Some Results about Abelian Group

This thesis presents some contributions in additive combinatorics and arithmetic Ramsey theory. More specifically, it deals with the interaction between combinatorics, number theory and additive combinatorics. This area saw a great improvement with the Szemerédi Regularity Lemma and some of the results that followed. The Regularity Lemma and its consequences have become a widely used tool in graph theory, combinatorics and number theory. Furthermore, its language and point of view has deeply changed the face of additive number theory, a fact universally acknowledged by the Abel award given to Szemerédi in 2012. One of the main reasons for the prize has been Szemerédi's theorem, a result regarding the existence of arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions in dense sets of the integers, the proof of which uses the Regularity Lemma in a key step. One of the earlier consequences of the Regularity Lemma was the Removal Lemma for graphs that was used by Ruzsa and Szemerédi to show Roth theorem, regarding the existence of 3-term arithmetic progressions in dense sets of the integers, in a combinatorial way. The Removal Lemma states that in any graph K with few copies of a subgraph, say a triangle, we can remove few edges from K so that the result contains no copy of the subgraph. This has become a key tool in the applications of the so-called Regularity Method, which has extensive literature in combinatorics, graph theory, number theory and computer science. In 2005 Green introduced a regularity lemma for Abelian groups as well as an algebraic removal lemma. The removal lemma for groups states that, for a given finite Abelian group G, if there are o(|G|^3) solution to x+y+z+t=0 with the variables taking values in S, a subset of G, then we can remove o(|G|) elements from S to make the set S solution-free. The main contributions of this work corresponds to extensions of the removal lemma for groups to either more general contexts, like non-necessary Abelian finite groups, or to linear systems of equations for finite Abelian groups. The main goal is to give a comprehensive and more general framework for many results in additive number theory like Szemerédi Theorem. In particular, we show that the removal lemma for groups by Green can be extended to non-necessary Abelian finite groups. Moreover, we prove a removal lemma for linear systems on finite fields: for every e>0 there exists a d>0 such that if A is a (k x m) linear system of equations with coefficients in a finite field F and the number of solutions to Ax=b, where each variable takes values from a subset Si in F is less than d times |F| raised to m-k, then by removing less than e|F| elements in each Si we can make the resulting sets solution-free, thus solving a conjecture by Green to that respect. Even more, if A is an integer linear system, G is a finite Abelian group, and the determinantal of A and |G| are coprime, then a similar statement holds. Let us mention that the last result allows us to characterize those linear systems where any set S with size proportional to G has a nontrivial solution in S, provided |G| is large enough. This extends the validity of Szmerédi's theorem to finite Abelian groups. These extensions of the removal lemma have been used in arithmetic Ramsey theory to obtain counting results for the number of monochromatic solutions of linear systems. The main result from a work by Frankl, Graham and Rödl in '88 states that the number of monochromatic solutions of regular systems in integer intervals is in fact a positive proportion of the total number of solutions. We give analogous results for solutions in Abelian groups with bounded exponent, for which the main tool in the torsion-free case cannot be applied. Density versions of these counting results are also obtained, in this case with a full characterization.

Computing sparse Fourier sum of squares on finite abelian groups in quasi-linear time

On the computational complexity of the theory of Abelian groups

In the theory of abelian groups, the study of relations between an abelian group and its endomorphism group is an important problem. The question arises on conditions under which an abelian group and its endomorphism group are isomorphic ([1], Problem 31). The answer to this question has been obtained in the classes of completely decomposable abelian groups [2], vector groups [3], in the classes of periodic abelian groups, divisible abelian groups, nonreduced abelian groups, reduced algebraically compact abelian groups [4]. A group A is called an E+-group if it is isomorphic to its endomorphism group End(A). Clearly, if an abelian group A is an E+-group, then its endomorphism group End(A) is also an E+-group. In this paper, we show that the converse statement holds not always. A group A is called an End-group if the following implication takes place:

