Simulation-based training for breastfeeding competency development in midwifery practice: a concept analysis

Maternal health literacy is a social skill that is relevant to successful postnatal newborn adaptation, neonatal feeding, and neonatal health outcomes, given the importance of maternal health literacy in newborn healthcare. The study aims to identify and assess the associations between maternal health literacy, neonatal health, and breastfeeding outcomes during the early postpartum period. Five hundred women who gave birth to full-term newborns at Vilnius University Hospital were invited to the study from 1 May to 30 September 2022. The 47 questions of the European Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47) were used to assess maternal health literacy on days 2 and 3 after birth. Each subject's health literacy indices were divided into four categories: inadequate, problematic, sufficient, and excellent. The neonatal health indicators were birth weight and height, along with the APGAR score and the outcomes of feeding either exclusively with breast milk or with adapted formula in addition to breastfeeding. Most women who participated in the survey had insufficient or problematic health literacy (69%). The study showed that women's higher health literacy is associated with a lower risk of obesity, a healthier diet, regular physical activity, and a higher birth weight and height of their newborns (p<0.05). Mothers with inadequate/problematic health literacy were more likely to feed their newborns with adapted formula in addition to breastfeeding. Women's health literacy is a factor that affects women's healthy lifestyle choices before and during pregnancy and is significant for newborns' health indicators.

Although the safety of water immersion during labor is largely supported by evidence from research, the risks to women and neonates during waterbirth are not well established. The purpose of this study was to generate evidence regarding maternal and neonatal outcomes related to water immersion in labor and during birth. A retrospective cohort study included a convenience sample of women receiving prenatal care at a nurse-midwifery practice. Participants were categorized into 3 groups: 1) waterbirth, 2) water labor, or 3) neither. Participant characteristics, maternal outcomes, and newborn outcomes were collected at time of birth and health record abstraction. At the 6-week postpartum visit, another maternal outcome, satisfaction with birth, was measured using the Care in Obstetrics: Measure for Testing Satisfaction (COMFORTS) scale. Analysis included effect size, descriptive statistics (sample characteristics), and maternal and neonatal group differences (analysis of variance and chi-square) with a significance level of P < .05. Women in the waterbirth (n = 58), water labor (n = 61), and neither (n = 111) groups were primarily white, married, and college educated and did not differ by age or education. Women in the waterbirth group were more likely to be multiparous. Nulliparous women who had a waterbirth had a significantly shorter second stage of labor than nulliparous women who did not have a waterbirth (P = .03). The most commonly cited reasons for discontinuation of hydrotherapy were maternal choice (42.6%) and need for pain medication (29.5%). Significantly more women in the waterbirth group experienced a postpartum hemorrhage, compared with water labor or neither (n = 5, n = 3, n = 1, respectively; P = .045); there was no difference in related clinical measures. Neonatal outcomes were not significantly different. Maternal satisfaction was high across all groups. The results of this study suggest that waterbirth, attended by qualified intrapartum care providers in hospital settings in the United States, is a reasonable option for low-risk women and their neonates.

Background Rising global temperatures have resulted in an increase in the frequency and severity of heatwaves. Pregnancy is a time of substantial physiological change and thus maternal and neonatal health outcomes are susceptible to adverse effects of heat. There is a lack of knowledge about thermoregulation in pregnancy, including how effectively pregnant people adapt in different climate contexts and what specific environmental conditions present the largest thermoregulatory challenges. The primary aim of this study is to examine the associations between exposure to heatwaves during pregnancy and maternal, neonatal, and child health outcomes in Western Australia (WA) climatic regions. Methods All neonates born in WA between 1991 and 2023 will be identified from perinatal records (~960,000 neonates). Perinatal records will be linked to weather data from the ERA5 database using Statistical Area 2 geocoding to identify heatwave exposed pregnancies. Commonly used definitions of heatwave exposure will be tested against three neonatal outcomes (pre-term birth, low birth weight, and congenital anomalies). From this, a single definition will be selected to examine maternal, neonatal, and child health outcomes using linked hospital, emergency department, and education assessment data, as well as data from the WA congenital anomalies and death register. The association between heatwaves during pregnancy and health outcomes will be performed using generalised estimating equations, adjusting for covariates including cigarette smoking, parity, maternal age, and Aboriginality where appropriate. Stratification by socio-economic status and geographic region will also be carried out. Discussion Examining the association between exposure to heatwaves in pregnancy and maternal, neonatal and child outcomes is important given the increasing frequency of heatwaves. The study will highlight which heat definitions confers the highest vulnerability as well as demographic and geographic subgroups who are particularly vulnerable to the effects of heatwaves. It will provide valuable information for future planning, including targets for intervention.

Proactive behavior in midwifery: A qualitative overview from midwifery student's perspective.

