SO-22 Clinical classification-based evaluation of adjuvant therapy with oxaliplatin in stage II colon cancer

Oxaliplatin combined with fluoropyrimidine improves survival in patients with stage III colon cancer. However, adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin is controversial in stage II and elderly patients. We performed subgroup analyses of stage II and elderly patients randomly assigned fluorouracil with leucovorin (FL) ± oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) in the Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer study. Comorbidities, severe adverse events, second cancers, management of relapse and death as a result of causes than other colon cancer were studied. Two thousand two hundred forty-six patients were enrolled. Overall, 899 patients had stage II disease, including 330 low-risk and 569 high-risk patients. A total of 315 patients were ages 70 to 75 years. For stage II patients, the hazard ratio (HR) for comparing FOLFOX4 with FL was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.62 to 01.14) for disease-free survival (DFS), 0.70 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.99) for time to recurrence (TTR), and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.41) for overall survival (OS). There was no interaction between treatment and stage or age. Low-risk stage II patients did not benefit from oxaliplatin. In high-risk stage II patients, the HR comparing FOLFOX4 with FL was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.51 to 1.01) for DFS, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.92) for TTR, and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.36) for OS. In elderly patients, the HR comparing FOLFOX4 with FL was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.35) for DFS, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.47 to 1.11) for TTR, and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.65) for OS. The results of these subset analyses show no statistically significant benefit (OS and DFS) for the addition of oxaliplatin to FL as adjuvant treatment for either stage II and elderly patients.

Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Oxaliplatin (OX) has been widely used in adjuvant and palliative treatments of advanced colon cancer; however, cancer cells ultimately become resistant in the majority of cases. Therefore, the development of a novel strategy to overcome this resistance is important for the effective treatment of colon cancer. Cell autophagy reduces the sensitivity of cancer cells to therapeutic reagents in various types of human cancer; therefore, the present study used murine CT26 colon carcinoma cells to explore whether inhibition of autophagy by 3-methyladenine (3-MA) is able to enhance OX-induced apoptosis in vitro and OX-suppressed tumor growth in vivo. CT26 cells were treated with 3-MA, OX, or 3-MA plus OX, and the autophagy, apoptosis and proliferation of the CT26 cells was investigated. Additionally, the therapeutic efficiency of the combination of 3-MA and OX treatment was evaluated in vivo by determining the survival time of the tumor-bearing mice and, thus, tumor growth rate. The treatment of CT26 cells in vitro with OX alone increased autophagy as well as apoptosis, whereas treatment with 3-MA plus OX markedly inhibited OX-induced autophagy, but increased OX-induced cell apoptosis. Furthermore, the combination of OX and 3-MA treatment significantly suppressed tumor growth in vivo and prolonged mouse survival time when compared with OX treatment alone. Similarly, 3-MA increased OX-induced cell apoptosis and decreased autophagy in xenograft tumor tissues. Thus, the administration of 3-MA may increase tumor cell sensitivity to OX by reducing its autophagic effects and enhancing its apoptotic effects. Data obtained in the present study indicates that the clinical combination of an autophagy inhibitor with OX may increase the therapeutic effect of OX and improve the clinical outcome of patients with colon cancer.

