Monocytes as potential therapeutic sensors in glucocorticoid‐treated newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder characterized by platelet counts less than 100 × 109/l.11 Clinical symptoms can manifest as petechiae, purpura, mucosal bleedings or, more rarely, as intracranial hemorrhages.14 Therapeutic management of ITP remains challenging due to the heterogeneity in patients caused by the diverse individual patient factors and the several phases of the disease course, such as newly diagnosed, persistent and chronic ITP. First-line treatments for ITP include corticosteroids such as glucocorticoids (GCs), intravenous immunoglobulin and anti-D immunoglobulin, while second-line treatments include rituximab or splenectomy, and third-line treatment options may be thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA).8 The pathogenesis of ITP has proven to be complex, with multiple factors and various cell types contributing to the immune imbalance that leads to destruction of platelets in the circulation.6, 12, 14 General mechanisms include anti-platelet antibody mediated platelet-phagocytosis via Fcγ-receptors on monocytes and macrophages9, 12, 14 and/or T cell mediated platelet destruction.10 Moreover, a plethora of studies have clearly demonstrated that the pathophysiology of ITP is characterized by abnormal T cell responses, predominantly signified by an impairment in T regulatory cells (Tregs).12 In addition, dendritic cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) have also been shown to be impaired in ITP.2, 12 The working mechanism of certain ITP therapeutics has been demonstrated to be related to restoring these abnormal T cell,5 dendritic cell3, 4 and MDSC responses.1, 2 Looking specifically at treatment with GCs, CD39+ Tregs were shown to be decreased in newly diagnosed ITP patients and, upon treatment with the high-dose GC dexamethasone, Treg numbers increased in responding patients, with an improvement of the Treg-immunosuppressive function.5 Similarly, it was previously shown that Tregs were deficient in adult chronic ITP patients and that treatment with high-dose dexamethasone resulted in increased numbers of circulating Tregs as well as myeloid dendritic cells with decreased CD11c expression, while, in contrast, plasmacytoid dendritic cells were decreased in number.4 Furthermore, it was demonstrated that both the numbers of MDSCs and their suppressive functions were impaired in peripheral blood and spleens of adult ITP patients, and that high-dose dexamethasone treatment could increase the numbers of MDSCs while also enhancing their suppressive functions.2 The immunosuppressive capacity of GCs in ITP may not only impact Tregs, dendritic cells and MDSCs, but also monocytes, as demonstrated by Williams and colleagues in this issue of the British Journal of Haematology.13 Williams et al. investigate the percentage of monocyte subsets (and their cell surface phenotype) from peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from newly diagnosed ITP patients prior to and following GC-treatment. They interestingly observe intermediate monocytes (CD14++, CD16+) to be increased in newly diagnosed untreated ITP patients, with these cells displaying an inflammatory phenotype of enhanced surface CD64 and CD80 expression. GC-treatment subsequently reduced the proportion of intermediate monocytes and enhanced the expression of the anti-inflammatory markers CD206 and CD163. These GC-induced phenotypic effects were not observed in chronic ITP patients receiving TPO-RA. The authors conclude that intermediate monocytes may have a role in the ITP pathogenesis with a clinical response to GC-treatment. Notably, Manzano et al. recently found that intermediate monocytes were not increased in their cohort of ITP patients.7 However, these patients suffered from ITP for a minimum of 6 months (some greater than 12 months), while the study by Williams et al. focused on newly diagnosed (acute) ITP with on average lower platelet counts of less than 30 × 109/l. Besides the intermediate monocytes, Williams et al. also found a potentially important role for non-classical monocytes (CD14+, CD16++). The non-classical monocyte population was not increased in untreated ITP patients but was found to be strongly reduced upon GC-treatment, with an increase in CD206 and CD163 surface expression. Overall, it would be interesting to monitor GC-treated newly diagnosed ITP patients over a longer period of time and investigate if the percentage and phenotype of monocyte subsets may change and thereby serve as a potential indicator as to whether to switch to another therapeutic approach. On a functional level, it can be hypothesized that GC-primed monocytes may shape T cell responses in ITP, but it may also be possible that they inhibit antibody-mediated platelet phagocytosis. FcγRI (CD64) and FcγRIII (CD16) have been shown to be important for antibody-mediated platelet phagocytosis in ITP.9 Williams and colleagues observed that GC-treatment generally reduced the expression of CD64 on monocytes and reduced the total fraction of CD16 expressing monocytes. How GC-primed monocytes may restore ITP-responses could, for instance, be researched in T cell and platelet phagocytosis assays, with and without GC-treatment. In conclusion, Williams et al. identify a GC-induced reduction in monocyte subsets in combination with cell surface phenotype alterations in clinically responding, newly diagnosed ITP patients. Further research should focus on monitoring these GC-induced monocyte effects throughout the ITP disease course to assess if they may change and potentially provide a novel predictive clue for adjusting therapeutic strategy. In addition, the pathogenic role of the different monocyte subsets in ITP, with and without GC-treatment, should be further mechanistically investigated.
Read more