The role of machine learning in robotics

With the popularization of machine learning (ML) techniques and the increased chipset’s performance, the application of ML to pedestrian localization systems has received significant attention in the last years. Several survey papers have attempted to provide a state-of-the-art overview, but they usually limit their scope to a particular type of positioning system or technology. In addition, they are written from the point of view of ML techniques and their practice, not from the point of view of the localization system and the specific problems that ML techniques can help to solve. This article is intended to offer a comprehensive state-of-the-art survey of the ML techniques that have been adopted over the last ten years to improve the performance of pedestrian localization systems, addressing the applicability of ML techniques in this domain, along with the main localization strategies. It concludes by indicating the underlying open issues and challenges associated with the existing systems, and possible future directions in which ML techniques could improve the performance of pedestrian localization systems. Among other open issues, most previous authors have focused their attention on position estimation accuracy, which wastes the potential of ML techniques to improve other performance parameters (e.g., response time, computational complexity, robustness, scalability or energy efficiency). This study shows that there is a strong trend towards the application of supervised learning. Consequently, there are many potential research opportunities in the use of other learning types, such as unsupervised and reinforcement learning, to improve the performance of pedestrian localization systems.

Machine Learning (ML) techniques are pervasive tools in various emerging commercial applications, but have to be accommodated by powerful computer systems to process very large data. Although general-purpose CPUs and GPUs have provided straightforward solutions, their energy-efficiencies are limited due to their excessive supports for flexibility. Hardware accelerators may achieve better energy-efficiencies, but each accelerator often accommodates only a single ML technique (family). According to the famous No-Free-Lunch theorem in the ML domain, however, an ML technique performs well on a dataset may perform poorly on another dataset, which implies that such accelerator may sometimes lead to poor learning accuracy. Even if regardless of the learning accuracy, such accelerator can still become inapplicable simply because the concrete ML task is altered, or the user chooses another ML technique.In this study, we present an ML accelerator called PuDianNao, which accommodates seven representative ML techniques, including k-means, k-nearest neighbors, naive bayes, support vector machine, linear regression, classification tree, and deep neural network. Benefited from our thorough analysis on computational primitives and locality properties of different ML techniques, PuDianNao can perform up to 1056 GOP/s (e.g., additions and multiplications) in an area of 3.51 mm^2, and consumes 596 mW only. Compared with the NVIDIA K20M GPU (28nm process), PuDianNao (65nm process) is 1.20x faster, and can reduce the energy by 128.41x.

A comprehensive review on detection of plant disease using machine learning and deep learning approaches

Machine learning (ML) techniques have numerous applications in many fields, including healthcare, medicine, finance, marketing, and cyber security. For example, ML techniques are being applied to determine whether to give a loan to a customer or whether the computing system has been attacked. However, the ML techniques themselves may be subject to attacks and may discriminate when determining who should get the loan. Therefore, the ML techniques have to be secure, ensure privacy of the individuals, incorporate fairness and be accurate. Such collection of ML techniques has come to be known as trustworthy machine learning (trustworthy ML). This article describes an architecture to support scalable trustworthy ML and describes the features that have to be incorporated into the ML techniques to ensure that they are trustworthy.

Code smells are considered symptoms of poor implementation choices, which may hamper the software maintainability. Hence, code smells should be detected as early as possible to avoid software quality degradation. Unfortunately, detecting code smells is not a trivial task. Some preliminary studies investigated and concluded that machine learning (ML) techniques are a promising way to better support smell detection. However, these techniques are hard to be customized to promote an early and accurate detection of specific smell types. Yet, ML techniques usually require numerous code examples to be trained (composing a relevant dataset) in order to achieve satisfactory accuracy. Unfortunately, such a dependency on a large validated dataset is impractical and leads to late detection of code smells. Thus, a prevailing challenge is the early customized detection of code smells taking into account the typical limited training data. In this direction, this paper reports a study in which we collected code smells, from ten active projects, that were actually refactored by developers, differently from studies that rely on code smells inferred by researchers. These smells were used for evaluating the accuracy regarding early detection of code smells by using seven ML techniques. Once we take into account such smells that were considered as important by developers, the ML techniques are able to customize the detection in order to focus on smells observed as relevant in the investigated systems. The results showed that all the analyzed techniques are sensitive to the type of smell and obtained good results for the majority of them, especially JRip and Random Forest. We also observe that the ML techniques did not need a high number of examples to reach their best accuracy results. This finding implies that ML techniques can be successfully used for early detection of smells without depending on the curation of a large dataset.

