• Home
  • Search
  • The Stroop Task Sex Difference: Evolved Inhibition or Color Naming?
  • Cite Icon20
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02439-9Copy DOI Icon

The Stroop Task Sex Difference: Evolved Inhibition or Color Naming?

Show More
  • Abstract
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Previous research shows that women outperform men in the classic Stroop task, but it is not known why this difference occurs. There are currently two main hypotheses: (1) women have enhanced verbal abilities, and (2) women show greater inhibition. In two Stroop experiments, we examined the Inhibition hypothesis by adopting a procedure, often used in visual cognition paradigms, that induces a particular inhibitory component. So-called Negative Priming occurs when a distracting non-target stimulus on one trial becomes the target on the following trial. Results from our experiments showed that the degree to which this type of inhibition occurs within the Stroop effect is no different for men and women. This was the case irrespective of whether participants made a vocal response (Experiment 1; n = 64, 32 men and 32 women) or a manual response (Experiment 2; n = 64, 32 men and 32 women). These results do not therefore support the Inhibition hypothesis. We additionally review findings from a range of paradigms that can be seen as indexing the different components required for the Stroop task (e.g., distractor suppression). This review suggests that the sex effect is due to superior color naming ability in women.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Dissertation
  • Citations1

An examination of the stimuli used in and the theories behind the cross-modal Stroop task

  • May 22, 2013
  • Danielle Lutfi-Proctor
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Effect of hypothyroidism on cognitive status: Evidence from stroop task

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • Indian Journal of Medical Specialities
  • Shilpi Goyal +3
  • Research Article

Multiple sources of conflict in the flanker task: Flanker interference can be decomposed into cumulative components.

  • Apr 01, 2026
  • Psychonomic bulletin & review
  • Corentin Gonthier +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Shape and color naming are inherently asymmetrical: Evidence from practice-based interference

  • Nov 11, 2016
  • Cognition
  • Athanassios Protopapas +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

Response Modality and the Stroop Task.

  • Sep 01, 2019
  • Experimental Psychology
  • Benjamin A Parris +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations21

Automaticity of lexical access in deaf and hearing bilinguals: Cross-linguistic evidence from the color Stroop task across five languages

  • Mar 31, 2021
  • Cognition
  • Rain G Bosworth +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Revisiting congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task.

  • May 02, 2022
  • Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
  • Yi Pan +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations31

Stroop/reverse-Stroop interference in typical development and its relation to symptoms of ADHD

  • May 25, 2013
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities
  • Yoshifumi Ikeda +2
  • Research Article

The effect of drug dependence severity on the relationship between impulsivity construct and cue-elicited craving

  • Jul 20, 2015
  • Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
  • Yang Zhi-Lin +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Attentional retraining and cognitive biases in a regular cannabis smoking student population

  • Dec 01, 2016
  • SUCHT
  • P Andrea Wolf +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations93

Treatment effects on insular and anterior cingulate cortex activation during classic and emotional Stroop interference in child abuse-related complex post-traumatic stress disorder

  • Mar 22, 2012
  • Psychological Medicine
  • K Thomaes +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations23

Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: What component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced?

  • Dec 31, 2013
  • Cognition
  • Maria Augustinova +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

The relationship between biological sex, cognitive reserve, and cognition in multiple sclerosis.

  • Feb 01, 2025
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS
  • Manuela Altieri +10
  • Abstract

F10 Analysis of performance in two different versions of stroop test in manifest and pre-manifest patients with huntington’s disease of burgos (Spain)

  • Sep 01, 2016
  • Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • Katia Llano Ordóñez +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations19

Interference and Negative Priming Effects in Adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

  • Apr 01, 2007
  • The American Journal of Psychology
  • Verena E Pritchard +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.