Securing AI-driven Infrastructure: Advanced Cybersecurity Frameworks for Cloud and Edge Computing Environments

Real-World Surveillance of FDA-Cleared Artificial Intelligence Models: Rationale and Logistics.

This study analyzes how the United Nations (UN) constructs the issue of artificial intelligence (AI) as part of international security through a constructivist approach. In recent years, AI has developed rapidly and raised global concerns regarding technological misuse, disinformation, and potential threats to political stability and human rights. This phenomenon has driven the emergence of various global governance initiatives, including discussions at the UN Summit of the Future 2025. Using qualitative methods and constructivist discourse analysis, this research examines official documents, speeches by the Secretary-General, and reports from institutions such as UNIDIR, WEF, and OECD. The analysis is conducted through three stages: description, interpretation, and explanation. The findings reveal that the concept of “AI security” does not arise naturally from the nature of the technology itself but is shaped through social processes and normative discourses among global actors. The UN acts as a norm entrepreneur promoting the values of responsible AI and collective security, while states interpret these norms according to their own identities and interests. Thus, AI security is a social construct reflecting the interaction between ideas, interests, and identities within the international system. This study contributes to the strengthening of non-traditional security studies by demonstrating how technological issues can be understood as arenas for the formation of global norms and state political identities.

Artificial Intelligence: The Future of Maxillofacial Prognosis and Diagnosis?

Steady advancement in Artificial Intelligence (AI) development over recent years has caused AI systems to become more readily adopted across industry and military use-cases globally. As powerful as these algorithms are, there are still gaping questions regarding their security and reliability. Beyond adversarial machine learning, software supply chain vulnerabilities and model backdoor injection exploits are emerging as potential threats to the physical safety of AI reliant CPS such as autonomous vehicles. In this work in progress paper, we introduce the concept of AI supply chain vulnerabilities with a provided proof of concept autonomous exploitation framework. We investigate the viability of algorithm backdoors and software third party library dependencies for applicability into modern AI attack kill chains. We leverage an autonomous vehicle case study for demonstrating the applicability of our offensive methodologies within a realistic AI CPS operating environment.

Artificial intelligence (AI) safety and security constitute interdependent disciplines essential for mitigating both unintended and deliberate harms arising from autonomous systems. AI safety aims to ensure that intelligent agents operate predictably and in alignment with human values, while AI security safeguards systems against adversarial manipulation, data poisoning, and model exploitation. Together, these domains underpin the ethical and operational integrity of AI technologies across sectors, particularly in high-stakes environments such as healthcare and governance. Nevertheless, the persistent underrepresentation of women, who comprise less than one-third of AI professionals globally, poses a critical challenge to the field's inclusivity, legitimacy, and epistemic diversity. This commentary argues that women's participation in AI safety and security is not merely a matter of representation, but a prerequisite for developing systems that are equitable, accountable, and aligned with societal values. Women's perspectives are indispensable in identifying algorithmic bias, confronting gendered harms such as deepfakes, and designing governance frameworks that advance fairness and transparency. Simultaneously, AI technologies themselves can serve as tools for empowerment, mentorship, and confidence-building among women in professional roles. Ensuring women's engagement is therefore both an ethical and strategic policy imperative for achieving robust, socially responsive AI safety and security practices.

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems increasingly underpin critical applications in healthcare, finance, defense, and infrastructure, ensuring their security has become paramount. However, the rapid advancement of quantum computing poses a significant threat to classical cryptographic schemes that currently safeguard these systems. Quantum algorithms such as Shor’s and Grover’s threaten to undermine the confidentiality, integrity, and authentication of data and models that AI systems depend on. In this context, Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) has emerged as a crucial area of research aimed at developing cryptographic algorithms that are secure against both classical and quantum adversaries. This paper investigates the intersection of quantum computing threats and AI system vulnerabilities, highlighting how current security mechanisms may fail in a post-quantum era. We explore various categories of PQC—including lattice-based, hash-based, and multivariate polynomial cryptography—and evaluate their applicability to securing AI systems, particularly in scenarios such as model distribution, federated learning, data encryption, and communication in AI-enabled edge and IoT environments. Through analysis of emerging use cases and proposed architectures, the paper outlines how PQC can be integrated into the AI lifecycle to mitigate quantum-era threats. It also identifies key challenges such as computational overhead, integration complexity, and standardization gaps. The study concludes by outlining future research opportunities, including the development of efficient PQC protocols tailored to AI workloads, the creation of quantum-resilient AI pipelines, and the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to secure AI’s future.

