TOPSIS-based dynamic approach for mobile network interface selection

Decision making is the hot topic in business management. Recently, there have been investigations in Call Admission Control (CAC) to handle the handover events in wireless network environments. Wireless networks have been seen to support different handoff mechanisms, in which the user can switch from one wireless network to another such as from IEEE 802.11 to IEEE 802.16. Many wireless standards, such as IEEE 802.16e and IEEE 802.11, have been proposed to satisfy diverse requirements for mobile users.. Several strategies have been proposed to realize seamless handoff in the heterogeneous networks; in this paper, we analyze the performance of some novel intelligent handoff mechanisms with multiple attributes. The mobile set dynamically selects the optimal network and provides the user with high throughput of Quality of Service (QoS) as to minimize the blocking probability of the system in heterogeneous networks. We evaluate some intelligent handoff mechanisms such as Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solutions (TOPOSIS), Simple Additive Weight (SAW), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Logic and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA). From the results, blocking probability and dropping rate can be referenced to support better QoS.

In recent years, there has been an enormous increase in data traffic due to the proliferation of smartphones and multi-media applications. Thus, offloading among heterogeneous wireless networks has become a vital incentive for accommodating the huge data traffic increase in cellular networks. In this paper, we propose an algorithm based on Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for assessing network selection. Our proposed algorithm accounts for realistic attributes such as users' mobility/velocity and users' battery life. These realistic attributes are proposed in addition to other existing ones such as networks' congestion level, maximum offered throughput, and received signal strength. Such attributes are weighted based on the underlying operational scenario and accordingly available networks are ranked for the best handover selection. Moreover, we assess the merits of network offloading in terms of various realistic KPIs that, to the best of our knowledge, were not considered in this context before including users' equipment power gain, ping-pong and un-useful handovers, and successful number of handovers in addition to other conventional metrics such as achievable throughput and total number of triggered handovers.

The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method are two methods that are commonly used to handle multicriteria problems. The AHP technique uses a matrix of pairwise comparisons and a hierarchical approach to criteria in order to obtain the final criteria weights. In contrast, the TOPSIS approach incorporates the concepts of proximity to the ideal solution and preference. Next, TOPSIS uses the previously established criterion weights to compute each option's relative closeness score to the ideal answer. In order to determine how effectively the AHP and TOPSIS methodologies complement one another, this study aims to assess the protocols and underlying assumptions of the two approaches. When decision makers are aware of the benefits and drawbacks of each approach, they may choose the best course of action from a mix of the two. The results of the study indicate that the process may be streamlined, subjectivity can be reduced, and criterion weights can be stabilized by combining the AHP and TOPSIS approaches.The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method are two methods that are commonly used to handle multicriteria problems. The AHP technique uses a matrix of pairwise comparisons and a hierarchical approach to criteria in order to obtain the final criteria weights. In contrast, the TOPSIS approach incorporates the concepts of proximity to the ideal solution and preference. Next, TOPSIS uses the previously established criterion weights to compute each option's relative closeness score to the ideal answer. In order to determine how effectively the AHP and TOPSIS methodologies complement one another, this study aims to assess the protocols and underlying assumptions of the two approaches. When decision makers are aware of the benefits and drawbacks of each approach, they may choose the best course of action from a mix of the two. The results of the study indicate that the process may be streamlined, subjectivity can be reduced, and criterion weights can be stabilized by combining the AHP and TOPSIS approaches.

Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is an effective tool for multi-attribute decision making. We present a general overview about the development of TOPSIS strategies in neutrosophic environments. In this chapter, we extend TOPSIS strategy to solve multi-attribute group decision making problems in single valued neutrosophic set as well as interval neutrosophic set environments. To develop the proposed TOPSIS strategies, the weights of decision makers are determined by using similarity measure based on Hamming distance. We aggregate each decision maker’s ratings to make common decision using aggregation operators. Employing revised closeness coefficient, we select the best option in the proposed TOPSIS strategies. To demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed TOPSIS strategy, we solve two numerical examples of multi-attribute group decision making problems.

Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information

The interval‐valued q‐rung orthopair fuzzy set (IVq‐ROFS) and complex fuzzy set (CFS) are two generalizations of the fuzzy set (FS) to cope with uncertain information in real decision making problems. The aim of the present work is to develop the concept of complex interval‐valued q‐rung orthopair fuzzy set (CIVq‐ROFS) as a generalization of interval‐valued complex fuzzy set (IVCFS) and q‐rung orthopair fuzzy set (q‐ROFS), which can better express the time‐periodic problems and two‐dimensional information in a single set. In this article not only basic properties of CIVq‐ROFSs are discussed but also averaging aggregation operator (AAO) and geometric aggregation operator (GAO) with some desirable properties and operations on CIVq‐ROFSs are discussed. The proposed operations are the extension of the operations of IVq‐ROFS, q‐ROFS, interval‐valued Pythagorean fuzzy, Pythagorean fuzzy (PF), interval‐valued intuitionistic fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, complex q‐ROFS, complex PF, and complex intuitionistic fuzzy theories. Further, the Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method are also examine based on CIVq‐ROFS to explore the reliability and proficiency of the work. Moreover, we discussed the advantages of CIVq‐ROFS and showed that the concepts of IVCFS and q‐ROFS are the special cases of CIVq‐ROFS. Moreover, the flexibility of proposed averaging aggregation operator and geometric aggregation operator in a multi‐attribute decision making (MADM) problem are also discussed. Finally, a comparative study of CIVq‐ROFSs with pre‐existing work is discussed in detail.

Purpose - The purpose of this study, Borsa Istanbul 100 (BIST100) of the financial performance of energy companies traded multi-criteria decision making methods, TOPSIS (Technique for order preference by Similarity to ideal solution) method is measured. Methodology - For this purpose, 5 energy companies traded in BIST in 2021 and whose data are regularly accessed have been included in the scope of the study. The annual balance sheet and income statements of the companies were used in the study. The balance sheets and income statements of the companies within the scope of the research for the year 2021 were taken from the official website of the Public Lighting Platform (KAP). During the period when the application part of this study was conducted, the data of the year 2022 could not be used due to the fact that the data of the year 2022 has not yet been published. The obtained data were measured by TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method, which is one of the multi-criteria Decisionmaking methods, and the performance of the companies were analyzed and compared among themselves. Findings - Ipek Natural Energy Resources Research and Production A. One of the companies included in the study as a result of the analyzes performed by the TOPSIS method.Sh. ((IPEK) was found to be the company with the best data in terms of financial performance in the analyzes carried out in accordance with the criteria included in the evaluation. After this company, the second best company in terms of financial performance is Koza Anadolu Metal Madencilik Işletmeleri A.Sh. He appeared as a (COCOON). Conclusion - In the light of the analyzes carried out in the study; IPEKE company ranked first as the best company in terms of financial performance. Ardın KOZAA of IPEKE company ranked second, ASELS company ranked third, AKSEN company ranked fourth and VESTL company ranked last in terms of financial performance among the 5 companies included in the study. Dec. Apart from these data, it can be said that changing the December period to be based on different studies, using different financial ratios, the degree of importance given to criteria, using other multi-criteria decision-making methods (MSCS) such as MOORA other than TOPSIS may give results that may change the performance ranking. Keywords: BIST-100, TOPSIS, financial performance, energy, MCDMM JEL Codes: C61, M41, M49

Due to the trends of energy shortage and energy price rise, energy efficiency, which was always ignored over the past decades, becomes a worldwide hot issue and also a significant challenge for most factories. Therefore, it is necessary to incorporate energy-relevant criterion as a key criterion with traditional criteria in the layout planning phase. As a multiattribute decision-making (MADM) problem, the evaluation and selection of facility layout alternatives are often difficult and time consuming since the criteria generally have different units and conflicting features. In this article, a MADM approach which incorporates the advantages of rough set theory, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is proposed to solve the facility layout design problem with considering both traditional layout criteria and energy relevant criteria. At first, rough set theory is integrated with AHP to determine the weights for each criterion of alternatives. Then, TOPSIS is applied to get the final alternative ranking. Besides, sensitivity analysis for both decision weights and production rates is performed, and a comparison among different decision-making approaches for the same problem is also studied to demonstrate the rationality of the final decision. Finally, a practical expanding case is studied to validate the proposed approach.

An extended compromise ratio method for fuzzy group multi-attribute decision making with SWOT analysis

PurposeThis paper aims to optimize the process parameters of the fused deposition modelling (FDM) process using the Grey-based Taguchi method and the results to be verified based on a technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) calculation.Design/methodology/approachThe optimization of process parameters is gaining a potential role to develop robust products. In this context, this paper presents the parametric optimization of the FDM process using Grey-based Taguchi, TOPSIS and AHP method. The effect of slice height (SH), part fill style (PFS) and build orientation (BO) are investigated with the response parameters machining time, surface roughness and hardness (HD). Multiple objective optimizations were performed with weights of w1 = 60%, w2 = 20% and w3 = 20%. The significance of the process parameters over response parameters is identified through analysis of variance (ANOVA). Comparisons are made in terms of rank order with respect to grey relation grade (GRG), relative closeness and AHP index values. Response table, percentage contributions of process parameters for both GRG and TOPSIS evaluation are done.FindingsThe optimum factor levels are identified using GRG via the Grey Taguchi method and TOPSIS via relative closeness values. The optimized factor levels are SH (0.013 in), PFS (solid) and BO (45°) using GRG and SH (0.013 in), PFS (sparse-low density) and BO (45°) using TOPSIS relative closeness value. SH has higher significance in both Grey relational analysis and TOPSIS which were analysed using ANOVA.Research limitations/implicationsIn this research, the multiple objective optimizations were done on an automotive component using GRG, TOPSIS and AHP which showed a 27% similarity in their ranking order among the experiments. In the future, other advanced optimization techniques will be applied to further improve the similarity in ranking order.Practical implicationsThe study presents the case of an automotive component, which illustrates practical relevance.Originality/valueIn several research studies, optimization was done on the standard test specimens but not on a real-time component. Here, the multiple objective optimizations were applied to a case automotive component using Grey-based Taguchi and verified with TOPSIS. Hence, an effort has been taken to find optimum process parameters on FDM, for achieving smooth, hardened automotive components with enhanced printing time. The component can be explored as a replacement for the existing product.

Initial water rights allocation is a complex decision problem, and it is difficult for traditional methods to determine weights and solve the decision problem. In this study, an improved TOPSIS (Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) method is proposed using vertical distance instead of Euclidean distance to calculate the closeness degree of schemes to the ideal solution, which overcomes the shortage of traditional TOPSIS method. In order to determine the weights of evaluation indexes reasonably, the improved method adopts game theory to harmonize and conjugate the subjective weight and the objective weight. On this basis, a comprehensive weight which eliminates the unilateral result can be obtained, and a model of initial water rights allocation in the watershed is established by the improved TOPSIS method. Finally, the proposed model is applied in the study of initial water rights allocation in Fuhuan River in Hubei Province, which shows rationality and validity when comparing with other models like traditional TOPSIS method, analytic hierarchy process and projection pursuit model.

This study aims to objectively analyze the feasibility of prospective recipients of the Smart Indonesia Card Scholarship (KIP-K) by integrating the Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) algorithm and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. The research dataset consists of 287 data on prospective scholarship recipients with 11 main attributes that reflect the socio-economic and academic conditions of students. The research process includes data collection, pre-processing, transformation of categorical attributes into numerical values using a linear weighting scheme, cluster analysis using DBSCAN, and candidate ranking using TOPSIS. DBSCAN is used to identify cluster patterns and detect anomalies in the data of potential recipients, while TOPSIS is used to rank candidates based on proximity to the ideal solution. The results of the grouping produced 10 clusters and one noise cluster that showed a variety of socio-economic characteristics of prospective scholarship recipients. The results of the ranking show that some of the candidates with the highest TOPSIS scores come from clusters with higher levels of economic vulnerability. In addition, some of the high-scoring candidates also came from the noise cluster, indicating that even though they did not belong to a particular group, they still met the eligibility criteria based on a multi-criteria evaluation. These findings show that the combination of DBSCAN and TOPSIS has the potential to support the process of analyzing the eligibility of scholarship recipients in a more systematic and data-driven manner.

Purpose – This paper aims to address the problem of optimal allocation of demand of items among candidate suppliers to maximize the purchase value of items. The purchase value of the items directly relates to cost and quality of raw materials purchased from the supplier. In an increasingly competitive environment, firms are paying more attention to selecting the right suppliers for procurement of raw materials and component parts for their products. The present research work focuses on this issue of supply chain management. Design/methodology/approach – This present research work devises a hybrid algorithm for multi-period demand allocation among the suppliers. The customer demand is allocated by using a hybrid algorithm based on the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), fuzzy set theory and the mixed linear integer programming (MILP) approaches. Findings – The supply chain network is witnessing a changing business environment due to government policies aimed at promoting new small manufacturing enterprises (small and medium-sized enterprises) for intermediate parts and components. Hence, the managers have an option to select a new group of suppliers and allocate the optimal multi-period demand among the new group of suppliers to maximize their purchase value. In this context, the proposed hybrid model would be beneficial for the managers to operate their supply chain effectively and efficiently. The present research work will be helpful for the managers who are interested to reconfigure their supply chain under the failure of any supply chain partner or in a changing business environment. The model provides flexibility to the managers for evaluation of the different available alternatives to take a decision of optimal demand allocation among the suppliers. The proposed hybrid (fuzzy, TOPSIS and MILP) model provides more objective information for supplier evaluation and demand allocation among suppliers in a supply chain. The managers can use the proposed model to the analysis of other management decision-making problems. Originality/value – This present research work devises a hybrid algorithm for multi-period demand allocation among the suppliers. This hybrid algorithm prioritizes the suppliers and then allocates the multi-period demand among the suppliers. The customer demand is allocated by using a hybrid algorithm based on the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), fuzzy set theory and the mixed linear integer programming (MILP) approaches.

Vertical handover management plays an essential role in wireless network technologies, mainly due to the rapid development of various radio access technologies (RATs) that require users to connect seamlessly from one RAT to another. However, in multiple RAT environments, vertical handover management encounters different challenges, including unnecessary handovers, handover failures, ping-pong handovers, and unsuitable access network selection. Essential in vertical handover management is maintaining the desired quality of service (QoS) by the mobile device user. The seamless movement of mobile device users as they run various applications depends on a well-performing vertical handover decision-making algorithm. This bears special significance in a heterogeneous network environment. This paper proposes a vertical handover algorithm that considers user preferences (i.e., a vertical handover algorithm that evaluates the application currently running on a user device). The main objective of the algorithm is to determine when it is necessary to perform the handover, depending on the applications running on the mobile device. The proposed algorithm utilizes a fuzzy logic system to assess whether the handover is necessary and a multiattribute decision-making (MADM) method to select the best available radio access network. A simulation scenario involving different applications at various mobile device velocities was developed. The results proved the algorithm’s effectiveness compared to some of the earlier proposed vertical handover algorithms. At velocities below 10 m/s and 30 m/s, the proposed algorithm had 0% and 15.02% unnecessary handovers, respectively, while the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) utility’s function-based algorithm obtained 12.38% and 23.24% at the same velocities, respectively. In addition, compared to TOPSIS, the obtained results of the proposed algorithm demonstrated a lower handover failure rate and ping-pong rate for a velocity span of 1–30 m/s for the considered user applications.

Abstract- Phase change materials store large amount of heat in the form of latent heat of fusion. For latent heat thermal energy storage systems, the comprehensive performance evaluation of phase change materials is very important task for the selection of the most suitable phase change material from among multiple alternative one. It is a typical multi-attribute decision making (MADM) problem. This work proposed a MADM approach to evaluate the comprehensive performance of the phase change materials using technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), and applied it to evaluate the comprehensive performance of 9 alternative phase change materials for solar domestic hot water system. As the result, the comprehensive performance ranking of the phase change materials was n-eicosane, n-octadecane, n-nonadecane, RT 60, RT 30, calcium chloride hexa-hydrate, n-docosane, p116, and stearic acid. It could be actively applied to not only the phase change materials but also various materials comprehensive performance evaluation ones arising in practice.