Security Assessment of Selectively Encrypted Visual Data: Iris Recognition on Protected Samples

Common image quality metrics (NLSE, SNR) do not consistently evaluate information loss in compression in the same way as the human eye. This is especially true for speckled SAR imagery. This paper presents a correlation based metric which provides improved local and global measures of SAR image compression quality.

Although human iris pattern is widely accepted as a stable biometric feature, recent research has found some evidences on the aging effect of iris system. In order to investigate changes in iris recognition performance due to the elapsed time between probe and gallery iris images, we examine the effect of elapsed time on iris recognition utilizing 7,628 iris images from 46 subjects with an average of ten visits acquired over two years from a legacy database at Clarkson University. Taken into consideration the impact of quality factors such as local contrast, illumination, blur and noise on iris recognition performance, regression models are built with and without quality metrics to evaluate the degradation of iris recognition performance based on time lapse factors. Our experimental results demonstrate the decrease of iris recognition performance along with increased elapsed time based on two iris recognition system (the modified Masek algorithm and a commercial software VeriEye SDK). These results also reveal the significance of quality factors in iris recognition regression indicating the variability in match scores. According to the regression analysis, our study in this paper helps provide the quantified decrease on match scores with increased elapsed time, which indicates the possibility to implement the prediction scheme for iris recognition performance based on learning of impact on time lapse factors.

When an investigator is developing a new image-processing technique or manipulating an image-acquisition technique they are confronted with the question of whether the new technique will improve clinical diagnosis. A first approach is to look at individual physical properties of the image such as image contrast and resolution. Although these properties might be useful, it has long been known that the noise characteristics of the image system need to be taken into consideration to appropriately evaluate the quality of an image whether it will be used to detect, classify, and/ˆ•or estimate a signal (Cunningham and Shaw, 1999). One useful measure of the noise characteristics is the noise-equivalent quanta (NEQ) that expresses the image noise in terms of the number of Poisson-distributed input photons per unit area at each spatial frequency (Wagner and Brown, 1985). The NEQ can be thought of as a measure inversely related to the amount of noise as a function of spatial frequency. However, when the diagnostic decision involves a human observer, medical image quality can be defined in terms of human performance in visual tasks that are relevant to clinical diagnosis (Barrett, 1993). In this context, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) studies are the standard method of evaluating the impact of a particular image manipulation on clinical diagnosis. In these studies, the physicians scrutinize a set of medical images (under the different image-acquisition or processing conditions) and rate their confidence about the presence of the lesion. The investigator infers from these ratings a measure of performance known as the area under the ROC curve. Often, the number of possible conditions is large and ROC studies become time consuming and costly because they require a large number of human observations. Other times, the investigator might want to optimize a parameter or a set of parameters. In such cases, the number of conditions suffers a combinatorial explosion, and therefore ROC studies become unfeasible. Thus it is desirable to develop a metric of image quality that could be used for fast evaluation and optimization of image quality but also would have the predictive power of ROC studies. Computer-model observers are algorithms that attempt to predict human visual performance in noisy images and might represent the desired metric of image quality when the diagnostic decision involves a human observer and a visual task. Development of models to predict human visual signal detection in noise goes back to work by Rose (1948) who studied the detectability of a flat-topped disk embedded in white noise (see Burgess, 1999a, for a review). In the last two decades, many studies have concentrated on finding a model observer that can predict human performance across many types of synthetic backgrounds. More recently, model observers have been applied to real medical-image backgrounds. The hope is that eventually model observers will become common metrics of task-based image quality for evaluation of medical-image quality as well as optimization of imaging systems.

