• Home
  • Search
  • Spatial Two-Sided Online Bottleneck Matching With Deadlines
  • Cite Icon1
  • https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2982423Copy DOI Icon

Spatial Two-Sided Online Bottleneck Matching With Deadlines

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Recently, there are several studies focusing on the bottleneck optimization objective in Spatial Crowdsourcing (SC). However, these studies usually do not consider the deadline constraint. Different from these studies, we take deadlines into consideration and identify the Fully Online Bottleneck Matching with Deadlines (FOBMD) problem in SC. Because of the deadlines, consideration must be given to both the bottleneck cost and the cardinality, which makes the FOBMD problem more challenging, and no online algorithm without actively refusing tasks can achieve a constant competitive ratio of the bottleneck cost for the FOBMD problem. To settle the FOBMD problem, we consider three baseline algorithms and propose an online algorithm, namely Local Isolated Point Greedy (LIPG). Finally, we validate the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed algorithm via extensive experiments on both synthetic and real world datasets.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article
  • Citations73

A Multi-armed Bandit Approach to Online Spatial Task Assignment

  • Dec 01, 2014
  • Umair Ul Hassan +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations33

Three-Dimensional Stable Matching Problem for Spatial Crowdsourcing Platforms

  • Jul 25, 2019
  • Boyang Li +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations156

Multi-Objective Optimization Based Allocation of Heterogeneous Spatial Crowdsourcing Tasks

  • Jul 01, 2018
  • IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
  • Liang Wang +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations171

Reliable diversity-based spatial crowdsourcing by moving workers

  • Jun 01, 2015
  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • Peng Cheng +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations86

On Reliable Task Assignment for Spatial Crowdsourcing

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing
  • Xinglin Zhang +3
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations2

Finding Optimal Team for Multi-skill Task in Spatial Crowdsourcing

  • Jan 01, 2017
  • Qian Tao +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations106

Dynamic Pricing in Spatial Crowdsourcing

  • May 27, 2018
  • Yongxin Tong +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations372

A framework for protecting worker location privacy in spatial crowdsourcing

  • Jun 01, 2014
  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • Hien To +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations11

Towards reward-based spatial crowdsourcing

  • Nov 01, 2013
  • Khanh-Hung Dang +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

Benchmarking the benchmark — Comparing synthetic and real-world Network IDS datasets

  • Jan 02, 2024
  • Journal of Information Security and Applications
  • Siamak Layeghy +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

A Trustworthiness-Aware Spatial Task Allocation using a Fuzzy-based Trust and Reputation System Approach

  • Aug 20, 2022
  • Expert Systems with Applications
  • Md Mujibur Rahman +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations28

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Task Assignment in Spatial Crowdsourcing and Sensing

  • Feb 08, 2021
  • IEEE Sensors Journal
  • Lijun Sun +4
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations25

Group Task Assignment with Social Impact-Based Preference in Spatial Crowdsourcing

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • Xiang Li +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Task Planning Considering Location Familiarity in Spatial Crowdsourcing

  • Mar 30, 2021
  • ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
  • Chaoqun Peng +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

A location privacy protection method in spatial crowdsourcing

  • Jan 19, 2022
  • Journal of Information Security and Applications
  • Fagen Song +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.