• Home
  • Search
  • STRUCTURAL COLLAPSE, THE FAILURE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND “OFF‐THE‐SHELF” OPERATION
  • Cite Icon2
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00785.xCopy DOI Icon

STRUCTURAL COLLAPSE, THE FAILURE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND “OFF‐THE‐SHELF” OPERATION

  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract— The criteria for determining whether ferritic material exhibits fully ductile behaviour are generally based on the fracture toughness vs temperature relationship determined from standard laboratory test pieces (e.g. Charpy V Impact tests or fracture toughness specimens). This relationship defines a ductile‐brittle transition region. When fully ductile, microvoid coalescence behaviour is experienced, and fracture toughness is described as being on the “upper shelf”. At “off the shelf” temperatures brittle, cleavage fracture is experienced. On the lower shelf the material is entirely brittle, exhibiting 100% crystallinity on the fracture face. As the temperature increases, initiation of tearing by microvoid coalescence occurs and some stable tearing can occur prior to the cleavage event. Material toughness increases with temperature until the upper shelf condition is achieved.The characteristics of fracture toughness tests in terms of the toughness level exhibited and the extent of ductile tearing experienced have been used as a guide to whether the structural application (e.g. a pressure vessel) will behave in a brittle or a ductile manner. This paper reports on a feasibility study where various worked examples have been performed to examine the concept of using a “cut off” on the failure assessment diagram, determined from the conditions required to cause plastic collapse of a pressure vessel, as a criterion for defining effective “ductile” operation. Fracture assessment procedures (R6 revisions 2 and 3 and PD6493 levels 2 and 3) have been utilised to determine the influence on pressure vessel performance of the behaviour of fracture toughness test specimens.The procedure of plotting a structural collapse “cut off” on a failure assessment diagram enables the assessment of whether a particular flaw geometry would result in gross deformation of the structure at failure. The use of this procedure provides an unambiguous demarcation between “fracture dominated” and “collapse controlled” conditions. This procedure facilitates judgements on the level of toughness necessary to ensure ductile operation and whether a “tearing plus toughness” requirement is necessary.It is recommended that consideration be given to including structural collapse into fracture assessment procedures carried out using R6 revision 3 or PD 6493:1991 procedures in order to determine the conditions when enhanced toughness no longer influences structural performance (i.e. when effective “upper shelf” conditions are attained).

Similar Papers
  • Single Report
  • Citations2

The Assessment and Validation of Mini-Compact Tension Test Specimen Geometry and Progress in Establishing Technique for Fracture Toughness Master Curves for Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels

  • Sep 01, 2016
  • Mikhail A Sokolov +1
  • Research Article

Integrity Assessment of Cracked Pressure Vessel with Considering Effect of Residual Stress Based on Failure Assessment Diagram Criteria

  • Feb 28, 2016
  • The Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering- (JOMAse)
  • Musthafa Akbar +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Three-dimensional constraint-based failure assessment diagrams

  • Apr 06, 2023
  • Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
  • F Yusof
  • Single Report

Subtask 12D3: Fracture properties of V-5Cr-5Ti Alloy

  • Mar 01, 1995
  • H Li +2
  • Research Article

Study on Fracture Toughness Prediction of Non Power Law Hardening Material by Using Local Approach

  • Feb 21, 2011
  • Advanced Materials Research
  • Hu Hui +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

Use of Mini-CT Specimens for Fracture Toughness Characterization of Low Upper-Shelf Linde 80 Weld

  • Jul 16, 2017
  • Mikhail A Sokolov
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

The relation between the fracture toughness of plates and the thickness of the shear lips

  • Sep 01, 1974
  • Engineering Fracture Mechanics
  • D.L Holt +2
  • Book Chapter

Fracture Evaluation of a High-Pressure Gas Bottle by J-Integral Based Failure Assessment Diagram Using Ansys

  • Jan 01, 2022
  • A K Asraff +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

Leak-Before-Break Assessment of a Cracked Reactor Vessel Nozzle Using 3D Crack Meshes

  • Jul 17, 2016
  • Greg Thorwald +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations118

Development of the Euro fracture toughness dataset

  • Feb 02, 2002
  • Engineering Fracture Mechanics
  • J Heerens +1
  • Single Report
  • Citations4

Development of Mini-Compact Tension Test Method for Determining Fracture Toughness Master Curves for Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels

  • May 01, 2017
  • Mikhail A Sokolov
  • Conference Article

Use of Small Specimens for Evaluation of Irradiated Materials

  • Jul 14, 2013
  • Mikhail A Sokolov +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Application of R6 failure assessment method to obtain fracture toughness

  • Oct 31, 2015
  • Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
  • M.K Sahu +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations2

Fracture Analysis of Ductile Crack Growth in Weld Material from a Full-Thickness Clad RPV Shell Segment

  • Jan 01, 1999
  • JA Keeney +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Failure Assessment of Cracked Pipes Based on Failure Assessment Diagram Considering Random and Fuzzy Uncertainties

  • Jan 01, 2015
  • Procedia Engineering
  • W Wu +4
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.