25
Behavior analysis is the underclass of psychology. It is under-funded, under-taught, and underappreciated. A lot is happening that is positive, but just beneath the surface, there are grave dangers lurking that could significantly worsen our already poor status. I prefer to believe that most of these dangers are things we can control by our own behavior (itself a rather behavioral idea), and I offer this list of dangers in that spirit. As someone once said: if you always do what you always did, you'll always get what you always got. Behavior analysts need to appreciate the following six dangers and adapt to them. LOSS OF MISSION Behavior analysis was initially strategically committed to the field of animal learning, but from the beginning its ultimate purpose was an understanding of complex human behavior: importance of a science of behavior derives largely from the possibility of an eventual extension to human affairs (Skinner, Behavior of Organisms, 1938, p. 441). In the early decades that was merely a promise, but the arrival of applied behavior analysis turned it into a program. Over the years, however, both basic and applied behavior analysis have narrowed and that original vision is being lost. Applied behavior analysis is gradually becoming a subfield of developmental disabilities, as a glance at a recent issue of JABA will confirm. The depth of the risk this creates is covered over by methodological rigor and applied impact within that narrow domain. Basic behavior analysis clings largely to narrow and precise questions of self-stimulatory interest in the animal laboratory, even while animal laboratories are being closed one by one, and areas of research within behavior analysis are being opened up that require human research. The depth of the problem is covered over by the productivity of a few major behavioral laboratories and the emergence of a handful of international labs, where protection from political winds have allowed the old seeds to grow a few new sprouts. In some ways, all of the other dangers I list can be traced back to the following core concern. Behavior analysis was always a carom shot. Instead of approaching human complexity directly, it tried to develop conceptual tools based on simple behaviors in simple contexts with small non-human animals, and then to apply these to an analysis of virtually every form of complex human behavior. It was a bold and even slightly preposterous idea, and yet it was one that worked far beyond what anyone had a right to expect. Now, however, we seem to be on the verge of forgetting what the mission was in the first place. Many basic behavior analysts have begun to believe that basic behavior analysis is a subfield of animal learning or (perhaps worse) behavioral biology. Where are the experimental analyses of emotion, friendship, sexuality, health, reasoning, humor, intelligence, and so on? Interpretation is not enough--we need an experimental analysis of such behaviors. Without the basic account, applied behavior analysts either ignore these areas or build common sense approaches to them. TOOL POLISHING No field so enjoys principles as does behavior analysis. Principles of behavior are ways of speaking about the prediction and influence of the historically and currently situated actions of organisms that are precise, broadly applicable, and coherent in terms of the larger fabric of science. Principles are the intellectual tools of analysis. They are not, however, ends in themselves. Sometimes behavior analysts are like the watchmakers who decided to make a set of extremely fine tools before actually making some complicated new watches. Forgetting what the tools were for, the talented watchmakers did not build the watches and display them in a glass cabinet, but instead put the tools themselves in that cabinet, taking them out only to polish them and to show how they work. Basic behavior analysts are especially prone to this error. …
1A Glossary of Behavior Analytic Terms for Speech-Language Pathologists' Considerations for Augmentative and Alternative Communication
At its core, productive collaboration between speech-language pathologists and behavior analysts requires effective communication between both parties. Successful communication can be gained in par...
Read more5The aesthetics of intervention in defense of the esoteric
The aesthetics of intervention in defense of the esoteric
25Training and certification of behaviour analysts in Europe: Past, present, and future challenges
Across many countries in Europe, the last decade has seen a rapid increase in the number of early intervention programmes for children with autism based on applied behaviour analysis, and a related growth in demand for competent behaviour analyst practitioners. There has also been a rapid growth in university-based courses that are focused solely on behaviour analysis, and these have all aligned their curriculum with the Behavior Analyst Certification Board task list. We describe the context of these developments and discuss some of the ways courses have been developed and some of the future challenges to be faced in developing an international profession of behaviour analysis. These have been positive moves for behaviour analysis in Europe. Now there is a solid foundation to continue this work, and to ensure that behaviour analysts play a central role in helping those who need their expertise.
Read more6In response
The emergence of positive behav-ior support (PBS) has presented somechallenges and opportunities for ap-plied behavior analysis. In a recentreview and critique of positive behav-ior support, Johnston, Foxx, Jacob-son, Green, and Mulick (2006) ac-knowledge that the success of PBS ingarnering support in schools, agen-cies that service individuals with de-velopmental disabilities, and stateand federal agencies, and suggestsome behaviors to be emulated byapplied behavior analysis in order togarner similar support. However,they recommend that PBS shouldnot be embraced by behavior analystsbecause it poses a threat to the fieldand is less effective than appliedbehavior analysis. Before this recom-mendation is embraced by behavioranalysts, it is important to considerthe ramifications of a split betweenPBS and behavior analysis, particu-larly given that PBS has its origins inbehavior analysis and is conceptual-ized by prominent adherents of thePBS model to be a type of orextension of applied behavior analy-sis (Dunlap, 2006; Horner, 2000). Ipropose that PBS should not bedismissed but should be viewed asan opportunity by the field of appliedbehavior analysis to reach its goal oflarge-scale adoption. A continuedstrong relation between PBS andbehavior analysis may actually ac-complish the broadest disseminationand adoption of effective behavioraltechnology. It will also benefit PBSby keeping it grounded in the con-ceptual system that fostered its de-velopment.PBS is clearly still in its formativestages; in fact the executive board ofthe Association for Positive BehaviorSupport currently is working to de-velop a comprehensive definition ofPBS and to define the roles for theorganization (C. Anderson, personalcommunication, November 2, 2006).As is true in any organization—eventhe Association for Behavior Analy-sis—different members may espousedifferent perspectives on issues suchas the relation between PBS andother perspectives, training models,and so on. This in itself has been thesource of many challenges, and per-haps misunderstandings, for those inthe behavior analysis community.For example, Johnston et al. (2006)emphasize the negative views of PBSresearchers toward behavior analysis.However, many leaders, trainers, andresearchers in PBS have a favorableview of behavior analysis, considerthemselves to be behavior analysts,and continue to publish in behavioraljournals such as the Journal ofApplied Behavior Analysis and TheBehavior Analyst. Thus, although thissituation has been viewed pessimisti-cally by Johnston et al., I believe thatthere are significant grounds forhaving an optimistic view about thefuture relation between PBS andapplied behavior analysis. BecausePBS is in its formative stages and isrooted in behavior analysis, the field
Read moreThe curse of exciting times: Current challenges within the field of clinical behavior analysis.
There is an old Chinese curse that says you live in exciting and we as clinical psychologists are certainly living in exciting times these days. Most of us are aware of the increasing pressure community-based clinical psychologists are experiencing, although we are not necessarily sensitive to the impact this pressure is having on those practitioners or on our field. In large part, many of the changes and challenges we are facing are byproducts of the increasing financial limitations and time restrictions being place on community-based clinical psychologists and it has become apparent that there are a number of changes ahead that will greatly impact the field as we know it. Clinical behavior analysis has much to contribute to the field. On a fundamental level, we have the strength of an empirically grounded theory and a lengthy history of research demonstrating effective clinical work. Additionally, our historical roots in pragmatism allow for the adaptation and integration of techniques from other branches of clinical psychology, not traditionally seen as behavioral. We will need to be aware of the current context, however, if we are to effectively participate in the transition clinical psychology is undergoing. In addition, there are number of obstacles which make it difficult for CBA to be a part of this process; some of the variables controlling these trends are in our hands. First there is our isolation from other branches of psychology. We need to spend more time talking to clinical psychologists from alternative theoretical orientations. This is true for both academic psychologists and clinical behavior analysts. I work in a department of anesthesiology, a somewhat unusual setting for a clinical psychologists, and my various roles in the medical school are such that I have a foot in the clinical camp and a foot in the ivory towers of academia. In trying to balance these contingencies, it has become apparent to me that there is a schism between what academic clinicians are doing and what community-based clinicians are doing. If that schism grows, we may find that community-based clinical psychologists will pay less and less attention to the research we produce. There is already a general attitude ex- pressed by many of the clinical psychologists I encounter that much of what we do as researchers is not relevant to what they do as clinicians. It is vital that we attend to this issue. On a more practical level, we as clinical behavior analysts need to participate in dialogues with other clinicians if we want to play a role in the changes psychology is already undergoing. As CBA is largely performed by academic psychologists at this point, we don't often consider our role in the economic marketplace. Since the marketplace is largely oriented toward cognitive-behavioral therapy, it is wise for us to plan specifically how CBA will fit into the future marketplace. This has implications for attracting future behavior analysts into the field. Although applied behavior analysis has been highly successful in our work with the developmentally disabled and in closed communities/hospital settings, many have been reluctant to move into settings in which our influence over the functional contingencies is more limited and relies heavily on verbal and rule-governed behavior. Despite pioneering early work in the outpatient arena by Kanfer and Saslow (1965, 1966), Ferster (1973), Krasner (1978, 1988), and Rachlin (1988), the role of functional analysis in the outpatient treatment session and a more molar view of a client's life were largely unexplored. The more traditional treatment areas for behavior analysts do not represent the typical setting in which most clinical psychologists practice and when these behavioral treatments appear, they are similar to cognitive treatments (e. …
Read more
1A Team Approach: How the LEND Program Can Provide Interdisciplinary Training for Behavior Analysts
Supporting people with neurodevelopmental disabilities often requires interdisciplinary collaboration and effective partnerships with clients and their families. Behavior analysts receive intensive training and supervision in a variety of domains; however, expanding interdisciplinary training for behavior analysts is needed. Interdisciplinary training programs, such as the Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) programs, offer trainees the opportunity to hone their skills as advocates for people with neurodevelopmental disabilities and collaborators as part of an interdisciplinary team. Historically, many LEND programs have not offered training positions specifically to behavior analysis students or professionals, although some behavior analysts have participated as trainees in other disciplines such as psychology or special education. The benefits, barriers, and possible future directions of interdisciplinary training for behavior analysts within a LEND program are discussed through the experience of the University of Cincinnati LEND Program which added an Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) training track in 2020.
Read moreUsing Virtual Reality within Behavior Analysis Practice
Researchers and behavior analysts are interested in exploring the fusion between behavior analysis technology and emerging technological tools to augment meaningful learning and clinical outcomes. Tools such as virtual reality (VR) provide a means to augment learning opportunities within applied behavior analysis (ABA) clinical applications and practice. This chapter discusses using VR as a tool and medium for behavior analytic technology within ABA practice. Current research on VR simulations is reviewed, along with a historical review of how this research paved the way to modern, everyday uses within research and clinical practices. Concepts of psychological immersion, simulated environments, artificial intelligence use within VR platforms, and the ethics behind these technologies are discussed, including a series of suggestions and considerations for VR clinical implementation.
Read more13The Use of Health Coaching to Improve Health Outcomes: Implications for Applied Behavior Analysis
Chronic health conditions are predominant in the USA. Health coaching has demonstrated significant results in increasing health-promotion behaviors that impact the development or progression of chronic health conditions (Simmons & Wolever, 2011). Behavior analysis has also contributed to this body of research with effective behavior-change procedures (Allen & Hine, 2015). While often not cited, the methodology used in health coaching utilizes many principles that align with applied behavior analysis. The current paper serves several purposes: (1) introduces health coaching and the potential for application within a behavior analytic framework, (2) discusses commonalities and areas behavior analysis could impact, (3) suggests implications for future research and practice, and finally, (4) urges collaboration between behavior analysts, health coaches, physicians and other professionals practicing within fields that focus on improving individual health and healthcare.
Read more1Mental health outcomes associated with applied behavior analysis in a US national sample of privately insured autistic youth.
Applied behavior analysis is a widely used intervention for autistic youth, though its mental health impacts remain under-researched. This study aims to investigate the association between applied behavior analysis therapy and post-traumatic stress disorder, suicidality, mental health hospitalization rates, and length of mental health hospitalizations using a national database of privately insured youth under 18. We matched 17,120 autistic youth who received applied behavior analysis with a control group of autistic youth with no record of applied behavior analysis and clustered them into four applied behavior analysis dose groups using two-stage bisecting k-medians clustering. Then, we used negative binomial regression and logistic regression to compare outcomes for the applied behavior analysis and non-applied behavior analysis groups. Overall, applied behavior analysis receipt was associated with 30% higher odds of experiencing a mental health hospitalization (odds ratio = 1.30, p < 0.001) and a 32% higher incidence rate of these hospitalizations (incidence rate ratio = 1.32, p < 0.001). Our analysis found no relationship between applied behavior analysis dosing and the other tracked mental health outcomes. These results indicate the need for more quantitative analysis with more comprehensive records of applied behavior analysis receipt to fully investigate claims of ABA resulting in adverse adult mental health outcomes.Lay abstractAutistic youth often receive applied behavior analysis (ABA) therapy, but some autistic adults who had ABA as youth say it harmed their mental health as adults. We looked at the relationship between ABA and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), suicidality, mental health hospitalization rates, and length of mental health hospitalizations among autistic youth. We used private health insurance claims data to look at how ABA receipt was related to those mental health outcomes. We divided autistic youth into groups based on how much ABA they received, so we could see if different amounts of ABA had different associations with mental health. There were 17,120 autistic youth in the group that did not receive ABA, and 17,120 autistic youth in the group that did receive ABA. In this sample, ABA therapy was associated with a greater use of acute mental health services; autistic youth in the ABA group had an overall risk that was 30% higher for mental health hospitalizations; and a 32% greater frequency of mental health hospitalizations. These results suggest that there may be a relationship between mental health hospitalizations and getting ABA. However, more work is needed to fully understand the impact of ABA therapy on mental health outcomes.
Read more5Comments on “There’s a policy for that”: Interdisciplinary analyses of hostile work environments
The article “There’s a Policy for That: A Comparison of the Organizational Culture of Workplaces Reporting Incidents of Sexual Harassment” (Hertzog, Wright, & Beat, 2008, this volume) explores organizational variables related to reports of sexual harassment and other negative behaviors in organizations. The paper considers relatively new ground for behavior analysts in terms of broad organizational assessment and exploratory analyses of work contexts. Extending and integrating these analyses of organizational contexts with behavior analyses would be interesting, challenging, and provocative. Behavior analysis rests on accurate measurement of individual’s behavior and experimental analysis of environmental variables that determine functional relationships between behavior and environments. A few key concepts such as reinforcement and stimulus control are elaborated to explain a great deal of behavior. Behavior analysis has shown in multiple replications that all sorts of targeted behaviors in organizations can be altered by practical adjustments of reinforcement contingencies and contextual variables (Daniels & Daniels, 2006). A general observation is that behavior is as complex as the contexts that generate and maintain it. A methodology for very large scale organizational assessment is under-developed in behavior analysis and the complexities of organizational environments are perhaps limited in scope to evaluations of features of the individual’s local environment and learning history. Possible connections across levels of inquiry from broad surveys of organizational climate and the types of more molecular organizational behavior analyses conducted within behavior analysis may show interplay and enhance both methodologies. Exploration of the National Organization Survey (NOS) provides an interesting high altitude window into organizational settings, and Hertzog and colleagues provide and describe a molar level perspective on organizational climate that might influence behaviors such as sexual harassment and incivility. These are important topics not often addressed by behavior analysts although work is beginning in this area. No direct observations of organizational variables or dependent variables are reported so the extent to which the reported measures match actual events is undetermined. Correspondence between what people say
Read more1Methodology, the Matching Law, and Applied Behavior Analysis
THE PRACTICAL VALUE OF THE QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR IS LIMITED BY TWO METHODOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THIS AREA OF RESEARCH: the use of (a) steady-state strategies and (b) relative vs. absolute response rates. Applied behavior analysts are concerned with both transition-state and steady-state behavior, and applied interventions are typically evaluated by their effects on absolute response rates. Quantitative analyses of behavior will have greater practical value when methods are developed for their extension to traditional rate-of-response variables measured across time. Although steady-state and relative-rate-of-response strategies are appropriate to the experimental analysis of many behavioral phenomena, these methods are rarely used by applied behavior analysts and further separate the basic and applied areas.
Read more40Science For Sale in a Free Market Economy: But at What Price? ABA and the Treatment of Autism in Europe
Educating the public accurately about Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) is an important undertaking, not least because misconceptions and myths about ABA abound. In this paper we argue that, unfortunately, the efforts of many dedicated professionals and parents to disseminate accurate information about the benefits of ABA for children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are damaged by a few behavior analysts whose focus seems to be more on monetary gains than social responsibility. We cite examples of the resulting harm to the public image of behavior analysis from a number of European countries. We conclude by calling upon fellow scientists to unite in their opposition to unscrupulous abuses of free market forces for short-term monetary gains that damage the dissemination of the science of behavior analysis and thereby ultimately disadvantage those who should benefit primarily from our science, i.e., some of the most vulnerable citizens of society.
Read more1Standing on the Shoulders of a Giant: Remembrances of Jack Michael, Part 2.
In Part 1 of these remembrances of Jack Michael, we briefly described Jack's history in terms of how he became a behavior analyst (Sundberg & Schlinger, 2021). We pointed out that he was one of the first to apply the principles of behavior analysis discovered in the experimental laboratory to the area of rehabilitation. In so doing, Jack was perhaps the first applied behavior analyst. In Part 1, some of his former students and close associates from his early years at the University of Houston, Arizona State University, and Western Michigan University-John Mabry, Grayson Osborne, Jon Bailey, Mark Sundberg, and J. Vincent Carbone-provided their personal tributes to Jack. In Part 2, we offer six more tributes that-with one exception, that of Ted Ayllon-provide insight into Jack's work in the latter part of his career. In addition to Ted Ayllon, these tributes are from Jack's students and close associates Hank Schlinger, Dave Palmer, John and Barb Esch, Carl Sundberg, and Caio Miguel. The authors provide insights not only into their views about Jack but also into their own lives. Collectively, they paint a picture of people from different backgrounds that all found their way to Jack Michael and to behavior analysis. To a person, they describe how their behavior, whether as scientists, practitioners, or both, was radically transformed as a result, and how they attribute that change largely to Jack's influence.
Read more2Effect of play-based communication and behavior intervention on toddlers with autism spectrum disorder
Objective To compare and analyze the short-term effect of play-based communication and behavior intervention (PCBI) and applied behavioral analysis (ABA) on the treatment of toddlers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods Seventy-four ASD toddlers aged from 19 to 30 months were recruited in Nanjing Brain Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from November 2017 to May 2018.The toddlers who participated in this study were randomly assigned into PCBI group and ABA group, then they were intervened weekly by PCBI or ABA for a total of 12 weeks.Portage Early Development Checklist and autism treatment evaluation checklist (ATEC) were used to estimate the toddlers′ developmental level and the treatment efficacy respectively.The t-test was used to reveal whether there was significant difference between the 2 groups before and after intervention. Results (1)Compared with the ABA group, there was a significant increase in cognitive scores (ΔPCBI=9.03 scores, ΔABA=4.27 scores, t=3.997) and a significant decrease in social behavior scores (ΔPCBI=8.87 scores, ΔABA=16.91 scores, t=-4.022) of the Portage Early Development Checklist after 12 weeks of intervention in the PCBI group, and there were statistically significant differences(all P 0.05). (2)Compared with the ABA group, after 12 weeks of PCBI intervention, the scores of social contact, perception, behavior of ATEC were decreased, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05); the total score of ATEC scale(ΔPCBI total=14.89 scores, ΔABA total=22.22 scores, t=2.209)and the scores of language subscale(ΔPCBI language=2.89 scores, ΔABA language=6.43 scores, t=2.515)were decreased significantly, and there were statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). Conclusions After 12 weeks of the very early intervention of PCBI, the ASD toddlers all improved in clinical symptoms and developmental level.Compared with ABA intervention, PCBI very early intervention with parental guidance was comparable in short term efficacy, and PCBI was not taking up as much medical rehabilitation resources as ABA. Key words: Autism spectrum disorder; Toddler; Very early intervention; Play-based communication behavior intervention; Efficacy evaluation
Read more4The PORTL Laboratory.
In the history of the field, behavior analysts have used the operant chamber as an apparatus for both teaching and experimental investigations. In the early days of the field, students spent significant time in the animal laboratory, using operant chambers to conduct hands-on experiments. These experiences allowed students to see behavior change as an orderly process and drew many students toward careers in behavior analysis. Today, most students no longer have access to animal laboratories. However, the Portable Operant Research and Teaching Lab (PORTL) can fill this void. PORTL is a table-top game that creates a free-operant environment for studying the principles of behavior and their application. This article will describe how PORTL works and the parallels between PORTL and the operant chamber. Examples will illustrate how PORTL can be used to teach concepts such as differential reinforcement, extinction, shaping, and other basic principles. In addition to its use as a teaching tool, PORTL provides a convenient and inexpensive way for students to replicate research studies and even conduct their own research projects. As students use PORTL to identify and manipulate variables, they gain a deeper understanding for how behavior works.
Read more
Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.
