- Research Article
1
- 10.1002/alz.040721
Identifying mild cognitive impairment with older aboriginal Australians in community settings: Performance of the Clock Drawing Test relative to other cognitive screening tools
- Dec 01, 2020
- Alzheimer's & Dementia
- Madeleine Nichols + 2 more +2
BackgroundThe Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is commonly used in the detection of cognitive disorder. Easily administered in both clinical and non‐clinical settings and well accepted by patients, this test is a good candidate for use in early detection of dementia with older Aboriginal Australians. This study aimed to: (i) compare three CDT scoring methods and their reliability/validity in detecting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in Aboriginal communities; (ii) determine the optimal CDT sensitivity, specificity and cut‐off scores; (iii) investigate the relative and combined performance of the CDT with other cognitive screening tools [Kimberly Indigenous Cognitive Assessment (KICA); Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE); Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS)].MethodA subset of participants (n=153; aged 60‐93) recruited for the Koori Growing Old Well Study completed neurocognitive evaluation as part of a comprehensive medical assessment and were diagnosed by expert consensus as intact, MCI or dementia. CDT responses originally scored as part of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE‐R) were rescored using the Mendez and Sunderland methods by an assessor blind to diagnosis.ResultThere were strong positive correlations between all three CDT scoring methods (r s range=.895‐.924). All methods differentiated dementia from MCI and intact participants (p<.001), but not intact from MCI (Mendez p=.712; Sunderland p=.545; ACE‐R p=.094). There was no significant difference between scoring methods in diagnostic validity for dementia (AUC=.739‐.756); however, the simple ACE‐R method had the highest positive and negative predictive values (PPV=0.643; NPV=0.862), with optimal cut‐off score <3.The MMSE outperformed all other screening tests in detecting cognitive impairment (MCI or dementia; AUC=.851) and was superior to both the KICA and CDT in distinguishing MCI from intact participants, but comparable to the RUDAS. Combining the CDT with other screening tools did not significantly improve their diagnostic performance for either cognitive impairment or MCI.ConclusionCDT alone is not an adequate screening tool for MCI; however, has potential for detecting moderate to severe cognitive impairment in older Aboriginal Australians. Relative to other screening tools, the MMSE performed well for detecting both cognitive impairment and MCI; the addition of the CDT did not significantly improve other tests’ performance.
Read more