Strontium ranelate: A physiological approach for optimizing bone formation and resorption

Strontium ranelate: New insights into its dual mode of action

Oestrogen deficiency increases the rate of bone remodelling which, in association with a negative remodelling balance (resorption exceeding formation), results in impaired bone architecture, mass and strength. Current anti-osteoporotic drugs act on bone remodelling by inhibiting bone resorption or by promoting its formation. An alternative therapeutic approach is based on the concept of inducing opposite effects on bone resorption and formation. One therapeutic agent, strontium ranelate, was shown to induce opposite effects on bone resorption and formation in pre-clinical studies and to reduce fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients. How strontium ranelate acts to improve bone strength in humans remains a matter of debate, however. This review of the most recent pre-clinical and clinical studies is a critical analysis of strontium ranelate's action on bone resorption and formation and how it increases bone mass, microarchitecture and strength in postmenopausal osteoporotic women.

Strontium ranelate: An increased bone quality leading to vertebral antifracture efficacy at all stages

Given its increasing incidence and serious complications, osteoporosis requires safe and effective long-term treatment. Strontium ranelate (SR), a new anti-osteoporotic treatment with a unique mode of action, has been investigated in the Spinal Osteoporosis Therapeutic Intervention (SOTI) and the Treatment Of Peripheral OSteoporosis (TROPOS) trials, two major 3-year multinational placebo-controlled Phase III randomized clinical trials. In SOTI, SR treatment reduced the risk of vertebral fracture by 41% (20.9% vs. 32.8%, P < 0.001); in TROPOS, it reduced the risk of non-vertebral fracture by 16% (11.2% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.04), and the risk of hip fracture in patients at high risk by 36% (4.3% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.046). Also SR has been shown to decrease the risk of vertebral fracture after 4 years of treatment and the risk of nonvertebral fracture after 5 years. Also it demonstrated for high risk patients a significant decrease of the risk of hip fractures (–43%) after 5 years of treatment. Unlike antiresorptive agents, SR produced steady and significant BMD increases that correlated directly with decreases in vertebral and hip fracture risk. Preplanned analysis of the pooled dataset from SOTI and TROPOS showed that SR was effective whether or not patients had key risk factors for fractures at baseline. SR was also effective in patients with osteopenia and younger postmenopausal patients aged 50–65 years. It was also effective for preventing both vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in the elderly (>80 years). Also, SR significantly attenuated height loss and decreased back pain. Finally long-term follow-up showed that BMD gains were maintained through a 8 year-period with maintaining the incidence of fracture between the first 3 years and the last 3 years of treatment. The safety profile of SR was almost similar to placebo in both trials. A slight but significant increased risk of thromboembolism events was noted from the pooled phase III studies data. However this increased was not found in a large retrospective observational study. Thus, SR demonstrates broad spectrum safety and efficacy in reducing the risks of both vertebral and non-vertebral (including hip) fractures in a wide variety of patients, and should be considered as a first-line option to treat women at risk of osteoporotic fractures, whatever their age, the severity of the disease, and their risk factors.

The objective of this systematic review was to examine the influence of treatments for postmenopausal osteoporosis (parathyroid hormone [PTH], bisphosphonates, strontium ranelate, and denosumab) on bone quality and discuss the clinical implications. Most bone-quality data for PTH is from teriparatide. Teriparatide results in a rapid increase in bone-formation markers, followed by increases in bone-resorption markers, opening an "anabolic window," a period of time when PTH is maximally anabolic. Teriparatide reverses the structural damage seen in osteoporosis and restores the structure of trabecular bone. It has a positive effect on cortical bone, and any early increases in cortical porosity appear to be offset by increases in cortical thickness and diameter. Bisphosphonates are antiresorptive agents which reduce bone turnover, improve trabecular microarchitecture, and mineralization. Concerns have been raised that the prolonged antiresorptive action of bisphosphonates may lead to failure to repair microdamage, resulting in microcracks and atypical fragility. Strontium ranelate is thought to have a mixed mode of action, increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption. Strontium ranelate improves cortical thickness, trabecular number, and connectivity, with no change in cortical porosity. Denosumab exerts rapid, marked, and sustained effects on bone resorption, resulting in falls in the markers of bone turnover. Evidence from bone-quality studies suggests that treatment-naive women, aged 60-65 years, with very low BMD T scores may benefit from PTH as primary therapy to improve bone substrate and build bone. Post-PTH treatment with bisphosphonates will maintain improvements in bone quality and reduce the risk of fracture.