The ability to identify individuals based on their iris is known as iris recognition. Over the past decade iris recognition has garnered much attention because of its strong performance in comparison with other mainstream biometrics such as fingerprint and face recognition. Performance of iris recognition systems is driven by application scenario requirements. Standoff distance, subject cooperation, underlying optics, and illumination are a few examples of these requirements which dictate the nature of images an iris recognition system has to process. Traditional iris recognition systems, dubbed "stop and stare", operate under highly constrained conditions. This ensures that the captured image is of sufficient quality so that the success of subsequent processing stages, segmentation, encoding, and matching are not compromised. When acquisition constraints are relaxed, such as for surveillance or iris on the move, the fidelity of subsequent processing steps lessens.;In this dissertation we propose a multi-faceted framework for mitigating the difficulties associated with non-ideal iris. We develop and investigate a comprehensive iris image quality metric that is predictive of iris matching performance. The metric is composed of photometric measures such as defocus, motion blur, and illumination, but also contains domain specific measures such as occlusion, and gaze angle. These measures are then combined through a fusion rule based on Dempster-Shafer theory. Related to iris segmentation, which is arguably one of the most important tasks in iris recognition, we develop metrics which are used to evaluate the precision of the pupil and iris boundaries. Furthermore, we illustrate three methods which take advantage of the proposed segmentation metrics for rectifying incorrect segmentation boundaries. Finally, we look at the issue of iris image interoperability and demonstrate that techniques from the field of hardware fingerprinting can be utilized to improve iris matching performance when images captured from distinct sensors are involved.

Image quality metrics have become more and more popular in the image processing community. However, so far, no one has been able to define an image quality metric well correlated with the percept for overall image quality. One of the causes is that image quality is multi-dimensional and complex. One approach to bridge the gap between perceived and calculated image quality is to reduce the complexity of image quality, by breaking the overall quality into a set of quality attributes. In our research we have presented a set of quality attributes built on existing attributes from the literature. The six proposed quality attributes are: sharpness, color, lightness, artifacts, contrast, and physical. This set keeps the dimensionality to a minimum. An experiment validated the quality attributes as suitable for image quality evaluation. The process of applying image quality metrics to printed images is not straightforward, because image quality metrics require a digital input. A framework has been developed for this process, which includes scanning the print to get a digital copy, image registration, and the application of image quality metrics. With quality attributes for the evaluation of image quality and a framework for applying image quality metrics, a selection of suitable image quality metrics for the different quality attributes has been carried out. Each of the quality attributes has been investigated, and an experimental analysis carried out to find the most suitable image quality metrics for the given quality attributes. For the sharpness attributes the Structural SIMilarity index (SSIM) by Wang et al. (2004) is the the most suitable, and for the other attributes further evaluation is required.

Motion-induced artifact detection has become a fixture in the assessment of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) quality control. However, the effects of other MR image quality (IQ) metrics on intrinsic connectivity brain networks are largely unexplored. Accordingly, we report herein the initial assessment of the effects of a comprehensive list of IQ metrics on resting state networks using a multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) approach based on high-order spatial independent component analysis (ICA). Three categories of MR IQ metrics were considered: (1) metrics for artifacts including the AFNI outlier ratio and quality index, framewise displacement, and ghost to signal ratio, (2) metrics for the temporal quality of MRI data including the temporal framewise change in global BOLD signals (DVARS), global correlation of time-series, and temporal signal to noise ratio, (3) metrics for the structural quality of MRI data including the entropy focus criterion, foreground-background energy ratio, full-width half maximum smoothness, and static signal to noise ratio. After FDR-correction for multiple comparisons, results showed significant effects of the static and temporal signal to noise ratios on the spatial map intensities of the basal ganglia, default-mode and cerebellar networks. AFNI outlier ratio, framewise displacement and DVARS exhibited significant effects on the BOLD power spectra of sensorimotor networks. The global correlation of time-series displayed wide-spread modulation of the spectral power in most networks. Further investigations of the effect of IQ metrics on the characteristics of intrinsic connectivity brain networks allow more accurate interpretation of the fMRI results.

This paper investigates the effect of segmentation errors on off-angle iris recognition. We first segment the inner and outer boundaries of off-angle iris images by fitting the best ellipses to boundaries. Then, we validate the segmentation results using Ground Truth Tool and fix the possible errors. Second, we add random errors on iris segmentation parameters to examine how Hamming distance distribution changes for different amount of segmentation error. In order to add errors, we first group the parameters into three sets as ellipse center (i.e., x, y), minor and major axis (i.e., r 1 , r 2 ) and orientation (θ) and changed the parameters by adding positive and negative random error as a noise to the ground truth segmentation parameters. Our purpose is to show how performance of iris recognition is affected if there is an error in segmentation and how important is to have a very robust segmentation algorithm for off-angle iris recognition. We test the effect of segmentation errors using our off-angle iris dataset that contains images from -50° to +50° in gaze angles. Based on our experimental results, we observed that error in ellipse center decrease the recognition performance worse than minor and major axis and orientation. The main reason is the normalization process tolerates the small amount of error in minor and major axis and bit shift in matching handles the small variations in the orientation errors. However, if the error in the ellipse orientation exceeds the limit of the bit shift method tolerance, the performance of the off-angle iris recognition dramatically drops.

© IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.

Image quality metrics have been widely used in imaging systems to maintain and improve the quality of images being processed and transmitted. Due to the close relationship between image quality perception and the human visual system, the development of image quality metrics has been contributed to by both psychologists and computer scientists. In this paper, three novel image quality metrics are proposed by improving the well-known image quality metric structural similarity index (SSIM). In this new approach, images are not compared directly, but their feature maps are (preprocessing is incorporated to extract the corner, edge and symmetry maps). The similarity measured (by SSIM) between corner, edge and symmetry maps of images being compared is used as an indicator of image quality, and named C SSIM, E SSIM and S SSIM respectively. The experiments show that all the proposed image quality metrics have a better performance than SSIM, and E SSIM has the best performance among them.

This paper presents a new area-efficient approximate 4-2 compressor with improved image quality and error metrics. The proposed compressor is developed using functional approximation and Karnaugh map (K-map) simplification. The circuit behavior is verified through modeling and synthesis using Verilog HDL. The effectiveness of the proposed compressor for image multiplication is evaluated using an 8 × 8 approximate multiplier simulated in MATLAB. The performance of the proposed design is compared with existing compressors using circuit, error, and image-quality metrics. Post-synthesis and image-multiplication results show that the proposed compressor achieves excellent power, delay, and image-quality performance compared to existing area-efficient designs.

Iris recognition systems are among the most accurate of all biometric technologies with immense potential for use in worldwide security applications. This study examined the effect of eye pathology on iris recognition and in particular whether eye disease could cause iris recognition systems to fail. The experiment involved a prospective cohort of 54 patients with anterior segment eye disease who were seen at the acute referral unit of the Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion in Edinburgh. Iris camera images were obtained from patients before treatment was commenced and again at follow-up appointments after treatment had been given. The principal outcome measure was that of mathematical difference in the iris recognition templates obtained from patients' eyes before and after treatment of the eye disease. Results showed that the performance of iris recognition was remarkably resilient to most ophthalmic disease states, including corneal oedema, iridotomies (laser puncture of iris) and conjunctivitis. Problems were, however, encountered in some patients with acute inflammation of the iris (iritis/anterior uveitis). The effects of a subject developing anterior uveitis may cause current recognition systems to fail. Those developing and deploying iris recognition should be aware of the potential problems that this could cause to this key biometric technology.

To assess the performance of routine cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) quality assurance (QA) at predicting and diagnosing clinically recognizable linac CBCT image quality issues. Monthly automated linac CBCT image quality QA data were acquired on eight Varian linacs (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) using the CATPHAN 500 series phantom (The Phantom Laboratory, Inc., Greenwich, NY) and Total QA software (Image Owl, Inc., Greenwich, NY) over 34months between July 2014 and May 2017. For each linac, the following image quality metrics were acquired: geometric distortion, spatial resolution, Hounsfield Unit (HU) constancy, uniformity, and noise. Quality control (QC) limits were determined by American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) expert consensus documents Task Group (TG-142 and TG-179) and the manufacturer acceptance testing procedure. Clinically recognizable CBCT issues were extracted from the in-house incident learning system (ILS) and service reports. The sensitivity and specificity of CATPHAN QA at predicting clinically recognizable image quality issues was investigated. Sensitivity was defined as the percentage of clinically recognizable CBCT image quality issues that followed a failing CATPHAN QA. Quality assurance results are categorized as failing if one or more image quality metrics are outside the QC limits. The specificity of CATPHAN QA was defined as one minus the fraction of failing CATPHAN QA results that did not have a clinically recognizable CBCT image quality issue in the subsequent month. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for each image quality metric by plotting the true positive rate (TPR) against the false-positive rate (FPR). Over the study period, 18 image quality issues were discovered by clinicians while using CBCT to set up the patient and five were reported prior to x-ray tube repair. The incidents ranged from ring artifacts to uniformity problems. The sensitivity of the TG-142/179 limits was 17% (four of the prior monthly QC tests detected a clinically recognizable image quality issue). The area under the curve (AUC) calculated for each image quality metric ROC curve was: 0.85 for uniformity, 0.66 for spatial resolution, 0.51 for geometric distortion, 0.56 for noise, 0.73 for HU constancy, and 0.59 for contrast resolution. Automated monthly QA is not a good predictor of CBCT image quality issues. Of the available metrics, uniformity has the best predictive performance, but still has a high FPR and low sensitivity. The poor performance of CATPHAN QA as a predictor of image quality problems is partially due to its reliance on region-of-interest (ROI) based algorithms and a lack of a global algorithm such as correlation. The manner in which image quality issues occur (trending toward failure or random) is still not known and should be studied further. CBCT image quality QA should be adapted based on how CBCT is used clinically.

For practicing medical physicists, CT image quality assessment is, in general, limited to the ones required by ACR and based on the axial images, such as CT number uniformity, image noise, contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), and high contrast resolution. However, with more advanced technologies introduced by CT vendors, just assessing these basic image quality metrics may not be enough. Noise power spectrum (NPS), characterizing the signal noise component at each spatial frequency, is a powerful tool to predict the CT performance related to lesion detectability and noise texture. The quality of coronal and sagittal reformatted images is, in a large part, determined by the slice profile. How to accurately assess the slice profile is important for clinical medical physicists but not well recognized.Automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) has been adopted by major CT manufacturers, to maintain image quality across the scan range. The way how ATMC works varies significantly among vendors. A “standard” method is needed to evaluate the performance of this critical dose‐saving and image quality improvement technique. As dual energy CT becomes more readily available for routine clinical use, the need of image quality assessment metrics unique to the dual energy CT mode is becoming urgent.The session will facilitate the discussion of NPS and its application in the evaluation of FBP and iterative reconstruction. This session will also present the methods to measure the slice profile and characterize the performance of ATCM. The last part of this session will focus on the physics of CT dual energy mode, as well as unique image quality metrics to evaluate the performance of the dual energy mode.Learning Objectives: Be familiar with procedures on how to correctly compute CT noise power spectrum Understand why basic image quality metrics used for FBP may not be sufficient to characterize the performance of advanced iterative reconstruction Understand CT slice profile and how to accurately measure it Be familiar with ATCM from major CT vendors and how to evaluate its performance Understand different hardware approaches for dual energy CT Be familiar with image quality metrics relevant to dual energy mode Schmidt: Employee of Siemens HealthcareFan: Employee of GE Healthcare

Ground-based solar observations are severely affected by Earth’s turbulent atmosphere. As a consequence, observed image quality and prevailing seeing conditions are closely related. Partial correction of image degradation is nowadays provided in real time by adaptive optics (AO) systems. In this study, different metrics of image quality are compared with parameters characterizing the prevailing seeing conditions, i.e. Median Filter Gradient Similarity (MFGS), Median Filter Laplacian Similarity (MFLS), Helmli–Scherer mean, granular rms-contrast, differential image motion, and Fried-parameter \(r_{0}\). The quiet-Sun observations at disk center were carried out at the Vacuum Tower Telescope (VTT), Observatorio del Teide (OT), Izaña, Tenerife, Spain. In July and August 2016, time series of short-exposure images were recorded with the High-resolution Fast Imager (HiFI) at various wavelengths in the visible and near-infrared parts of the spectrum. Correlation analysis yields the wavelength dependence of the image quality metrics and seeing parameters, and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) is employed to characterize the seeing on a particular observing day. In addition, the image quality metrics and seeing parameters are used to determine the field dependence of the correction provided by the AO system. Management of high-resolution imaging data from large-aperture, ground-based telescopes demands reliable image quality metrics and meaningful characterization of prevailing seeing conditions and AO performance. The present study offers guidance on how retrieving such information ex post facto.

For image quality assessment, the availability of diverse databases is vital for the development and evaluation of image quality metrics. Existing databases have played an important role in promoting the understanding of various types of distortion and in the evaluation of image quality metrics. However, a comprehensive representation of optical aberrations and their impact on image quality is lacking. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a novel image quality database that focuses on optical aberrations. We conduct a subjective experiment to capture human perceptual responses on a set of images with optical aberrations. We then test the performance of selected objective image quality metrics to assess these aberrations. This approach not only ensures the relevance of our database to real-world scenarios but also contributes to ensuring the performance of the selected image quality metrics. The database is available for download at https: // www. ntnu. edu/ colourlab/ software .