Objective: Here, we aimed to explore the effect of LBP in combination with Oxaliplatin (OXA) on reversing drug resistance in colon cancer cells through in vitro and in vivo experiments. We also aimed to explore the possible mechanism underlying this effect. Finally, we aimed to determine potential targets of Lycium barbarum polysaccharide (LBP) in colon cancer (CC) through network pharmacology and molecular docking.Methods: The invasion ability of colon cancer cells was assessed using the invasion assay. The migration ability of these cells was assessed using the migration assay and wound healing assay. Cell cycle analysis was carried out using flow cytometry. The expression levels of phosphomannose isomerase (PMI) and ATP-binding cassette transport protein of G2 (ABCG2) proteins were determined using immunofluorescence and western blotting. The expression levels of phosphatidylinositol3-kinase (PI3K), protein kinase B (AKT), B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), and BCL2-Associated X (Bax) were determined using western blotting. Forty BALB/c nude mice purchased from Weitong Lihua, Beijing, for the in vivo analyses. The mice were randomly divided into eight groups. They were administered HCT116 and HCT116-OXR cells to prepare colon cancer xenograft models and then treated with PBS, LBP (50 mg/kg), OXA (10 mg/kg), or LBP + OXA (50 mg/kg + 10 mg/kg). The tumor weight and volume of treated model mice were measured, and organ toxicity was evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin staining. The expression levels of PMI, ABCG2, PI3K, and AKT proteins were then assessed using immunohistochemistry. Moreover, PMI and ABCG2 expression levels were analyzed using immunofluorescence and western blotting. The active components and possible targets of LBP in colon cancer were explored using in silico analysis. GeneCards was used to identify CC targets, and an online Venn analysis tool was used to determine intersection targets between these and LBP active components. The PPI network for intersection target protein interactions and the PPI network for interactions between the intersection target proteins and PMI was built using STRING and Cytoscape. To obtain putative targets of LBP in CC, we performed GO function enrichment and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses.Results: Compared with the HCT116-OXR blank treatment group, both invasion and migration abilities of HCT116-OXR cells were inhibited in the LBP + OXA (2.5 mg/mL LBP, 10 μΜ OXA) group (p < 0.05). Cells in the LBP + OXA (2.5 mg/mL LBP, 10 μΜ OXA) group were found to arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Knockdown of PMI was found to downregulate PI3K, AKT, and Bcl-2 (p < 0.05), while it was found to upregulate Bax (p < 0.05). After treatment with L. barbarum polysaccharide, 40 colon cancer subcutaneous tumor models showed a decrease in tumor size. There was no difference in the liver index after LBP treatment (p > 0.05). However, the spleen index decreased in the OXA and LBP + OXA groups (p < 0.05), possibly as a side effect of oxaliplatin. Immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and western blotting showed that LBP + OXA treatment decreased PMI and ABCG2 expression levels (p < 0.05). Moreover, immunohistochemistry showed that LBP + OXA treatment decreased the expression levels of PI3K and AKT (p < 0.05). Network pharmacology analysis revealed 45 active LBP components, including carotenoids, phenylpropanoids, quercetin, xanthophylls, and other polyphenols. It also revealed 146 therapeutic targets of LBP, including AKT, SRC, EGFR, HRAS, STAT3, and MAPK3. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showed that the LBP target proteins were enriched in pathways, including cancer-related signaling pathways, PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, and IL-17 signaling pathways. Finally, molecular docking experiments revealed that the active LBP components bind well with ABCG2 and PMI.conclusion: Our in vitro experiments showed that PMI knockdown downregulated PI3K, AKT, and Bcl-2 and upregulated Bax. This finding confirms that PMI plays a role in drug resistance by regulating the PI3K/AKT pathway and lays a foundation to study the mechanism underlying the reversal of colon cancer cell drug resistance by the combination of LBP and OXA. Our in vivo experiments showed that LBP combined with oxaliplatin could inhibit tumor growth. LBP showed no hepatic or splenic toxicity. LBP combined with oxaliplatin could downregulate the expression levels of PMI, ABCG2, PI3K, and AKT; it may thus have positive significance for the treatment of advanced metastatic colon cancer. Our network pharmacology analysis revealed the core targets of LBP in the treatment of CC as well as the pathways they are enriched in. It further verified the results of our in vitro and in vivo experiments, showing the involvement of multi-component, multi-target, and multi-pathway synergism in the drug-reversing effect of LBP in CC. Overall, the findings of the present study provide new avenues for the future clinical treatment of CC.

North Central Cancer Treatment Group-Mayo Clinic trials in colon cancer

In vitro studies suggest that a deficient mismatch repair (MMR) system reduces 5-Fluorouracil cytotoxicity. Colon cancer (CC) in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is due to a dysfunctioning MMR gene that leads to microsatellite instability (MSI). Clinical studies on the efficacy of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in MSI high tumours are contradictory. In a retrospective study, we compared the survival of subjects with stage III CC from HNPCC families that were treated with and without adjuvant 5-FU. The Dutch HNPCC family registry was used. Information on adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III CC was obtained from subjects of families with a mutation and/or who fulfilled the AMS criteria or who were strongly suspicious for HNPCC. CC specific survival was calculated. Observation time was measured either until the date of death, date of a second primary CC or until the closing date of the study, i.e., June 1, 2001. Statistical analysis was done by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. A total of 92 subjects with stage III CC were included. Twenty-eight of them (17 males) had adjuvant treatment with 5-FU. The median follow-up was 4 (range: 1-17) years; 8 subjects died of CC. The 5-year survival was 70% (95% Cl: 49-90). Sixty-four subjects (36 males) did not have adjuvant therapy. Their median follow-up was 6 (range: 0-23) years. Twenty of them died of CC. The 5-year survival in this group was also 70% (95% Cl: 59-83). To date, the selection of patients with CC for 5-FU treatment is based on the stage rather than the biology of the tumour. In our study, the 5-year survival of subjects treated with and without adjuvant 5-FU did not differ. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the role of MSI in 5-FU treatment of MSI-H tumours in HNPCC.

