Tree plantations are sometimes the only alternative in restoring forest landscapes, at least in the short term, especially on very badly degraded soils. Low soil fertility, soil compaction after abandonment from cattle grazing, and invasion by grasses and other aggressive vegetation can be serious obstacles to natural forest regeneration. As the area of degraded lands expands, there is a greater need for tree species that can grow in such conditions and yield useful products (timber, fuelwood, and others) as well as environmental benefits (recovery of ecosystem biodiversity, soil conservation, watershed protection, carbon sequestration). Tree species chosen for a plantation in the context of forest restoration can provide benefits from the tree products (timber, fuelwood, leaf mulches, etc.), and from their ecological effects, for example, nutrient recycling, or attracting birds and other wildlife to the landscape. The choice of a tree species depends on whether both productive and ecological advantages can be achieved in the same system, and in some cases one function, either productive or environmental, may be desired. Within a forest landscape, the preferred choice for restoration would be natural regeneration. Planting would only be a secondary option, to be used in cases where natural regeneration cannot proceed due to the obstacles mentioned above (poor soil conditions, long distances to seed sources, isolation, invasion by aggressive grasses). Within a landscape context, there should be a balance of socioeconomic goals (e.g., productivity) and biodiversity objectives for restoration. The following factors influence species’ choice for plantations: 38 Selecting Tree Species for Plantation