The Stratonovich–Weyl correspondence for one-dimensional kinematical groups

Let H be an abstract separable Hilbert space. We will consider the Hilbert space H1 whose elements are functionsf(x) with domain H and we will also consider the set of self-adjoint operators Q(x) in H of the form Q(x)=A+B(x). In this formula A≥E, B(x)≥0, and the operator B(x) is bounded for all x. An operator L0 is defined on the set of finite, infinitely differentiable (in the strong sense) functions y(x) eH1 according to the formula: L0y=−y″ + Q(x)y (−∞<x<∞). It is proved that the closure of the operator L0 is a self-adjoint operator in H1 under the given assumptions.

Weakly closed, commutative, symmetric rings of operators on a Hilbert space are examined and their structure is ex ploited to characterize normal operators in terms of the rings they generate. In the first chapter, notation is established, and the less common theorems from Hilbert space theory not to be used in later sections are briefly reviewed. In Chapter II, the structure of weakly closed, commu tative, symmetric rings with a cyclic vector is specified. This theorem is then used in conjunction with a strucure called a canonical decomposition system to establish that every weakly closed, commutative, symmetric ring or opera tors acting on a separable space and containing the iden tity is spatially isomorphic to a "divect sum" of L rings of a certain type. In Chapter III, two sets of necessary and sufficient conditions are given for two normal operators on a separ able Hilbert space to be unitarily equivalent. The concept of a spectral class of a normal operator is introduced -a natural generalization of the concept of an eigen value. Each spectral class is assigned a multiplicity, and it is shown that two normal operators are unitarily equivalent iff they have the same spectral classes with the same respective multiplicities. A multiplicity is iv also defined for weakly continuous positive functionals o n the symmetric ring generated by a normal operator in the weak topology, and it is shown that this multiplicity function determines the operator. This multiplicity theory is compared w i t h a previous theory. v CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION We shall be concerned in this paper with rings of operators on a Hilbert space, in particular, weakly closed, commutative, symmetric rings. All Hilbert spaces to be considered will be complex Hilbert spaces. If H is a Hilbert space and x,y e H, then (x(y) will denote the inner product of x and y, and 1 Jxi| will denote the norm of x. We shall consider only bounded linear operators in this paper, and therefore we shall use the word "operator" solely to mean a bounded linear operator. The set of all operators on the Hilbert space H will be denoted by B(H). If A s B(H), then A* will denote the adjoint of A, We employ the usual concepts of isometric, unitary, hermitian, normal, and positive definite operators. Knowledge of the weak, strong, strongest, and norm topologies for B(H) is assumed. The norm topology is the strongest of the four; hence, any set of operators closed in one of the topologies is closed in the norm topology. By a ring of operators we shall mean a set of opera tors forming a ring in the usual algebraic sense which is also a vector space over the complex numbers. A ring R of operators is symmetric if A e R whenever A e R. from the theory of Banach algebras, we know that any norm closed, 1 we define an operator A a e BCLg) by A ftf = af* Note that two Ly,, functions which differ only on a set of measure zero give rise to the same operator. The ring of operators thus obtained is a maximal, commutative, symmetric ring. If E is a weakly closed, commutative, symmetric ring with maximal ideal space M, then the fact that E is closed under sups gives rise to some strong topological properties of M. In this case, M is totally disconnected, and the closure of every open set is open. Thus, M contains many sets which are both open and closed, and such sets we call clopen. It is easy to see that projections in E correspond v i a the Gelfand transform to the characteristic functions of clopen sets. If U is a clopen subset of M, then we will let pu denote the corresponding projection in E. pu (m) -JtjjCm) = the characteristic function of U. Throughout the remainder of this discussion, E will denote a weakly closed commutative, symmetric subring of B(H) with identity, and M will denote the maximal ideal space of E. Corresponding to each vector 5 e H, there is a measure u on M defined by The topological properties of M carry strong implications for the resulting measure space. If S = M is measurable, then there exists a clopen set U such that m (S\UUU\S) * 0. If ? is cyclic for E ' , then u is supported on all of M, in ( A $ 0 = J A (m)du(m)

