• Home
  • Search
  • Signal‐to‐interference‐plus‐noise ratio estimation for wireless communication systems: Methods and analysis
  • Cite Icon20
  • https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20022Copy DOI Icon

Signal‐to‐interference‐plus‐noise ratio estimation for wireless communication systems: Methods and analysis

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract The Signal‐to‐Interference‐plus‐Noise Ratio (SINR) is an important metric of wireless communication link quality. SINR estimates have several important applications. These include optimizing the transmit power level for a target quality of service, assisting with handoff decisions and dynamically adapting the data rate for wireless Internet applications. Accurate SINR estimation provides for both a more efficient system and a higher user‐perceived quality of service. In this paper, we develop new SINR estimators and compare their mean squared error (MSE) performance. We show that our new estimators dominate estimators that have previously appeared in the literature with respect to MSE. The sequence of transmitted bits in wireless communication systems consists of both pilot bits (which are known both to the transmitter and receiver) and user bits (which are known only by the transmitter). The SINR estimators we consider alternatively depend exclusively on pilot bits, exclusively on user bits, or simultaneously use both pilot and user bits. In addition, we consider estimators that utilize smoothing and feedback mechanisms. Smoothed estimators are motivated by the fact that the interference component of the SINR changes relatively slowly with time, typically with the addition or departure of a user to the system. Feedback estimators are motivated by the fact that receivers typically decode bits correctly with a very high probability, and therefore user bits can be thought of as quasipilot bits. For each estimator discussed, we derive an exact or approximate formula for its MSE. Satterthwaite approximations, noncentral F distributions (singly and doubly) and distribution theory of quadratic forms are the key statistical tools used in developing the MSE formulas. In the case of approximate MSE formulas, we validate their accuracy using simulation techniques. The approximate MSE formulas, of interest in their own right for comparing the quality of the estimators, are also used for optimally combining estimators. In particular, we derive optimal weights for linearly combining an estimator based on pilot bits with an estimator based on user bits. The optimal weights depend on the MSE of the two estimators being combined, and thus the accurate approximate MSE formulas can conveniently be used. The optimal weights also depend on the unknown SINR, and therefore need to be estimated in order to construct a useable combined estimator. The impact on the MSE of the combined estimator due to estimating the weights is examined. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2004

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Modelling and forecasting of signal‐to‐interference plus noise ratio in femtocellular networks using logistic smooth threshold autoregressive model

  • Feb 01, 2015
  • IET Signal Processing
  • Sepideh Kabiri +3
  • Research Article

Analysis and Elimination of Self‐Induced Effect in SINR Estimation

  • Jan 01, 2025
  • Electronics Letters
  • Hao Wu +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

ICDM: Interference Cancellation Diffusion Models for Wireless Semantic Communications

  • Jan 01, 2026
  • IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
  • Tong Wu +7
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations1

FebICA: Feedback Independent Component Analysis for Complex Domain Source Separation of Communication Signals

  • Jan 01, 2014
  • A K Kattepur +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

An evaluation of frequency domain PLC interference cancellation for DSL systems

  • Jun 01, 2013
  • Khaled M Ali +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations7

Theoretical analysis of subband adaptive array combining cyclic prefix data transmission scheme

  • Nov 25, 2002
  • X.N Tran +2
  • Conference Article

MSE-Optimaized Linear Transform for Noisy Fronthaul Channels in Distributed MIMO C-RAN

  • Dec 01, 2021
  • Tadashi Wadayama +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Distributed Power Control in Cellular Communication Systems Concerning Inaccurate SINR Reports

  • Oct 01, 2011
  • IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
  • Mehrzad Biguesh +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Joint adaptive beamforming and perfect power control in wireless networks over power control error

  • Oct 20, 2012
  • Indian Journal of Science and Technology
  • Mohamad Dosaranian-Moghadam
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations27

Worst-Case Cooperative Jamming for Secure Communications in CIoT Networks

  • Mar 07, 2016
  • Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
  • Zhen Li +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Two novel iterative algorithms for interference alignment with symbol extensions in the MIMO interference channel

  • Jan 03, 2014
  • Science China Information Sciences
  • Chao Wang +1
  • Research Article

Coverage and capacity of next generation cellular radio systems: bandwidth sharing and massive mimo

  • Jan 01, 2013
  • Roy D Yates +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations4

Distributed beamforming for SINR balancing approach in cognitive two-way relay networks with imperfect channel state information

  • May 01, 2012
  • Seyed Hamid Safavi +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Design and analysis of supervised and decision-directed estimators of the MMSE/LCMV filter in data-limited environments

  • Jul 25, 2003
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE
  • Jeffrey M Farrell +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Robust and secure beamformer design for MIMO relaying with imperfect eavesdropper CSI

  • Oct 01, 2016
  • Nadim Badra +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.