 1970 to 1986. Among 6068 women in the CCSS, 95 women had 111 confirmed cases of breast cancer. Standardized incidence ratios for breast cancer were calculated by using age-specific incidence rates in the general population. Breast cancer incidence was evaluated with respect to primary cancer diagnosis and therapy, age at and time since primary diagnosis, menstrual and reproductive history, and family history of cancer. Breast cancer risk was increased in survivors who were treated with chest radiation therapy (standardized incidence ratio, 24.7 [95% CI, 19.3 to 31.0]) and survivors of bone and soft-tissue sarcoma who were not treated with chest radiation therapy (standardized incidence ratios, 6.7 and 7.6, respectively). Family history of breast cancer (relative rate, 2.7 [CI, 1.3 to 5.0]) and history of thyroid disease (relative rate, 1.7 [CI, 1.1 to 2.6]) were independently associated with increased risk, and exposure to pelvic radiation was protective (relative rate, 0.6 [CI, 0.4 to 0.9]). Age at primary cancer diagnosis and menstrual and reproductive histories did not statistically significantly modify risk. This cohort has not yet attained an age at which breast cancer risk is greatest. Survivors of childhood sarcomas and those who received chest radiation therapy are at risk for secondary breast cancer. When assessing a survivor's risk, clinicians should consider primary diagnosis, previous radiation therapy, family cancer history, and history of thyroid disease.

Emerging Risks of AML/MDS and Other Myeloid Neoplasms Following Chemotherapy for First Primary Malignancy, 2000-2012

Secondary Primary Cancers in Nodular Lymphocyte Predominant Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

Using complete information on total treatment burden, this population-based study aimed to investigate second cancer (SC) risk in testicular cancer survivors (TCS) treated in the cisplatin era. The Cancer Registry of Norway identified 5,625 1-year TCS diagnosed 1980-2009. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated to evaluate the total and site-specific incidence of SC compared to the general population. Cox regression analyses evaluated the effect of treatment on the risk of SC. After a median observation time of 16.6 years, 572 TCS developed 651 nongerm cell SCs. The SC risk was increased after surgery only (SIR 1.28), with site-specific increased risks of thyroid cancer (SIR 4.95) and melanoma (SIR 1.94). After chemotherapy (CT), we observed 2.0- to 3.7-fold increased risks for cancers of the small intestine, bladder, kidney and lung. There was a 1.6- to 2.1-fold increased risk of SC after ≥2 cycles of cisplatin-based CT. Radiotherapy (RT) was associated with 1.5- to 4.4-fold increased risks for cancers of the stomach, small intestine, liver, pancreas, lung, kidney and bladder. After combined CT and RT, increased risks emerged for hematological malignancies (SIR 3.23). TCS treated in the cisplatin era have an increased risk of developing SC, in particular after treatment with cisplatin-based CT and/or RT.

Risk of second primary cancer among women with breast cancer: A population-based study in Granada (Spain)

Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominantly inherited disorder caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Previous studies have shown that MMR gene mutation carriers are at increased risk of colorectal, endometrial, and several other cancers following an initial diagnosis of colorectal cancer. We estimated cancer risks following an endometrial cancer diagnosis for women carrying MMR gene mutations. We obtained data from the Colon Cancer Family Registry for a cohort of 127 women who had a diagnosis of endometrial cancer and who carried a mutation in one of four MMR genes (30 carried a mutation in MLH1, 72 in MSH2, 22 in MSH6, and 3 in PMS2). We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate 10- and 20-year cumulative risks for each cancer. We estimated the age-, country-, and calendar period-specific standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for each cancer, compared with the general population. Following endometrial cancer, women carrying MMR gene mutations had the following 20-year risks of other cancer cancers: colorectal cancer (48%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 35% to 62%); cancer of the kidney, renal pelvis, or ureter (11%, 95% CI = 3% to 20%); urinary bladder cancer (9%, 95% CI = 2% to 17%); and breast cancer (11%, 95% CI = 4% to 19%). Compared with the general population, these women were at statistically significantly elevated risks of colorectal cancer (SIR = 39.9, 95% CI = 27.2 to 58.3), cancer of the kidney, renal pelvis, or ureter (SIR = 28.3, 95% CI = 11.9 to 48.6), urinary bladder cancer (SIR = 24.3, 95% CI = 8.56 to 42.9), and breast cancer (SIR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.17 to 4.14). Women with Lynch syndrome who are diagnosed with endometrial cancer have increased risks of several cancers, including breast cancer.