If A is a bounded linear multicyclic operator acting on a complex Banach spaceX, then thedisc of A is defined by: disc A = sup(R ∈ Cyc A) min{dimR′: R′ ⊂ R, R′ ∈ Cyc A}, where Cyc A denotes the family of all finite dimensional subspacesR ofX such that X = (R+AR+A 2 R+⋯)−. It is shown that if the set {λ ∈ ℂ: dim ker (λ-A)* ≥ n} has nonempty interior (in particular, if A is a Fredholm operator of index -n), then disc A ≥ n+1. This result affirmatively answers a question of V.I. Vasjunin and N.K. Nikol'skii. In the case whenX is a Hilbert space, it is shown that the set of all operators A such that A is n-multicyclic, but disc A =∞, is dense in the set of all n-multicyclic operators. If Mλ = "multiplication by λ" acting on the disk algebra (and many other spaces of continuous and/or analytic functions), then Mλ is cyclic, but disc Mλ = ∞. However, the analogous result is false if the disk algebra is replaced by the algebra of functions analytic on the disk and smooth on the boundary, or algebras of Lipschitz functions. If T is a multicyclic unicellular operator, then T is cyclic and disc T=1.

The Weyl correspondence for obtaining quantum operators from functions of classical coordinates and momenta is known to be incorrect. To calculate quantum-mechanical expectation values as phase-space averages with the Wigner density function, one cannot use classical functions but must use Weyl transforms. These transforms are defined and their properties derived from quantum mechanics. Their properties are expressed in terms of a Hermitian operator Δ(Q, K) whose Weyl transform is a δ function. The Wigner function is the transform of the density operator. Every Weyl transform is exhibited as a difference of two functions which are nonnegative on the phase spece. Weyl transforms do not obey the algebra of classical functions. In the classical limit ℏ → 0, Weyl transforms become classical functions, the Wigner function becomes nonnegative throughout the phase space, and the Hilbert space is spanned by an orthonormal set of vectors which are simultaneous eigenkets of the commuting coordinate and momentum operators.

When we decompose the invariant amplitude f(s, t) into the partial-wave scattering amplitudes for fixed t, we must consider four different cases according to the values of t. The amplitude f(s, t) is considered as a function over a little group. For t=0, two cases occur; we treat the case where the little group is two-dimensional Euclidean group E2. Taking f(s, t=0) as a function over E2, we get the partial-wave expansion according to the unitary irreducible representations of E2 and can pick out the Regge behavior from this expansion. We find that this group-theoretical method is essentially the “eikonal” approximation representation.

This is a tutorial paper for those who wish to understand what role the Lorentz group plays in studying squeezed states and polarization optics. It is noted first that the basic underlying language of squeezed states of light is the Lorentz group. It is then shown that this basic language can also serve as the basic language of polarization optics. It is pointed out that phase-shift and rotation filters lead to the symmetry of SU(2), while rotation and attenuation filters lead to the symmetry of Sp(2) or SU(1,1) which are familiar to us through squeezed states of light. The combined effects lead to the six-parameter Lorentz group. From this, it is possible to derive a new subgroup having the symmetry as the two-dimensional Euclidean group. Optical filters exhibiting this new symmetry property are discussed in detail.

We explore the concept of the extended Galilei group, a representation for the symplectic quantum mechanics in the manifold G, written in the light-cone of a five-dimensional de Sitter space-time in the phase space. The Hilbert space is constructed endowed with a symplectic structure. We study the unitary operators describing rotations and translations, whose generators satisfy the Lie algebra of G. This representation gives rise to the Schr¨odinger (Klein–Gordon-like) equation for the wave function in the phase space such that the dependent variables have the position and linear momentum contents. The wave functions are associated to the Wigner function through the Moyal product such that the wave functions represent a quasiamplitude of probability. We construct the Pauli–Schr¨odinger (Dirac-like) equation in the phase space in its explicitly covariant form. Finally, we show the equivalence between the five-dimensional formalism of the phase space with the usual formalism, proposing a solution that recovers the non-covariant form of the Pauli–Schr¨odinger equation in the phase space.

