The Temporal Vadalog System: Temporal Datalog-Based Reasoning

17 Automata-theoretic techniques for temporal reasoning

Time is the grand stage where human activities take place (rational or otherwise). And the view of a branching temporal universe, or tree of possible events, with our actual history linearly advancing through it, is a widely shared cultural idea, not confined to Academia (cf. Borges brilliant 1941 essayEl Jardin de senderos que se bifurcan). Even though logic is often considered a study of timeless propositions, temporal languages and logics over tree structures have a long tradition. Philosophers have studied temporal structure and temporal reasoning since the 1950s, from the ‘tense logic’ of Prior (1967) to the ‘STIT’ system of Belnap et al. (2001). Moreover, starting from 1970s, computer scientists have joined in, and developed many further flavours of temporal logic, with major strands such as Pnueli on program correctness (Manna and Pnueli 1991), Emerson and Clarke on process specification and verification (Emerson and Clarke 1980, 1982), Reiter on the situation calculus in AI (Reiter 2001), and Thomas on the automata-theoretic foundations of computing (Thomas 1990). In addition, the pure firstand second-order logic of tree-like structures, starting from Rabin’s classic decidability result (Rabin 1969), provides deeper background (cf. Gradel et al. (2002)). The chapter by Hodkinson and Reynolds on ‘Temporal Logic’ in the Handbook of Modal Logic (Hodkinson and Reynolds 2006) brings together many of these trends in one mathematical narrative. But the field of reasoning in, and about, time can be mapped out in many further ways: Van Benthems chapter ‘Temporal Logic’ in the

A causal and temporal reasoning model and its use in drug therapy applications

Interval temporal logics are expressive formalisms for temporal representation and reasoning, which use time intervals as primitive temporal entities. They have been extensively studied for the past two decades and successfully applied in AI and computer science. Unfortunately, they lack the ability of expressing promptness conditions, as it happens with the commonly-used temporal logics, e.g., LTL: whenever we deal with a liveness request, such as “something good eventually happens”, there is no way to impose a bound on the delay with which it is fulfilled. In the last years, such an issue has been addressed in automata theory, game theory, and temporal logic. In this paper, we approach it in the interval temporal logic setting. First, we introduce PROMPT- PNL, a prompt extension of the well-studied interval temporal logic PNL, and we prove the undecidability of its satisfiability problem; then, we show how to recover decidability (NEXPTIME-completeness) by imposing a natural syntactic restriction on it.

In this thesis, we introduce and examine four new temporal logic formalisms that can be used as specification languages for the automated verification of the reliability of hardware and software designs with respect to a desired behavior. The work is organized in two parts. In the first one, we reason about two logics for computations, GCTL* and MCTL*, which are useful to describe a correct execution of monolithic closed systems. In the second one, instead, we focus on two logics for strategies, SL and mATL*, which are useful to formalize several interesting properties about interactive plays in multi-entities systems modeled as multi-agent games. In the “Logics for Computations” part, we first study the immersion of the idea of graded quantifications into the temporal-logic framework. In first order logic, existential and universal quantifiers express the concepts of the existence of at least one individual object satisfying a formula, or that all individual objects satisfy a formula. In other logics, these quantifiers have been generalized to express that, for a given non-negative integer n, at least n or all but n individuals satisfy a particular formula. Here, we consider GCTL, a temporal logic with graded path quantifiers, which allows to describe properties like “there exist at least n different classes of computational fluxes in which a system reaches a predetermined state”, where the classes over paths are computed by means of a predetermined equivalence relation. More precisely, we uniformly extend the classic concept of graded quantifiers from states to paths, through the use of a concept of path equivalence with respect to a given path formula. About this logic, in particular, we study the expressiveness and succinctness relationships with respect to GµCalculus and the complexity of the satisfiability problem, which results to be ExpTime-Complete. This research is partially based on the works [BMM09] “Graded Computation Tree Logic” and [BMM10] “Graded Computation Tree Logic with Binary Coding” published, respectively, in the proceedings of the “IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 2009” and “EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic, 2010”. Preliminary results can be also found in [Mog07]. Furthermore, we consider special quantifiers over substructures, which allow to select, using parametric criteria, small critical parts of a system to be successively verified. In literature, there are some attempts to define a logic that allows to modify the underlying structure under exam and then to verify on it some assigned property. However, as far as we know, none of them is able to select minimal submodels of a given property describing the criteria on which then execute the verification process. Here, we base our work on the search of a new operator that merges the concept of quantifiers on structures with that one derived by a generalization of the concept of pruning. The results of this work, is a class of three different extensions of CTL* with minimal model quantifiers, which we name MCTL*. Regarding these logics, we study several reductions among them, as well as the satisfiability problem that we prove to be highly undecidability, i.e., Σ_1^1-Hard, for two out of the three cases. This research is partially based on the work [MM09] “Branching-Time Temporal Logics with Minimal Model Quantifiers” published in the proceedings of the “International Conference on Developments in Language Theory, 2009”. In the “Logics for Strategies” part, we first study the problem of defining a new specification language through which it is possible to express several important properties of multi-entities systems that are neither expressible using classical monolithic temporal logics, such as CTL*, nor using two-agent-teams temporal logics, such as ATL*. In literature, we can found some proposal of logics that try to achieve this goal, but unfortunately, none of them succeeds completely on all the aspects. Among them, one of the most important attempts is CHP-SL, a logics in which one can use variables over strategies. However, this logic has a deep weakness, since it does not allow to describe games with more than two players and even two-players concurrent games. Here, we introduce SL, a logic with a syntax similar in some aspects to the first order logic, in which the strategies of the agent building the game are treated as first order objects on which we can quantify. This logic generalizes CHP-SL, by allowing the specification of the correct behavior of multi-agent concurrent games. In SL, for example, we are able to express very complex but useful Nash equilibria that are not expressible with CHP-SL. We enlighten that Nash equilibrium is one of the most important concepts in game theory. For the introduced logic, we solve two problems left open in the work on CHP-SL. Precisely, we show that the related model-checking problem is 2ExpTime-Complete, thus not harder of the same problem for several subsumed logics, while we prove that its satisfiability problem is highly undecidable, i.e., Σ_1^1-Hard. This research is partially based on the work [MMV10a] “Reasoning About Strategies” published in the proceedings of the “IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, 2010”. Finally, we consider the concept of relentful strategic reasoning, i.e., a formalism that expresses the ability of a strategy to be used not only to achieve a first given goal, but also to change its final goal in dependence of the history of the play. In the context of planning, memoryful quantification, i.e., quantification over computations that does not lose information about the past along the time, is one of the principal way to express the fact that a system is able to achieve a desired result, and shift to a different goal if some event happens. However, this kind of quantification was not considered before in the context of multi-agent planning. Here, we introduce mATL*, a fusion of the classic alternating temporal logic ATL* with memoryful quantification, with the aim of covering the previous idea. About this logics, we prove that, although it is equivalent to ATL*, it is exponentially more succinct. Nevertheless, we prove that both the model-checking and the satisfiability problems remain 2ExpTime-Complete, as for ATL*. This research is partially based on the work [MMV10b] “Relentful Strategic Reasoning in Alternating-Time Temporal Logic” published in the proceedings of the “International Conference on Logic for Programming Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning, 2010”.