Strontium ranelate is composed of an organic moiety (ranelic acid) and of two atoms of stable non-radioactive strontium. In vitro, strontium ranelate increases collagen and non-collagenic proteins synthesis by mature osteoblast enriched cells. The effects of strontium ranelate on bone formation were confirmed as strontium ranelate enhanced pre-osteoblastic cells replication. The stimulation by strontium ranelate of the replication of osteoprogenitor cells and collagen as well as non-collagenic protein synthesis in osteoblasts provides substantial evidence to categorise SR ranelate as a bone forming agent. In the mouse calvaria culture system, SR ranelate induces a dose-dependent inhibition of labelled calcium release. The inhibitory effects of SR ranelate on bone resorption were close to those of salmon calcitonin. In the isolated rat osteoclast assay, a pre-incubation of bone slices with SR ranelate induced a dose-dependent inhibition of the bone resorbing activity of a treated rat osteoclast. SR ranelate also dose-dependently inhibited, in a chicken bone marrow culture, the expression of both CA II and the alpha-subunit of the vitronectin receptor. These effects showing that SR ranelate significantly affects bone resorption due to direct and/or matrix-mediated inhibition of osteoclast activity and also inhibits osteoclasts differentiation are compatible with the profile of an anti-resorptive drug. In normal rats, administration of SR ranelate induces an improvement in the mechanical properties of the humerus and/or the lumbar vertebra associated with a commensurate increase in bone dimension, shaft and volume. This was not related to any change in the stiffness, suggesting the absence of a mineralisation defect. After oral administration of SR ranelate in humans, the absolute bio-availability of SR ranelate is 27 % after a dose of 2g is given as sachets. The simultaneous intake of SR ranelate and calcium remarkably reduces the bio-availability of SR. SR ranelate was administered in 160 early postmenopausal women, in a 24-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective randomized study. Daily oral dose of 125 mg, 500 mg, 1 g of SR ranelate were compared to a placebo. At the conclusion of the study, the percent variation of lumbar adjusted BMD from baseline was significantly different in the group receiving 1 g/day of SR as compared to placebo (+ 1.41 % versus 0.98 % respectively). Increase in total hip and neck BMD averages respectively 3.2 % and 2.5 %. SR ranelate does not induce any significant adverse reaction compared to those observed in women receiving a placebo for the same duration. In a phase II study, the effect of SR ranelate in postmenopausal women with vertebral osteoporotic fractures were assessed during a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SR ranelate (500 mg, 1 g, 2 g per day) or placebo were given to 353 Caucasian women with prevalent osteoporosis. At the conclusion of this two-year study, the annual increase in lumbar adjusted BMD of the group receiving 2 g of SR ranelate was + 2.97 %. This result was significantly different as compared to placebo. A significant decrease in pyridinium crosslinks (NTX) and an increase in bone specific alkaline phosphatase were evident after 3 and 6 months of treatment. During the second year of treatment, the dose of 2 g was associated with a 4 % reduction in the number of patient experiencing a new vertebral deformity. Bone histomorphometry showed no mineralisation defects. The same percentage of withdrawal following an adverse effect was observed for patients receiving placebo and for those receiving 2 g of strontium ranelate. Currently, strontium ranelate is further investigated in a large Phase III program that includes two extensive trials for the treatment of severe osteoporosis, one assessing SR ranelate effects on the risk of vertebral fractures (SOTI) and one evaluating the effects of SR ranelate on peripheral (non spinal) fractures (TROPOS). The primary analysis of the SOTI study, evaluating the effect of 2 g of strontium ranelate on vertebral fracture rates are expected to be released during the summer 2002.

Osteoporosis is a progressive and debilitating disease characterized by a massive bone loss with a deterioration of bone tissues, and a propensity for a fragility fracture. Strontium ranelate is the first antiosteoporotic treatment that has dual mode of action and simultaneously increases bone formation, while decreasing bone resorption, thus rebalancing bone turnover formation. Strontium ranelate rebalances bone turnover in favor of improved bone geometry, cortical thickness, trabecular bone morphology and intrinsic bone tissue quality, which translates into enhanced bone strength. This review describes the mechanism of the strontium ranelate action and its effects on bone mineral density, bone turnover, and osteoporotic fractures. The efficacy of strontium ranelate in postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment to reduce the risk of vertebral and hip fractures has been highlighted in several randomized, controlled trials. Treatment efficacy with strontium ranelate has been documented across a wide range of patient profiles: age, number of prevalent vertebral fractures, body mass index, and a family history of osteoporosis. Because strontium ranelate has a large spectrum of efficacy, it can be used to treat different subgroups of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Strontium ranelate was shown to be relatively well tolerated and the safety aspects were good. Strontium ranelate should be considered as a first-line treatment for postmenopausal osteoporotic patients.

SummaryOsteoporotic post-menopausal women patients in two randomised trials comparing the anti-fracture efficacy of strontium ranelate with placebo were separated into tertiles according to their baseline levels of biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption. The vertebral anti-fracture efficacy of strontium ranelate was shown to be independent of baseline bone turnover levels.IntroductionBone turnover (BTO) levels vary among women at risk of osteoporotic fracture. Strontium ranelate is an anti-osteoporotic treatment increasing bone formation and reducing bone resorption. It was hypothesised that its anti-fracture efficacy would be independent of baseline BTO levels.MethodsPost-menopausal women with osteoporosis from two pooled studies were stratified in tertiles according to baseline levels of two BTO markers: bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (b-ALP, n = 4995) and serum C-telopeptide cross-links (sCTX, n = 4891). Vertebral fracture risk was assessed over 3 years with strontium ranelate 2 g/day or placebo.ResultsIn the placebo group, relative risk of vertebral fractures increased with BTO tertiles by 32% and 24% for patients in the highest tertile for b-ALP and CTX, respectively, compared to those in the lowest tertile. In the strontium ranelate group, incidences of vertebral fracture did not differ significantly across BTO tertiles. Significant reductions in vertebral fractures with strontium ranelate were seen in all tertiles of both markers, with relative risk reductions of 31% to 47% relative to placebo. Risk reduction did not differ among tertiles (b-ALP: p = 0.513; sCTX: p = 0.290).ConclusionThe vertebral anti-fracture efficacy of strontium ranelate was independent of baseline BTO levels. Strontium ranelate offers clinical benefits to women across a wide range of metabolic states.