Background: Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is a non-invasive proliferation of epithelial cells of the terminal-duct lobular unit. Although LCIS is non-invasive itself, studies in the past showed that patients with LCIS have a 4-12 times higher risk of developing invasive breast cancer than the general population. Therefore, the optimal management of LCIS is still subject of debate. Despite lack of information about LCIS in the Dutch population, the Dutch guidelines recommend active surveillance for classic LCIS. This study aims to describe incidence and management of classic LCIS over time in the Netherlands, and to understand its behavior in terms of survival and the risk of developing subsequent ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive breast cancer. Methods: All female patients diagnosed with classic LCIS between 1989-2017 in the Netherlands were identified from the nationwide population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients previously diagnosed with DCIS or invasive breast cancer were excluded. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were calculated to estimate the risk of subsequent DCIS and invasive breast cancer, using data on population size from Statistics Netherlands (CBS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of overall mortality and risk of subsequent invasive breast cancer for different patient-, tumor- and treatment-related characteristics. Competing risks were taken into account. Relative survival was estimated using the Ederer II method, with expected mortality of the general population (matched by age, gender, calendar year) as a reference. Results: We included 1,890 patients. The median age at diagnosis was 51 years (range 24-91 years). The incidence of classic LCIS increased from 186 patients between 1989-1993 to 497 patients between 2014-2017. Of all patients, 50.5% were treated with breast-conserving surgery, 10.2% were treated with mastectomy, 12.6% were treated with an unknown type of surgery and 26.7% did not receive surgery. While in 1989 all patients were surgically treated, only 41% were surgically treated in 2017. Radiotherapy was administered in 3.1% and endocrine therapy in 0.2% of the patients. Median follow-up to death, and subsequent DCIS or invasive breast cancer was 8.5 years (range 0-29 years) and 6.9 years (range 0-27 years). Unadjusted 10- and 20-year overall survival rates were 91% (95%CI:90-93%) and 76% (95%CI:73-79%). Unadjusted 10- and 20-year relative survival rates were 99% (95%CI:97-100%) and 95% (95%CI:91-99%). In total, 270 patients was diagnosed with subsequent invasive breast cancer and 48 were diagnosed with DCIS. Of these, 60% were ipsilateral and 40% were contralateral. The SIRs for DCIS and invasive breast cancer were 4.4 (95%CI:3.2-5.8) and 24.4 (95%CI:21.6-27.5) as compared to the general population, respectively. The SIR was higher for younger patients than for older patients, and the SIR of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer was higher in case no surgical management was performed. In multivariable analysis, increasing age was the most important predictor for overall mortality, while no surgical management was related to a higher incidence of subsequent invasive breast cancer. Conclusion: LCIS incidence has increased over time, while surgical management has decreased. This study shows that the mortality risk is very low compared to the general population. In contrast, the incidence of invasive breast cancer, over a median follow-up of 6.9 years (range 0-27 years), is over 24 times more common in LCIS patients than in the general population. These results suggest that LCIS patients have a good prognosis, even when a subsequent invasive breast cancer is diagnosed. However, the high incidence of second tumors suggest that we carefully monitor these patients. Citation Format: Marissa Corine van Maaren, Agustin Ortega Avila, Jos Bart, Pieter J Westenend, Sabine Siesling. Classic lobular carcinoma in situ in the Netherlands: A population-based analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-04.

BackgroundCurrent evidence on risk of prostate cancer following a diagnosis of male breast cancer is limited and guidance for screening in this potentially higher-risk population remainsunclear. Our objective was to quantify prostate cancer risk in men diagnosed with breast cancer.MethodsWe identified men diagnosed with first primary breast cancer between 1988 and 2012 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program registry databases. Men were followed for occurrence of a second primary prostate cancer and secondary outcomes of cancer-specific and overall survival. Stratified analyses were performed by age, breast cancer stage, race, and breast cancer hormone receptor status. Excess risk per 10,000 person-years and standardized incidence ratios (SIR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. We used multivaraible Cox proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI for characteristics associated with secondary prostate cancer and survival.ResultsFrom a cohort of 5753 men with breast cancer with median follow up of 4.3 years, we identified 250 cases of second primary prostate cancer. Overall, the incidence of second primary prostate cancer was modestly greater than expected (SIR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.93–1.33), although not statistically significant. Stratified analyses demonstrated associations for men ages 65–74 at the time of breast cancer diagnosis (SIR = 1.34, 95%CI 1.01–1.73), hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (SIR = 1.23, 95%CI 1.11–1.39) or AJCC stage I breast cancer (SIR = 1.36, 95%CI 1.04–1.75) and second primary prostate cancer diagnosis.ConclusionsThe incidence of prostate cancer in men with history of breast cancer is similar to the general population. Men with favorable characteristics of their breast cancer were more likely to develop prostate cancer, possibly due to a lower competing risk of breast cancer mortality.

