The BIMSTRESS study protocol: biofeedback, interoception, and mindfulness for stress reduction in a university population

The Use of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback and Neurofeedback for Traumatic Brain Injury

Low heart rate variability (HRV) characterizes several medical and psychological diseases. HRV biofeedback is a newly developed approach that may have some use for treating the array of disorders in which HRV is relatively low. This review critically appraises evidence for the effectiveness of HRV and related biofeedback across 14 studies in improving (1) HRV and baroreflex outcomes and (2) clinical outcomes. Results revealed that HRV biofeedback consistently effectuates acute improvements during biofeedback practice, whereas the presence of short-term and long-term carry-over effects is less clear. Some evidence suggests HRV biofeedback may result in long-term carry-over effects on baroreflex gain, which is an area most promising for future investigations. On the other hand, concerning clinical outcomes, there is ample evidence attesting to efficacy of HRV biofeedback. However, because clinical and physiological outcomes do not improve concurrently in all cases, the mechanism by which HRV biofeedback results in salutary effects in unclear. Considerations for the field in addressing shortcomings of the reviewed studies and advancing understanding of the way in which HRV biofeedback may improve physiological and clinical outcomes are offered in light of the reviewed evidence.

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) often experience anger events before cardiovascular events. Anger is a psychological risk factor and causes underlying psychophysiological mechanisms to lose balance of the autonomic nervous system (ANS). The heart rate variability (HRV) was the common index for ANS regulation. It has been confirmed that heart rate variability biofeedback (HRV-BF) restored ANS balance in patients with CAD during the resting state. However, the effects of HRV-BF during and after the anger event remain unknown. This study aimed to examine the effects of HRV-BF on ANS reactivity and recovery during the anger recall task in patients with CAD. This study was a randomized control trial with a wait-list control group design, with forty patients in the HRV-BF group (for six sessions) and 44 patients in the control group. All patients received five stages of an anger recall task, including baseline, neutral recall task, neutral recovery, anger recall task, and anger recovery. HRV reactivity in the HRV-BF group at the post-test was lower than that in the control group. HRV recovery at the post-test in the HRV-BF group was higher than that in the control group. The HRV-BF reduced ANS reactivity during anger events and increased ANS recovery after anger events for CAD patients. The possible mechanisms of HRV-BF may increase total HRV, ANS regulation, and baroreflex activation at anger events for patients with CAD, and may be a suitable program for cardiac rehabilitation.

Introduction and Purpose:Rigorous training of elite athletes can lead to nonfunctional overreaching (NFOR) and overtraining (OT), both of which decrease performance and increase the risk of injury. Heart rate variability (HRV) is a measure of autonomic nervous system balance. Reductions in HRV are associated with NFOR and OT. Breath-based biofeedback increases HRV through activation of the baroreceptor reflex.Purpose:This case study explored the impact of breath-based HRV biofeedback (HRV-BF) training on daily resting HRV values of a female triathlete and the association between daily HRV with subjective performance indicators of workout quality and amount of postworkout energy.Methods:A 24-year-old female triathlete completed an 8-week A-B repeated-measures study—A: baseline; 4 weeks and B: intervention HRV-BF training; 4 weeks. The subject recorded daily resting HRV for 120 seconds, completed regular daily training, and measured workout performance and postworkout energy levels on a 0 to 10 scale. During B, the subject added 15 minutes of HRV-BF 5 times per week.Results:With HRV-BF, median HRV level increased (A: 137; B: 191) and the interquartile band narrowed (A: 83–184; B: 142–201), suggesting higher HRV with less variability. The subject had more days at highest readiness (A: 35%; B: 62%). Median values for reports of workout performance and postworkout energy increased.Conclusions:This study found that, for this subject, 15 minutes of HRV-BF, 5 times per week, was associated with increased HRV and improved subjective workout performance. Further research exploring HRV measures and biofeedback to inform athletic performance is warranted.

Coping with pressure and anxiety is an ineluctable demand of sports performance. Heart rate variability (HRV) Biofeedback (BFB) shall be used as a tool for self regulating physiological responses resulting in improved psycho physiological interactions. For further analysis, the present study has been designed to examine the relationship between anxiety and performance and also effectiveness of biofeedback protocol to create stress-eliciting situation in basketball players. Thirty basketball players of university level and above (both male and female) aged 18-28 years, who scored a minimum of 20 in state trait anxiety inventory, were randomly divided into three equal groups- Experimental (Biofeedback) group, Placebo group and Control (No Treatment) group. The BFB group received HRV BFB training for 10 consecutive days for 20 min that included breathing at individual's resonant frequency through a pacing stimulus; Placebo group was shown motivational video clips for 10 consecutive days for 10 min, whereas No Treatment Control group was not given any intervention. Two way repeated measure ANOVA was applied to analyze the differences within and between the groups. Anxiety, coping self-efficacy, heart rate variability, respiration rate, and performance (dribbling, passing and shooting) at session 1, 10 and 1 month follow up were statistically significant in each group along with interaction of group and time (p < 0.001). Also, all the measures showed statistically significant inter group difference (p < 0.05). The findings are harmonious with existing data on HRV BFB as a strategy for dealing with anxiety. The Placebo group showed improvement in self efficacy and performance post training. The Control group showed no change in any variable except performance. The results of the study support the idea that HRV BFB lowers the anxiety and thus there seems to be a potential association between HRV BFB and performance optimization.

Background and purposeCritical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) has been linked to neurocardiac dysfunction mediated by autonomic nervous system dysregulation, which increases mortality. We aimed to assess if heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback could improve neurocardiac function in CIP.MethodsWe randomly allocated (1:1) patients with electrophysiologically confirmed CIP undergoing early inpatient neurological rehabilitation to additional HRV or sham biofeedback over 14 days. We evaluated neurocardiac function via standard deviation of normal‐to‐normal intervals (SDNN) as the primary outcome, as well as HRV frequency domains, sympathetic cutaneous sudomotor and vasomotor functions and disability at baseline, post intervention and 4 weeks later. The study is registered on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028911).ResultsWe included 30 patients with CIP (40% females, median [interquartile range] age 64.6 [56, 72] years). We observed an increase in SDNN and the predominantly parasympathetic high frequency domain post intervention (ß = 16.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2, 32.6 [p = 0.047] and ß = 1179.2, 95% CI 119.9, 2158.5 [p = 0.018]), which was sustained at the 4‐week follow‐up (ß = 25.7, 95% CI 6.0, 45.4 [p = 0.011] and ß = 25.7, 95% CI 6.0, 45.4 [p = 0.011]). Patients who underwent HRV biofeedback displayed a higher adjusted Barthel index, indicating less severe disability 4 weeks after the intervention compared to those in the sham group (ß = 23.3, 95% CI 5.5, 41.1 [p = 0.014]). Low frequency and sympathetic skin functions did not differ between groups (p = nonsignificant).ConclusionsOur study provides pilot data suggesting that, in patients with CIP, HRV biofeedback can improve neurocardiac function with a predominant effect on the parasympathetic nervous system and has a beneficial effect on functional recovery.

BackgroundFunctional dizziness is one of the most common causes of chronic dizziness. Associated psychiatric diseases such as depression and anxiety lead to significant impairment, possibly due to autonomic nervous system imbalance. We investigated whether heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback can modulate autonomic function in patients with functional dizziness.MethodsWe performed a randomized controlled study in 24 patients diagnosed functional dizziness for the first time. Patients received six 20 min sessions of HRV biofeedback or no intervention. We assessed HRV (time and frequency domains), sympathetic vasomotor function, sympathetic skin response and psychometric assessments at baseline, immediately post-intervention (or control period) and another 3 and 6 weeks later.ResultsPatients in the HRV biofeedback group showed improved cardiac autonomic function with elevated HRV time-dependent parameters immediately post-intervention [Root Mean Square of Successive Differences (RMSSD): 71.2 ms ± 38 ms vs. 38.2 ms ± 18.5 ms, p = 0.014; Standard Deviation of all NN Intervals (SDNN): 78.3 ms ± 35.9 ms vs. 48.1 ms ± 20.5 ms, p = 0.001], increased HRV frequency-dependent parameter [Low Frequency (LF): p = 0.001], as well as reduced depressiveness (BDI-II: p = 0.0236). None of these parameters were changed in control patients (p = ns). Dizziness-associated symptoms and sympathetic function of vasculature and sweat glands were unaltered in both study arms.ConclusionIn a randomized controlled pilot study, HRV biofeedback led to improved autonomic cardiac function and alleviated symptoms of depression in patients with functional dizziness, most likely mediated by a predominantly parasympathetic effect.

ABSTRACTThis study examined the six critical parameters for evaluating interventions, including necessity, acceptability, feasibility, safety, fidelity, and effectiveness, of a heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback training intervention in a sample of 20 grandmothers who were the primary caregivers of their grandchildren. After the grandmothers completed the HRV biofeedback training, they answered open-ended questions to provide data on the six parameters during face-to-face interviews. The findings of the study provided evidence for the necessity, acceptability, feasibility, safety, fidelity, and effectiveness of the HRV biofeedback intervention for reducing the stress experienced by grandmothers in raising their grandchildren.

This article describes the administration of a heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback intervention designed to reduce posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) severity in post-9/11 service members. The study recruited 33 male OEF/OIF/OND combat veterans in a Los Angeles transitional housing program. Twenty-seven veterans completed the study. Participants attended eight once-weekly HRV biofeedback group sessions. For the first four weeks, veterans learned to use biofeedback to regulate physiological stress responses. The latter four weeks consisted of real-life biofeedback application and coaching. Results suggest that consistent HRV biofeedback practice was essential for HRV improvement, which may help alleviate PTSD.

The Biofeedback Certification International Alliance (BCIA) has developed a certificate of completion program to establish education and training standards for the exciting modality of heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback. HRV represents the beat-to-beat changes in the intervals between consecutive heartbeats. A growing list of HRV biofeedback applications has earned ratings from possibly efficacious to probably efficacious. BCIA's expert-designed Blueprint of Knowledge and exam promise to increase the academic rigor of didactic HRV biofeedback courses and enhance the knowledge of providers who incorporate this modality into their practice.

IntroductionA goal of inbodied interaction is to explore how tools can be designed to provide external interactions that support our internal processes. One process that often suffers from our external interactions with modern computing technology is our breathing. Because of the ergonomics and low-grade-but-frequent stress associated with computer work, many people adopt a short, shallow breathing pattern that is known to have a negative effect on other parts of our physiology. Breathing guides are tools that help people match their breathing patterns to an external (most often visual) cue to practice healthy breathing exercises.However, there are two leading protocols for how breathing cues are offered by breathing guides used in non-clinical settings: simple paced breathing (SPB) and Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRV-b). Although these protocols have separately been demonstrated to be effective, they differ substantially in their complexity and design. Paced breathing is a simpler protocol where a user is asked to match their breathing pattern with a cue paced at a predetermined rate and is simple enough to be completed as a secondary task during other activities. HRV-b, on the other hand, provides adaptive, real-time guidance derived from heart rate variability, a physiological signal that can be sensed through a wearable device. Although the benefits of these two protocols have been well established in clinical contexts, designers of guided breathing technology have little information about whether one is better than the other for non-clinical use.MethodsTo address this important gap in knowledge, we conducted the first comparative study of these two leading protocols in the context of end-user applications. In our N=28 between-subject design, participants were trained in either SPB or HRV-b and then completed a 10-minute session following their training protocol. Breathing rates and heart rate variability scores were recorded and compared between groups.Results and discussionOur findings indicate that the exercises did not significantly differ in their immediate outcomes – both resulted in significantly slower breathing rates than their baseline and both provided similar relative increases in HRV. Therefore, there were no observed differences in the acute physiological effects when using either SPB or HRV-b. Our paper contributes new findings suggesting that simple paced breathing – a straightforward, intuitive, and easy-to-design breathing exercise – provides the same immediate benefits as HRV-b, but without its added design complexities.

Secular Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Efficacy and Neurobiology.

ABSTRACTResearch suggests that heart rate variability (HRV) is a physiological indicator of the flexibility of the autonomic nervous system and can provide an objective measure of an individual’s ability to appropriately match emotional responses to environmental demands. The present study investigated whether angry response to emotional stimuli was related to HRV, and whether manipulation of HRV using biofeedback could change the anger response in a healthy adult population. Fifty-eight participants received HRV biofeedback (n = 29) or an active control condition (n = 29). HRV measures included standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN), low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) power, and was recorded across three sessions: baseline, training, and anger induction. The anger induction procedure resulted in increased subjective experience of anger, as well as physiological changes. The biofeedback group had higher HRV than active controls both during the training session (SDNN and LF HRV) and during anger induction (LF HRV). HRV during anger induction was significantly associated with self-reported emotional response for participants receiving biofeedback but not for active controls. Results provide support for HRV as an index of emotion regulation, specifically anger. Further research is needed to determine whether long-term HRV biofeedback can have a lasting effect on managing anger.

Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (FGID) are a group of symptom-based disorders that occur across the alimentary tract and have a high prevalence globally in both adults and children. These symptoms are chronic and/or recurrent and often have substantial effects on quality of life. Their incidence is tied to multiple factors, including gut-brain axis imbalance, which includes autonomic dysregulation related to a relative withdrawal of vagal activity. Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) is a non-invasive intervention that can influence autonomic activity and has shown benefit for diverse conditions including depression and anxiety, however the evidence of its effect has not yet been systematically assessed in FGIDs. This scoping review aimed to collate and evaluate the available literature regarding HRVB and FGIDs. We systematically searched four medical databases. Four articles met inclusion criteria for being interventional studies using HRVB in FGIDs. These were heterogeneous, including both paediatric and adult as well different subtypes of FGID. Two of the four studies demonstrated significant improvements from HRVB interventions in FGID symptoms while the other two found no significant difference. Scoping evaluation indicated this inconsistency likely reflects heterogeneous populations and study designs. Further scoping review of the broader HRVB literature also discovered that at least six weeks of HRVB is required to observe an impact on FGID symptoms and defined recommended guidance for performing future evaluations of HRVB in FGIDs. Evidence on HRVB for FGID is emergent, however HRVB appears a promising intervention when administered optimally. Further studies using best-practice techniques are required.

Background and Purpose: Low heart rate variability (HRV) has been correlated with chronic pain, making it the target of behavioral and rehabilitation interventions. This scoping review aimed to synthesize the literature on nonpharmacological HRV interventions in populations with chronic pain. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews, the Pubmed, CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, SPORTdiscus, and Academic Search Complete databases were searched. Experimental studies reporting quantitative HRV outcomes in adult populations with chronic pain were included. Data on study author, year, country, study design, population description (diagnosis, mean age), number and sex of participants, intervention, HRV and other measures, and HRV results were extracted from eligible studies. Results: Sixty-eight articles received full-text review, and 39 studies were included for data extraction. Of these, 46.2% were randomized controlled trials. The most common chronic pain diagnosis in the included studies was fibromyalgia (35.9%). The most common intervention was exercise (33.3%). Twenty-two interventions resulted in statistically significant increases in HRV. Those within the physical therapy scope of practice included aerobic exercise, thoracic mobilization, group exercise through exergames, warm water exercises, tai chi, HRV biofeedback, focused breathing, yoga, head and neck massage, myofascial release, and walking. Conclusion: This scoping review organizes the current literature on nonpharmacological HRV interventions in populations with chronic pain and offers an overview of evidence-based interventions. However, methodological heterogeneity such as disparate inclusion criteria and interventions precludes a robust comparative analysis. Future research should include more physical performance measures, randomized controlled trials, and larger sample sizes.