• Home
  • Search
  • Structure-free model-based predictive signal control: A sensitivity analysis on a corridor with spillback
  • Cite Icon3
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2023.104174Copy DOI Icon

Structure-free model-based predictive signal control: A sensitivity analysis on a corridor with spillback

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Model-based predictive signal control is a popular method to pro-actively control traffic and to reduce the effects of congestion in urban networks. In combination with structure-free controllers, which adapt signal settings in arbitrary order and combination (no imposed cycles), these predictive control methods have a high potential to increase system performance by adapting to individual vehicle patterns, which are increasingly available due to new technology. However, most of these control methods assume perfect predictions, while in practice there are prediction errors due to various reasons. In this paper, the sensitivity of the system performance to these prediction errors is analyzed, for an urban corridor with spillback.In a microscopic simulator, first the ideal world is created for the structure-free model-based predictive signal controller, in which perfect predictions are made and the controller can reach its optimal performance. Then prediction errors are introduced in this perfect world, distinguished in aggregation errors that arise using a macroscopic prediction model and biases that represent structural errors in the prediction model or in its demand and state input. The effects of these prediction errors on the system performance are analyzed, as a function of the prediction horizon and update frequency of the control system.The results show that, even under errors, longer prediction horizons lead to better performance, up to a certain optimal prediction horizon length. A high update frequency dampens the influence of prediction errors, enabling the structure-free controller to correct mistakes faster. However, there remains a significant performance loss due to aggregation errors and biases in the prediction model, indicating a promising performance gain of more reliable predictions and the incorporation of information on individual vehicles in future control applications. Moreover, for all model quantities one direction of the bias has more impact on the system performance than the other direction, indicating guidelines towards a more robust control system that suffers less from erroneous predictions.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations54

Predictive Error Model-Based Enhanced Observer for PMSM Deadbeat Control Systems

  • Mar 01, 2024
  • IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
  • Dongliang Ke +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

A Model-Free Predictive Control Method for Grid-Tied Inverter Based on Discrete Space Vector

  • Nov 20, 2021
  • Zhuangzhuang Feng +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Low cogging torque design and simplified model-free predictive current control for radial-flux dual three-phase permanent magnet electric machines

  • Dec 01, 2019
  • Advances in Mechanical Engineering
  • Hsing-Cheng Yu +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

Robust attitude predictive control design for reentry vehicle

  • Jun 01, 2016
  • Guo Jianguo +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations249

Recurrent neuro-fuzzy networks for nonlinear process modeling

  • Mar 01, 1999
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
  • Jie Zhang +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

A Lateral Acceleration Prediction Model based on Current Vehicle State

  • Oct 28, 2022
  • Shaosong Li +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Model-based predictive controller design for a class of nonlinear networked systems with communication delays and data loss

  • Jun 10, 2014
  • Chinese Physics B
  • Bao-Ran An +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Constraint Optimal Model-Based Disturbance Predictive and Rejection Control Method of a Parabolic Trough Solar Field

  • Nov 20, 2024
  • Energies
  • Shangshang Wei +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

Model-Free Adaptive Predictive Balancing Control for Freeway and Side Road

  • Jul 01, 2018
  • Kai Li +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations135

A Comparison of Model Predictive Control Schemes for MV Induction Motor Drives

  • May 01, 2013
  • IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
  • James Scoltock +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

LONG-RANGE PREDICTIVE CONTROL WITH STEADY STATE ERROR WEIGHTING

  • May 01, 1997
  • International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing
  • K Ezra Kwok +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations5

Control architectures of galvanometer-based scanners for an increased precision and a faster response

  • Jan 14, 2014
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE
  • Corina Mnerie +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

Torque ripple reduction of DFIG by a new and robust predictive torque control method

  • Jun 27, 2017
  • IET Renewable Power Generation
  • Mohsen Mokhtari Vayeghan +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Nonparametric three-vector model predictive current control for permanent magnet synchronous motor

  • Oct 01, 2023
  • Xibei Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University
  • Yufeng Zhang +6
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

An exact-model based unified predictive force control of flexible manipulators

  • Jul 29, 1996
  • Aria Alasty +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.