Landslide disaster risk reduction necessitates the investigation of different geotechnical causal factors for slope failures. Machine learning (ML) techniques have been proposed to study causal factors across many application areas. However, the development of ensemble ML techniques for identifying the geotechnical causal factors for slope failures and their subsequent prediction has lacked in literature. The primary goal of this research is to develop and evaluate novel feature selection methods for identifying causal factors for slope failures and assess the potential of ensemble and individual ML techniques for slope failure prediction. Twenty-one geotechnical causal factors were obtained from 60 sites (both landslide and non-landslide) spread across a landslide-prone area in Mandi, India. Relevant causal factors were evaluated by developing a novel ensemble feature selection method that involved an average of different individual feature selection methods like correlation, information-gain, gain-ratio, OneR, and F-ratio. Furthermore, different ensemble ML techniques (Random Forest (RF), AdaBoost (AB), Bagging, Stacking, and Voting) and individual ML techniques (Bayesian network (BN), decision tree (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and support vector machine (SVM)) were calibrated to 70% of the locations and tested on 30% of the sites. The ensemble feature selection method yielded six major contributing parameters to slope failures: relative compaction, porosity, saturated permeability, slope angle, angle of the internal friction, and in-situ moisture content. Furthermore, the ensemble RF and AB techniques performed the best compared to other ensemble and individual ML techniques on test data. The present study discusses the implications of different causal factors for slope failure prediction.

Quantum random number generators (QRNG) provide a strong assurance for the quality of the generated random numbers by using the intrinsic, indeterministic nature of quantum systems. In practise, a subtle correlation gone undetected is enough to greatly compromise the security of an RNG. This is especially so with the advent of state-of-art machine learning (ML) techniques. An adversary familiar with ML techniques could potentially use them to gain much more information about a seemingly random source, causing a significant risk for security. In this presentation, we turn ML techniques from being a potential adversary to a powerful tool for the diagnostics of a QRNG. We demonstrate the capability of ML in finding correlations in a random source, thereby making first steps in establishing ML as a diagnostic tool. To this end, we inspect the classical and the quantum entropy sources in a vacuum fluctuation based QRNG using ML technique. Alongside existing NIST statistical tests, we discover that even a statistically-sound PRNG can be considered non-uniform under the scrutiny of ML techniques.

PurposeThis study aims to emphasize utilization of Predictive Six Sigma to achieve process improvements based on machine learning (ML) techniques embedded in define, measure, analyze, improve, control (DMAIC). With this aim, this study presents selection and utilization of ML techniques, including multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural network (ANN), random forests (RF), gradient boosting machines (GBM) and k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) in the analyze and improve phases of Six Sigma DMAIC.Design/methodology/approachA data set containing 320 observations with nine input and one output variables is used. To achieve the objective which was to decrease the number of fabric defects, five ML techniques were compared in terms of prediction performance and best tools were selected. Next, most important causes of defects were determined via these tools. Finally, parameter optimization was conducted for minimum number of defects.FindingsAmong five ML tools, ANN, GBM and RF are found to be the best predictors. Out of nine potential causes, “machine speed” and “fabric width” are determined as the most important variables by using these tools. Then, optimum values for “machine speed” and “fabric width” for fabric defect minimization are determined both via regression response optimizer and ANN surface optimization. Ultimately, average defect number was decreased from 13/roll to 3/roll, which is a considerable decrease attained through utilization of ML techniques in Six Sigma.Originality/valueAddressing an important gap in Six Sigma literature, in this study, certain ML techniques (i.e. MLR, ANN, RF, GBM and k-NN) are compared and the ones possessing best performances are used in the analyze and improve phases of Six Sigma DMAIC.

In recent years, planners have started considering Machine Learning (ML) techniques as an alternative to discrete choice models (CM). ML techniques are primarily data-driven and typically achieve better prediction accuracy compared to CM. However, it is hypothesized that since the ML techniques do not have the strong grounding to economic theory as the CMs, they may not perform well in contexts that are radically different from the ‘training’ scenario. It is also hypothesized that the relative prediction performance may be affected by the metrics used for comparing the models. This research aims to test these two hypotheses empirically by modelling vehicle ownership choices using household survey data from Dhaka, Bangladesh collected in 2004, 2010 and 2019. The performances of CM (multinomial logit) and ML techniques (neural networks and gradient boosting trees) have been compared using log-likelihood and mean absolute percentage error of market shares. The results indicate that the multinomial logit model (MNL) with a piecewise linear transformation of the household income, has the best performance in terms of log-likelihood and mean absolute percentage error of market shares. This is followed by Neural Networks (NN) and Gradient Boosting Trees (GBT). The results thus provide empirical evidence that the ML techniques do not consistently outperform CM. Moreover, the difference in the performance of the models further increases if the prediction scenario is substantially different. This reinforces the hypothesis that CMs, with their behavioural underpinning, are better suited for long-term forecasting than data-driven ML approaches, especially if the population and network attributes are expected to change substantially. These findings will be useful for planners and policy makers in the selection of the appropriate tool for forecasting travel demand.