Osteoporotic fractures are one of the major causes of increased morbidity and mortality in postmenopausal women and the overall aging population. One of the major issues in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis is to find a safe and effective treatment in the long term (>3 years) to achieve and maintain a reduction in the risk of fracture. Strontium ranelate (PROTELOS(®)) is a relatively novel drug, currently approved in Europe for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Strontium ranelate is the first agent of a new therapeutic class in osteoporosis, capable of both promoting bone formation and, to a lesser extent, inhibiting bone resorption. This uncoupling in bone turnover results in a net gain in bone mineral density (BMD), bone quality improvement and reduction in risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, as initially demonstrated in the preplanned long-term registrative trials SOTI (Spinal Osteoporosis Therapeutic Intervention) and TROPOS (Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis) at 5 years. Recently, open-label extensions of the SOTI and TROPOS trials up to 8 and, recently, 10 years have confirmed the sustained efficacy of strontium ranelate in increasing BMD, the long-term safety profile and the high compliance to treatment, independently from baseline BMD or other risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. Recent economic impact analyses have proved that long-term treatment with strontium ranelate is highly cost effective, especially in women older than 70 years of age. Histomorphometric analyses in animals and humans participating in the phase III trials have proved that the quality of mineralization is preserved in the long term and bone microarchitecture is ameliorated, with increased bone strength. Thus, strontium ranelate has been confirmed to be an effective compound for the long-term, chronic treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Strontium ranelate is a new anti-osteoporosis treatment. This study showed that strontium ranelate stimulated PGE(2) production and osteoblastic differentiation in murine marrow stromal cells, which was markedly reduced by inhibition of COX-2 activity or disruption of COX-2 gene expression. Hence, some anabolic effects of strontium ranelate may be mediated by the induction of COX-2 and PGE(2) production. Strontium ranelate is an orally active drug that reduces vertebral and hip fracture risk by increasing bone formation and reducing bone resorption. Strontium ranelate effects on bone formation are the result of increased osteoblastic differentiation and activity, but the mechanisms governing these effects are unknown. Based on previous work, we hypothesized that strontium ranelate increases cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression and that, consequently, the prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) produced could mediate some effects of strontium ranelate on osteoblasts. Marrow stromal cells (MSCs) from COX-2 wildtype (WT) and knockout (KO) mice were cultured with and without low-dose dexamethasone. Osteoblastic differentiation was characterized by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, real-time PCR for ALP and osteocalcin (OCN) mRNA expression, and alizarin red staining for mineralization. Medium PGE(2) was measured by radioimmunoassay or enzyme immunoassay. In MSCs from COX-2 WT mice, strontium ranelate significantly increased ALP activity, ALP and OCN mRNA expression, and mineralization after 14 or 21 days of culture. A short treatment at the beginning of the culture (0-7 days) with strontium ranelate was as effective as continuous treatment. Strontium ranelate (1 and 3 mM Sr(+2)) dose-dependently increased PGE(2) production, with maximum PGE(2) production occurring during the first week of culture. NS-398, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, blocked the strontium ranelate stimulation of PGE(2) production and significantly inhibited the strontium ranelate stimulation of ALP activity. In MSCs from COX-2 KO mice, the strontium ranelate stimulation of ALP and OCN mRNA expression and mineralization were markedly reduced compared with COX-2 WT cultures. Similar effects of strontium ranelate on osteoblastic markers and on PGE(2) production were seen when MSCs were cultured with or without low-dose dexamethasone (10 nM). We conclude that PGE(2) produced by the strontium ranelate induction of COX-2 expression plays a role in strontium ranelate-induced osteoblastic differentiation in MSCs in vitro.

The aim of the PREVOS study (PREVention Of early postmenopausal bone loss by Strontium ranelate) and the STRATOS study (STRontium Administration for Treatment of OSteoporosis) was to determine the minimum dose at which strontium ranelate (SR) is effective in, respectively, the prevention of bone loss in early postmenopausal nonosteoporotic women and the treatment of postmenopausal vertebral osteoporosis. Both studies were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding studies in parallel groups and lasted 2 years. In the PREVOS study, 160 early postmenopausal women were randomized to receive placebo, SR 125 mg/day, 500 mg/day or 1 g/day. In the STRATOS study, 353 osteoporotic postmenopausal women with at least one previous vertebral fracture and a lumbar T-score <-2.4 were randomized to receive placebo, SR 500 mg/day, 1 g/day or 2 g/day. In both studies, the primary efficacy parameter was lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Secondary efficacy criteria included incidence of new vertebral deformities (in the STRATOS study only) and biochemical markers of bone metabolism. In the PREVOS study, the increase in lumbar BMD from baseline in the 1 g/day group (+5.53%) was significantly different from the decrease in the placebo group ( p<0.001). In the STRATOS study, the annual increase in lumbar BMD in the 2 g/day group (+7.3% per year) was significantly higher than in the placebo group ( p<0.001). There was a significant reduction in the number of patients experiencing new vertebral deformities in the second year of treatment in the 2 g/day group (relative risk: 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.35, 0.89). In both studies, there was a significant increase in the bone formation marker (bone alkaline phosphatase) in the higher-dose group. Urinary excretion of the marker of bone resorption (cross-linked N-telopeptide) was lower with SR than with placebo in the STRATOS study. SR was very well tolerated in both studies. The minimum dose at which SR is effective in preventing bone loss in early postmenopausal nonosteoporotic women and in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis is 1 g/day and 2 g/day, respectively.