Temporal Reasoning and MAS

It is widely accepted that spatial reasoning plays a central role in artificial intelligence, for it has a wide variety of potential applications, e.g., in robotics, geographical information systems, medical analysis and diagnosis. As noticed by many authors, spatial and temporal reasoning have a close connection. In this paper we propose a new, semi-decidable, modal logic for spatial reasoning through directional relations, which is able to express meaningful spatial statements. Spatial propositional neighborhood logic can be polynomially reduced to a decidable temporal logic based on time intervals preserving, at least, valid formulas. Thanks to such a reduction, we are able to reuse a sound and complete tableaux method in order to reason with spatial propositional neighborhood logic; to the best of our knowledge, there are practically no previous attempts of devising automatic reasoning methods for spatial reasoning

Composition of software artifacts modelled using Colored Petri nets

On Metric Temporal Łukasiewicz Logic

Temporal logic has been extensively utilized in academia and industry to formally specify and verify behavioural properties of numerous kinds of hardware and software. We present a novel way to apply temporal logic to the study of a version of itself, namely, propositional linear-time temporal logic (PTL). This involves a hierarchical framework for obtaining standard results for PTL, including a small model property, decision procedures and axiomatic completeness. A large number of the steps involved are expressed in a propositional version of Interval Temporal Logic (ITL) which is referred to as PITL. It is a natural generalization of PTL and includes operators for reasoning about periods of time and sequential composition. Versions of PTL with finite time and infinite time are both considered and one benefit of the framework is the ability to systematically reduce infinite-time reasoning to finite-time reasoning. The treatment of PTL with the operator until and past time naturally reduces to that for PTL without either one. The interval-oriented methodology differs from other analyses of PTL which typically use sets of formulas and sequences of such sets for canonical models. Instead, we represent models as time intervals expressible in PITL. The analysis furthermore relates larger intervals with smaller ones. Being an interval-based formalism, PITL is well suited for sequentially combining and decomposing the relevant formulas. Consequently, we can articulate issues of equal significance in more conventional analyses of PTL but normally only considered at the metalevel. A good example of this is the existence of bounded models with periodic suffixes for PTL formulas which are satisfiable in infinite time. We also describe decision procedures based on binary decision diagrams and exploit some links with finite-state automata. Beyond the specific issues involving PTL, the research is a significant application of ITL and interval-based reasoning and illustrates a general approach to formally reasoning about sequential and parallel behaviour in discrete linear time. The work also includes some interesting representation theorems. In addition, it has relevance to hardware description and verification since the specification languages PSL/Sugar (IEEE Standard 1850) and ‘temporal e’ (part of IEEE Standard 1647) both contain temporal constructs concerning intervals of time as does the related SystemVerilog Assertion language contained in SystemVerilog (IEEE Standard 1800), an extension of the IEEE 1364–2001 Verilog language.