In this chapter, we discuss several special types of modules that will make frequent appearances later. These include semisimple modules, artinian modules, and torsionfree modules, which have prototypes in vector spaces, finite abelian groups, and torsionfree abelian groups, respectively. That special types of modules have useful roles in the study of arbitrary modules may be seen already in the case of abelian groups (i.e., ℤ-modules). In studying an arbitrary abelian group, an almost reflexive first step is to look at its torsion part (i.e., the torsion subgroup) and its torsionfree part (i.e., the factor group modulo the torsion subgroup), since entirely different techniques are available (and needed) for dealing with torsion groups and torsionfree groups. On the torsionfree side, vector spaces make an appearance due to the facts that the torsionfree divisible abelian groups are exactly the vector spaces over ℚ and that every torsionfree abelian group can be embedded in a divisible one. On the torsion side, many questions can be reduced to the case of finite abelian groups, since every torsion abelian group is a directed union of finite subgroups. In studying torsion abelian groups, one also reduces to the case of p -groups for various primes p . Vector spaces make another appearance here, since in an abelian p -group the set of elements of order p (together with 0) forms a vector space over ℤ/ p ℤ.

Let \Lambda be a finite abelian group. A dynamical system with transformation group \Lambda is a triple (A,\Lambda,\alpha) , consisting of a unital locally convex algebra A , the finite abelian group \Lambda and a group homomorphism \alpha:\Lambda\rightarrow\operatorname{Aut}(A) , which induces an action of \Lambda on A . In this paper we present a new, geometrically oriented approach to the noncommutative geometry of principal bundles with finite abelian structure group based on such dynamical systems.

Group Invariant Fourier Transform Algorinthms

Let an element of a group be called an FC element if it has only a finite number of conjugates in the group. Baer(1) and Neumann (8) have discussed groups in which every element is FC, and called them FC-groups. Both Abelian and finite groups are trivially FC-groups; Neumann has studied the properties common to FC-groups and Abelian groups, and Baer the properties common to FC-groups and finite groups. Baer has also shown that, for an arbitrary group G, the set H1 of all FC elements is a characteristic subgroup. Haimo (3) has defined the FC-chain of a group G byHi/Hi−1 is the subgroup of all FC elements in G/Hi−1.

The study of Hopficity in Abelian groups has been largely motivated by the fundamental results of Baumslag, who proved that torsion groups are always Hopfian regardless of their cardinality, but left several questions open concerning torsion-free groups. Later, Corner addressed some of these questions by providing counterexamples showing that a direct sum of two Hopfian groups can be non-Hopfian, and that a group with an automorphism group of order two does not guarantee Hopficity. These results highlighted the need for new constructions to explore Hopficity in torsion-free Abelian groups. Our work introduces a new approach based on divisibility techniques, as it contributes to the understanding of free-torsion groups with respect to the Hopficity property, providing new insights into their structural properties and implications within group theory. Our analysis also demonstrates how divisibility properties, as well as the introduction of totally invariant subgroups and homomorphisms, can be used to establish Hopficity in specific Abelian groups, particularly those that are free-torsion. In order to reach all of this, we start by taking a group defined as an infinite direct sum of cyclic groups; then we construct a specific subgroup generated by two particular families of elements; and finally we show that this group is Hopfian through results from the theory of divisible subgroups.

Brouéʼs abelian defect group conjecture holds for the sporadic simple Conway group [formula omitted

All groups herein are assumed to be abelian. It was not until the 1940's that it was known that a subgroup of an infinite direct sum of finite cyclic groups is again a direct sum of cyclics. This result rests on a general criterion due to Kulikov [7] for a primary abelian group to be a direct sum of cyclic groups. If G is p-primary, Kulikov's criterion presupposes that G has no elements (other than zero) having infinite p-height. For such a group G, the criterion is simply that G be the union of an ascending sequence of subgroups Hn where the heights of the elements of Hn computed in G are bounded by some positive integer λ(n). The theory of abelian groups has now developed to the point that totally projective groups currently play much the same role, at least in the theory of torsion groups, that direct sums of cyclic groups and countable groups played in combination prior to the discovery of totally projective groups and their structure beginning with a paper by R. Nunke [11] in 1967.