In monkeys, long-term strontium ranelate administration results in a dose-dependent bone strontium uptake (mainly into newly formed bone) that preserves the degree of mineralization of bone and the bone mineral at the crystal level, showing its safety at bone mineral level. Strontium ranelate simultaneously increases bone formation and decreases bone resorption, leading to prevention of bone loss and increase in bone mass and bone strength in normal and ovariectomized rats. This study investigated the interactions of stable strontium (Sr) with bone mineral in monkeys after long-term strontium ranelate treatment and after a period of treatment withdrawal. Iliac bone was obtained from untreated monkeys, monkeys at the end of a 52-week strontium ranelate administration (200, 500, 1250 mg/kg/day orally), and in parallel groups 10 weeks after the end of strontium ranelate administration (same three doses; n = 3-7). Sr uptake and distribution in bone mineral were quantified by X-ray microanalysis, changes at the crystal level by X-ray diffraction, and the degree of mineralization of bone (DMB) by quantitative microradiography. After strontium ranelate administration, dose-dependent Sr uptake occurred into cortical and cancellous bone, with higher content (1.6 times) in new than in old bone. This Sr uptake decreased (50%) 10 weeks after treatment withdrawal; the decrease occurred almost exclusively in new bone. At the end of strontium ranelate treatment and after its withdrawal, a preservation of crystal characteristics was observed, suggesting that Sr was only faintly linked to crystals by ionic substitution and of DMB. These results show the absence of a deleterious effect of long-term strontium ranelate treatment on bone mineralization, confirming the histomorphometric observations made in postmenopausal osteoporotic women treated with strontium ranelate.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of physical exercise (EXE), strontium ranelate (SR), or their combination on bone status in ovariectomized (OVX) rats. DESIGN: Sixty female Wistar rats were randomized to one of five groups: sham (Sh), OVX (O), OVX+EXE (OE), OVX+SR (OSR), and OVX+EXE+SR (OESR). Animals in EXE groups were subjected to 10 drops per day (45 cm in height); rats in SR groups received 625 mg/kg/day of SR, 5 days/week for 8 weeks. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)), mechanical strength of the left femur (three-point bending test), and femur microarchitecture of (micro-computed tomography imaging, microCT) analyses were performed to characterize biomechanical and trabecular/cortical structure. Bone remodeling, osteocyte apoptosis, and lipid content were evaluated by ELISA and immunofluorescence tests. RESULTS: In OVX rats, whole-body BMD, trabecular parameters, and osteocalcin (OCN) levels decreased, while weight, lean/fat mass, osteocyte apoptosis, and lipid content all increased. EXE after ovariectomy improved BMD and BMC, trabecular parameters, cross-sectional area (CSA), moment of inertia, and OCN levels while decreasing osteocyte apoptosis and lipid content. SR treatment increased BMD and BMC, trabecular parameters, CSA, stiffness, OCN, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels. Furthermore, fat mass, N-telopeptide (NTX) level, osteocyte apoptosis, and lipid content significantly decreased. The combination of both EXE and SR improved bone parameters compared with EXE or SR alone. CONCLUSION: EXE and SR had positive and synergistic effects on bone formation and resorption.

More than a decade has passed since the publication of the first report implicating T cells in the bone loss induced by ovariectomy (ovx).1 Since then there has been extraordinary progress in the understanding of the regulatory network that links the hemopoietic and the mesenchymal compartments of the bone marrow (BM), the interactions between the immune system and bone, and the role of lymphocytes as mediators of the effects of calciotrophic hormones in bone. Collectively this body of knowledge has led to the firm establishment of "osteoimmunology" as a novel discipline and a promising area of investigation. The objective of this perspective is to revisit the exciting hypothesis that T cells play a pivotal role in the mechanism of ovx-induced bone loss. The bone-sparing activity of estrogens is due to a repression of bone remodeling coupled with a balancing effect on bone formation and resorption.2 The dominant acute effect of estrogen is the blockade of new osteoclast formation, cells which arise by cytokine-driven proliferation and differentiation of monocyte precursors that circulate within the hematopoietic cell.3 This process is facilitated by BM stromal cells (SCs), which provide physical support for nascent osteoclasts and produce soluble and membrane-associated factors essential for the proliferation and differentiation of osteoclast precursors. This inhibitory effect on osteoclastogenesis is associated with a repressive effect on osteoblastogenesis.4 Another critical effect of estrogen is that of increasing osteoclast apoptosis5-7 while blocking the apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes.2, 8 It has been proposed that the effects of estrogens on the generation of osteoblasts and the lifespan of osteoblasts and osteoclasts result from extranuclear actions of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and activation of cytoplasmic kinases.2, 7 The decline of ovarian function at menopause results in decreased production of estrogen and a parallel increase in pituitary follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels. The combined effects of estrogen deprivation and elevated FSH production cause a marked stimulation of bone resorption9 and a period of rapid bone loss that is central to the pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis. In mice the acute effects of menopause are modeled by ovx, a procedure that stimulates bone resorption by increasing osteoclast formation3 and lifespan.5-7 This initial phase of bone loss is followed by a slower but more prolonged loss of mainly cortical bone due to incomplete refilling of the resorption cavities due to insufficient osteoblast (OB) activity and lifespan.10 An expansion of the