Osteopontin in skeletal tissue homeostasis: An emerging picture of the autocrine/paracrine functions of the extracellular matrix.
The bone remodeling cycle is intimately involved in the metabolic homeostasis of mineral balance.1 Bone formation and the remodeling cycle are essential in maintaining the structural integrity of skeletal tissue in response to the mechanical loading to which it is subjected.2, 3 It is likely that remodeling also provides the means of repairing bone tissue damaged as a result of mechanical fatigue.4 Thus, the skeletal cells (osteoblasts and osteoclasts) that mediate the remodeling process almost certainly are regulated by their mechanical environment. In the article by Terai et al., "Role of osteopontin in bone remodeling caused by mechanical stress"5 published in this issue of JBMR, data are presented that begin to elucidate the molecular events that regulate the remodeling cycle in response to mechanical stimulation. The authors show that induction of osteopontin (OPN) expression by osteoblasts in response to mechanical stimulation provides one of the mechanisms by which osteoclast function is coupled to a response that is regulated by the mechanical loading of the bone tissue. A brief review is presented in this perspective on the state of knowledge concerning the function of OPN in bone and other tissues. This perspective also presents the emerging picture that OPN in particular, as well as other molecules of the extracellular matrix (ECM), play essential roles in skeletal tissue structure and also mediate crucial autocrine and paracrine functions in the regulation of tissue formation and remodeling. OPN was initially characterized as one of the predominant noncollagenous proteins that accumulate in the ECM of bone tissue.6-10 Both its levels of expression relative to other noncollagenous proteins,11, 12 and its quantities of accumulation6-10, 13, 14 in the bone demonstrate that it's one of the most prevalent noncollagenous proteins synthesized by osteoblasts. The protein is ∼300 amino acids in length and shows a variable size on SDS-PAGE (∼70–45 kDa) due primarily to its differing degrees of post-translational modifications. Sequence comparisons among various species of OPN15 have identified the conserved protein domains within the mature molecule. These domains include a number of N- and O-linked glycosylation sites, a poly-aspartic acid sequence of 7–10 consecutive aspartic residues, an RGD integrin recognition site, and a number of casein kinase II phosphorylation sites.16, 17 The OPN gene is ubiquitously expressed in all skeletal tissues during embryogenesis. However, it is not exclusively restricted to skeletal tissues since it is expressed at moderately high levels within developing kidneys.18 During the in vitro growth of primary osteoblast cultures, OPN expression shows a very early transient peak of expression, after these cells initially attach to their substrate, followed by a continued rise in expression that precedes that of osteocalcin and the mineralization of the ECM.19-22 Maximal levels of OPN expression are observed when osteoblasts reach full differentiation, and regulatory elements appear to control the promoter activity in both a skeletal tissue-specific manner and in response to AP-1–related activation.15 During skeletal tissue development in vivo, OPN expression reaches maximal levels of expression during postembryological bone development.23, 24 There is now considerable evidence that osteoclasts also express25 and synthesize OPN during bone remodeling,26 suggesting that this protein plays a more important role in postnatal skeletal tissue homeostasis than in initial skeletal tissue development. Extensive ultrastructural studies of OPN distribution in skeletal tissue ECMs illustrate that the protein is distributed throughout the mineralized areas of the bone and hypertrophic cartilage ECM. It is primarily associated with electron-dense areas of matrix-containing aggregates of other noncollagenous proteins that appear between collagen fibrils in the interfibrillar spaces of the ECM.27-29 One of the most unique aspects of OPN structural organization is its very specific association with boundary surfaces of skeletal tissues. These include the cement lines that demarcate matrix–matrix interfaces, such as that surrounding osteocytes and their canalicular processes and between lining cells and the underlying bone matrix.30 Other ultrastructural studies indicate that OPN localizes adjacent to the clear zones of resorptive osteoclasts.31 It has been proposed from these structural and immunocytochemical studies that OPN may have a functional role in providing tissue cohesion within the mineralized portions of the ECM where it is ubiquitously distributed and, likewise, might promote tissue and cellular adhesion at boundary surfaces such as at cement lines, the lamatan limitantes, and sites of matrix resorption.32 Numerous functional studies have focused on defining the role of OPN in bone metabolism. It was theorized that, due to its highly anionic and phosphorylated nature and its ability to tightly bind Ca2+ and hydroxyapatite,33, 34 phosphorylated proteins in general, and osteopontin in particular, played a role in the initiation and/or regulation of the mineralization process.33-37 A number of in vitro studies, however, indicate that OPN acts primarily as an inhibitor of mineral nucleation and growth,38, 39 raising the doubt that this molecule plays an important role in the initial deposition of the mineral in the matrix. The identification of the RGD sequence in the OPN molecule and its unique ultrastructural localization at resorption and boundary surfaces30 within the ECM of mineralized tissues led to other studies focusing on the function of the protein in mediating cell–matrix interactions through its RGD binding with specific integrin receptors.31, 40 Initial in vitro studies demonstrated that OPN promoted cellular adherence of a wide variety of cells including osteoblasts,13, 14 fibroblasts,41-43 macrophages, T-cells,44 and osteoclasts.45 The initial data, indicating that OPN specifically interacted with the αvβ3 integrin isotype40 and identification of αvβ3 integrin as one of the predominant cell adhesion receptors on the surface of osteoclasts.45-47 subsequently led to studies that have documented that osteopontin interaction with this receptor potentiates resorption,48, 49 while antagonism of this receptor interaction with OPN specifically inhibits bone resorption.50, 51 Finally, other data also suggest that both OPN, as well as other RGD-containing extracellular matrix proteins such as fibronectin and bone sialoprotein, may play important roles in directing cellular migration during skeletal growth or in defining the spatial boundaries of mineral deposition within the extracellular matrix.13, 52 Thus, the preponderance of functional and structural data to date suggest that the function of OPN in skeletal tissue is more associated with tissue remodeling and providing cells with positional information within the ECM and less of an inductive role in the mineralization process. Independent research efforts in both cancer biology and immunology identified that OPN plays an important role in aspects of metastasis and immunological response. OPN is an early, immediate-response gene during both T-cell53, 54 and macrophage activation.44 In addition, it is an AP-1–inducible gene following phorbol ester tumor promoter treatment in both epithelial55 and skeletal cells.56 Finally, it is identified independently as both a serum marker of malignant cell growth57 and as a component of metastatic tumors from a wide variety of primary tissue origins in mice and humans.58, 59 Numerous studies have shown OPN expression at varying levels in many tissues in conjunction with inflammatory processes induced either in response to infection or tissue injury.59 Considerable data have been accumulated which show that OPN is associated with a wide variety of pathologies including solid tumors, atherosclerotic plaques,60 granuloma tissue formation,61 as well as exogenous pathogen infection.62 The identification of an OPN interaction with the CD44 receptor also suggests that this molecule may use an alternate cell surface receptor to discriminate varying functions in these differing immunological processes in which it is involved.63 Common functions that have been ascribed to OPN in these differing pathologies have been its chemotaxis activities and its role in promoting adhesion of monocytes, macrophages, T-cells, and B-cells.59, 62 It is interesting to note the many common aspects of the remodeling cycle of bone in comparison with the biological events associated with inflammation and tissue repair in which OPN may be involved. Previous studies from several research groups have now shown that opn expression is responsive to mechanical stimulation within osteoblasts both in vitro64-67 and in vivo.5, 68 The current study by Terai et al.5 provides yet another study demonstrating that OPN expression is induced by physiologically relevant mechanical strains in vivo. OPN induction by mechanical stimulation also occurs in vascular smooth muscle cells69 and in the egg laying organ of chickens (M. Pines, personal communication). The induction of this gene therefore appears to be a common response to mechanical stimulation in many tissues, and its induction may serve a common function in tissue ECM remodeling that is needed in conjunction with the structural demands of the mechanical environment. The intracellular mechanisms that transduce mechanical stimuli are still poorly understood. However, a number of different signal transduction mechanisms including Ca2+ transients,70 cAMP/PKA stimulation,71 alterations in the cytoskeleton,67, 72, 73 and integrin mediated74, 75 second signal cascades are all activated by mechanical stimulation of osteoblasts. Examination of the mechanisms of mechano-signal transduction that induced opn expression demonstrated that the signal transduction process was a primary response through the activation of pre-existing transcription factors, dependent on the activation of a tyrosine kinase(s) and protein kinase A (PKA) or a PKA-like kinase, and dependent on microfilament integrity. These studies also demonstrated that mechanical stimuli activated focal adhesion kinase pp125FAK,67 which specifically transduces signals from integrin receptors. Subsequent studies demonstrated that the cell adhesion to fibronectin but not tissue culture plastic alone mimics the mechano-transduction of opn mRNA expression. Furthermore, integrin receptor(s) are involved in mediating the signal transduction processes of both cell attachment and mechanical stimulation, since incubation of osteoblasts with the integrin antagonists such as RGDS partially blocked the induction of opn expression in response to both stimuli.75 The induction of the opn expression, which itself is an integrin ligand, through both integrin occupancy and/or activation by mechanical stimulation, leads to the possibility that the molecules containing integrin binding domains such as RGDS may themselves behave like cytokines. The studies showing that osteoclast recruitment is blocked by the apparent antagonism of OPN function in mechanically stimulated resorption during orthodontic tooth movement5 provides further evidence supporting the idea that this molecule behaves in many ways like a cytokine. It is interesting to note that fibronectin and bone sialoprotein are also uniquely and separately regulated by mechanical stimulation, while osteocalcin and collagen are not (Carvalho, Schaffer, and Gerstenfeld, unpublished data). Such data provide further evidence that other integrin ligands may have an autocrine or paracrine function in regulating cellular function in the ECM. Indeed, these data show that the composition of the ECM, as regulated by mechanical stimuli, may itself have a specific feedback effect on the osteoblast, thereby providing a self-regulating mechanism of controlling ECM composition. Although the structural roles of the ECM are easily appreciated, their role in regulatory functions is only now becoming fully realized with the identification of the complexity of cellular receptors that interact with the ECM.76-79 The cellular logic of using these molecules to carry out regulatory function is both implicit and explicit. The implicit informational content of these molecules resides in the context of their spatial and temporal assembly in the matrix. These molecules therefore provide "positional information." As an example, OPN is synthesized both during early assembly and remodeling steps and later during the period when osteoblasts are synthesizing and mineralizing their ECM after the resorption process has reversed. Thus, during the initial periods of remodeling, transient OPN production provides important regulatory information for the recruitment and migration of osteoclasts into an active area of resorption. The incorporated OPN in the matrix, which had been previously laid down at the end of the last remodeling cycle, subsequently provides the latent structural mechanisms by which osteoclast attachment to mineralized matrix and its activation may be facilitated during a new round of remodeling. Other positional information imparted by OPN includes its role in regulating osteoclast polarity. Explicit information contained in ECM molecules is related to their receptor specificity. The specific ECM protein interactions with unique subsets of cellular receptors provides the means by which specific second signal kinase(s) cascades are activated and cellular responses initiated. As an example, recent data indicate that cellular adhesion to αvβ3 ligands activates a specific member of the focal adhesion kinase family, PYK2, and this kinase specifically interacts with src.80 Downstream from the activation of specific signal transduction cascades are wide-ranging numbers of cellular response, including specific gene activation, stimulation of cellular replication, or induction of apoptosis.77 While this review has focused only on the function of one ECM protein, OPN, a brief description is provided of other data that demonstrate the central role of the ECM in providing regulatory signals to cells. It has been recognized for some time that collagenous matrix itself provides crucial signals during the temporal differentiation of osteoblasts and experimentally this may be observed since osteoblasts growing in the absence of ascorbate (an essential cofactor in the synthesis of collagen) fail both to develop a collagenous matrix and to progress in their differentiation.20, 81, 82 Recently, a number of studies have shown that integrin ligation of α2 receptors is necessary for the ascorbate acid mediated induction of the osteogenic phenotype in cultures MC3T3 E-1.83-85 More specifically, these studies have identified both focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and mitogen-activated protein kinases as mediating the ascorbic acid induction. In one study, the specific activation of pre-existent CBFA transcriptional factor has been shown to be the mechanism of action by which the matrix induces osteogenic progression.85 In conclusion, the data presented in this perspective present the convergence of several different lines of research that provide an emerging picture that the ECM contributes its own set regulatory signals crucial for mediation, cellular formation, remodeling, and repair. We acknowledge Drs. Marc McKee, Jeff Berman, Joel Barnes, and Paul Kostenuick for their discussions and useful insights during the course of writing this review. We thank Drs. Mark Pines and Renny Franceschi for sharing their results before publication. Preparation of this review and studies in this laboratory on the mechano-induction of osteopontin are supported by a grant from the Department of Defense Bone Health and Military Medical Readiness Program.
Read more