Style and Reader Response. Minds, Media, Method
In his famous play Mozart and Salieri (1832), Alexander Pushkin doubted whether it is possible to “check harmony with algebra,” and for centuries artists and scholars of art, literature in particular, were skeptical about marrying the two, asserting instead the dualistic point of view—the one that hard sciences and the Humanities belong to different, predominantly incompatible worlds. Now that empirical research methods are getting their due recognition in the spheres of literature and other media, and that the field of stylistics has also greatly developed, this volume, published within John Benjamins’ well-established Linguistic Approaches to Literature series, is really welcome. The tradition has been to see stylistics as an area of interface between language and literature. As a result, unfortunately, there are not enough studies that look at what happens with actual readers as they engage with texts, so it is really useful to have a comprehensive look at readers’ experiences with texts of various kinds. Where textbooks (e.g., Leech, Short, Semino and Culpeper, Verdonk, Burke, or Simpson, to name just a few) introduce students to the linguistic description and interpretation of textual features of literary works, Style and Reader Response instead familiarizes readers with the evidence-based approach to the real effects of literature.The issue of interaction between empirical research on literary reading and stylistics is a vital one, and the authors’ attempt to cast light on the benefits of such an approach definitely deserves attention. The book is an innovative and important contribution to the emerging paradigm within stylistics in that it grounds its discussion of literature in the responses of real respondents across media rather than in textual analysis alone aiming at pinpointing the ways in which evidence-based “insights from style and response are used to generate new stylistic models and new understandings of texts” (Bell et al. 1).As the title suggests, the chapters in this collection of eleven articles specifically address texts of different genres and modes as well as individual and collective responses thereto. Clearly, this diversity is intentional with the aim of allowing readers to get acquainted with the whole spectrum of possibilities this interdisciplinary approach holds. For those working within stylistics and/or literary studies, empirical studies of literature in particular, this volume has much to offer as most of the chapters focus not only on theoretical approaches or methods, but also, and primarily so, on presenting substantive findings on how readers confront texts as well as new interpretations of such encounters.The volume is transparent in its structure, and the general argumentation is coherent and lucidly clear. The introductory chapter by the editors previews the book’s major innovation: the attention not to the style of various texts and/or response to them per se, but rather to “the ways in which style generates response and what response can reveal about a text’s style” (Bell et al. 1), thus highlighting a clear integration of the disciplines by way of a systematic, data-driven approach to the reading of a wide range of material.Subsequently, the volume is organized into three sections which, despite the general emphasis of the collection on reader-centered matters, are arranged according to the specific subtopic investigated. The sheer number of chapters indicates that this is a broad-ranging work that brings a considerable variety of contexts and methods into dialogue with one another.The first section, “Mind,” contains four chapters that explore the reading of literature as a result of underpinning mental processes, naturally and logically linking empirical perspective with that offered by cognitive studies. Thus David Peplow and Sara Whiteley, largely relying on the conceptual approach to metaphor, report the results of a poetry discussion session by a reading group in that they convincingly demonstrate how the text itself, its author, and subsequently its readers interact, eliciting a dynamic, dialogic, and intersubjective response. Similarly, Jessica Norledge also concentrates on a group discussion as a research tool, but diversely from the previous chapter, the focus is on a dystopian narrative while readers engage with the narrator and characters to coconstruct fictional worlds and fictional minds. In the next chapter, Sam Browse, following the Text World Theory framework as well as insights from cognitive grammar, resorts to an online think-aloud protocol as his main research method, and looks at how readers build their interpretation of a sample of political writing—an unfavorably received opinion piece by Theresa May, the former British Prime Minister. Finally, Julia Vaeßen and Sven Strassen, drawing on cognitive anthropology ideas, focus their attention on the responses of readers from different subcultures to characters in fiction as well as onthe cultural models used.The second section of the volume, “Media,” includes three chapters examining the way stylistics and reader response criticism can complement each other in investigation of modes and media beyond traditional literature. In line with the title, the focus is now shifted from poetry, narrative, political writing, and children’s play in the first section to an art exhibition, hypertext fiction as well as to online news articles and blogs. In doing so, Alison Gibbons resorts to qualitative empirical methods to look not only at whether gallery visitors are conscious of the artist’s fictionality, but also at how this belief/disbelief affects their experience and emotional response. In their turn, Isabelle van der Bom, Lyle Skains, Alice Bell, and Astrid Ensslin investigate reader response to hyperlinks in digital literature (in contrast with their straightforward function in digital nonfiction). In the last chapter of this section, Martine van Driel employs interview as a research tool to cast light on readers’ different reactions to news presented through traditional online stories from their reactions to news presented as live blogs.The four chapters in the final section, “Methods,” are dedicated to methodological aspects of interdisciplinary studies and to the procedures, showing in what way different research questions are addressed with different methods (naturally having their advantages and limitations). To this end, Peter Stockwell draws on cognitive poetics and corpus linguistics approach to a poem by Thomas Hardy. In doing so, he gives solid arguments in favor of a multitooled approach to literary analysis and argues that introspection, despite certain skepticism about its validity, is nevertheless a valuable method in empirical stylistics. In the following chapter, Bronwen Thomas addresses ethical issues of using data from online sources—something researchers in the digital era are tempted to do in light of the ubiquity of social media platforms and ease of access to the data. In his turn, Hugh Escott, drawing on his experience with a literacy workshop for children on punctuation, claims that literacy-related activities are highly relevant to reader-response stylisticians. To sum up the discussion, in the postscript to the collection, Moniek M. Kuijpers reflects on empirical investigation of reading and literature, on the benefits such an approach holds, but also on the limitations that are yet to be faced and remedied.That said, the quality of the chapters in the volume is very high, and many of them would be useful for those at the interface between literary stylistics and reader response. At the same time, as the methods presented are precise and clearly described, this book may serve as a point of entry for novices in the field, thus enlarging the world of researchers working on the interaction of stylistics and literary and psychological studies, and this agenda of expanding the population of interdisciplinary researchers is clear in the choice of the chapters’ topics. To promote their viewpoint, the authors, in an engaging style and welcoming manner, explain how the seemingly incompatible research paradigms can meet to enhance the rigor of methodology and validity of findings so that new cognitive insights into a variety of texts are produced.Thus, from what really makes the book distinct from existing approaches, two features are particularly noteworthy: the attention to real readers rather than implied or ideal ones, and its highly welcoming manner of presentation when the examples in the chapters are excellent and well linked to one another, and the explanations lucid. Therefore, the volume’s significance is beyond any doubt: the book has considerable implications for further research in the field and, I am sure, will be widely discussed in professional communities. By and large, a concrete body of research on processes of reading and their outcomes has grown over the last years, and there are several international associations (e.g., the Poetics and Linguistics Association [PALA] and the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature [IGEL from Internationale Gesellschaft für Empirische Literaturwissenschaft in German], whose division on the matter as well as potential rapprochement and collaboration Kuijpers discusses) which cater to this need. Moreover, the volume itself is a result of the 2016 conference with the same title, thus serving as a live example of how academic interaction stimulates research advancement.On a practical note, if I were ordering the volume for a university library, I would definitely consider using individual chapters as valuable course reading. Ultimately, it is absolutely possible to check harmony with algebra, and Pushkin again (in Nabokov’s translation of Eugene Onegin), contemplating on how opposites attract, writes that “[t]hey got together; wave and stone, / verse and prose, ice and flame, / were not so different from one another.” So they did in this volume—to the benefit of the Humanities.
Read more