osteoclastic pool is therefore the key mechanism responsible for the bone loss that occurs early after ovx. The net bone loss caused by ovx is limited, in part, by an increase in bone formation resulting from stimulated osteoblastogenesis.11 This compensation is fueled by an expansion of the pool of BM–SCs, increased commitment of such pluripotent precursors toward the osteoblastic lineage,11 and enhanced proliferation of early OB precursors.4 Subsequent escalations in OB apoptosis12, 13 extensions of osteoclast lifespan5, 6 and increased secretion of cytokines that suppress bone formation, such as interleukin 7 (IL-7) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), are the likely reasons for why bone formation does not increase as much as resorption after ovx. The stimulatory effect of ovx on SCs is equally relevant for osteoclastogenesis as one of the consequences of estrogen deprivation is the formation of osteoblastic cells with an increased osteoclastogenic activity14; ie, the capacity to support osteoclast formation. Evidence now suggests that T cells play a pivotal role in the mechanism of ovx-induced bone loss. Core observations include reports showing that ovx fails to induce trabecular and cortical bone loss in: T-cell–deficient nude mice,1, 15-17, wild-type (WT) mice deleted of T cells by injection of anti–T cell antibodies,18 mice treated with Abatacept19 (an agent that blocks T cell costimulation and induces T cell anergy and apoptosis)20, 21 and mice lacking the T cell costimulatory molecule CD40 ligand (CD40L).18 The fact that nude mice are protected against ovx-induced bone loss has been confirmed independently.22 By contrast, Lee and colleagues23 showed that nude mice are protected against the loss of cortical, but not trabecular bone induced by ovx. In another study, T-cell–deficient and B-cell–deficient mice were found to lose bone after ovx.24 The discrepancy between our reports1, 15-19, 25 and those of others23, 24 is likely explained by differences in the experimental design, the lack of B cells in some models, and compensatory mechanisms such as an increase in natural killer (NK) cells producing the osteoclastogenic factor IL-17.26 Both CD4+ and CD8+ cells have been found to play a role in ovx-induced bone loss. CD4+ cells include the TH1, Th2, and Th17 subsets. Th17 are regarded as the most osteoclastogenic subset of T CD4+ cells because they produce high levels of IL-17, receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL), and TNF, and low levels of interferon gamma (IFNγ).27, 28 The differentiation of Th17 is inhibited by estrogen via a direct effect mediated by estrogen receptor alpha (ERα).29 The role of Th17 in ovx-induced bone loss remains to be determined because one study reported that IL-17R–null mice are more susceptible to ovx-induced bone loss than controls,30 while another group found these mice to be protected from ovx-induced bone loss.26 More abundant information is available about regulatory T cells (Tregs), a population capable of suppressing the effector function of TH1, Th2, and Th17 T cells. Tregs are defined by the expression of the transcription factor FoxP3. Tregs inhibit monocyte differentiation into osteoclasts in vitro and in vivo, and blunt bone resorption31, 32 through the secretion of IL-4, IL-10, and transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ1).33 Attesting to the relevance of Tregs, studies have shown that estrogen increases the relative number of Tregs.27, 34 Moreover, transgenic mice overexpressing Tregs develop progressive high bone mass due to inhibition of bone resorption, and are protected against ovx-induced bone loss.35 Moreover, adoptive transfer of Tregs into T cell–deficient mice increases bone mass, indicating that Tregs directly affect bone homeostasis without the need to engage other T cell lineages.35 Two mechanisms have been described to explain how T cells contribute to ovx-induced bone loss (Fig. 1). The first involves an increase in T cell activation, leading to enhanced production of TNF by BM T cells. The second is a regulatory crosstalk between T cells and SCs, resulting in enhanced production of osteoclastogenic cytokines by SCs. Schematic representation of the role of T cells in the mechanism by which ovx promotes osteoclastogenesis, osteoblastogenesis, and hemopoiesis. Estrogen deficiency promotes T cell activation by increasing the interaction of antigen (Ag)-loaded MHC molecules with bone marrow macrophages (BMM) and dendritic cells (DC) with the T cell receptor (TCR). The Ags are likely to be non-self peptides derived from the intestinal macrobiota. T cell activation also requires at least two costimulatory signals provided by the binding of BMM and DC-expressed CD40 and CD80 to the T cell surface molecules CD40L and CD28, respectively. A critical upstream event is the increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that activate DCs by increasing their expression of CD80. The expansion of T cells in the BM is partially driven by an ovx-induced increase in the thymic output of naïve T cells. Activated T cells secrete TNF that stimulates osteoclast formation primarily by potentiating the response to RANKL. In addition, T cell–expressed CD40L and DLK1/FA-1 increase the osteoclastogenic activity of SC by blunting their secretion of OPG and augmenting their production of RANKL, M-CSF, and other proinflammatory factors. The survival of naïve T cells and some memory T cells requires the low-affinity engagement of the T cell receptor (TCR) by a diverse repertoire of self-antigens (Ags) bound to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules expressed on Ag-presenting cells.36, 37 By contrast, binding of foreign Ags such as bacterial Ags with MHC molecules is followed by high-affinity interactions with TCRs that drive T cell activation. Both low-affinity interactions with self-Ags and high-affinity foreign Ag/MHC/TCR interactions are referred to as "Ag presentation." Ovx induces T cell expression of activation markers and promotes T cell proliferation, expansion, and acquisition of effector functions. These are all features of T cells exposed to foreign Ags.36 The gastrointestinal tract is colonized for life with 100 trillion indigenous