Patients with stage 2 and stage 3 colon cancer often are treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. However, patients seen in daily practice have more comorbidity than those enrolled in clinical trials. This study aims to evaluate prognostic factors for recurrence and to ascertain the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients in a nonselected population. Furthermore, the impact of relative dose intensity (RDI) of adjuvant therapy on RFS is examined. Chart review was performed for 243 consecutive patients diagnosed and treated at a single center for stage 2 and stage 3 colon cancer from 2002 to 2008. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 66 patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 5.84 years and median RFS was 5.37 years. For stage 2 disease, patients treated with or without adjuvant therapy had a median RFS of 5.49 and 5.73, respectively (p = ns). For stage 3 disease, median RFS rates were 5.08 and 1.19, respectively (p = 0.084). Overall RDI of oxaliplatin based chemotherapy higher than median was associated with increased RFS (p = 0.045). In conclusion, adjuvant therapy did not significantly increase recurrence-free survival. This could be the result of comorbidity in patients. Relative dose intensity of oxaliplatin based therapy is associated with RFS.

Colon cancer is a disease of the elderly, and prior studies have indicated that adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) provides a similar survival benefit in both younger and older patients. Standard therapy for stage III colon cancer now combines treatment with an oral or intravenous (IV) fluorinated pyrimidine and oxaliplatin for 6 months. To evaluate the impact of age on the effectiveness of newer …

Biliary tract cancers are rare, and surgical resection is the standard treatment at early stages. However, reports on the benefits of adjuvant treatment following surgical resection are conflicting. This study aimed to evaluate the factors affecting survival and adjuvant treatments in patients with surgically treated biliary tract cancers. Patient clinical features, adjuvant treatments, and efficacy and prognostic factor data were evaluated. Survival analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0. The median overall survival was 30.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.4-42.9 months). Median survival was 19 months (95% CI, 6-33) for patients treated with fluorouracil based chemotherapy and 53 months (95% CI, 33.2-78.8) with gemcitabine based chemotherapy (p=0.033). On univariate analysis, poor prognostic factors for survival were galbladder localization, perineural invasion, hepatic invasion, a lack of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy treatment, and a lack of lymph node dissection. On multivariate analysis, perineural invasion was a poor prognostic factor (p=0.008). Biliary tract cancers generally have poor prognoses. The main factors affecting survival are tumour localization, perineural invasion, hepatic invasion, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and lymph node dissection. Gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy is more effective than 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

Although several clinical factors which show the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in early-stage colon cancer use for evaluating the risk of relapse, there is no consensus on which risk factors are more reliable. In this study, we evaluated both the utility of MSI and the daily practice of the Turkish oncologists in stage II and III colon cancer. We conducted an online questionnaire which was consisting of twenty questions including the treatment choices and duration about stage II-III colon cancer depending on sidedness and risk factors for relapse. More than 65% of the oncologists declared the use of MSI testing in stage II colon cancer without considering any risk factors. In stage 3 colon cancer oncologists had an equal decision "to do or not to do" in MSI testing. More than 50% of the oncologists had preferred XELOX protocol in high-risk stage II (T4N0) colon cancer, while three out of four preferred observation in low-risk stage II (T3N0) patients without risk factors. Two-thirds of the oncologists had preferred 6 months of treatment in stage II colon cancer with at least one risk factor. Turkish oncologists participating to this trial had declared conflicting results about adjuvant treatment in early-stage colorectal cancer in their daily practice compared with the updated guidelines, especially, MSI evaluation utility in stage III colon cancers, adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) duration, and oxaliplatin adding to AC in elderly and stage II patients.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Administration and Survival Outcomes in Lymphoma Survivors with Common Solid Tumors: A Population-Based Study

3597 Background: Patient prognosis can be predicted based on cancer subtypes classified according to DNA microarray results. The most robust classification system involves the consensus molecular subtypes, which uses over 600 genes for classification. To simplify this classification, we recently constructed a 55-gene classifier (55GC) to classify colon cancer (CC) into three subtypes with different recurrence rates: “microsatellite instability (MSI)-like,” “chromosomal instability (CIN)-like,” and “stromal” colon cancers. The 55GC has been reported to be a useful and reproducible grading system for stage II CC recurrence risk stratification. This study aimed to explore the usefulness of 55GC for classifying stage III CC patients. Methods: We retrospectively identified stage III CC patients aged 20-79 years who underwent curative surgery and received adjuvant chemotherapy with or without oxaliplatin (OX) between 2009 and 2012 from 15 institutions. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for the number of lymph node metastases, tumor location, sex, and age. Results: Among 938 eligible patients, 203 and 201 cases involving adjuvant chemotherapy with and without OX were selected, respectively, using propensity score matching. Ninety-five cases each from groups were analyzed after exclusion of cases involving low-quality specimens and those involving chemotherapy for &lt; 3 months. The 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with and without OX were 77.1% and 73.7%, respectively. Classification of the stage III CC according to 55GC and related 5-year RFS rates were as follows: stromal (N = 60), 66.6%; CIN-like (N = 78), 80.5%; and MSI-like (N = 52), 78.4%. The HRs for 5-year RFS for adjuvant chemotherapy with and without OX in each subtype were as follows: stromal, HR = 0.791 (95% CI = 0.329-1.901); CIN-like, HR = 1.241 (95% CI = 0.465-3.308); and MSI-like, HR = 0.495 (95% CI = 0.145-1.692). Conclusions: The stromal subtype showed poor prognosis in stage III as well as stage II patients. Oxaliplatin had a good additive effect in adjuvant chemotherapy for MSI-like subtype. The 55GC is useful for predicting the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for CC.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is the current standard in the management of patients with localised colon cancer (CC) following curative resection. The use of oxaliplatin plus 5 fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX) or oxaliplatin plus capecitabine-based (XELOX) regimens, both approved in Europe as adjuvant treatment for stage III CC, has improved prognosis in this stage, but questions on their usefulness in high-risk stage II or elderly CC patients and on the role of some prognostic biomarkers are still pending. In April 2010, a consensus meeting on adjuvant CC treatment based on a revision of the most recent literature was held in Spain. The panel considered the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II CC patients to be justified. Additionally, the more convenient administration of oral fluoropyrimidines vs. IV continuous infusion 5-FU would make XELOX a more suitable alternative for the patient. A more cautious decision should be taken when prescribing oxaliplatin treatment in patients aged ≥70.