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems increasingly underpin critical applications in healthcare, finance, defense, and infrastructure, ensuring their security has become paramount. However, the rapid advancement of quantum computing poses a significant threat to classical cryptographic schemes that currently safeguard these systems. Quantum algorithms such as Shor’s and Grover’s threaten to undermine the confidentiality, integrity, and authentication of data and models that AI systems depend on. In this context, Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) has emerged as a crucial area of research aimed at developing cryptographic algorithms that are secure against both classical and quantum adversaries. This paper investigates the intersection of quantum computing threats and AI system vulnerabilities, highlighting how current security mechanisms may fail in a post-quantum era. We explore various categories of PQC—including lattice-based, hash-based, and multivariate polynomial cryptography—and evaluate their applicability to securing AI systems, particularly in scenarios such as model distribution, federated learning, data encryption, and communication in AI-enabled edge and IoT environments. Through analysis of emerging use cases and proposed architectures, the paper outlines how PQC can be integrated into the AI lifecycle to mitigate quantum-era threats. It also identifies key challenges such as computational overhead, integration complexity, and standardization gaps. The study concludes by outlining future research opportunities, including the development of efficient PQC protocols tailored to AI workloads, the creation of quantum-resilient AI pipelines, and the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to secure AI’s future.

Quantum computing (QC) is not a futuristic notion in agriculture, though its full potential has yet to be realized. QC is an emerging field at the intersection of physics and computer science that holds immense potential to revolutionize various sectors, including agriculture production and artificial intelligence (AI) modeling. While QC is still in the early stages of development and practical applications within agriculture are not yet widespread, researchers are actively exploring its potential benefits in various agricultural domains, including crop optimization, livestock breeding, and environmental monitoring. QC harnesses the principles of quantum mechanics to perform computations using quantum bits or qubits, which can exist in multiple states simultaneously. Unlike classical computers, which rely on binary bits representing 0 or 1, quantum computers exploit phenomena such as superposition and entanglement to process information in parallel, potentially offering exponential speedup for certain types of problems. In agriculture production, particularly in animal science, QC offers promising avenues for optimizing processes and enhancing productivity. Quantum algorithms can analyze vast amounts of genomic data to improve breeding programs, leading to the development of more resilient and productive livestock breeds. Furthermore, QC can facilitate precision farming techniques by modeling complex environmental factors and animal behavior to optimize feeding strategies, disease management, and overall farm management practices. Moreover, QC can significantly benefit AI modeling by accelerating computations and enabling more efficient training of AI models. Quantum algorithms can enhance the performance of AI algorithms in various tasks, including pattern recognition, natural language processing, and predictive analytics. By leveraging quantum-enhanced optimization algorithms, AI models can achieve better convergence and accuracy, leading to more effective decision-making and problem-solving capabilities. While hybrid intelligent models also represent a novel frontier in agriculture, QC has the potential to expedite the merging of mechanistic and AI modeling paradigms, facilitating a more holistic understanding of complex systems in agriculture and beyond. By integrating mechanistic models, which describe the underlying physical processes, with AI models, which learn patterns from data, quantum computing can enable comprehensive simulations and predictions of agricultural systems. This fusion of modeling paradigms can lead to more accurate and robust predictions of crop yields, livestock performance, and environmental impacts, facilitating informed decision-making for farmers and policymakers. The application of QC in agriculture, however, requires interdisciplinary collaborations between physicists, computer scientists, agronomists/animal scientists, and AI researchers. These collaborations can drive the development of quantum algorithms tailored to agricultural applications, the integration of quantum-enhanced AI techniques into existing modeling frameworks, and the deployment of QC resources in real-world agricultural systems. Ultimately, harnessing the power of QC holds the potential to revolutionize agriculture production practices, including regenerative agriculture, and advance AI modeling capabilities, paving the way for a more sustainable and efficient agricultural industry.

Adversarial Machine Learning (AML) is an essential research area because of its impact on the security and trustworthiness of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Attackers take advantage of weaknesses in machine learning (ML) models by injecting well-designed perturbations, resulting in misclassifications, unauthorized access, and security violations. These attacks pose significant risks in high-stakes applications such as cybersecurity, healthcare, autonomous vehicles, and IoT, where adversarial manipulations can lead to severe financial, operational, and safety consequences. This paper presents a thorough review of adversarial attacks and defenses, classifying attacks into three main paradigms: backdoor attacks, weight attacks, and adversarial examples. These attacks occur at various points in the ML life cycle, threatening real- world applications by compromising model integrity, degrading performance, and enabling malicious exploitation. To counter these threats, several defense mechanisms have been investigated, ranging from adversarial training and input preprocessing to robust model architectures. Despite these efforts, existing solutions still struggle with computational complexity, scalability, and adaptability against evolving adversarial strategies. This work further explores the efficacy of AML defenses across different domains, identifying key challenges and open research questions, including the accuracy- robustness trade-off, security vulnerabilities in black-box AI models, and the continuous evolution of adversarial tactics. By analyzing current advancements and identifying gaps in AML research, this study contributes to the development of more resilient AI models capable of withstanding adversarial threats. The findings emphasize the need for adaptive and proactive security measures, calling for scalable, real-time adversarial detection techniques and multi-layered security frameworks to safeguard AI systems against emerging adversarial techniques.

This study evaluated if medical doctors could identify more hemorrhage events during chart review in a clinical setting when assisted by an artificial intelligence (AI) model and medical doctors' perception of using the AI model. To develop the AI model, sentences from 900 electronic health records were labeled as positive or negative for hemorrhage and categorized into one of 12 anatomical locations. The AI model was evaluated on a test cohort consisting of 566 admissions. Using eye-tracking technology, we investigated medical doctors' reading workflow during manual chart review. Moreover, we performed a clinical use study where medical doctors read two admissions with and without AI assistance to evaluate performance when using and perception of using the AI model. The AI model had a sensitivity of 93.7% and a specificity of 98.1% on the test cohort. In the use studies, we found that medical doctors missed more than 33% of relevant sentences when doing chart review without AI assistance. Hemorrhage events described in paragraphs were more often overlooked compared with bullet-pointed hemorrhage mentions. With AI-assisted chart review, medical doctors identified 48 and 49 percentage points more hemorrhage events than without assistance in two admissions, and they were generally positive toward using the AI model as a supporting tool. Medical doctors identified more hemorrhage events with AI-assisted chart review and they were generally positive toward using the AI model.

Solar energy-based technologies have developed rapidly in recent years, however, the inability to appropriately estimate solar energy resources is still a major drawback for these technologies. In this study, eight different artificial intelligence (AI) models namely; convolutional neural network (CNN), artificial neural network (ANN), long short-term memory recurrent model (LSTM), eXtreme gradient boost algorithm (XG Boost), multiple linear regression (MLR), polynomial regression (PLR), decision tree regression (DTR), and random forest regression (RFR) are designed and compared for solar irradiance prediction. Additionally, two hybrid deep neural network models (ANN-CNN and CNN-LSTM-ANN) are developed in this study for the same task. This study is novel as each of the AI models developed was used to estimate solar irradiance considering different timesteps (hourly, every minute, and daily average). Also, different solar irradiance datasets (from six countries in Africa) measured with various instruments were used to train/test the AI models. With the aim to check if there is a universal AI model for solar irradiance estimation in developing countries, the results of this study show that various AI models are suitable for different solar irradiance estimation tasks. However, XG boost has a consistently high performance for all the case studies and is the best model for 10 of the 13 case studies considered in this paper. The result of this study also shows that the prediction of hourly solar irradiance is more accurate for the models when compared to daily average and minutes timestep. The specific performance of each model for all the case studies is explicated in the paper.