ABSTRACTThis paper reviews the activity-travel behaviour literature that employs Machine Learning (ML) techniques for empirical analysis and modelling. Machine Learning algorithms, which attempt to build intelligence utilizing the availability of large amounts of data, have emerged as powerful tools in the fields of pattern recognition and big data analysis. These techniques have been applied in activity-travel behaviour studies since the early ’90s when Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) were employed to model mode choice decisions. AMOS, an activity-based modelling system developed in the mid-’90s, has ANN at its core to model and predict individual responses to travel demand management measures. In the dawn of 2000, ALBATROSS, a comprehensive activity-based travel demand modelling system, was proposed by Arentze and Timmermans using Decision Trees. Since then researchers have been exploring ML techniques like Support Vector Machines (SVM), Decision Trees (DT), Neural Networks (NN), Bayes Classifiers, and more recently, Ensemble Learners to model and predict activity-travel behaviour. A large number of publications over the years and an upward trend in the number of published articles over time indicate that Machine Learning is a promising tool for activity-travel behaviour analysis and prediction. This article, first of its kind in the literature, reviews these studies and explores the trends in activity-travel behaviour research that apply ML techniques. The review finds that mode choice decisions have received wide attention in the literature on ML applications. It was observed that most of the studies identify the lack of interpretability as a serious shortcoming in ML techniques. However, very few studies have attempted to improve the interpretability of the models. Further, some studies report the importance of feature engineering in ML-based studies, but very few studies adopt feature engineering before model development. Spatiotemporal transferability of models is another issue that has received minimal attention in the literature. In the end, the paper discusses possible directions for future research in the area of activity-travel behaviour modelling using ML techniques.

Growth in system complexity increases the need for automated techniques dedicated to different log analysis tasks such as Log-based Anomaly Detection (LAD). The latter has been widely addressed in the literature, mostly by means of a variety of deep learning techniques. However, despite their many advantages, that focus on deep learning techniques is somewhat arbitrary as traditional Machine Learning (ML) techniques may perform well in many cases, depending on the context and datasets. In the same vein, semi-supervised techniques deserve the same attention as supervised techniques since the former have clear practical advantages. Further, current evaluations mostly rely on the assessment of detection accuracy. However, this is not enough to decide whether or not a specific ML technique is suitable to address the LAD problem in a given context. Other aspects to consider include training and prediction times as well as the sensitivity to hyperparameter tuning, which in practice matters to engineers. In this paper, we present a comprehensive empirical study, in which we evaluate a wide array of supervised and semi-supervised, traditional and deep ML techniques w.r.t. four evaluation criteria: detection accuracy, time performance, sensitivity of detection accuracy and time performance to hyperparameter tuning. Our goal is to provide much stronger and comprehensive evidence regarding the relative advantages and drawbacks of alternative techniques for LAD. The experimental results show that supervised traditional and deep ML techniques fare similarly in terms of their detection accuracy and prediction time on most of the benchmark datasets considered in our study. Moreover, overall, sensitivity analysis to hyperparameter tuning with respect to detection accuracy shows that supervised traditional ML techniques are less sensitive than deep learning techniques. Further, semi-supervised techniques yield significantly worse detection accuracy than supervised techniques.

Machine learning in computational docking.

Background/aimsTo investigate the feasibility and accuracy of using machine learning (ML) techniques on self-reported questionnaire data to predict the 10-year risk of cataract surgery, and to identify meaningful predictors of...

Techno-economic estimation of a non-cover box solar still with thermoelectric and antiseptic nanofluid using machine learning models

Air quality, both indoors and outdoors, is crucial for public health as it affects respiratory conditions and overall well-being. Machine learning (ML) techniques offer innovative solutions for monitoring and predicting air quality. However, choosing the right ML algorithms and evaluation metrics is essential for creating accurate air quality prediction models, as these choices directly impact the accuracy and reliability of the results. This study aims to explore and summarize the literature on the use of ML techniques in predicting and optimizing air quality, addressing the urgent issue of air pollution. The review analyzed papers from two electronic databases, namely Scopus and Science Direct. Information on ML techniques for predicting air quality and identifying the main sources of pollution was extracted from 26 studies. The study focuses on common ML techniques employed in air quality prediction, including classification, deep learning, regression, ensemble learning, and combinations of regression and deep learning. It also identifies the evaluation metrics used to assess the performance of these models, such as recall, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2). By synthesizing existing knowledge, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of the metrics researchers use to measure the overall effectiveness of ML algorithms. It serves as a benchmark for future research and guides the selection of appropriate evaluation metrics in the field of air quality prediction.