Maximally localized Gabor orthonormal bases on locally compact Abelian groups

The study of effectiveness in classical mathematics is rapidly expanding, through recent research in algebra, topology, model theory, and functional analysis. Well-known contributors are Barwise (Wisconsin), Crossley (Monash), Dekker (Rutgers), Ershoff (Novosibirsk), Feferman (Stanford), Harrington (Berkeley), Mal′cev (Novosibirsk), Morley (Cornell), Nerode (Cornell), Rabin (Hebrew University), Shore (Cornell). Further interesting work is due to Kalantari (University of California, Santa Barbara), Metakides (Rochester), Millar (Wisconsin), Remmel (University of California, San Diego), Nurtazin (Novosibirsk). Areas investigated include enumerated algebras, models of complete theories, vector spaces, fields, orderings, Hilbert spaces, and boolean algebras.We investigate the effective content of the structure theory of p-groups. Recall that a p-group is a torsion abelian group in which the (finite) order of each element is some power of a fixed prime p. (In the sequel, “group” = “additively written abelian group”.)The structure theory of p-groups is based on the two elementary notions of order and height. Recall that the order of x is the least integer n such that nx = 0. The height of x is the number of times p divides x, that is, the least n such that x = pny for some y in the group but x ≠ pn+1y for any y. If for each n ∈ ω there is a “pnth-root” yn, so that x = pnyn, then we say that x has infinite height. In 1923, Prüfer related the two notions as criteria for direct sum decomposition, provingTheorem. Every group of bounded order is a direct sum of cyclic groups, andTheorem. Every countable primary group with no (nonzero) elements of infinite height is a direct sum of cyclic groups.

Recently, the concept of (normal) bent partitions, which are partitions of elementary abelian groups having similar properties to spreads, has been introduced by Anbar and Meidl. A large number of bent partitions, so-called generalized semifield spreads, can be obtained from semifields with certain properties. A strongly related concept, namely Latin square partial difference set packings (LP-packings) in finite abelian groups, has also been introduced recently by Jedwab and Li. The examples for LP-packings in an elementary abelian group are obtained from spreads. LP-packings yield bent partitions (not only for elementary abelian groups). In this paper, we first point out that conversely, generalized semifield spreads yield LP-packings. As a result, there is a huge amount of LP-packings in elementary abelian groups, other than spreads. With some examples from ternary bent functions, we then show that normal bent partitions and LP-packings are not the same concept. Finally, we extend the lifting procedure from spreads to LP-packings in nonelementary abelian groups to a lifting procedure from some generalized spreads to LP-packings in nonelementary abelian groups and in larger elementary abelian groups. This potentially yields bent partitions other than generalized semifield spreads.

We shall characterize the complete first order theories of torsion free abelian groups having algebraically prime models, elementarily prime models, minimal models, etc., using the well known invariants from [9], [3]. This study was suggested by the questions raised in [2]. Group here will always mean abelian group. For reference on groups see Fuchs [5], [6], for model theory Chang-Keisler [1]. All theories considered are theories in the first order language of group theory. A group G is minimal (strictly minimal) if H < G implies H = G (H-= G), and elementarily prime (algebraically prime) if G is elementarily (algebraically) embeddable in every H G. p, q always denote prime numbers, P the set of all primes. The p-rank of a group G, p-rk(G), is the dimension of G/pG as a vector space over Z/pZ. We define tf(p, G): = min {p-rk(G), ~o}. By the results of [9], [3], two nontrivial torsion free abelian groups G and H are elementarily equivalent iff for all primes p tf(p, G) = tf(p, H). This gives a natural 1-1 correspondence between the complete theories of nontrivial torsion free abelian groups and the functions /3 : P --~ ~o + 1. /3 will always stand for such a function, and the corresponding complete theory will be denoted by T 0. S o is the set of primes p for which/3(p) ~ 0. For more definitions see section 3. Let 13 be a function from P to o) + 1. We shall study the following questions: Does T o have an elementarily (algebraically) prime model? Does T o have a minimal (strictly minimal) model, and if this is the case, how many such models does T o have? Do the minimal and strictly minimal models of T o coincide? These questions have been studied for the special case of the theory of the