Despite apparently complete resection of cancers of the rectum or colon, many patients have recurrences in the area from which their primary cancer was excised and in more distant organs. Radiation therapy has been used either alone or in combination with chemotherapy as an adjuvant to surgery to reduce the risk of recurrence. The literature describing the results of adjuvant radiation treatment for colorectal cancer was reviewed. In randomized studies in patients with moderately advanced rectal cancers (T2-4 N0, M0 or N1-3, M0) adjuvant radiation therapy has often reduced the risk of pelvic recurrence, but has had little effect on survival rates or the risk of extrapelvic metastases. Recent reports show that combined radiation and chemotherapy can improve both disease-free survival and survival rates. Such treatment has caused only moderate toxicity in most studies. Nonrandomized studies in patients in whom small superficial rectal cancers are treated by local excision suggest that adjuvant radiation therapy reduces the risk of pelvic recurrence after this limited surgery and allows anorectal function to be preserved. Strategies similar to those developed for the treatment of rectal cancer are being studied in patients with colon cancer. In moderately advanced rectal cancers, the combination of chemotherapy and radiation is more effective than radiation alone in reducing local recurrence and increasing survival rates. Additional trials are needed to improve results and to refine drug and radiation schedules. Radiation alone may be sufficient as an adjuvant treatment when combined with local excision of small rectal cancers. The role of radiation in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer is investigational. There is a need to more accurately delineate the patients with colorectal cancer most likely to benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Standard of care for non-metastatic colon cancer is surgery followed by stage-guided adjuvant therapy and/or structured follow-up. Upfront surgery in resectable colon cancer is irrespective of local T/N stage, whereas adjuvant systemic therapy is recommended according to pathological staging. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. Whereas perioperative systemic therapy in colon cancer seems to be safe and may lead to pathologic downstaging, evidence on improved survival and quality of life remains scarce. The PROTECTOR / FIRE‑10 trial aims to generate evidence that perioperative systemic therapy improves survival without compromising quality of life in locally advanced, mismatch-repair proficient colon cancer patients. Open-label, randomized, controlled, multicenter, phase III study with two parallel arms. Patients with locally advanced colon or upper rectal cancer staged cT3-4 and/or cN+ are randomized in a 2:1 fashion (favoring preoperative therapy) to investigate the efficacy, patient reported quality of life, and safety of preoperative therapy followed by surgery (Arm A) versus direct surgery followed by non-study specific stage-guided adjuvant therapy (Arm B). Stratification during randomization will be performed according to the following parameters: Fit for mFOLFOXIRI vs. mFOLFOX/CAPOX vs. 80%-mFOLFOX/CAPOX, ECOG 0 vs. ECOG 1-2, and left-sided primary vs. right-sided primary tumor. Only patients with confirmed mismatch-repair proficient and/or microsatellite stable tumor can be included. Preoperative treatment in Arm A is performed for a maximum of 6 biweekly cycles of FOLFOX/FOLFOXIRI or for a maximum of 4 triweekly cycles CAPOX (i.e., appr. 12 weeks). Patients in both arms should undergo quality-controlled surgery of the primary tumor, performed as complete mesocolic excision. Patients will be followed up with regard to relapse, survival and if applicable subsequent anti-cancer treatments until death or for at least 5 years after randomization, whichever date is earlier. The PROTECTOR / FIRE‑10 trial compares preoperative systemic therapy to upfront surgery (with stage-guided adjuvant therapy) in patients with locally advanced colon cancer. This study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06899477) and EudraCT (2023-508076-11-00).