TeIL: a type-safe imperative tensor intermediate language

A weight-balanced tree (WBT) is a binary search tree, whose balance is based on the sizes of the subtrees in each node. Although purely functional implementations on a variant WBT algorithm are widely used in functional programming languages, many existing implementations do not maintain balance after deletion in some cases. The difficulty lies in choosing a valid pair of rotation parameters: one for standard balance and the other for choosing single or double rotation. This paper identifies the exact valid range of the rotation parameters for insertion and deletion in the original WBT algorithm where one and only one integer solution exists. Soundness of the range is proved using a proof assistant Coq. Completeness is proved using effective algorithms generating counterexample trees. For two specific parameter pairs, we also proved in Coq that set operations also maintain balance. Since the difference between the original WBT and the variant WBT is small, it is easy to change the existing buggy implementations based on the variant WBT to the certified original WBT with a rational solution.

We present verification of a bare-metal server built using diverse implementation techniques and languages against a whole-system input-output specification in terms of machine code, network packets, and mathematical specifications of elliptic-curve cryptography. We used very different formal-reasoning techniques throughout the stack, ranging from computer algebra, symbolic execution, and verification-condition generation to interactive verification of functional programs including compilers for C-like and functional languages. All these component specifications and domain-specific reasoning techniques are defined and justified against common foundations in the Coq proof assistant. Connecting these components is a minimalistic specification style based on functional programs and assertions over simple objects, omnisemantics for program execution, and basic separation logic for memory layout. This design enables us to bring the components together in a top-level correctness theorem that can be audited without understanding or trusting the internal interfaces and tools. Our case study is a simple cryptographic server for flipping of a bit of state through public-key authenticated network messages, and its proof shows total functional correctness including static bounds on memory usage. This paper also describes our experiences with the specific verification tools we build upon, along with detailed analysis of reasons behind the widely varying levels of productivity we experienced between combinations of tools and tasks.

Futures are an elegant approach to expressing parallelism in functional programs. However, combining futures with imperative programming (as in C++ or in Java) can lead to pernicious bugs in the form of data races and deadlocks, as a consequence of uncontrolled data flow through mutable shared memory. In this paper we introduce the Known Joins (KJ) property for parallel programs with futures, and relate it to the Deadlock Freedom (DF) and the Data-Race Freedom (DRF) properties. Our paper offers two key theoretical results: 1) DRF implies KJ, and 2) KJ implies DF. These results show that data-race freedom is sufficient to guarantee deadlock freedom in programs with futures that only manipulate unsynchronized shared variables. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first theoretical results to establish sufficient conditions for deadlock freedom in imperative parallel programs with futures, and to characterize the subset of data races that can trigger deadlocks (those that violate the KJ property). From result 2), we developed a tool that avoids deadlocks in linear time and space when KJ holds, i.e., when there are no data races among references to futures. When KJ fails, the tool reports the data race and optionally falls back to a standard deadlock avoidance algorithm by cycle detection. Our tool verified a dataset of ∼2,300 student’s homework solutions and found one deadlocked program. The performance results obtained from our tool are very encouraging: a maximum slowdown of 1.06× on a 16-core machine, always outperforming deadlock avoidance via cycle-detection. Proofs of the two main results were formalized using the Coq proof assistant.

Proceedings First International Workshop on Hammers for Type Theories

A prototype framework for formal, machine-checked validation of GPU pseudo-assembly code algorithms using the Coq proof assistant is presented and discussed. The framework is the first to afford GPU programmers a reliable means of formally machine-validating high-assurance GPU computations without trusting any specific source-to-assembly compilation toolchain. A formal operational semantics for the PTX pseudo-assembly language is expressed as inductive, dependent Coq types, facilitating development of proofs and proof tactics that refer directly to the compiled PTX object code. Challenges modeling PTX’s complex and highly parallelized computation model in Coq, with sufficient clarity and generality to tractably prove useful properties of realistic GPU programs, are discussed. Examples demonstrate how the prototype can already be used to validate some realistic programs.

Compositional compiler verification is a difficult problem that focuses on separate compilation of program components with possibly different verified compilers. Logical relations are widely used in proving correctness of program transformations in higher-order languages; however, they do not scale to compositional verification of multi-pass compilers due to their lack of transitivity. The only known technique to apply to compositional verification of multi-pass compilers for higher-order languages is parametric inter-language simulations (PILS), which is however significantly more complicated than traditional proof techniques for compiler correctness. In this paper, we present a novel verification framework for lightweight compositional compiler correctness . We demonstrate that by imposing the additional restriction that program components are compiled by pipelines that go through the same sequence of intermediate representations , logical relation proofs can be transitively composed in order to derive an end-to-end compositional specification for multi-pass compiler pipelines. Unlike traditional logical-relation frameworks, our framework supports divergence preservation—even when transformations reduce the number of program steps. We achieve this by parameterizing our logical relations with a pair of relational invariants . We apply this technique to verify a multi-pass, optimizing middle-end pipeline for CertiCoq, a compiler from Gallina (Coq’s specification language) to C. The pipeline optimizes and closure-converts an untyped functional intermediate language (ANF or CPS) to a subset of that language without nested functions, which can be easily code-generated to low-level languages. Notably, our pipeline performs more complex closure-allocation optimizations than the state of the art in verified compilation. Using our novel verification framework, we prove an end-to-end theorem for our pipeline that covers both termination and divergence and applies to whole-program and separate compilation, even when different modules are compiled with different optimizations. Our results are mechanized in the Coq proof assistant.