Aim: The majority of machine learning (ML) models in healthcare are built on retrospective data, much of which is collected without explicit patient consent for use in artificial intelligence (AI) and ML applications. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether clinicians and scientific researchers themselves consent to provide their own data for the training of ML models. Materials and Methods: This survey was conducted through an anonymous online survey, utilizing platforms such as Telegram, LinkedIn, and Viber. The target audience comprised specific international groups, primarily Russian, German, and English-speaking, of clinicians and scientific researchers. These participants ranged in their levels of expertise and experience, from beginners to veterans. The survey centered on a singular, pivotal question: “Do You Consent to the Use of Your Biological and Private Data for Training Machine Learning and AI Models?” Respondents had the option to choose from three responses: “Yes” and “No”. Results: The survey was conducted in January 2024. A total of 119 unique and verified individuals participated in the survey. The results revealed that only 50% of respondents (63 persons) expressed consent to provide their own data for the training of ML and AI models. Conclusion: In the development of ML and AI models, particularly open-source ones, it is crucial to ascertain whether participants are willing to provide their private data. While ML algorithms can transform the nature of data, it is important to remember that the primary owner of this data is the individual. Our findings show that in 50% of the cases, even participants from scientific research and clinical backgrounds – individuals typically accountable for ensuring data quality in AI and ML model development – do not consent to the use of their data in AI and ML settings. This highlights the need for more stringent consent processes and ethical considerations in the utilization of personal data in AI and ML research.

The secondary use of health data for training Artificial Intelligence (AI) models holds immense potential for advancing medical research and healthcare delivery. However, ensuring patient consent for such utilization is paramount to uphold ethical standards and data privacy. Patient informed consent means patients are fully informed about how their data will be collected, used, and protected, and they voluntarily agree to allow their data to be used for AI models. In addition to formal consent frameworks, establishing a social license is critical to foster public trust and societal acceptance for the secondary use of health data in AI systems. This study examines patient consent practices in this domain. In this scoping review, we searched Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus. We included studies in English that addressed the core issues of interest, namely, privacy, security, legal, and ethical issues related to the secondary use of health data in AI models. Articles not addressing the core issues, as well as systematic reviews, meta-analyses, books, letters, conference abstracts, and study protocols were excluded. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, resolving disagreements with a third author. Data was extracted using a data extraction form. After screening 774 articles, a total of 38 articles were ultimately included in the review. Across these studies, a total of 178 barriers and 193 facilitators were identified. We consolidated similar codes and extracted 65 barriers and 101 facilitators, which we then categorized into four themes: "Structure," "People," "Physical system," and "Task." We identified notable emphasis on "Legal and Ethical Challenges" and "Interoperability and Data Governance." Key barriers included concerns over privacy and security breaches, inadequacies in informed consent processes, and unauthorized data sharing. Critical facilitators included enhancing patient consent procedures, improving data privacy through anonymization, and promoting ethical standards for data usage. Our study underscores the complexity of patient consent for the secondary use of health data in AI models, highlighting significant barriers and facilitators within legal, ethical, and technological domains. We recommend the development of specific guidelines and actionable strategies for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers to improve informed consent, ensuring privacy, trust, and ethical use of data, thereby facilitating the responsible advancement of AI in healthcare.