We investigate a class of new <svg style="vertical-align:-2.3205pt;width:85.949997px;" id="M2" height="15.0875" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 85.949997 15.0875" width="85.949997" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x1D43B"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,14.97,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,20.852,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,26.734,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,30.609,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x2C"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,37.307,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,41.182,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,47.064,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x2C"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,53.779,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,59.66,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,63.536,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x2C"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,70.233,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,74.109,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,79.991,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"/></g> </svg>-mixed cocoercive operators in Hilbert spaces. We extend the concept of resolvent operators associated with <svg style="vertical-align:-2.3205pt;width:41.25px;" id="M3" height="15.0875" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 41.25 15.0875" width="41.25" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x1D43B"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,14.97,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,20.852,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,24.728,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x2C"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,31.425,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,35.301,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"/></g> </svg>-cocoercive operators to the <svg style="vertical-align:-2.3205pt;width:85.949997px;" id="M4" height="15.0875" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 85.949997 15.0875" width="85.949997" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x1D43B"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,14.97,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,20.852,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,26.734,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,30.609,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x2C"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,37.307,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,41.182,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,47.064,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x2C"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,53.779,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,59.66,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,63.536,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x2C"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,70.233,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,74.109,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,79.991,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"/></g> </svg>-mixed cocoercive operators and prove that the resolvent operator of <svg style="vertical-align:-2.3205pt;width:85.949997px;" id="M5" height="15.0875" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 85.949997 15.0875" width="85.949997" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x1D43B"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,14.97,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,20.852,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,26.734,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,30.609,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x2C"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,37.307,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,41.182,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,47.064,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x2C"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,53.779,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,59.66,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,63.536,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x2C"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,70.233,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,74.109,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,79.991,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"/></g> </svg>-mixed cocoercive operator is single valued and Lipschitz continuous. Some examples are given to justify the definition of <svg style="vertical-align:-2.3205pt;width:85.949997px;" id="M6" height="15.0875" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 85.949997 15.0875" width="85.949997" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x1D43B"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,14.97,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,20.852,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,26.734,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,30.609,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x2C"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,37.307,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,41.182,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,47.064,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x2C"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,53.779,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,59.66,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,63.536,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x2C"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,70.233,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,74.109,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,79.991,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"/></g> </svg>-mixed cocoercive operators. Further, by using resolvent operator technique, we discuss the approximate solution and suggest an iterative algorithm for the generalized mixed variational inclusions involving <svg style="vertical-align:-2.3205pt;width:85.949997px;" id="M7" height="15.0875" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 85.949997 15.0875" width="85.949997" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x1D43B"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,14.97,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,20.852,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,26.734,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,30.609,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x2C"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,37.307,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,41.182,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,47.064,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x2C"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,53.779,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,59.66,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,63.536,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x2C"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,70.233,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x22C5"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,74.109,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,79.991,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"/></g> </svg>-mixed cocoercive operators in Hilbert spaces. We also discuss the convergence criteria for the iterative algorithm under some suitable conditions. Our results can be viewed as a generalization of some known results in the literature.

When describing a quantum mechanical system, it is convenient to consider state vectors that do not belong to the Hilbert space. In the first part of this paper, we survey the various formalisms have been introduced for giving a rigorous mathematical justification to this procedure: rigged Hilbert spaces (RHS), scales or lattices of Hilbert spaces (LHS), nested Hilbert spaces, partial inner product spaces. Then we present three types of applications in quantum mechanics, all of them involving spaces of analytic functions. First we present a LHS built around the Bargmann space, thus giving a natural frame for the Fock-Bargmann (or phase space) representation. Then we review the RHS approach to scattering theory (resonances, Gamow vectors, etc.). Finally, we reformulate the Weinberg-van Winter integral equation approach to scattering in the LHS language, and this allows us to prove that it is in fact a particular case of the familiar complex scaling method.

Quantum processes on phase space

Some representations of the Poincaré group, by functions on phase space are studied both for classical as well as quantum relativistic systems. The classical representations are identified with certain canonically induced representations, and the quantum representations are then obtained on the same Hilbert space. Equations of motion on phase space are also developed.

In this paper, we study the parametrization of conservative extensions of minimal dynamic semigroups used in the quantum theory of open systems for describing irreversible processes. The particular case of extensions parametrized by normal states is discussed in [1, 2]. The construction used below is similar to that of self-ajoint extensions for densely-defined, bounded below, symmetric operators in a Hilbert space. The dynamic semigroup, unlike the unitary operator group, acts not on elements of a Hilbert space 7/but on elements of a topological operator algebra in a Hilbert space B(H); moreover, this semigroup is completely positive (see [3]). For such semigroups, direct methods of describing domains of generating mappings are absent; this complicates the parametrization of extensions of the minimal generating mapping. It turns out that the range of the resolvent of the minimal dynamic semigroup belongs to the complement of the zero set (the kernel) of the limit mapping QOO(.) associated with the formal generating mapping of the dynamic semigroup. For this reason, we first consider general properties of the zero set for a completely positive mapping (see Sec. 1). In what follows, the C*-algebra generated by positive roots of a mapping Q(-) plays the central role. In Sec. 2, we prove that this algebra has the following property: it is maximal in the class of algebras that contain an element X if and only if X* X and X X* are elements of the algebra. In Sec. 3, the mentioned property is extended to the set of positive operators that are zeros of the limit mapping QOO(.) _- s-lira Qn (.). We prove that the domain of the infinitesimal mapping of the minimal dynamic semigroup is contained in the maximal C*-Mgebra generated by positive roots of the mapping Q~(-) associated with the semigroup. In Sec. 4, we give a construction of conservative extensions of the minimal dynamic semigroup, which is based on limit properties of the resolvent mapping. In Sec. 5, we prove the characteristic theorem for completely positive mappings with given ranges, which enables us to consider the set of conservative extensions as a *-weakly compact convex manifold in/3+(/2(7-~)), whose points admit an expansion in the set of extreme elements. The barycentric expansion of elements T in extreme points of E C T establishes a one-to-one correspondence between classes of equivalent normed measures on E and conservative extensions of the minimal dynamic semigroup; in this case, E plays the role of boundary and the class of equivalent measures plays the role of boundary condition for a conservative extension.

As earlier conjectured by several authors and much later established by Solèr, from the lattice-theory point of view, Quantum Mechanics may be formulated in real, complex or quaternionic Hilbert spaces only. On the other hand, no quantum systems seem to exist that are naturally described in a real or quaternionic Hilbert space. In a previous paper [23], we showed that any quantum system which is elementary from the viewpoint of the Poincaré symmetry group and it is initially described in a real Hilbert space, it can also be described within the standard complex Hilbert space framework. This complex description is unique and more precise than the real one as, for instance, in the complex description, all self-adjoint operators represent observables defined by the symmetry group. The complex picture fulfils the thesis of Solér’s theorem and permits the standard formulation of the quantum Noether’s theorem. The present work is devoted to investigate the remaining case, namely, the possibility of a description of a relativistic elementary quantum system in a quaternionic Hilbert space. Everything is done exploiting recent results of the quaternionic spectral theory that were independently developed. In the initial part of this work, we extend some results of group representation theory and von Neumann algebra theory from the real and complex cases to the quaternionic Hilbert space case. We prove the double commutant theorem also for quaternionic von Neumann algebras (whose proof requires a different procedure with respect to the real and complex cases) and we extend to the quaternionic case a result established in the previous paper concerning the classification of irreducible von Neumann algebras into three categories. In the second part of the paper, we consider an elementary relativistic system within Wigner’s approach defined as a locally-faithful irreducible strongly-continuous unitary representation of the Poincaré group in a quaternionic Hilbert space. We prove that, if the squared-mass operator is non-negative, the system admits a natural, Poincaré invariant and unique up to sign, complex structure which commutes with the whole algebra of observables generated by the representation itself. This complex structure leads to a physically equivalent reformulation of the theory in a complex Hilbert space. Within this complex formulation, differently from what happens in the quaternionic one, all self-adjoint operators represent observables in agreement with Solèr’s thesis, the standard quantum version of Noether theorem may be formulated and the notion of composite system may be given in terms of tensor product of elementary systems. In the third part of the paper, we focus on the physical hypotheses adopted to define a quantum elementary relativistic system relaxing them on the one hand, and making our model physically more general on the other hand. We use a physically more accurate notion of irreducibility regarding the algebra of observables only, we describe the symmetries in terms of automorphisms of the restricted lattice of elementary propositions of the quantum system and we adopt a notion of continuity referred to the states viewed as probability measures on the elementary propositions. Also in this case, the final result proves that there exists a unique (up to sign) Poincaré invariant complex structure making the theory complex and completely fitting into Solèr’s picture. The overall conclusion is that relativistic elementary systems are naturally and better described in complex Hilbert spaces even if starting from a real or quaternionic Hilbert space formulation and this complex description is uniquely fixed by physics.

The purpose of this paper is to introduce and study the existence problem of solution for a system of monotone variational inclusion problems in Hilbert spaces. By using the inertial forward-backward splitting technique, we propose and analyze an algorithm. Under suitable conditions, we proved that the sequence generated by the algorithm converges strongly to a solution of such kind of monotone variational inclusion problems. At the end of the paper, some applications are also given. The results presented in the paper extend and improve some recent results.

We introduce new iterative algorithms with perturbations for finding a common element of the set of solutions of the system of generalized equilibrium problems and the set of common fixed points of two quasi‐nonexpansive mappings in a Hilbert space. Under suitable conditions, strong convergence theorems are obtained. Furthermore, we also consider the iterative algorithms with perturbations for finding a common element of the solution set of the systems of generalized equilibrium problems and the common fixed point set of the super hybrid mappings in Hilbert spaces.