Although ovarian cancer incidence rates have declined in the United States, less is known of ovarian cancer trends among survivors of breast cancer. Therefore, we examined second primary ovarian cancers after first primary breast cancer. Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (1973 to 2008). Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated as the observed numbers of ovarian cancers among survivors of breast cancer compared with the expected numbers in the general population. Absolute rates were measured as the incidence rates for second primary ovarian cancer by year of diagnosis of the first primary breast cancer adjusted for age of breast cancer diagnosis and years since diagnosis. SIRs for second primary ovarian cancer were elevated over the entire study period (SIR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.3), whereas the absolute rates declined with an estimated annual percentage change near 1% (-1.34% to -0.09% per year). Secular trends for second ovarian cancers were similar after estrogen receptor (ER) -positive and ER-negative breast cancers, whereas the age-specific patterns varied significantly by ER expression (P for interaction < .001). The largest SIR was among women age less than 50 years with ER-negative breast cancer (SIR, 4.35; 95% CI, 3.5 to 5.4). Persistently elevated SIRs along with decreasing absolute rates over the entire study period suggest that ovarian cancers in both the general population and survivors of breast cancer are declining in parallel, possibly because of common risk factor exposures. Analytic studies are needed to further assess the parallel overall trends and the age-specific interaction by ER expression.

Second Primary Malignancy Risk Among HIV-Uninfected and HIV-Infected Survivors of Hodgkin Lymphoma: A 30-Year Follow-up Population-Based Study

Patients with Cowden syndrome (CS) with underlying germline PTEN mutations are at increased risk of breast, thyroid, endometrial, and renal cancers. To our knowledge, risk of subsequent cancers in these patients has not been previously explored or quantified. We conducted a 7-year multicenter prospective study (2005 to 2012) of patients with CS or CS-like disease, all of whom underwent comprehensive PTEN mutational analysis. Second malignant neoplasms (SMNs) were ascertained by medical records and confirmed by pathology reports. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for all SMNs combined and for breast, thyroid, endometrial, and renal cancers were calculated. Of the 2,912 adult patients included in our analysis, 2,024 had an invasive cancer history. Germline pathogenic PTEN mutations (PTEN mutation positive) were identified in 114 patients (5.6%). Of these 114 patients, 46 (40%) had an SMN. Median age of SMN diagnosis was 50 years (range, 21 to 71 years). Median interval between primary cancer and SMN was 5 years (range, <1 to 35 years). Of the 51 PTEN mutation-positive patients who presented with primary breast cancer, 11 (22%) had a subsequent new primary breast cancer and 10-year second breast cancer cumulative risk of 29% (95% CI, 15.3 to 43.7). Risk of SMNs compared with that of the general population was significantly elevated for all cancers (SIR, 7.74; 95% CI, 5.84 to 10.07), specifically for breast (SIR, 8.92; 95% CI, 5.85 to 13.07), thyroid (SIR, 5.83; 95% CI, 3.01 to 10.18), and endometrial SMNs (SIR, 14.08.07; 95% CI, 7.10 to 27.21). Patients with CS with germline PTEN mutations are at higher risk for SMNs compared with the general population. Prophylactic mastectomy should be considered on an individual basis given the significant risk of subsequent breast cancer.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk for cancer patients of developing a new primary invasive cancer. Using data from a French Cancer Registry, we included 14,353 cancer patients (breast, colorectal or prostate cancer) diagnosed between 1989 and 1997. Observed second cancers occurring during the first 5 years after the first cancer were compared with the expected number, based on primary cancer incidence rate, by the standardized incidence ratio (SIR). Breast cancer patients had significantly elevated SIR for contralateral breast cancer (SIR=1.7), kidney cancer (SIR=3.5) and myeloid leukaemia (SIR=8.3). Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer had significantly elevated risk for small intestine (SIR=10.7) and colorectal cancer (SIR=1.6). Young age at diagnosis of breast and colorectal cancers was associated with risk of a second cancer. After prostate cancer, men had no greater risk of cancer, except for kidney cancer. Our results help to direct attention to regions especially vulnerable to secondary cancers after primary breast or colorectal cancer.

Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials