The ( h,k )-Server Problem on Bounded Depth Trees

We consider a model for online computation in which the online algorithm receives, together with each request, some information regarding the future, referred to as advice . The advice provided to the online algorithm may allow an improvement in its performance, compared to the classical model of complete lack of information regarding the future. We are interested in the impact of such advice on the competitive ratio, and in particular, in the relation between the size b of the advice, measured in terms of bits of information per request, and the (improved) competitive ratio. Since b = 0 corresponds to the classical online model, and $ b = \lceil \log |\mathcal{A}| \rceil $, where $\mathcal{A}$ is the algorithm's action space, corresponds to the optimal (offline) one, our model spans a spectrum of settings ranging from classical online algorithms to offline ones. In this paper we propose the above model and illustrate its applicability by considering two of the most extensively studied online problems, namely, metrical task systems (MTS) and the k-server problem. For MTS we establish tight (up to constant factors) upper and lower bounds on the competitive ratio of deterministic and randomized online algorithms with advice for any choice of 1 ≤ b ≤ *** (logn ) , where n is the number of states in the system: we prove that any randomized online algorithm for MTS has competitive ratio *** ( log(n ) / b ) and we present a deterministic online algorithm for MTS with competitive ratio O (log(n ) / b ) . For the k -server problem we construct a deterministic online algorithm for general metric spaces with competitive ratio k O (1 / b ) for any choice of *** (1) ≤ b ≤ logk .

The peak-demand charge motivates large-load customers to flatten their demand curves, while their self-owned renewable generations aggravate demand fluctuations. Thus, it is attractive to utilize energy storage for shaping real-time loads and reducing electricity bills. In this paper, we propose the first peak-aware competitive online algorithm for leveraging stored energy (e.g., in fuel cells) to minimize peak-demand charges. Our algorithm decides the discharging quantity slot by slot to maintain the optimal worst-case performance guarantee (namely, competitive ratio) among all deterministic online algorithms. Interestingly, we show that the best competitive ratio can be computed by solving a linear number of linear-fractional problems. We can also extend our competitive algorithm and analysis to improve the average-case performance and consider short-term prediction.

Parallel disks provide a cost effective way of speeding up I/Os in applications that work with large amounts of data. The main challenge is to achieve as much parallelism as possible, using prefetching to avoid bottlenecks in disk access. Efficient algorithms have been developed for some particular patterns of accessing the disk blocks. In this paper, we consider general request sequences. When the request sequence consists of unique block requests, the problem is called prefetching and is a well-solved problem for arbitrary request sequences. When the reference sequence can have repeated references to the same block, we need to devise an effective caching policy as well. While optimum offline algorithms have been recently designed for the problem, in the online case, no effective algorithm was previously known. Our main contribution is a deterministic online algorithm threshold-LRU which achieves O((MD/L)2/3) competitive ratio and a randomized online algorithm threshold-MARK which achieves O(√(MD/L) log (MD/L)) competitive ratio for the caching/prefetching problem on the parallel disk model (PDM), where D is the number of disks, M is the size of fast memory buffer, and M+L is the amount of lookahead available in the request sequence. The best-known lower bound on the competitive ratio is Ω(≾MD/L) for lookahead L ≥ M in both models. We also show that if the deterministic online algorithm is allowed to have twice the memory of the offline then a tight competitive ratio of Θ(≾MD/L) can be achieved. This problem generalizes the well-known paging problem on a single disk to the parallel disk model.

A Randomized Algorithm for Two Servers on the Line

We investigate the power of migration in online scheduling for parallel identical machines. Our objective is to maximize the total processing time of accepted jobs. Once we decide to accept a job, we have to complete it before its deadline d that satisfies d >= (1+epsilon)p + r, where p is the processing time, r the submission time and the slack epsilon > 0 a system parameter. Typically, the hard case arises for small slack epsilon << 1, i.e. for near-tight deadlines. Without migration, a greedy acceptance policy is known to be an optimal deterministic online algorithm with a competitive factor of (1+epsilon)/epsilon (DasGupta and Palis, APPROX 2000). Our first contribution is to show that migrations do not improve the competitive ratio of the greedy acceptance policy, i.e. the competitive ratio remains (1+epsilon)/epsilon for any number of machines. Our main contribution is a deterministic online algorithm with almost tight competitive ratio on any number of machines. For a single machine, the competitive factor matches the optimal bound of (1+epsilon)/epsilon of the greedy acceptance policy. The competitive ratio improves with an increasing number of machines. It approaches (1+epsilon) ln((1+epsilon)/epsilon) as the number of machines converges to infinity. This is an exponential improvement over the greedy acceptance policy for small epsilon. Moreover, we show a matching lower bound on the competitive ratio for deterministic algorithms on any number of machines.

It has been a long-standing open problem to determine the exact randomized competitiveness of the 2-server problem, that is, the minimum competitiveness of any randomized online algorithm for the 2- server problem. For deterministic algorithms the best competitive ratio that can be obtained is 2 and no randomized algorithm is known that improves this ratio for general spaces. For the line, Bartal et al. [2] give a 155/78 competitive algorithm, but their algorithm is specific to the geometry of the line. We consider here the 2-server problem over Cross Polytope Spaces M2,4. We obtain an algorithm with competitive ratio of 19/12, and show that this ratio is best possible. This algorithm gives the second non-trivial example of metric spaces with better than 2 competitive ratio. The algorithm uses a design technique called the knowledge state technique - a method not specific to M2,4.

We develop a new approach for online network design and obtain improved competitive ratios for several problems. Our approach gives natural deterministic algorithms and simple analyses. At the heart of our work is a novel application of embeddings into hierarchically well-separated trees (HSTs) to the analysis of online network design algorithms --- we charge the cost of the algorithm to the cost of the optimal solution on any HST embedding of the terminals. This analysis technique is widely applicable to many problems and gives a unified framework for online network design. In a sense, our work brings together two of the main approaches to online network design. The first uses greedy-like algorithms and analyzes them using dual-fitting. The second uses tree embeddings and results in randomized $O(\log n)$-competitive algorithms, where $n$ is the total number of vertices in the graph. Our approach uses deterministic greedy-like algorithms but analyzes them via HST embeddings of the terminals. Our proofs are simpler as we do not need to carefully construct dual solutions and we get $O(\log k)$ competitive ratios, where $k$ is the number of terminals. In this paper, we apply our approach to obtain deterministic $O(\log k)$-competitive online algorithms for the following problems. - Steiner network with edge duplication. Previously, only a randomized $O(\log n)$-competitive algorithm was known. - Rent-or-buy. Previously, only deterministic $O(\log^2 k)$-competitive and randomized $O(\log k)$-competitive algorithms by Awerbuch, Azar and Bartal (2004) were known. - Connected facility location. Previously, only a randomized $O(\log^2 k)$-competitive algorithm by San Felice, Williamson and Lee (2014) was known. - Prize-collecting Steiner forest. We match the competitive ratio first achieved by Qian and Williamson (2011) and give a simpler analysis.

We study the advice complexity and the random bit complexity of the online knapsack problem: Given a knapsack of unit capacity, and n items that arrive in successive time steps, an online algorithm has to decide for every item whether it gets packed into the knapsack or not. The goal is to maximize the value of the items in the knapsack without exceeding its capacity. In the model of advice complexity of online problems, one asks how many bits of advice about the unknown parts of the input are both necessary and sufficient to achieve a specific competitive ratio. It is well-known that even the unweighted online knapsack problem does not admit any competitive deterministic online algorithm. We show that a single bit of advice helps a deterministic algorithm to become 2-competitive, but that Ω(log n) advice bits are necessary to further improve the deterministic competitive ratio. This is the first time that such a phase transition for the number of advice bits has been observed for any problem. We also show that, surprisingly, instead of an advice bit, a single random bit allows for a competitive ratio of 2, and any further amount of randomness does not improve this. Moreover, we prove that, in a resource augmentation model, i.e., when allowing a little overpacking of the knapsack, a constant number of advice bits suffices to achieve a near-optimal competitive ratio. We also study the weighted version of the problem proving that, with O(log n) bits of advice, we can get arbitrarily close to an optimal solution and, using asymptotically fewer bits, we are not competitive.

On the competitive ratio of the work function algorithm for the k-server problem

We consider the following scheduling problem. The input is a set of jobs with equal processing times, where each job is specified by its release time and deadline. The goal is to determine a single-processor nonpreemptive schedule that maximizes the number of completed jobs. In the online version, each job arrives at its release time. We give two online algorithms with competitive ratios below $2$ and show several lower bounds on the competitive ratios. First, we give a barely random $5/3$-competitive algorithm that uses only one random bit. We also show a lower bound of $3/2$ on the competitive ratio of barely random algorithms that randomly choose one of two deterministic algorithms. If the two algorithms are selected with equal probability, we can further improve the bound to $8/5$. Second, we give a deterministic $3/2$-competitive algorithm in the model that allows restarts, and we show that in this model the ratio $3/2$ is optimal. For randomized algorithms with restarts we show a lower bound of $6/5$.

We consider the online version of the piercing set problem, where geometric objects arrive one by one, and the online algorithm must maintain a valid piercing set for the already arrived objects by making irrevocable decisions. It is easy to observe that any deterministic algorithm solving this problem for intervals in R has a competitive ratio of at least Ω(n). This paper considers the piercing set problem for similarly sized objects. We propose a deterministic online algorithm for similarly sized fat objects in R d . For homothetic hypercubes in R d with side length in the range [1, k], we propose a deterministic algorithm having a competitive ratio of at most 3 d ⌈log 2 k⌉ + 2 d . In the end, we show deterministic lower bounds of the competitive ratio for similarly sized α-fat objects in R 2 and homothetic hypercubes in R d . Note that piercing translated copies of a convex object is equivalent to the unit covering problem, which is well-studied in the online setup. Surprisingly, no upper bound of the competitive ratio was known for the unit covering problem when the corresponding object is anything other than a ball or a hypercube. Our result yields an upper bound of the competitive ratio for the unit covering problem when the corresponding object is any convex object in R d .

We consider a general online network design problem where a sequence of N requests arrive over time, each of which needs to use a subset of the available resources E. The cost incurred by a resource e ∊ E is some function fe of its total load ℓe. The objective is to minimize the total cost Σe∊E fe(ℓe). We focus on cost functions that exhibit (dis)economies of scale, which are of the form if x > 0 (and zero if x = 0), where the exponent αe ≥ 1.Our main result is a deterministic online algorithm with tight competitive ratio when αe is constant. This framework is applicable to many network design problems, including multicommodity routing, Steiner tree/forest connectivity and set-connectivity Even in special cases such as multicommodity routing in undirected graphs with edge-costs, this is the first online algorithm to handle non-uniform resource cost and with a competitive ratio independent of the network size and number of requests. Our online competitive ratio also matches the previous-best offline approximation ratio. Our approach is based on the online primal-dual method for convex programs.

We extend the Mobile Server problem introduced in Feldkord and Meyer auf der Heide (TOPC 6(3), 14:1–14:17 2019) to a model where k identical mobile resources, here named servers, answer requests appearing at points in the Euclidean space. To reduce communication costs, the positions of the servers can be adapted by a limited distance ms per round for each server. The costs are measured similarly to the classical Page Migration problem: i.e., answering a request induces costs proportional to the distance to the nearest server, and moving a server induces costs proportional to the distance multiplied with a weight D. We show that, in our model, no online algorithm can have a constant competitive ratio: i.e., one which is independent of the input length n, even if an augmented moving distance of (1 + δ)ms is allowed for the online algorithm. Therefore we investigate a restriction of the power of the adversary dictating the sequence of requests: We demand locality of requests: i.e., that consecutive requests come from points in the Euclidean space with distance bounded by some constant mc. We show constant lower bounds on the competitiveness in this setting (independent of n, but dependent on k, ms and mc). On the positive side, we present a deterministic online algorithm with bounded competitiveness when an augmented moving distance and locality of requests is assumed. Our algorithm simulates any given algorithm for the classical k-Page Migration problem as guidance for its servers and extends it by a greedy move of one server in every round. The resulting competitive ratio is polynomial in the number of servers k, the ratio between mc and ms, the inverse of the augmentation factor 1/δ and the competitive ratio of the simulated k-Page Migration algorithm. We also show how to directly adapt the Double Coverage algorithm (Chrobak et al. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 4(2), 172–181 11) for the k-Server problem to receive an algorithm with improved competitiveness on the line.

This paper studies an online cost optimization problem for distributed storage and access. The goal is to dynamically create and delete copies of data objects over time at geo-distributed servers to serve access requests and minimize the total storage and network cost. We revisit a recent algorithm in the literature and show that it does not have a competitive ratio of 2 as claimed by constructing a counterexample. We further prove that no deterministic online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio bounded by 2 for the general cost optimization problem. We develop an online algorithm and prove that it achieves a competitive ratio of max {2, min {γ, 3}}, where γ is the max/min storage cost ratio among all servers. Examples are given to confirm the tightness of competitive analysis.

We consider the classic online scheduling problem of minimizing the total weighted flow time on a single machine with preemptions. Here, each job j has an arbitrary arrival time rj, weight wj and size pj, and given a schedule its flow time is defined as the duration of time since its arrival until it completes its service requirement. The first non-trivial algorithms with poly-logarithmic competitive ratio for this problem were obtained relatively recently, and it was widely believed that the problem admits a constant factor competitive algorithm. In this paper, we show an ω(1) lower bound on the competitive ratio of any deterministic online algorithm. Our result is based on a gap amplification technique for online algorithms. Starting with a trivial lower bound of 1, we give a procedure to improve the lower bound sequentially, while ensuring at each step that the size of the instance increases relatively modestly.