Stimulus-dependent differences in cortical versus subcortical contributions to visual detection in mice

The superior colliculus is a critical brain region involved in processing visual information. It receives visual input directly from the retina, as well as via a projection from primary visual cortex. Here we determine which cell types in the superficial superior colliculus receive visual input from primary visual cortex in mice. Neurons in the superficial layers of the superior colliculus were classified into four groups - Wide-field, narrow-field, horizontal and stellate - based on their morphological and electrophysiological properties. To determine functional connections between V1 and these four different cell types we expressed Channelrhodopsin2 in primary visual cortex and then optically stimulated these axons while recording from different neurons in the superficial superior colliculus using whole-cell patch-clamp recording in vitro. We found that all four cell types in the superficial layers of the superior colliculus received monosynaptic (direct) input from V1. Wide-field neurons were more likely than other cell types to receive primary visual cortex input. Our results provide information on the cell specificity of the primary visual cortex to superior colliculus projection, increasing our understanding of how visual information is processed in the superior colliculus at the single cell level.

Decision letter: Visual and motor signatures of locomotion dynamically shape a population code for feature detection in Drosophila

Visual areas I and II of cerebral cortex of rabbit.

The superior colliculus and visual neglect in rat and hamster. II. possible mechanisms

PROJECTION OF THE RETINA ON SUPERIOR COLLICULUS OF CATS

Properties of cat retinal ganglion cells: a comparison of W-cells with X- and Y-cells.

The Superior Colliculus in De Novo Parkinson's Disease: A Prodromal Dysfunction?

Representation of the visual field in the superior colliculus of the grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) and the tree shrew (Tupaia glis)

The superior colliculus (SC) is a midbrain structure that integrates visual, somatosensory and auditory inputs to direct head and eye movements. Each of these modalities is topographically mapped and aligned with the others to ensure precise behavioral responses to multimodal stimuli. While it is clear that neural activity is instructive for topographic alignment of inputs from the visual cortex (V1) and auditory system with retinal axons in the SC, there is also evidence that activity-independent mechanisms are used to establish topographic alignment between modalities. Here, we show that the topography of the projection from primary somatosensory cortex (S1) to the SC is established during the first postnatal week. Unlike V1-SC projections, the S1-SC projection does not bifurcate when confronted with a duplicated retinocollicular map, showing that retinal input in the SC does not influence the topography of the S1-SC projection. However, S1-SC topography is disrupted in mice lacking ephrins-As, which we find are expressed in graded patterns along with their binding partners, the EphA4 and EphA7, in both S1 and the somatosensory recipient layer of the SC. Taken together, these data support a model in which somatosensory inputs into the SC map topographically and establish alignment with visual inputs in the SC using a gradient-matching mechanism.

1. Luis H. Ospina, MD* 1. *Assistant Professor, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Neuro-ophthalmology, Ste-Justine Hospital, University de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada After completing this article, readers should be able to: 1. Recognize cortical visual impairment (CVI) as an important cause of pediatric visual loss. 2. Identify the most frequent causes of pediatric CVI and, more specifically, understand the role of hypoxia as a cause of central visual damage. 3. Describe the different patterns and implications for future vision of hypoxic central visual damage occurring in preterm compared with term babies. 4. Know the clinical signs suggestive of CVI in children. 5. Discuss the involvement of visual functions other than visual acuity (ie, cognitive visual aspects) in CVI and correlate them with the likely affected neuroanatomic substrates. 6. Explain the value of using a multidisciplinary approach in rehabilitating children who have CVI early in their development. Vision loss caused by central nervous system damage often is referred to as CVI but also may be referred to as cerebral visual impairment or neurologic visual impairment. These terms refer to the fact that the primary defect may not necessarily be limited to the striate (primary visual) cortex and may affect other areas subserving vision, such as the visual associative cortex, optic radiations, and visual attention pathways. Although it is not yet certain which of these three terms best describes the visual deficit, it is clear that use of the label cortical blindness must be abandoned. That term not only evokes negative connotations for the child and the family but is inaccurate because in almost every instance, some degree of residual vision remains, and visual improvement can occur. CVI has become the greatest cause of pediatric visual impairment in developed countries (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) and is becoming increasingly prevalent in developing nations. CVI is a problem of increasing frequency for two primary reasons. First, the progress in neonatal care has resulted in improved survival of …

The neurophysiology of the rodent visual system has mainly been investigated by invasive and ex-vivo techniques providing fragmented data. This area of research has been deprived of functional MRI studies based on blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) contrast, which allows a whole brain approach with a high spatial and temporal resolution. In the present study, we looked at the neurovascular response properties of the visual system of the pigmented rat, focusing on the visual cortex (VC), the superior colliculus (SC) and the flocculus-paraflocculus of the cerebellum (FL-PFL), using BOLD fMRI under domitor anesthesia. Visual stimulation was performed monocularly or binocularly while flashing light from a strobe unit was presented. For each structure, we assessed the flashing frequency that evoked the optimal BOLD response: Neither the VC nor the FL-PFL displayed frequency dependence during monocular visual stimulation, but were most sensitive to low frequencies (1-5 Hz) when flashing light was provided binocularly. The SC responded optimally to high flashing rates (8-12 Hz) during both monocular and binocular stimulation. The signal intensity changes in the VC and FL-PFL were locked to the stimulation period, whereas the BOLD response in the SC showed a similar onset but a very slow recovery at offset. The VC and FL-PFL, but not the SC, showed signs of binocular competition. The observed correlation between frequency-dependent responses of different visual areas during binocular visual presentation suggests a functional relationship between the VC and FL-PFL rather than between the SC and FL-PFL.

The intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (SC) contain neurons that clearly play a major role in regulating the production of saccadic eye movements: a burst of activity from saccade neurons (SNs) is thought to provide a drive signal to set the eyes in motion, whereas the tonic activity of fixation neurons (FNs) is thought to suppress saccades during fixation. The exact contribution of these neurons to saccade control is, however, unclear because the nature of the signals sent by the SC to the brain stem saccade generation circuit has not been studied in detail. Here we tested the hypothesis that the SC output signal is sufficient to control saccades by examining whether antidromically identified tectoreticular neurons (TRNs: 33 SNs and 13 FNs) determine the end of saccades. First, TRNs had discharge properties similar to those of nonidentified SC neurons and a proportion of output SNs had visually evoked responses, which signify that the saccade generator must receive and process visual information. Second, only a minority of TRNs possessed the temporal patterns of activity sufficient to terminate saccades: Output SNs did not cease discharging at the time of saccade end, possibly continuing to drive the brain stem during postsaccadic fixations, and output FNs did not resume their activity before saccade end. These results argue against a role for SC in regulating the timing of saccade termination by a temporal code and suggest that other saccade centers act to thwart the extraneous SC drive signal, unless it controls saccade termination by a spatial code.

Previous experiments in cats have shown that complete contralateral visual neglect is produced by removing all known visual cortex on one side of the brain, which can then be reversed by damaging the opposite superior colliculus. Presumably, descending facilitatory influences from the visual cortex to the ipsilateral superior colliculus are counterbalanced by intercollicular inhibition (Sprague: Science 153:1544-1546, '66). However, not all of visual cortex or all of the superior colliculus needs to be involved in this circuit. It is the deep rather than the superficial laminae of the superior colliculus that are primarily involved in visual attentive and orientation behaviors, and these laminae are largely independent of primary visual cortex. However, they do depend on corticotectal influences from a comparatively small extraprimary visual area of the posterior region of the lateral suprasylvian cortex (PSSC-Ogasawara et al: J. Neurophysiol. 52:1226-1245, '84). The present experiments demonstrate that lesions only a few millimeters in diameter in this corticotectal zone of the PSSC can produce profound visual neglect. While damage to this area has little, if any, effect on superficial laminae visual activity, it produces a dramatic decrease in the visual activity of the deep laminae. These cats with PSSC lesions fail to orient to a visual stimulus that is introduced suddenly into the contralateral visual field, yet they respond on nearly 100% of the trials to this same stimulus when it is presented in the ipsilateral visual field. The lesion-induced visual neglect produced by PSSC lesions is long-lasting but can be abruptly ameliorated by a midbrain lesion that primarily involves, or undercuts, the deep laminae of the contralateral superior colliculus. Thus, 1) visual neglect can be produced by depriving the deep laminae of the superior colliculus of visual inputs from the cortex, even when the principal visual cortical regions (17, 18, and 19) and their target structures are intact, and 2) visually guided behavior can be restored by eliminating afferents originating in, or passing through, the deep laminae of the contralateral superior colliculus.

Cocaine- and amphetamine–regulated transcript peptide and calcium binding proteins immunoreactivity in the deep layers of the superior colliculus of the guinea pig: Implications for multisensory and visuomotor processing

In mammals, the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and the superior colliculus (SC) are the major targets of visual inputs from the retina. The LGN projects mainly to primary visual cortex (V1) while the SC targets the thalamus and brainstem, providing two potential pathways for processing visual inputs. Indeed, cortical lesion experiments in rodents have yielded mixed results, leading to the hypothesis that performance of simple visual behaviors may involve computations performed entirely by this subcortical pathway through the SC. However, these previous experiments have been limited by both their assays of behavioral performance and their use of lesions to change cortical activity. To determine the contribution of V1 to these tasks, we trained mice to perform threshold detection tasks in which they reported changes in either the contrast or orientation of visual stimuli. We then reversibly inhibited V1 by optogenetically activating parvalbumin-expressing inhibitory neurons with channelrhodopsin-2. We found that suppressing activity in V1 substantially impaired performance in visual detection tasks. The behavioral deficit depended on the retinotopic position of the visual stimulus, confirming that the effect was due to the specific suppression of the visually driven V1 neurons. Behavioral effects were seen with only moderate changes in neuronal activity, as inactivation that raised neuronal contrast thresholds by a median of only 14% was associated with a doubling of behavioral contrast detection threshold. Thus, detection of changes in either orientation or contrast is dependent on, and highly sensitive to, the activity of neurons in V1.