To apply information theory to more areas, the author proposed semantic information G theory, which is a natural generalization of Shannon’s information theory. This theory uses the P-T probability framework so that likelihood functions and truth functions (or membership functions), as well as sampling distributions, can be put into the semantic mutual information formula at the same time. Hence, we can connect statistics and (fuzzy) logic. Rate-distortion function R(D) becomes rate-verisimilitude function R(G) (G is the lower limit of the semantic mutual information) when the distortion function is replaced with the semantic information function. Seven difficult tasks are 1) clarifying the relationship between minimum information and maximum entropy in statistical mechanics, 2) compressing images according to visual discrimination, 3) multilabel learning for obtaining truth functions or membership functions from sampling distributions, 4) feature classifications with maximum mutual information criterion, 5) proving the convergence of the expectation-maximization algorithm for mixture models, 6) interpreting Popper’s verisimilitude and reconciling the contradiction between the content approach and the likeness approach, and 7) providing practical confirmation measures and clarifying the raven paradox. This paper simply introduces the mathematical methods for these tasks and the conclusions. The P-T probability framework and the semantic information G theory should have survived the tests. They should have broader applications. Further studies are needed for combining them with neural networks for machine learning.

Operational Semantics of a Focusing Debugger

We develop a mechanized proof of Featherweight Java with Assignment and Immutability in the Coq proof assistant. This is a step towards more machine-checked proofs of a non-trivial type system. We used object immutability close to that of IGJ [9] . We describe the challenges of the mech- anisation and the encoding we used inside of Coq.

This work describes a formalization effort, using the Coq proof assistant, of fundamental results related to the classical theory of context-free grammars and languages. These include closure properties union, concatenation and Kleene star, grammar simplification elimination of useless symbols, inaccessible symbols, empty rules and unit rules, the existence of a Chomsky Normal Form for context-free grammars and the Pumping Lemma for context-free languages. The result is an important set of libraries covering the main results of context-free language theory, with more than 500 lemmas and theorems fully proved and checked. This is probably the most comprehensive formalization of the classical context-free language theory in the Coq proof assistant done to the present date, and includes the important result that is the formalization of the Pumping Lemma for context-free languages.

Language model enhanced surface chloride concentration determination for concrete within splash environment based on limited field records

Nowadays, formal methods rely on tools of different kinds: proof assistants with which the user interacts to discover a proof step by step; and fully automated tools which make use of (intricate) decision procedures. But while some proof assistants can check the soundness of a proof, they lack automation. Regarding automated tools, one still has to be satisfied with their answers Yes/No/Do not know, the validity of which can be subject to question, in particular because of the increasing size and complexity of these tools.In the context of rewriting techniques, we aim at bridging the gap between proof assistants that yield formal guarantees of reliability and highly automated tools one has to trust. We present an approach making use of both shallow and deep embeddings. We illustrate this approach with a prototype based on the CiME rewriting toolbox, which can discover involved termination proofs that can be certified by the Coq proof assistant, using the Coccinelle library for rewriting.KeywordsModule TypeAutomate ToolProof AssistantGraph CriterionStrongly Connect ComponentThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

We present a certified compiler from the simply-typed lambda calculus to assembly language. The compiler is certified in the sense that it comes with a machine-checked proof of semantics preservation, performed with the Coq proof assistant. The compiler and the terms of its several intermediate languages are given dependent types that guarantee that only well-typed programs are representable. Thus, type preservation for each compiler pass follows without any significant “proofs ” of the usual kind. Semantics preservation is proved based on denotational semantics assigned to the intermediate languages. We demonstrate how working with a type-preserving compiler enables type-directed proof search to discharge large parts of our proof obligations automatically. Categories and Subject Descriptors F.3.1 [Logics and meanings

Verified compilers, such as Leroy's CompCert, are accompanied by a fully checked correctness proof. Both the compiler and proof are often constructed with an interactive proof assistant. This technique provides a strong, end-to-end correctness guarantee on top of a small trusted computing base. Unfortunately, these compilers are also challenging to extend since each additional transformation must be proven correct in full formal detail. At the other end of the spectrum, techniques for compiler correctness based on a domain-specific language for writing optimizations, such as Lerner's Rhodium and Cobalt, make the compiler easy to extend: the correctness of additional transformations can be checked completely automatically. Unfortunately, these systems provide a weaker guarantee since their end-to-end correctness has not been proven fully formally. We present an approach for compiler correctness that provides the best of both worlds by bridging the gap between compiler verification and compiler extensibility. In particular, we have extended Leroy's CompCert compiler with an execution engine for optimizations written in a domain specific and proved that this execution engine preserves program semantics, using the Coq proof assistant. We present our CompCert extension, XCert, including the details of its execution engine and proof of correctness in Coq. Furthermore, we report on the important lessons learned for making the proof development manageable.

This paper proposes a mechanized formal semantics for dataflow circuits: rather than following a predetermined, static schedule, the execution of the circuit components is constrained solely by the availability of their input data. We model circuit components as abstract computing units, asynchronously connected with each other through unidirectional, unbounded FIFO. In contrast to Kahn’s classic, denotational semantic framework, our semantics is operational. It intends to reflect Dennis’ dataflow paradigm with firing, while still formalizing the observable behaviors of circuits as channels histories. The components we handle are either stateless or stateful, and may be non-deterministic. We formalize sufficient conditions to achieve the determinacy of circuits executions: all possible schedules of such circuits lead to a unique observable behavior. We provide two equivalent views for circuits. The first one is a direct and natural representation as graphs of components. The second is a core, structured term calculus, which enables constructing and reasoning about circuits in a inductive way. We prove that both representations are semantically equivalent. We conduct our formalization within the Coq proof assistant. We experimentally validate its relevance by applying our general semantic framework to dataflow circuits generated with Dynamatic, a recent HLS tool exploiting dataflow circuits to generate dynamically scheduled, elastic circuits.