To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model able to perform both segmentation of hand joint ultrasound images for osteophytes, bone, and synovium and perform osteophyte severity scoring following the EULAR-OMERACT grading system (EOGS) for hand osteoarthritis (OA). One hundred sixty patients with pain or reduced function of the hands were included. Ultrasound images of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), distal interphalangeal (DIP), and first carpometacarpal (CMC1) joints were then manually segmented for bone, synovium and osteophytes and scored from 0 to 3 according to the EOGS for OA. Data was divided into a training, validation, and test set. The AI model was trained on the training data to perform bone, synovium, and osteophyte identification on the images. Based on the manually performed image segmentation, an AI was trained to classify the severity of osteophytes according to EOGS from 0 to 3. Percent Exact Agreement (PEA) and Percent Close Agreement (PCA) were assessed on individual joints and overall. PCA allows a difference of one EOGS grade between doctor assessment and AI. A total of 4615 ultrasound images were used for AI development and testing. The developed AI model scored on the test set for the MCP joints a PEA of 76% and PCA of 97%; for PIP, a PEA of 70% and PCA of 97%; for DIP, a PEA of 59% and PCA of 94%, and CMC a PEA of 50% and PCA of 82%. Combining all joints, we found a PEA between AI and doctor assessments of 68% and a PCA of 95%. The developed AI model can perform joint ultrasound image segmentation and severity scoring of osteophytes, according to the EOGS. As proof of concept, this first version of the AI model is successful, as the agreement performance is slightly higher than previously found agreements between experts when assessing osteophytes on hand OA ultrasound images. The segmentation of the image makes the AI explainable to the doctor, who can immediately see why the AI applies a given score. Future validation in hand OA cohorts is necessary though.

The pervasive deployment of Deep Learning models has recently prompted apprehensions regarding their ecological footprint, owing to the exorbitant levels of energy consumption necessitated by the training and inference processes. The term "Red AI" is employed to denote artificial intelligence (AI) models that undergo training using resource-intensive methodologies on very large datasets. This practice can engender substantial energy usage and emissions of carbon, thereby opposing "Green AI." The latter concept alludes to AI models designed for similar efficiency and reduced environmental impact. This objective is realized through the utilization of smaller datasets, less computationally intensive training techniques, or sustainable energy resources. While Red AI prioritizes accuracy and performance, Green AI emphasizes efficiency and sustainability. Given that both paradigms exhibit advantages and limitations, the debates around the topics have burgeoned in the scientific arena, delving into novel algorithms, hardware innovations, and improved data utilization techniques aimed at mitigating the ecological consequences of intricate applications such as GPT and BERT. Nevertheless, due to the relative novelty of this debate, not much effort has been dedicated yet to contextualizing the essence of Red AI and the prospects of Green AI in a coherent framework. Within this context, the present work contributes by meticulously delineating both domains through a multifaceted analysis of their causes and ramifications, described from the points of computer architectures, data structures, and algorithms. Additionally, the study reviews notable instances of study cases based on complex Red AI models. The primary contribution of this article encompasses a comprehensive survey of Red and Green AI, stemming from a selection of the literature performed by the authors, subsequently organized into distinct clusters. These clusters encompass i) articles that qualitatively or quantitatively address the issue of Red AI, identifying Green AI as a plausible remedy, ii) articles offering insights into the environmental impact associated with the deployment of extensive Deep Learning models, and iii) articles introducing the techniques underpinning Green AI, aiming at mitigating the cost of Red AI. The outcome emerging from the analysis performed by this work consists of a compromise between sustainability in contrast to the performance of AI tools. Unless the complex training and inference procedures of software models mitigate their environmental impact, it will be necessary to decrease the level of accuracy of production systems, inevitably conflicting with the objective of the major AI vendors. The outcomes of this work would be beneficial to scholars pursuing intricate Deep Learning architectures in scientific research, as well as AI enterprises struggling with the protracted training demands of commercial products within the realms of Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing.