Three New Mental Retardation Service Models

In August 2006, a year after Hurricane Katrina, the first acute inpatient public psychiatric unit for adults was opened in New Orleans to serve patients referred from local emergency departments. This article describes the clinical and administrative experiences of providing inpatient care in post-Katrina New Orleans, including the increased demand for programs to treat patients with co-occurring disorders, the expanded scope of practice for psychiatrists to include primary care, and ongoing staff shortages in a traumatized and displaced workforce. Lessons learned in regard to disaster planning and recovery are also discussed.

BackgroundGiving birth to one’s first child is a life changing event. Beyond the post-partum period, little is known about the association between becoming a mother and mental disorder among migrant women. This study investigates outpatient mental health (OPMH) service use, a proxy for mental disorder, among married migrant and non-migrant women who become mothers and those who do not.MethodsUsing Norwegian register data, we followed 90,195 married women, aged 18-40 years, with no children at baseline between 2008-2013 to see if becoming a mother was associated with OPMH service use. Data were analysed using discrete time analyses.ResultsWe found an interaction between motherhood and migrant category. Married non-migrant mothers, both in the perinatal period and beyond, had lower odds of OPMH use than married non-mothers. There was no association between motherhood and OPMH service use for migrants. However, there was no significant interaction between motherhood and migrant category when we excluded women who had been in Norway less than five years. Among women aged 25-40 years, a stable labour market attachment was associated with lower odds of OPMH use for non-migrants but not migrants, regardless of motherhood status.ConclusionsThe perinatal period is not associated with increased odds of OPMH use and appears to be associated with lower odds for married non-migrant women. Selection effects and barriers to care may explain the lack of difference in OPMH service use that we found across motherhood status and labour market attachment for married migrant women. Married migrant women in general have a lower level of OPMH use than married non-migrants. Married migrant women with less than five years in Norway and those with no/weak labour market attachment may experience the greatest barriers to care. Further research to bridge the gap between need for, and use of, mental health care among migrant women is required.

BackgroundThis study ascertain gender-specific determinants of outpatient mental health (MH) service use for depression to highlight gender disparities in barriers to care and explain how depressed men and women in need of care might differ in their help-seeking behaviour.MethodsData used in this study came from the Canadian Community Health Survey on Mental Health and Well Being, cycle 1.2 (CCHS 1.2) conducted by Statistics Canada in 2002 (N = 36,984). The sample was limited to respondents filling the criteria for a probable major depression in the 12 months prior to the interview (n = 1743). Gender-specific multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out.ResultsThe results showed that 54.3% of respondents meeting criteria for major depression had consulted for mental health reasons in the year prior to interview. When looking at type of outpatient mental health service use, males were more likely to consult a general practitioner and a mental health specialist in the past year as opposed to females. However, females were more likely to consult a general practitioner only as opposed to no service use than males. Gender specific differences in determinants associated with outpatient service use included for males, lower adjusted household income, and for females, a younger age, the presence of social support, self-reported availability barriers, the presence of self-reported suicidal thoughts or attempt and a poorer self- perceived mental health.ConclusionsIt is concluded that continued efforts to promote access to mental health care are needed for men and women affected by depression, and this, to target specific vulnerable populations and increase utilization rates.

To provide a model to estimate human resource needs for community-based mental health services in South Africa. A situation analysis was conducted of current community-based mental health service provision in South Africa, which comprise outpatient and emergency services, residential care and day care. Service utilisation rates and staffing needs were estimated for two levels of service coverage, using data from the situation analysis, local epidemiological studies and consultation with key stakeholders. For a population of 100,000 people, 7.3-23.8 full-time equivalent staff would be required to provide services in outpatient services, 14.9-41.6 in day care and 11.5-23.0 in residential care at minimum and full coverage levels respectively. The model can facilitate rational planning by requiring transparency and accountability in the assumptions used. This method can be adapted to a range of countries, by entering relevant country data. The model fills a gap, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where community-based mental health services are sparse, and decisions regarding allocations to them are hampered by a lack of good quality data. The results of the model are limited by the quality of data and the assumptions upon which the modelling are based.

To describe the population characteristics of people with intellectual disability in New South Wales; to quantify and compare public mental health service use and costs for people with and without intellectual disability in NSW during 2014-15. Retrospective cohort data linkage analysis. People using publicly funded in- or outpatient (admitted or non-admitted) mental health services in NSW, 2014-15. Numbers of bed days (inpatient mental health services), and treatment days (ambulatory mental health); costs of publicly funded mental health services. People with intellectual disability comprised 1.1% of the NSW population, but 6.3% of people who used public mental health services; 12% of public mental health costs during 2014-15 were for people with intellectual disability. Compared with metropolitan local health districts (LHDs), overall public mental health service costs were lower for rural and regional LHDs (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 0.8; 95% CI, 0.8-0.9) and higher for specialty networks (aIRR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3). Per person costs for people with intellectual disability were higher than for those without intellectual disability (aIRR, 2.6; 95% CI, 2.2-3.0). People with intellectual disability use public mental health services to a greater degree than other people. They should be explicitly considered by all tiers of mental health policy and service planning in Australia. Population health planning for the needs of people with disabilities would be assisted by including disability identifiers in all health administrative data sets.

This paper estimates a model of the demand for hospital inpatient mental health services. It uses data on enrollees who were in the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Federal Health Benefits Plan from 1979 to 1981. The econometric analysis focuses on the impact of increased copayments and deductibles in the highoption plan. The results provide evidence that increases in outpatient copayments and deductibles reduce the utilization of both inpatient and outpatient mental health services. Of interest is the negative income elasticity of demand for hospital inpatient services and the positive association between the relative availability of mental health providers and the demand for mental health care.

BACKGROUND: Several recent studies of child outpatient mental health service use in the US have shown that having private insurance has no effect on the propensity to use services. Some studies also find that public coverage has no beneficial effect relative to no insurance. AIMS: This study explores several potential explanations, including inadequate measurement of mental health status, bandwagon effects, unobservable heterogeneity and public sector substitution for private services, for the lack of an effect of private insurance on service use. METHODS: We use secondary analysis of data from the three mainland US sites of NIMH's 1992 field trial of the Cooperative Agreement for Methodological Research for Multi-Site Surveys of Mental Disorders in Child and Adolescent Populations (MECA) Study. We examine whether or not a subject used any mental health service, school-based mental health services or outpatient mental health services, and the number of outpatient visits among users. We also examine use of general medical services as a check on our results. We conduct regression analysis; instrumental variables analysis, using instruments based on employment and parental history of mental health problems to identify insurance choice, and bivariate probit analysis to examine multiservice use. RESULTS: We find evidence that children with private health insurance have fewer observable (measured) mental health problems. They also appear to have a lower unobservable (latent) propensity to use mental health services than do children without coverage and those with Medicaid coverage. Unobserved differences in mental health status that relate to insurance choice are found to contribute to the absence of a positive effect for private insurance relative to no coverage in service use regressions. We find no evidence to suggest that differences in attitudes or differences in service availability in children's census tracts of residence explain the non-effect of insurance. Finally, we find that the lack of a difference is not a consequence of substitution of school-based for office-based services. School-based and office-based specialty mental health services are complements rather than substitutes. School-based services are used by the same children who use office-based services, even after controlling for mental health status. DISCUSSION: Our results are consistent with at least two explanations. First, limits on coverage under private insurance may discourage families who anticipate a need for child mental health services from purchasing such insurance. Second, publicly funded services may be readily available substitutes for private services, so that lack of insurance is not a barrier to adequate care. Despite the richness of data in the MECA dataset, cross-sectional data based on epidemiological surveys do not appear to be sufficient to fully understand the surprising result that insurance does not enable access to care. IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND RESEARCH: Limits on coverage under private mental health insurance combined with a relatively extensive system of public mental health coverage have apparently generated a situation where there is no observed advantage to the marginal family of obtaining private mental health insurance coverage. Further research using longitudinal data is needed to better understand the nature of selection in the child mental health insurance market. Further research using better measures of the nature of treatment provided in different settings is needed to better understand how the private and public mental health systems operate.

Hospitalization Patterns for Psychiatric Disorders Across the Lifespan in Australia From July 1998 to June 2005

Background. For many children in the United States, it is most cost e! ective and e cacious if mental health services are provided within the school setting (NASP, 2008). The mental well-being of a child has a large impact on their academic, behavioral and interpersonal development which provides yet another reason for providing mental health services in the schools. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to identify the need for mental health services within Nebraska schools, the extent to which they were being provided, and the level of satisfaction regarding the provision of mental health services reported by school professionals. Methods and Results. Two hundred and forty principals, school psychologists, and school counselors were sent a survey to assess the need, provision and satisfaction of mental health services within Nebraska's schools. Results indicate that the perceived needs, provision and satisfaction for various types of mental health services within Nebraska schools di! er signi# cantly. Respondents indicated a higher percentage of school counselors providing the various types of mental health services. Finally, results indicate no signi# cant di! erence among administrators, school counselors, and school psychologists in the mean ratings of need, provision, and satisfaction of mental health services. Conclusions. School administrators, school psychologists, and school counselors in Nebraska are in agreement with their perceptions of the need, provision and satisfaction of various mental health services within their schools. Signi# cant di! erences exist among the needs, provision and satisfaction between the various types of mental health services being provided within the schools.

County-Level Estimates of Need for Mental Health Professionals in the United States

This study estimates the rural-urban differences in outpatient service utilization and expenditures for depression, anxiety disorder, and substance use disorder, and the evolving mental health provider mix for privately insured US adults aged 18-64 during 2005-2018. We used the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database for individuals covered by employer-sponsored health insurance, from 2005 to 2018, with a yearly total number of beneficiaries ranging from 17.5 to 53.1 million. Claims for nonelderly adults with mental health and substance abuse coverage are included. Outcomes include rates of outpatient service utilization for depression, anxiety disorder, and substance use disorder; counts of outpatient visits; expenditure and share of the out-of-pocket cost; and the mental health services provider mix. Rural enrollees were less likely than urban enrollees to use outpatient mental health services for depression by 1.2% (percentage points) in 2005 and 0.6% in 2018. Among those who used outpatient mental health services, rural enrollees had fewer outpatient visits than their urban counterparts (difference: 1.8-2.4 visits for depression, 1.2-1.7 visits for anxiety disorder, and 0.7-2.1 visits for substance use disorder). Rural patients paid less per year for mental health outpatient visits of the 3 conditions but incurred a higher share of out-of-pocket expenses. Rural and urban patients differ in the mix of mental health providers, with rural enrollees relying more on primary care providers than urban enrollees. Rural-urban disparities in access to mental health services persist during 2005-2018 among a population with private insurance.

Growing evidence reveals relative stability in long-term clinical and functional outcomes of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), and links poor premorbid adjustment (PA) to worse prognoses. This study investigated associations between PA across developmental stages and long-term outcomes.Data on 496 participants (age 26.8 ± 6.5, male 58.5%) from the Danish randomised OPUS I trial were used (January 1998-December 2000; NCT00157313). Participants, with a first diagnosis within SSD, were recruited from outpatient and inpatient mental health services in Denmark and followed up for twenty years (retention = 29.0%). PA was assessed retrospectively at baseline using the Premorbid Adjustment Scale. Academic and social domain scores in childhood, and their subsequent changes in early and late adolescence, were used. Mixed models examined their effects on social functioning (Global Assessment of Functioning) and negative symptoms (Scales for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms).Low social functioning was associated with worse Social (β[95%CI] = 6.46 [0.54, 12.38], P ≤ 0.033) and Academic (9.40 [3.35, 15.44]; P ≤ 0.002) PA in childhood. Severe negative symptoms were associated with impaired Social PA in childhood (1.23 [0.73, 1.73], P ≤ 0.001), deterioration of Social PA in early adolescence (1.64 [0.93, 2.35], P ≤ 0.001), and declined Academic PA in late adolescence (0.77 [0.14, 1.39], P ≤ 0.016).Poor PA in childhood and PA decline during adolescence are related to Severer negative symptoms and lower social functioning 20 years after SSD onset. Our findings suggest that early signs may emerge in childhood, alongside age-dependent vulnerability-accumulation processes, when developing SSD. Support for maladjusting individuals during development is necessary to mitigate long-term impairments.

BackgroundA high proportion of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders will at some point in their lives be assessed as not having the capacity to make their own decisions about pharmacological treatment or inpatient care (‘capacity’). Few will be helped to regain it before these interventions proceed. This is partly because effective and safe methods to do so are lacking. Our aim is to accelerate their development by testing, for the first time in mental healthcare, the feasibility, acceptability and safety of running an ‘Umbrella’ trial. This involves running, concurrently and under one multi-site infrastructure, multiple assessor-blind randomised controlled trials, each of which is designed to examine the effect on capacity of improving a single psychological mechanism (‘mechanism’). Our primary objectives are to demonstrate feasibility of (i) recruitment and (ii) data retention on the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Treatment (MacCAT-T; planned primary outcome for a future trial) at end-of-treatment. We selected three mechanisms to test: ‘self-stigma’, low self-esteem and the ‘jumping to conclusions’ bias. Each is highly prevalent in psychosis, responsive to psychological intervention, and hypothesised to contribute to impaired capacity.MethodsSixty participants with schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses, impaired capacity and one or more mechanism(s) will be recruited from outpatient and inpatient mental health services in three UK sites (Lothian, Scotland; Lancashire and Pennine; North West England). Those lacking capacity to consent to research could take part if the key criteria were met, including either proxy consent (Scotland) or favourable Consultee advice (England). They will be allocated to one of three randomised controlled trials, depending on which mechanism(s) they have. They will then be randomised to receive, over an 8-week period and in addition to treatment as usual (TAU), 6 sessions of either a psychological intervention which targets the mechanism, or 6 sessions of assessment of the causes of their incapacity (control condition). Participants are assessed at 0 (baseline), 8 (end-of-treatment) and 24 (follow-up) weeks post-randomisation using measures of capacity (MacCAT-T), mechanism, adverse events, psychotic symptoms, subjective recovery, quality of life, service use, anxiety, core schemata and depression. Two nested qualitative studies will be conducted; one to understand participant and clinician experiences and one to investigate the validity of MacCAT-T appreciation ratings.DiscussionThis will be the first Umbrella trial in mental healthcare. It will produce the first 3 single-blind randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to support treatment decision-making in schizophrenia-spectrum disorder. Demonstrating feasibility will have significant implications not only for those seeking to support capacity in psychosis, but also for those who wish to accelerate the development of psychological interventions for other conditions.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04309435. Pre-registered on 16 March 2020.

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Seclusion is a harmful and traumatising intervention for people accessing mental health services. People who are subject to seclusion in inpatient mental health services often first experience this within the first 24 h following admission. There is limited research examining how recent contact with services impacts the likelihood of seclusion when people are admitted to inpatient services. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Males, Māori and Pasifika experience higher rates of seclusion within the first 24 h following inpatient admission. People perceived by clinicians as overactive, aggressive, disruptive or agitated are seven times more likely to be secluded within the first 24 h. People referred from police or justice services are three times more likely to be secluded within the first 24 h. People who had frequent contact with community mental health services prior to inpatient admission were less likely to be secluded. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: The first 24 h of inpatient admission is a critical focus for eliminating the use of seclusion. Initial interactions with people recently admitted should focus on nurturing relationships and reducing distress. Mental health staff should consider the person's cultural needs, referral pathway, recent service contact and baseline ratings on the Health of the Nation Outcomes Scales (HoNOS) when working proactively to prevent the use of seclusion in the first 24 h following admission. Strengthening the focus on nurturing relationships, cultural understanding and non-coercive de-escalation approaches requires leadership support and strategic workforce development. ABSTRACT: Introduction People who experience seclusion in inpatient mental health services often do so within the first 24 h following admission. There is limited research examining the potential contributing factors, particularly recent contact with services. Aim/Question To identify factors associated with seclusion within the first 24 h following admission into acute inpatient mental health services. Method A retrospective analysis was undertaken using routinely collected data from Aotearoa New Zealand mental health services. Results A higher likelihood of seclusion within the first 24 h following admission was associated with: males, Māori, Pasifika, referrals from police/justice services, inpatient transfers, recent contact with crisis assessment teams and clinician perceptions of aggression, problematic substance use, cognitive problems and hallucinations or delusions. Recent contact with community mental health services was associated with a lower likelihood. Discussion People's cultural needs, referral pathway, recent service contact and HoNOS scores should be considered when working to prevent the use of seclusion in the first 24 h following admission. Implications for Practice The first 24 h following inpatient admission is a critical period for preventing the use of seclusion. Nurturing relationships, cultural understanding and use of non-coercive de-escalation approaches can support better outcomes for people recently admitted.

Does Assertive Community Treatment Reduce the Use of Compulsory Admissions?