Seroprevalence of Infectious Diseases Among Migrant and Local Libyans: A Cross-Sectional Study

The Health and Safety of Migrant workers in the Garment industry in Vietnam: Key issues and potential strategies

Aims: This study was planned to evaluate the trends of transfusion-transmissible infectious diseases (TTID). Setting and Design: This cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted on donor community attending Transfusion Medicine Department, Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore, Pakistan from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016. Subject and Methods: A total of 79,774 blood donors were processed for HbsAg anti-HCV, anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), syphilis, and malaria detection by rapid immune chromatographic technique. Statistical Analysis: The data analysis was done through SPSS 20.0. Chi-square test was employed. Results: Males and females were 91% and 9%, respectively. The mean age was 44 ± 10 years, the prevalence of TTID was 4.0%, and year-wise decreasing trends were observed as 4.4%, 4.2%, 3.7%, 3.9%, and 3.9%, respectively, in 2012–2016. Overall Co-infection was 0.36%, HBV+HCV co-infection was most common. The seroprevalence of HBV, HCV, syphilis, malaria, and HIV was 0.9%, 1.7%, 1.1%, 0.1%, and 0%, respectively. Year-wise seroprevalence of HCV was 2.1%, 1.8%, 1.7%, 1.7%, and 1.3%; HBV was 1.2%, 0.8%, 0.8%, 1.0%, and 1.0%, syphilis was 0.8%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1.4%, and 1.5%, and malaria was 0.1%, 0.03%, 0.1%, 0.1%, and 0.05% in 2012–2016, respectively, and no single case of HIV was detected. Conclusion: Raising trends for syphilis among blood donors underscore the concern about growing infection of this disease in the community as these blood donors represent the highly selective community. The zero prevalence of HIV in Pakistani population supports the growing awareness of this life-threatening disease. HBV and HCV infections still continue to be a menace to the society because, in spite of decreasing trend, burden of the disease is still high in general community.

Many of India’s 19mn migrant workers have been displaced as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown. Save for a select few that received assistance from their employers and local governments, many migrants were left to make their own arrangements to return home. This paper investigates the role of labour laws and policies in overcoming the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and this unequal impact on migrant workers. Given that consolidation and strengthening of labour laws and codes in India is a recent phenomenon, this paper argues that there is an opportunity to account for vulnerabilities faced by migrant labourers in particular. We review recent bills such as the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code recently passed by Parliament (2020). We provide a roadmap of labour laws and policies potentially required to safeguard migrant and minimum wage labourers from such shocks in the future.

BackgroundCultural competency describes interventions that aim to improve accessibility and effectiveness of health services for people from ethnic minority backgrounds. Interventions include interpreter services, migrant peer educators and health worker training to provide culturally competent care. Very few studies have focussed on cultural competency for migrant service use in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC). Migrants and refugees in Thailand and Malaysia report difficulties in accessing health systems and discrimination by service providers. In this paper we describe stakeholder perceptions of migrants’ and health workers’ language and cultural competency, and how this affects migrant workers’ health, especially in Malaysia where an interpreter system has not yet been formalised.MethodWe conducted in-depth interviews with stakeholders in Malaysia (N = 44) and Thailand (N = 50), alongside policy document review in both countries. Data were analysed thematically. Results informed development of Systems Thinking diagrams hypothesizing potential intervention points to improve cultural competency, namely via addressing language barriers.ResultsLanguage ability was a core tenet of cultural competency as described by participants in both countries. Malay was perceived to be an easy language that migrants could learn quickly, with perceived proficiency differing by source country and length of stay in Malaysia. Language barriers were a source of frustration for both migrants and health workers, which compounded communication of complex conditions including mental health as well as obtaining informed consent from migrant patients. Health workers in Malaysia used strategies including google translate and hand gestures to communicate, while migrant patients were encouraged to bring friends to act as informal interpreters during consultations. Current health services are not migrant friendly, which deters use. Concerns around overuse of services by non-citizens among the domestic population may partly explain the lack of policy support for cultural competency in Malaysia. Service provision for migrants in Thailand was more culturally sensitive as formal interpreters, known as Migrant Health Workers (MHW), could be hired in public facilities, as well as Migrant Health Volunteers (MHV) who provide basic health education in communities.ConclusionPerceptions of overuse by migrants in a health system acts as a barrier against system or institutional level improvements for cultural competency, in an already stretched health system. At the micro-level, language interventions with migrant workers appear to be the most feasible leverage point but raises the question of who should bear responsibility for cost and provision—employers, the government, or migrants themselves.

The Asia-Pacific region consists of several of the world’s largest workforces that are major sources of both internal (domestic) and international migrant workers. Internal migrants themselves are a significant worker population in the region, especially in India and China. An International Organization for Migration review of global data sources on occupational fatalities reported that migrants, who constitute most national labour forces in the Gulf region of West Asia, suffer a majority of workplace fatalities. Existing government data showed that approximately 16 Indian workers died each day on average in the Gulf region between 2014 and 2019, and two Nepali workers abroad died each day on average every year since 2008. Over 37,000 bodies of Bangladeshi workers have been repatriated back home since 2000. An analysis of over 40,000 occupationally injured migrant construction workers of Chinese nationality in Korea identified that policies on their prohibition in changing workplaces was a risk factor for the significantly higher occupational fatalities. Australia is a major high income host country in the Asia-Pacific region for migrant workers but has sparse epidemiological studies on workplace fatalities or injury and illness among its diverse migrant workforce. Global labour shortages are making unprecedented demand for workers from low-income countries to fill low skilled, precarious jobs in higher income countries. This crisis should be an impetus for government agencies and researchers in host countries to give much needed attention to the health and safety of migrant workers and ensure that it is not acceptable to exploit vulnerable workers because they do not ‘belong’.

The health and well-being of migrant workers from low-income countries is often neglected in travel medicine. This article uses Nepal as a case study to highlight key issues affecting this particular group of international travellers. This narrative review used a comprehensive systematic literature search to identify relevant studies on Nepal. The included articles were thematically analysed leading to four key themes or risk factors. The search found 18 articles from which we identified 3 key themes related directly to migrant workers: (1) sexual risk taking; (2) occupational health and (3) lifestyles, and a fourth theme related to partners and family of migrant workers who are left behind in Nepal. Of the 18 included articles, 11 articles discussed sexual risk taking and HIV, whilst considerably fewer focused on work-related risk factors and lifestyle factors in migrant workers. Migrant workers who are generally healthy appear to be similar to tourist travellers in regarding sexual health as a key issue related to being abroad. Risky sexual behaviour increases in individuals separated from their usual sexual partners, away from their own communities and families, leading to the so-called 'situational disinhibition'. Considering the recent media coverage of deaths and injuries among migrant workers in the Middle East, it is interesting to see that their sexual health is more prevalent in the research literature. This article argues that travel medicine should provide more emphasis to the health and well-being of migrant workers as a highly vulnerable group of travellers with additional impact on the health of those left behind.

Migrant labour in the UK’s post-Brexit agri-food system: Ambiguities, contradictions and precarities

ABSTRACTJacobaea vulgaris is a biennial or perennial herb, reaching up to 200 cm, with pinnatifid leaves and numerous yellow flowerheads borne in flat-topped corymbs. The blooming season starts in June and lasts till September. The weed prefers waysides, railway embankments, pastures, and wastelands. While considered an indigenous herb of Europe and Western Asia, it is also widely found in North and South Americas, South Africa, India, Siberia, New Zealand, and Australia, where it poses a serious threat for agriculture and local ecosystems in the absence of natural insects and pathogen species. Although the plant was utilized in Early Modern Europe as a medicine for various purposes, it contains numerous harmful ingredients. Sesquiterpene lactones (STLs) are responsible for allergic dermatitis and phototoxic properties of the sap, while pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) pose a serious threat to livestock after ingestion. Jacobaea vulgaris has been regarded as a noxious weed since the 19th century. In the present day, its eradication from pastures is regulated by law in many countries. Nevertheless, migrant workers might not be conscious that this weed is dangerous. In the summer of 2012, a young migrant male farm worker was seen in the University Dermatology Out-Patient Clinic in Poznan due to acute blistering Jacobaea vulgaris-induced dermatitis clinically resembling dermatitis herpetiformis (cutaneous manifestation of gluten intolerance). The biological/chemical/mechanical control of the plant in farmlands, as well as education at an early age about poisonous and injurious herbs, is advisable for preventing potentially serious health hazards, particularly to urban dwellers accidentally exposed to those plants at their urban stands.

The age at which children enter school represents a transitional period between early childhood and adolescence that involves increasing autonomy, interaction with peers, and exposure to environments outside the home. Although mortality is generally much lower in the 5 to 9 age group compared with infancy and early childhood, there are many preventable causes of mortality, morbidity, and disability that emerge in this age group, including injuries, noncommunicable diseases, and vaccine-preventable and highly treatable infections.1 Partly because of relatively low mortality rates and less frequent contacts with the health system, school-age children and younger adolescents ages 5 to 14 have been referred to as the “missing middle,” in that there is a dearth of robust data on key health indicators, morbidity burden, and cause-specific mortality in this group.2 Many health issues that have a high burden in early childhood can persist in older children, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), resource-constrained settings, and marginalized communities worldwide. Undernutrition and infections occurring in the context of poverty remain leading causes of morbidity and mortality in school-age children living in LMIC,3 whereas those children in higher-income settings are more likely to die due to injuries or noncommunicable disease (NCD). In addition, the prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents has increased steadily over the last few decades,4 though the rate of these increases varies widely among countries.5New risk factors relating to diet, lifestyle, mental health, injuries, and NCDs also become more prominent as children approach and enter adolescence, many of which can contribute to the development of chronic NCDs over the life course. Within this period, school-age children begin to establish healthy lifestyle habits (eg, diet, physical activity, avoidance of substance use), and are learning about sexual and reproductive health and rights, as well as the measures they can take to protect themselves and others. This represents a window of opportunity for educational interventions to support good health, optimal development, and well-being. A growing body of evidence suggests that school-based and digital platforms and delivery strategies are promising tools that aid in the delivery of health interventions to older children.The methodology and reviews described herein contributed to the portion of the upcoming 2022 Lancet Optimizing Child and Adolescent Health and Development Series6 related to school-age child and adolescent health interventions. This Lancet Series is the product of an ongoing academic collaboration involving global child health researchers worldwide, including many who are authors on articles within this supplement. The aim of the specific Lancet Series article citing this supplement is to provide a comprehensive overview of systematic reviews describing the most recent evidence for effective interventions to support maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health and development from preconception through to 20 years of age.Figure 1 provides an overview of the key child health domains, and a breakdown of the intervention review topics addressing key risk factors covered by the articles included in this journal supplement. On the basis of work done in previous comprehensive overviews of interventions for child and adolescent health (eg, Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition7; Lancet Adolescent Health Commission8), we identified a comprehensive set of key child health domains that represented priority areas for interventions to address modifiable risks for the major causes of child mortality and morbidity. The factors that informed which domains were covered in this supplement included: conditions with a high global burden of disease, conditions with disproportionate impacts on vulnerable and marginalized populations, potential to support improved human capital development across the life course, and pragmatic considerations including whether the topic had recently been covered elsewhere. In cases where the child health domain was deemed too broad in scope for a single review (eg, infectious diseases), the subtopics for individual reviews were also chosen on the basis of these factors. The age group of specific interest for these reviews was older school-age children (ages 5–9.9), though the period of early adolescence (ages 10–14.9) was also recognized as an important area of overlap and transition. The general outcomes of interest aligned with those chosen through consensus by the Lancet Series working group. These included, but were not limited to, mortality, severe morbidity, disability, growth and development, knowledge and behavior, and indicators of improved human capital development such as academic achievement.The methodological approaches taken, and child health domains covered in this supplement of reviews, was informed by a broad initial literature-scoping and evidence-mapping process to identify key health interventions and associated evidence for their effectiveness in the form of systematic reviews. This was done across all domains, from preconception and pregnancy to ages 0 to 20 to inform the 2022 Lancet Optimizing Child and Adolescent Health and Development Series.6 This involved leveraging existing large-scale intervention overviews (eg, Disease Control Priorities 3rd edition, Lancet Series) that had already highlighted existing effective interventions and the most recent systematic reviews detailing the evidence for their effectiveness. Additional targeted searches for newer interventions and systematic reviews in each domain were also conducted. Through this evidence-mapping process, we explored coverage and extent of LMIC-specific evidence across all child health domains to identify areas where school-age evidence was lacking and determined that there were significant gaps in existing evidence for intervention effectiveness in school-age children.We funneled the reviews identified during this initial scoping process that contained studies covering school-age children and adolescents into the individual reviews for each domain of child health covered in this supplement. We elected to conduct targeted overviews of systematic reviews if there was deemed to be a large body of existing evidence syntheses. In cases where there was a lack of evidence syntheses of intervention effectiveness for a given domain of school-age child health, conventional systematic reviews of primary literature (ie, experimental studies) were conducted. The general methodology for these 2 approaches are described below. See Table 1 and Fig 1 for a summary of the review methods used for each child health domain, and Fig 2 for a breakdown of the main methodology followed in each type of review.For those child health domains that encompassed a variety of intervention types addressing a wide range of risk factors and health conditions, and for which the initial scoping process identified a variety of existing systematic reviews of intervention effectiveness, an overview of systematic reviews was undertaken. This approach was taken to ensure comprehensiveness, reduce duplication of review efforts, and make the review process feasible.In addition to incorporating those relevant reviews previously identified in the initial literature-scoping and evidence-mapping exercise, tailored searches were executed in several databases (eg, Medline, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Campbell Library) to identify literature published up until the end of 2020. Evidence derived from Cochrane reviews and other high-quality systematic reviews that synthesized evidence from randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies examining the effectiveness of interventions was prioritized for inclusion. A first pass of title and abstract screening for relevance was conducted, followed by a full text screening that was done by at least 2 reviewers against inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently filled a standardized data abstraction form to capture review characteristics, the characteristics of included studies and interventions (eg, age coverage, country representation, delivery platform), and pooled-effect estimates (eg, risk ratios, odds ratios, mean differences, 95% confidence intervals) derived from meta-analyses where they were reported. The main outcomes of interest across the reviews included measures of child morbidity, mortality, development, academic achievement, and mental and physical well-being. The extracted data were then matched among reviewers to check for errors and ensure consistency, and then consolidated into a single table for inclusion in the article. The AMSTAR 2 tool12 was used for review quality assessment, and was also conducted in duplicate, with any disagreements in ratings resolved by consensus or the involvement of a third reviewer.If for a given domain the initial evidence-mapping exercise revealed that the existing evidence-synthesis literature was lacking for the school-age group, we proceeded with a conventional systematic review of primary literature. All systematic reviews were reported in accordance with the reporting guidance provided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria.13Search strategies were developed using the population, intervention, control, and outcomes methodology, relevant medical subject headings terms, and keywords derived from the scoping search. The search terms were adapted for use in other bibliographic databases in combination with database-specific filters for controlled trials, where these were available. Searches for the individual, domain-specific reviews were conducted in a variety of databases, including but not limited to: PubMed, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Ovid SP, The Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Methodology Register, and the World Health Organization regional databases. Evidence derived from LMIC was prioritized for synthesis, though evidence from high-income countries (HIC) settings was leveraged to highlight whether effective interventions exist in cases where LMIC evidence was sparse. Gray literature searches and additional hand searching were conducted in Google Scholar and reference lists of relevant articles, book chapters, and reviews.After removal of duplicate studies, a multistage screening process was performed to select studies that met the eligibility criteria. Each title and abstract was assessed by at least 1 reviewer, who excluded those that were deemed irrelevant. At the full-text review stage, at least 2 reviewers assessed all full texts. Any disagreements in inclusion decisions were resolved by discussion and, where necessary, by consulting a third reviewer. At this stage, reasons for exclusion were documented. The methods section of each individual review in this supplement describes their selection and eligibility criteria, which differed depending on the child health domain being assessed. Data from included studies were independently extracted and coded by 2 review authors using standardized, previously piloted data extraction forms, which sought general study characteristics, details of the population, intervention, comparison groups, and quantitative outcome data. Data extraction forms were matched and checked, and if necessary, a third review author was consulted in the event of any disagreements to establish consensus.Assessment of risk of bias for included studies was conducted according to criteria and tools outlined in the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care guidelines14 for randomized trials, nonrandomized trials, controlled before–after, interrupted time series, and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.15 Assessments were conducted independently by 2 review authors; scores were compared, and a final risk of bias judgement was reported for the included studies of each systematic review. Randomized trials were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool15 across the following domains: randomization process, deviations from the intended interventions (blinding of personnel, participants, and outcome assessment), missing outcome data, outcome measurement, the selection of the reported result, disclosure of funding, and conflicts of interest. Studies were assigned an overall risk of bias judgement accordingly (low risk, high risk, or some concerns/medium risk). Quasi-experimental study designs were assessed using the Risk of Bias Tool for Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool.15,16 Studies were assessed according to the following domains: bias because of confounding, bias in selection of study participants, bias in classification of interventions, bias because of deviations from intended interventions, bias because of missing data, bias in measurement of outcomes, and bias in selection of the reported result. Each study was assigned an overall risk of bias judgement (low, moderate, serious, and critical risk).Meta-analyses were conducted where possible using Review Manager 5.4 software.17 Randomized controlled trials and cluster-randomized controlled trials were analyzed separately from quasi-experimental study designs. To mitigate heterogeneity within included studies, a random-effects meta-analysis was used for pooled outcomes. For those situations where meta-analysis was not possible, data on the effect of interventions from individual studies was tabulated and reported, and a narrative synthesis was conducted for each key intervention domain.Where there were a sufficient quantity of comparable studies (in both interventions and outcome), a summary of the intervention effect and a measure of quality for key outcomes were produced using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.18 The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach considers 5 domains (study limitations, consistency of effect, imprecision, indirectness, and publication bias) to assess the quality of the body of evidence for each outcome. The evidence was downgraded from “high quality” by 1 level for serious (or by 2 levels for very serious) limitations, depending on assessments for risk of bias, indirectness of evidence, serious inconsistency, imprecision of effect estimates, or potential publication bias.The aim of the authors of this supplement of reviews is to comprehensively assess the available evidence for the effectiveness of interventions to improve health and well-being in school-age children and adolescents. The initial literature-scoping and evidence-mapping process, followed by the different review approaches taken, has helped to maximize the scope covered across this set of reviews, and has allowed us to provide the most comprehensive assessment of the state of the published literature covering interventions for school-age children and adolescents. The individual reviews in this supplement have also highlighted child health domain-specific gaps in the evidence for both primary literature in the school-age group, and gaps in existing evidence syntheses.It is important to note that, for the reviews within this supplement, the descriptions of intervention effects are meant to provide an overview of what is currently known in terms of evidence for effectiveness, and do not imply that other interventions were ineffective simply because there was an evidence gap. Given the limited space and large scope, it was only possible to provide the highlights of specific comparisons and outcomes in each of the results sections. Comprehensive tables of study characteristics, outcomes, and effect estimates are provided in both the main articles and appendices.Although we were specifically interested in focusing on LMIC research, this was only feasible for a few review topics (eg, sexual and reproductive health and rights, neglected tropical diseases) because of a dearth of literature. Instead of being used to attempt to generalize their effectiveness to LMIC settings, evidence from intervention effectiveness in HIC settings are included and described to establish that effective interventions do indeed exist and may differ in their impact between settings. This approach has previously been used in the context of adolescent health interventions.19 This evidence from HIC could act as a starting point for future research and implementation in various LMIC settings, with program components tailored to local contexts.In the case of those reviews taking the overview of systematic reviews approach, we were limited to including only those primary studies already included in systematic reviews and could not cover each subdomain in depth. Thus, we were unable to identify and include those primary studies that may not have been included in systematic reviews because of studies not being identified in review authors’ database searches, not meeting their inclusion criteria, or falling out of the time frame of the review. Furthermore, some systematic reviews of primary literature were unable to perform meta-analyses because of high heterogeneity or a lack of high-quality evidence from randomized trials, which makes synthesizing the existing evidence more difficult.

The Coronavirus Response in India – World's Largest Lockdown

The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of migrant workers from developing countries when working in a more developed host country. Construction workers from developing countries that migrate to developed countries should benefit from remittances, savings, new skills and international contacts. In terms of their health and safety (HaS), they should also benefit from more advanced HaS regulations and ways of working. Arguably, such migrant workers (from developing countries in developed countries) should receive even more health and safety support than local workers, as they have to quickly adapt to new ways of working, systems, rules, regulations and policies. This chapter draws upon ethnographic research undertaken within the United Kingdom (UK) with migrant workers from lower-income countries in Eastern Europe that included Romania, Bulgaria and Croatia. The findings suggest that while migrant workers from lower-income countries received certain HaS benefits, they were also at risk of exploitation risks in terms of being paid less than the local workers; accidents due to arriving without adequate training or competency checks; precarious employment arrangements; extra demands and restrictions on travel home if they were bilingual; and gaining acceptance within the workforce due to inadequate communication strategies. Most construction migrant worker HaS research has focused on the physical accident risks, but this chapter also draws attention to the mental health risks that can be associated with these exploitations.

In low-income and middle-income countries, such as those in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, the COVID-19 pandemic has had substantial implications for women's wellbeing. Policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have highlighted the gendered aspect of pandemics; however, addressing the gendered implications of the COVID-19 pandemic comprehensively and effectively requires a planetary health perspective that embraces systems thinking to inequalities. This Viewpoint is based on collective reflections from research done by the authors on COVID-19 responses by international and regional organisations, and national governments, in Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa between June, 2020, and June, 2021. A range of international and regional actors have made important policy recommendations to address the gendered implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on women's health and wellbeing since the start of the pandemic. However, national-level policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have been partial and inconsistent with regards to gender in both sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, largely failing to recognise the multiple drivers of gendered health inequalities. This Viewpoint proposes that addressing the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on women in low-income and middle-income countries should adopt a systems thinking approach and be informed by the question of who is affected as opposed to who is infected. In adopting the systems thinking approach, responses will be more able to recognise and address the direct gendered effects of the pandemic and those that emerge indirectly through a combination of long-standing structural inequalities and gendered responses to the pandemic.

Much of our food and services rely on the work of migrants, which is often carried out under exploitative terms. Exploitative work results in work-related injuries and illnesses and mental ill-health. Yet, the global health community has been negligent in detecting migrant workers in the general population, and in measuring the effects of their work terms on their health. For instance, the International Labour Organization’s global labour force and forced labour surveys capture few health data. Conversely, health surveys, such as the Demographics and Health Survey (DHS), include few questions on exploitative and hazardous work conditions or aspects of migration status. Studies are even more remiss when it comes to developing evidence for work-related health interventions. This presentation will draw on two recent mixed-methods studies - on cattle ranching in the Amazon region of Brazil (Pará State) (n = 1,241), and on child domestic work in Liberia (n = 1,088) and Nigeria (n = 1,088). Findings suggest some necessary improvements to the measurement of migrant labour exploitation and its health effects, and approaches to gathering intervention-focused evidence. Each study highlights the value of re-thinking data collection beyond disciplinary silos and narrow dichotomous measures (e.g., forced/unforced labour), towards generating a more specific understanding of the different dimensions of labour exploitation (e.g., pay conditions, hours, occupational health and safety training and PPE), various types of associated harm, and how they compare across sectors and contexts. Further, each study demonstrates the benefits of intervention-focused research methods that are designed to feed directly into participatory intervention development processes. On this basis, we will suggest shifts in measurement and research designs to foster operationalizable evidence on migrant workers’ working conditions, health, and worker-informed interventions.

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Migrant workers are exposed to dangerous and unhygienic work environments, which puts them at risk of developing skin diseases. This study aims to assess the prevalence of skin diseases and provide epidemiological data regarding various dermatoses among migrant workers in Puducherry.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This is a hospital-based, cross-sectional study conducted in Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital from August 2019 to February 2021. 350 migrant workers were randomly selected and examined for the prevalence of infective and non-infective dermatoses. The observations were documented and data were analyzed using statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 22.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 350 migrant workers were included in the study. Of most migrants, 90.9% (n=318) were males, while the remaining 9.1% (n=32) were females. The prevalence of infective dermatoses was found to be 76% (n=266) and the prevalence of non-infective dermatoses was 43.10% (n=151) in this study. Fungal infections are the most common infective dermatoses affecting 51.5% of the workers, followed by bacterial skin lesions in 27.4%.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> This study reveals a high prevalence of infective and non-infective dermatoses among migrant workers, with fungal infections being the most commonly occurring infective skin disease. Eczema was the commonly occurring non-infective dermatoses, according to this study.</p>

Séroprévalence des virus des hépatites B et C, du VIH-1/2 et de la syphilis chez les donneurs de sang de l’hôpital central de Yaoundé, région du centre, Cameroun