In control theory, models of physical processes, such as systems of differential equations, are usually checked against specifications, such as stability and set invariance. In formal methods, rich specifications, such as languages and formulae of temporal logics, are checked against models of software programs and digital circuits, such as finite transition graphs. With the development and integration of cyber physical and safety critical systems, there is an increasing need for computational tools for verification and control of complex systems from rich, temporal logic specifications. The formal verification and synthesis problems have been shown to be undecidable even for very simple classes of infinitespace continuous and hybrid systems. However, provably correct but conservative approaches, in which the satisfaction of a property by a dynamical system is implied by the satisfaction of the property by a finite over-approximation (abstraction) of the system, have received a lot of attention in recent years. Some classes of systems allowing for computationally efficient verification and control from temporal logic specifications are reviewed. For continuous and discrete-time linear systems and continuous-time multi-linear systems, it is shown that finite abstractions can be constructed through polyhedral operations only. By using techniques from model checking and automata games, this allows for verification and control from specifications given as Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) formulae over linear predicates in the state variables. A connection between the existence of Lyapunov functions and finite bisimulations is established for discrete-time linear and switched linear systems. Finally, optimality and correctness requirements are combined in a model predictive approach to generate control strategies for discrete-time linear systems. The usefulness of these computational tools is illustrated with various examples such as verification and synthesis of biological circuits in synthetic biology and motion planning and control in robotics.

We propose a new approach to modelling and reasoning about dynamic networks. Dynamic networks consist of nodes and edges whose operating status may change over time (for example, the edges may be unreliable and operate intermittently). Message-passing in such networks is inherently difficult and reasoning about the behaviour of message-passing algorithms is also difficult. We develop a series of abstract models which allow us to focus on the correctness of routing methods. We model the dynamic network as a ``demonic'' process which runs concurrently with routing updates and message-passing. This allows us to use temporal logic and fairness constraints to reason about dynamic networks. The models are implemented as multi-threaded programs and, to validate them, we use an experimental run-time verification tool called RuleR.

Inductive logic reasoning is a fundamental task in graph analysis, which aims to generalize patterns from data. This task has been extensively studied for traditional graph representations, such as knowledge graphs (KGs), using techniques like inductive logic programming (ILP). Existing ILP methods assume learning from KGs with static facts and binary relations. Beyond KGs, graph structures are widely present in other applications such as procedural instructions, scene graphs, and program executions. While ILP is beneficial for these applications, applying it to those graphs is nontrivial: they are more complex than KGs, which usually involve timestamps and n-ary relations, effectively a type of hypergraph with temporal events. In this work, we propose temporal inductive logic reasoning (TILR), an ILP method that reasons on temporal hypergraphs. To enable hypergraph reasoning, we introduce the multi-start random B-walk, a novel graph traversal method for hypergraphs. By combining it with a path-consistency algorithm, TILR learns logic rules by generalizing from both temporal and relational data. To address the lack of hypergraph benchmarks, we create and release two temporal hypergraph datasets: YouCook2-HG and nuScenes-HG. Experiments on these benchmarks demonstrate that TILR achieves superior reasoning capability over various strong baselines.

Temporal logic.- Using temporal logic for automatic verification of finite state systems.- Resolution modal logics.- Tools for verifying network protocols.- An axiomatic semantics of concurrent programming languages.- In transition from global to modular temporal reasoning about programs.- Syntax directed verification methods.- Correctness proofs of distributed termination algorithms.- Script: A communication abstraction mechanism and its verification.- The cooperation test: a syntax-directed verification method.- Around CCS, Theoretical CSP and distributed systems.- Notes on algebraic calculi of processes.- Deadlock analysis in networks of Communicating Processes.- A paradigm for detecting quiescent properties in distributed computations.- About fair asynchrony.- A logic for the specification and proof of controllable processes of CCS.- Specification-oriented programming in TCSP.- Miscellaneous.- Theoretical foundations for non-monotonic reasoning in expert systems.- Towards a theory of knowledge and ignorance: preliminary report.- On the development of reactive systems.

Temporal logic has been widely used to express complex task specifications for cyber-physical systems (CPSs). One way to synthesize a controller for CPS under temporal logic constraints is to first abstract the CPS as a discrete transition system, and then apply formal methods. This approach, however, is computationally demanding and its scalability suffers due to the curse of dimensionality. In this paper, we propose a control barrier function (CBF) approach to abstraction-free control synthesis under a linear temporal logic (LTL) constraint. We first construct the deterministic Rabin automaton of the specification and compute an accepting run. We then compute a sequence of LTL formulae, each of which must be satisfied during a particular time interval, and prove that satisfying the sequence of formulae is sufficient to satisfy the LTL specification. Finally, we compute a control policy for satisfying each formula by constructing an appropriate CBF. We present a quadratic program to compute the controllers, and show the controllers synthesized using the proposed approach guarantees the system to satisfy the LTL specification, provided the quadratic program is feasible at each time step. A numerical case study is presented to demonstrate the proposed approach.