bacteria, creating a diverse ecosystem known as the microbiota, whose contributions to human health are profound.38 The macrobiota is likely to represent the source of foreign Ag that drives the expansion of T cells induced by ovx. Although direct verification of a role for macrobiota in T cell expansion is still lacking, compelling supportive data are available. For example, adoptive transfer of T cells into T cell–deficient mice is followed by rapid engraftment and expansion of donor T cells into the host. This process is driven by foreign Ags.36 Attesting to a role of the macrobiota, the expansion of transferred T cells into T cell–deficient mice is greatly reduced in host mice raised in a germ-free environment.36 Moreover, mice maintained in germ-free conditions display increased bone mass due to the lack of immune cell activation.39 T cells are key inducers of bone-wasting because ovx increases T cell TNF production to a level sufficient to augment RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis.1 This effect is due to an increased number of TNF-producing T cells15 and enhanced production of TNF per cell.18, 40 Ovx also increases the population of premature senescent CD4 + CD28–T cells,40 a lineage that produces high levels of TNF. The presence of increased levels of T cell–produced TNF in the BM of ovx animals is well documented.15, 19, 40, 41 Studies have also shown that menopause increases T cell activation and T cell production of TNF and RANKL in humans.42, 43 The role of TNF in ovx-induced bone loss has been demonstrated in multiple models. For example, ovx fails to induce bone loss in TNF-null mice and in animals lacking the p55 TNF receptor.15 Likewise, transgenic mice insensitive to TNF due to the overexpression of a soluble TNF receptor,44 and mice treated with the TNF inhibitor TNF binding protein45 are protected from ovx-induced bone loss. The specific relevance of T cell TNF production in vivo was demonstrated by the finding that although reconstitution of nude recipient mice with T cells from WT mice restores the capacity of ovx to induce bone loss, reconstitution with T cells from TNF-deficient mice does not.15 The mechanism by which estrogen deficiency expands the pool of TNF-producing T cells is summarized in Figure 1 and involves reactivation of thymic function and induction of T cell activation in the BM. T cell activation is driven by enhanced Ag presentation by macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs).46, 47 The thymus undergoes progressive structural and functional decline with age, coinciding with increased circulating sex-steroid levels at puberty.48 By middle age most parenchymal tissue is replaced by fat, and in both mice and humans fewer T cells are produced and exported to secondary lymphoid organs. However, the thymus continues to generate new T cells even into old age.49, 50 In fact, active lymphocytic thymic tissue has been documented in adults up to 107 years of age.51 Under severe T cell depletion secondary to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, chemotherapy, or bone marrow transplant, an increase in thymic output (known as thymic rebound) becomes critical for long-term restoration of T cell homeostasis. For example, middle-aged women treated with autologous bone marrow transplants develop thymic hypertrophy and a resurgence of thymic T cell output, which contributes to the restoration of a wide T cell repertoire,52 although the intensity of thymic rebound declines with age. The mechanism driving thymic rebound is not completely understood, but one factor involved is IL-7.53 Both androgens and estrogen suppress thymic function.54, 55 Accordingly, castration reverses thymic atrophy and increases export of recent thymic emigrants to the periphery,56 whereas sex steroids inhibit thymic regeneration by promoting thymocyte apoptosis and arresting thymocyte/prelymphocyte differentiation.57 Restoration of thymic function after castration occurs in young58 as well as in very old rodents.59, 60 In accordance with the notion that estrogen deficiency induces a rebound in thymic function, ovx increases the thymic export of naïve T cells.61 Indeed, stimulated thymic T cell output accounts for ∼50% of the increase in the number of T cells in the periphery. Moreover, thymectomy decreases the bone loss induced by ovx by ∼50%, thus demonstrating that the thymus plays a previously unrecognized role in the pathogenesis of ovx-induced bone loss in mice.61 The remaining bone loss is a consequence of the peripheral expansion of naïve and memory T cells. This finding suggests the tantalizing hypothesis that estrogen deficiency–induced thymic rebound may be responsible for the exaggerated bone loss in young women undergoing surgical menopause62 or for the rapid bone loss characteristic of women in their first 5 to 7 years after natural menopause.63 Indeed, an age-related decrease in estrogen deficiency–induced thymic rebound could mitigate the stimulatory effects of sex steroid deprivation and explain why the rate of bone loss in postmenopausal women diminishes as aging progresses.63 The most upstream effects of ovx in the BM are to stimulate the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and to impair the generation of antioxidants.10, 19, 64, 65 In response to ovx, ROS are produced by most BM cells, including T cells.41 ROS play an important role in postmenopausal bone loss by generating a more oxidized bone microenvironment.66, 67 Multiple enzymatic pathways regulate the intracellular redox state through modulation of ROS levels.68 Ovx blunts the BM levels of glutathione (GSH), a critical ROS scavenger, and reduces expression of APE1/Ref-1 and Prx-1 proteins, which collectively limit the production of intracellular ROS.69 ROS have important direct effects on osteoblasts and osteoclasts; these effects have been addressed elsewhere.7, 70, 71 However, additional pivotal effects of ROS include expanding the pool of mature DCs that express the costimulatory molecule CD80, and increasing DC-mediated Ag presentation.19 Antioxidants potently inhibit DC differentiation and their ability to activate T cells,72, 73 in part by suppressing expression of MHC class II and costimulatory molecules in