Financial barriers can affect timely access to maternal health services. Health insurance can influence the use and quality of these services and potentially improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of the evidence on health insurance and its effects on the use and provision of maternal health services and on maternal and neonatal health outcomes in middle- and low-income countries. Studies were identified through a literature search in key databases and consultation with experts in healthcare financing and maternal health. Twenty-nine articles met the review criteria of focusing on health insurance and its effect on the use or quality of maternal health services, or maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Sixteen studies assessed demand-side effects of insurance, eight focused on supply-side effects, and the remainder addressed both. Geographically, the studies provided evidence from sub-Saharan Africa (n = 11), Asia (n = 9), Latin America (n = 8), and Turkey. The studies included examples from national or social insurance schemes (n = 7), government-run public health insurance schemes (n = 4), community-based health insurance schemes (n = 11), and private insurance (n = 3). Half of the studies used econometric analyses while the remaining provided descriptive statistics or qualitative results. There is relatively consistent evidence that health insurance is positively correlated with the use of maternal health services. Only four studies used methods that can establish this causal relationship. Six studies presented suggestive evidence of over-provision of caesarean sections in response to providers' payment incentives through health insurance. Few studies focused on the relationship between health insurance and the quality of maternal health services or maternal and neonatal health outcomes. The available evidence on the quality and health outcomes is inconclusive, given the differences in measurement, contradictory findings, and statistical limitations. Consistent with economic theories, the studies identified a positive relationship between health insurance and the use of maternal health services. However, more rigorous causal methods are needed to identify the extent to which the use of these services increases among the insured. Better measurement of quality and the use of cross-country analyses would solidify the evidence on the impact of insurance on the quality of maternal health services and maternal and neonatal health outcomes.

Balancing it out: the process by which midwifery students provide care to women following stillbirth in Papua New Guinea

In Brief OBJECTIVE To systematically review the evidence for screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). DATA SOURCES We established eligibility criteria for relevant studies. We systematically searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration Library for studies meeting eligibility criteria. We supplemented this search with further studies identified from reference lists of reviews. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION Two reviewers examined each article for eligibility. A single reviewer abstracted relevant data from the included articles; a second reviewer checked the abstractions. We graded the quality of the articles according to criteria developed by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS No well-conducted, randomized, controlled trial provides direct evidence for the health benefits of screening for GDM. The evidence is unclear regarding the optimal screening and reference diagnostic test for GDM. The impact of hyperglycemia on adverse maternal and neonatal health outcomes is probably continuous. Although insulin therapy decreases the incidence of fetal macrosomia for those women with more severe degrees of hyperglycemia, the magnitude of any effect on maternal and neonatal health outcomes is not clear. The evidence is insufficient to determine the magnitude of health benefit for any treatment among the large number of women with GDM at milder degrees of hyperglycemia. We found limited evidence regarding the potential adverse effects of screening for GDM. CONCLUSION Because of the lack of high-quality evidence concerning critical issues, we are unable to determine the extent to which screening has an important impact on maternal and neonatal health outcomes. A randomized, controlled trial of screening is necessary to answer the many remaining questions. Current evidence is insufficient to establish whether screening for gestational diabetes mellitus significantly improves maternal or neonatal health outcomes.

Objective: The use of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications, dexamphetamine (DEX) and methylphenidate (MPH), during pregnancy is increasing. While previous studies have investigated ADHD medication usage compared to no use, it remains unclear if the risks differ between these medications, as no studies have compared their safety in pregnancy. This study examined maternal and neonatal outcomes (health risk to pregnant person and infant) associated with DEX and MPH use during pregnancy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used whole-population dispensing and perinatal records to identify mother-infant dyads exposed to DEX ( n = 852) or MPH ( n = 65) in Western Australia between 2003 and 2018. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups using generalised linear models. Results: Maternal outcomes, including preeclampsia, c-sections, and post-partum haemorrhage, were not different between people dispensed MPH or DEX during pregnancy. Neonates prenatally exposed to DEX compared to MPH had a higher length-for-gestational-age (coeff:1.59, 95% CI: 0.35, 2.84). However, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of other neonatal outcomes, including gestational age, birth weights and rates of pre-term births. Conclusion: Maternal and neonatal health outcomes were comparable between people treated with DEX or MPH during pregnancy. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm findings.

Pregnancy is a critical period characterized by significant physiological, psychological, and lifestyle changes that influence both maternal and fetal health. Adequate nutrition, healthy lifestyle behaviors, and appropriate maternal care during pregnancy are essential for optimal fetal development and for the prevention of pregnancy-related complications. The aim of this study is to highlight the importance of healthy dietary and lifestyle practices during pregnancy and to examine the role of breastfeeding as a key determinant of neonatal health. Additionally, the study proposes a structured nutritional intervention framework that can be implemented within maternity care services to support women during pregnancy and the postpartum period. The analysis emphasizes the importance of balanced nutrition, adequate intake of essential macro- and micronutrients, appropriate physical activity, and the avoidance of harmful behaviors such as smoking and alcohol consumption. The benefits of breastfeeding for both infants and mothers are also highlighted, including enhanced neonatal immune protection, reduced risk of chronic diseases, and improved maternal recovery after childbirth. The proposed intervention framework includes educational sessions, peer-support groups, interdisciplinary collaboration among healthcare professionals, and continuous monitoring of maternal lifestyle behaviors and pregnancy outcomes. These strategies may contribute to improved maternal and neonatal health outcomes by promoting healthier behaviors, reducing pregnancy-related complications, and supporting successful breastfeeding practices. Promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors during pregnancy represents an important public health strategy with long-term benefits for mothers, infants, and population health.

Midwifery students’ satisfaction with perinatal simulation-based training

Midwife-led continuity of care improved maternal and neonatal health outcomes in north Shoa zone, Amhara regional state, Ethiopia: A quasi-experimental study

BackgroundVaginal birth management is vital to midwifery education and practice in which midwives are most likely to be directly involved. This situation requires strong cognitive, technical, communicational, and teamwork skills. Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of normal vaginal birth simulation training before formal clinical education on the clinical skills of midwifery students compared with routine clinical education.MethodsThis quasi-experimental study was conducted at the Shoushtar Faculty of Medical Sciences from September 2018 to August 2021. Sixty-one midwifery students participated in the intervention group (n = 31) and in the control group (n = 30). The intervention group participated in the simulation-based training before entering the formal clinical education courses. The control group received no simulation-based training before their formal clinical education. The clinical skills of these students for performing normal vaginal birth in the real field were evaluated by observational examination in the three years (fourth, fifth, and sixth semesters). Data were analyzed by descriptive (mean, SD, and percentage) and inferential statistics (independent t-test and chi-square). A P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsThe mean score of midwives’ skills in the control group was (28.10 ± 3.42) and in the intervention group, it was (31.15 ± 4.30). The difference in the skill score between the groups was statistically significant (3.40 ± 0.68). The results showed that in the intervention group, 29 students (93.93%) were evaluated from a good to an excellent level, while only ten students (32.71%) in the control group achieved a good level, and others (n = 30) were evaluated at a low level (p < .001).ConclusionThe results of the present study indicated that the simulation situation for critical skills, such as vaginal birth skills, was significantly more effective than workplace-based learning situations.

Maternal, fetal, and neonatal health outcomes are interdependent. Designing public health strategies that link fetal and neonatal outcomes with maternal outcomes is necessary in order to successfully reduce perinatal and neonatal mortality, particularly in low- and middle- income countries. However, to date, there has been no standardized method for documenting, reporting, and reviewing facility-based stillbirths and neonatal deaths that links to maternal health outcomes would enable a more comprehensive understanding of the burden and determinants of poor fetal and neonatal outcomes. We developed and pilot-tested an adapted RAPID tool, Perinatal-Neonatal Rapid Ascertainment Process for Institutional Deaths (PN RAPID), to systematically identify and quantify facility-based stillbirths and neonatal deaths and link them to maternal health factors in two countries: Liberia and Nepal. This study found an absence of stillbirth timing documented in records, a high proportion of neonatal deaths occurring within the first 24 hours, and an absence of documentation of pregnancy-related and maternal factors that might be associated with fetal and neonatal outcomes. The use of an adapted RAPID methodology and tools was limited by these data gaps, highlighting the need for concurrent strengthening of death documentation through training and standardized record templates.

Universal access to maternal, newborn, and child healthcare is essential for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3, but the effectiveness of various incentive-based programs for pregnant mothers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains uncertain. Objective of this systematic review was to determine if incentive-based interventions influenced maternal and neonatal health outcomes. We conducted a search in various databases from inception. All incentive-based interventional studies conducted on pregnant women in LMICs were included. Evidence from the included trials was synthesized using risk ratios (RRs) to compare the outcomes between groups receiving incentives and not receiving incentives. The meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects model. We assessed the quality of the included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool and reviewed the collected data to determine its suitability for meta-analysis. This study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021247681). Of the 3,897 records that were identified, 11 met eligibility criteria, all of which exhibited varying degrees of risk of bias, ranging from high to some concerns. Analysis of maternal outcomes across studies revealed no significant differences in the likelihood of delivering at a healthcare facility (RR 1.13, 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.47) and in frequency of prenatal care (RR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.12) between intervention and control groups. However, high levels of statistical heterogeneity were observed for both outcomes indicating variability among study results. Similarly, analysis of tetanus vaccine coverage showed no significant difference between groups (RR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.08), with moderate statistical heterogeneity observed. The maternal and neonatal outcomes examined in this review did not have any significant differences in intervention group when compared to the control group. The interventions to address maternal health concerns need to follow a multifactorial approach. There is a need for extensive primary research studies in the future.

The midwifery-led care model improves maternal and neonatal health outcomes. For midwives to autonomously utlise a midwifery-led care model, they must know what it entails within available practice guidelines. Little is known about practitioners’ knowledge and practice of this model in Embu County. The study found that there are gaps in knowledge and implementation of midwifery-led care in Embu. We recommend educating midwives about midwifery-led care, and the introduction of this model into the region as a means of strengthening midwifery practice to improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes.