• Cite Icon14
  • https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2016.0009Copy DOI Icon

Starting Early: Introducing the Issue

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Starting Early:Introducing the Issue Jeanne Brooks-Gunn (bio), Lisa Markman-Pithers (bio), and Cecilia Elena Rouse (bio) Across the nation, more and more people want to see children receive quality education before kindergarten. Public opinion polls suggest that 70 percent of adults favor such programs, partly because of the irresistible idea that “starting early,” and ensuring that children arrive in school ready to learn, is the best way to generate happy, healthy, and productive adults.1 The notion of starting early resonates. Head Start, the federally funded prekindergarten program for children from low-income homes, was a cornerstone of President Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty. Even then it was believed that students can’t fully benefit from an elementary education if they don’t arrive at kindergarten ready to learn. Presidents with views as disparate as those of George W. Bush and Barack Obama have called for strengthening early childhood education in their budgets and State of the Union addresses. One reason for the strong support of early childhood education is the seemingly compelling evidence that exposing children to educational experiences when they’re young can have profound effects on later educational, social, and adult outcomes. In fact, as Lynn Karoly points out in this issue, estimates based on some older pre-K programs suggest that every dollar invested in prekindergarten pays off $3 to $17 in terms of benefits, both to the adult individual and to society. That suggests prekindergarten is one of the most effective investments that we can make in children. Indeed, James Heckman of the University of Chicago, a Nobel laureate in economics, has argued that investments made in early childhood are more beneficial and also more cost-effective than those made in later childhood and adolescence.2 The idea that prekindergarten can enhance later learning and adult success is based on the premise that if pre-K programs provide enriching activities more intensively and more intentionally than parents can, then those programs have the potential to boost children’s learning and skill acquisition. In brief, quality pre-K experiences can teach [End Page 3] children the skills that make it easier for them to learn new skills in early elementary school: that is, skills beget skills. Differences in literacy and cognitive skills between children in low-income families and their better-off counterparts are already apparent by age three, or perhaps even earlier.3 The pre-K education programs initiated in the 1960s and 1970s were designed to reduce those gaps by providing quality pre-K education to disadvantaged children, who were less likely to be ready for school. Few pre-K programs existed in the low-income neighborhoods where most disadvantaged children lived, and parents with little income and education were therefore less likely to send their children to prekindergarten than were parents with more resources. And when disadvantaged parents were able to find a pre-K program, it was likely to be of relatively low quality.4 Based on these observations, we would expect that children from disadvantaged environments would benefit the most from pre-K education; that high-quality programs would deliver the greatest benefits; and that children who received such education would benefit more than those who remained at home, cared for by parents, family, and friends. Comparisons between different pre-K programs, on the other hand, shouldn’t show such a stark contrast. These assumptions imply that not all programs would show equal benefits in empirical evaluations. Scholars have called this heterogeneity in outcomes. Interpreting the research requires attention to many factors—family background, comparison group composition, and programs’ quality and intensity. Scholars have extensively studied the efficacy of pre-K programs, especially those offered to four-year-olds. Of more than 100 evaluations of pre-K programs, the vast majority used random assignment of children to receive the preschool treatment or not.5 Most of these experimental programs served children from low-resource families, in keeping with the premise that these children were less likely to have the skills needed for kindergarten and were therefore most likely to benefit. Consequently, we know the most about how preschool influences children from disadvantaged backgrounds. And because many of these...

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Increasing Movement to Promote Health and Learning in Early Childhood

  • Apr 06, 2015
  • NAM Perspectives
  • Robert C Whitaker +1
  • Research Article

Access, quality, and home language support for emergent bilingual children in NYC’s universal Pre-K programs

  • Sep 27, 2025
  • International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy
  • Brian A Collins
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Impact of the Tennessee Voluntary Prekindergarten Program on Children’s Literacy, Language, and Mathematics Skills: Results From a Regression-Discontinuity Design

  • Jan 01, 2021
  • AERA Open
  • Georgine M Pion +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

Putting the Child Back Into Child Care: Combining Care and Education for Children Ages 3‐5

  • Sep 01, 2004
  • Social Policy Report
  • Jessica Brauner +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Family Engagement Practices in a Public Pre-Kindergarten Program: Variation by Program, Classroom, and Staff Characteristics

  • Jul 18, 2024
  • Journal of Research in Childhood Education
  • Ying-Chun Lin +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

From Threat to Opportunity: A Head Start Program's Response to State-Funded Pre-K

  • Mar 01, 2012
  • Journal of Health and Human Services Administration
  • Sharon Wrobel
  • Research Article
  • Citations27

Dual language supports for dual language learners? Exploring preschool classroom instructional supports for DLLs' early learning outcomes

  • Jan 01, 2021
  • Early childhood research quarterly
  • Anne Partika +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Contribution of ethnicity, area level deprivation and air pollution to paediatric intensive care unit admissions in the United Kingdom 2008–2021

  • Aug 16, 2024
  • eClinicalMedicine
  • Hannah K Mitchell +7
  • Research Article

Aloha Space Age: NASA and the Hawaiian Islands, 1957—1970

  • Jan 01, 2021
  • Hawaiian Journal of History
  • David A Smith
  • Research Article

균형적 언어교육 프로그램 모형 개발 -드림스타트 저소득 가정 유아를 대상으로-

  • Dec 28, 2016
  • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
  • You-Hwa Kim +1
  • Single Report
  • Citations4

Access to Early Care and Education for Low-Income Hispanic Children and Families: A Research Synthesis

  • Sep 19, 2018
  • Julia Mendez +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations51

Cooking fuel type, household ventilation, and the risk of acute lower respiratory illness in urban Bangladeshi children: a longitudinal study

  • Nov 12, 2011
  • Indoor Air
  • E L Murray +9
  • Research Article

SCHIP Renewal

  • May 01, 2009
  • Neonatal Network
  • Gail Mccain
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

저소득가정 아동의 자아개념: 성별 비교를 중심으로

  • Dec 30, 2012
  • The Korean Journal of Community Living Science
  • Seon Rye Ji
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Family Factors for Child Meal Skipping in Low-Income Families in Korea

  • Apr 01, 2010
  • Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health
  • Hwa-Ok Bae +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.