response to Ag.74 N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC), which acts as an intracellular scavenger of ROS by restoring intracellular concentrations of GSM, can block DC maturation75 and DC-mediated T cell activation.76 In vivo support for a role of ROS is provided by experiments demonstrating that administration of antioxidants prevents ovx-induced bone loss,19, 64, 70 while depletion of glutathione by buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), which inhibits glutathione synthesis, enhances bone loss.64 Bone loss caused by BSO has significant similarities to bone loss induced by estrogen deficiency, as both processes are TNF-dependent.77 A second, direct upstream effect of estrogen deficiency is to blunt BM levels of TGFβ,78 a powerful repressor of T cell activation. TGFβ acts as an immunosuppressant by inhibiting T cell activation and T cell production of inflammatory cytokines, including IFNγ. Demonstrating the relevance of the repressive effects of TGFβ on T cell function, mice with T cell–specific blockade of TGFβ signaling were found to be completely resistant to the bone-sparing effects of estrogen.16 Gain of function experiments confirmed that elevation of the systemic levels of TGFβ prevents ovx-induced bone loss and bone turnover.16 The key downstream mechanism by which ovx increases Ag presentation by macrophages is a stimulatory effect on the expression of the gene encoding Class II Transactivator (CIITA). The product of CIITA is a non-DNA binding factor induced by IFNγ that functions as a transcriptional coactivator at the MHC II promoter.79 Increased CIITA expression in macrophages results from ovx-mediated increases in IFNγ production by CD4+ T cells and the responsiveness of CIITA to IFNγ.46 This cytokine was initially described as an anti-osteoclastogenic cytokine because it is a potent inhibitor of osteoclastogenesis in vitro.80 The notion that IFNγ is an inhibitor of bone resorption was reinforced by the finding that silencing of IFNγR−/− signaling leads to a more rapid onset of collagen-induced arthritis and bone resorption81 as compared to WT controls, and by the report that IFNγ decreases serum calcium and osteoclastic bone resorption in nude mice.82, 83 Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the anti-osteoclastogenic activity of IFNγ, including inhibition of RANKL signaling through the degradation of TNF receptor–associated factor 6 (TRAF6),80 stimulation of apoptosis mediated by Fas/FasL signals,84 and inhibition of RANK and c-Fms gene expression.85 However, the finding that IFNγ is an effective treatment for osteopetrosis both in humans86 and rodents87 demonstrates that the net effect of IFNγ in vivo is to stimulate osteoclastic bone resorption. In keeping with a net pro-resorptive effect of IFNγ in vivo are reports demonstrating that IFNγ−/− and IFNγR−/− mice are protected against ovx-induced bone loss.17, 46 Mice lacking IFNγ production are also protected against infection-induced alveolar bone loss,88 whereas in erosive tuberculoid leprosy and psoriatic arthritis IFNγ production correlates positively with tissue destruction.89 In addition, randomized controlled trials have shown that IFNγ does not prevent bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA),90 nor the bone-wasting effect of cyclosporine A.91 Finally, disruption of IFNγ signaling in vivo results in a strong and sustained inhibition of markers of osteoclastic activity.92 These opposing in vitro and in vivo effects of IFNγ are explained by the fact that IFNγ influences osteoclast formation via both direct and indirect effects.17 IFNγ directly blocks osteoclast formation through targeting of maturing osteoclast.93 However, IFNγ is also a potent inducer of antigen presentation and thus of T cell activation. Therefore, when IFNγ levels are increased in vivo, activated T cells secrete pro-osteoclastogenic factors and this activity offsets the anti-osteoclastogenic effects of IFNγ.17 It should also be mentioned that it is now recognized that IFNγ affects bone turnover by promoting the commitment of BM–SCs into the osteoblastic lineage and their differentiation into mature osteoblasts.94 Accordingly, treatment with IFNγ reverses ovx-induced bone loss by promoting bone formation.92 Another mechanism by which estrogen regulates T cell TNF production is by repressing the production of IL-7, a potent lymphopoietic cytokine and an inducer of bone destruction in vivo.95 Attesting to the relevance of this factor, IL-7 levels are significantly elevated following ovx,61, 96 and in vivo IL-7 blockade is effective in preventing ovx-induced bone destruction.96 The elevated BM levels of IL-7 contribute to the expansion of the T cell population in peripheral lymphoid organs through several mechanisms. First, IL-7 directly stimulates T cell proliferation.61 Second, IL-7 increases antigen presentation by upregulating the production of IFNγ. Third, IL-7 and TGFβ regulate The in TGFβ signaling characteristic of estrogen deficiency may to stimulate IL-7 thus driving the of osteoclastogenic cytokine production and bone In estrogen deficiency, IL-7 bone loss by suppressing bone formation and thus bone formation from resorption. A that the crosstalk between T cells and SCs is relevant for ovx-induced bone loss was provided by the finding that activated T cells induce SC apoptosis via the ligand a which blunts the compensatory increase in bone formation that bone loss in ovx More abundant information is available about the T crosstalk driven by the also known as is a key surface ligand expressed on T CD40L to and several CD40 is expressed on cells, hemopoietic and cells of the osteoblastic CD40L has been to because T cells, through the production of the anti-osteoclastogenic factor by B mice a reduced bone due to exaggerated bone bone has also been found in by a in which CD40L production is due to a in the CD40L However, mice lacking T cell–expressed CD40L are protected against hormone bone the that CD40L may in while promoting bone resorption conditions of bone Studies with mice and with WT mice treated with the CD40L have that silencing of CD40L completely prevents ovx-induced bone A mechanism was shown to be First, silencing of CD40L blocks the activation of T cells and the resulting production of TNF. Second, CD40L is for ovx to increase the proliferation and the differentiation of SCs and their capacity to support osteoclast formation through enhanced production of factor and RANKL, and secretion of a critical additional mechanism by which T cells bone homeostasis in ovx mice is through a crosstalk between T cells and SCs that results in enhanced osteoclastogenesis to a enhanced In ovx increases the number of activated T cells that the expression of and RANKL by SCs, and ovx the SC production of The net result is a significant increase in the rate of The interaction of CD40L with CD40 on SCs in the of estrogen deficiency to the effects of costimulation on B cell OPG the of osteoclast formation in of bone loss. An additional mechanism of T crosstalk the novel of bone mass antigen has been for a known as This factor can be to generate a soluble known as In conditions DLK1/FA-1 are produced by SCs, B cells, and T cells. These factors stimulate osteoclastogenesis and block by the production of TNF, IL-7, and other inflammatory cytokines by SCs. Ovx increases the production of DLK1/FA-1 by activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, resulting in a stimulation of the production of osteoclastogenic cytokines by SCs. Attesting to the relevance of mice are significantly protected against ovx-induced bone The hypothesis that the immune system is pivotal for the bone loss about by menopause remains to be demonstrated in it remains to the of why the immune system in and is involved in the mechanism of ovx-induced bone loss. may by postmenopausal bone loss as an of an event critical for the need to stimulate bone resorption in the This process is essential to the increased for calcium about by The for this event is the acute in estrogen levels A second to the period is in associated with is by proliferation of the and formation of These are by and is now that regulates and to by the production of RANKL and a system that is for bone homeostasis is also a key of The in levels in the period results in reduced tissue levels of RANK and RANKL, with the effect of the for The increase in the and TNF levels in the BM induced by estrogen levels the of calcium from the to the and then to the a state of to the is induced by an increase in the number of A to the of is the loss of such immune and the restoration of a immune This is through a decrease in the resulting from the acute in steroid levels. However, a between immune to the and bone is provided by the that OPG is expressed by human it is to that of ovarian function induces bone loss through an immune response because natural has these key within the immune system to (Fig. Schematic representation of in the period and of the involved cells and The that estrogen and are followed by a stimulation of bone resorption, to and of immune to the Activated T cells drive bone resorption by TNF. A decrease in the number of Tregs induces the of the immune The loss of OPG may contribute to the and the increased bone resorption. A decrease in levels of RANKL and RANK induce the of the for with increased of calcium from the the in the contribute to an event critical for The data the hypothesis that of ovarian function induces bone loss through an immune response because natural has key within the immune system to The data support the hypothesis that the bone loss induced by estrogen deficiency is due to a complex of hormones and cytokines that to the process of bone Ovx T cell TNF production by increasing T cell activity in the and the peripheral lymphoid organs. T cell precursors the BM and to the T cell and expansion in the of from the these new T cells to peripheral lymphoid including the BM Ovx induces T cell activation in the BM in part by directly promoting antigen and in part via stimulation of IL-7 and IFNγ production and of TGFβ The net result of these actions is an increase in the number of TNF-producing T cells. The elevated levels of TNF increase RANKL-induced osteoclast formation. Estrogen deficiency also T cell activation and osteoclastogenesis by leading to an in The combined effect of IFNγ and ROS enhances Ag T cell activation. T cells stimulate RANKL and production by SCs, through CD40L and The that has of

The phase 3 program for strontium ranelate, a new oral agent in the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, was aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the daily oral dose of 2 g. This program was conducted in 12 countries, involved 75 centers, and was structured in 3 studies: FIRST (Fracture International Run-in for Strontium ranelate Trial), SOTI (Spinal Osteoporosis Therapeutic Intervention study) and TROPOS (TReatment Of Peripheral OSteoporosis). FIRST, a run-in open study, was designed to start the normalization of the calcium and vitamin D status of the patients, check all entry criteria, and ensure inclusion of a sufficient number of well-motivated patients in either one of the two therapeutic intervention protocols, SOTI or TROPOS: FIRST included 9,196 patients. SOTI and TROPOS were prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trials comparing, in two parallel groups, the daily oral dose of 2 g of strontium ranelate with placebo, the patients of both groups receiving calcium and vitamin D according to their own deficiencies. The main objective of SOTI and TROPOS was to demonstrate a reduction in the incidence of postmenopausal women experiencing a new osteoporotic fracture (vertebral fracture in SOTI and nonvertebral fracture in TROPOS) over a 3-year treatment period, the total duration of the studies being 5 years. SOTI included 1,649 women with at least one osteoporotic vertebral fracture at inclusion and a lumbar BMD </=0.840 g/cm(2). TROPOS included 5,091 women with a femoral neck BMD </=0.600 g/cm(2). The phase 3 program for the clinical development of strontium ranelate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis is a long-term program with the main statistical analysis after 3 years of treatment. Its aim is to demonstrate the effect of strontium ranelate on the axial and appendicular skeleton as well as its tolerability in osteoporotic patients with replete calcium and vitamin D stores.