• Home
  • Search
  • Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation modulates human corticospinal system excitability.
  • Open Access IconOpen Access
  • Cite Icon88
  • https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00490.2014Copy DOI Icon

Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation modulates human corticospinal system excitability.

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effects of thoracic anodal and cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) on upper and lower limb corticospinal excitability. Although there have been studies assessing how thoracic tsDCS influences the spinal ascending tract and reflexes, none has assessed the effects of this technique over upper and lower limb corticomotor neuronal connections. In 14 healthy subjects we recorded motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) from abductor hallucis (AH) and hand abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles before (baseline) and at different time points (0 and 30 min) after anodal or cathodal tsDCS (2.5 mA, 20 min, T9-T11 level). In 8 of the 14 subjects we also tested the soleus H reflex and the F waves from AH and ADM before and after tsDCS. Both anodal and cathodal tsDCS left the upper limb MEPs and F wave unchanged. Conversely, while leaving lower limb H reflex unchanged, they oppositely affected lower limb MEPs: whereas anodal tsDCS increased resting motor threshold [(mean ± SE) 107.33 ± 3.3% increase immediately after tsDCS and 108.37 ± 3.2% increase 30 min after tsDCS compared with baseline] and had no effects on MEP area and latency, cathodal tsDCS increased MEP area (139.71 ± 12.9% increase immediately after tsDCS and 132.74 ± 22.0% increase 30 min after tsDCS compared with baseline) without affecting resting motor threshold and MEP latency. Our results show that tsDCS induces polarity-specific changes in corticospinal excitability that last for >30 min after tsDCS offset and selectively affect responses in lower limb muscles innervated by lumbar and sacral motor neurons.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article

Upper Extremity Motor Evoked Potentials and Hand Function in Elderly Stroke Survivors: A Correlational Study.

  • Feb 13, 2026
  • Journal of clinical medicine
  • Woo-Hwa Choi +10
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

Motor cortex and corticospinal excitability in humans with a history of illicit stimulant use

  • Sep 06, 2012
  • Journal of Applied Physiology
  • Stanley C Flavel +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations54

The influence of gender, hand dominance, and upper extremity length on motor evoked potentials

  • Nov 26, 2010
  • Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
  • Scott C Livingston +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

Voluntary motor function in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

  • Jan 01, 2001
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • N.J Davey +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations43

Differences in corticospinal system activity and reaction response between karate athletes and non-athletes.

  • Aug 20, 2016
  • Neurological Sciences
  • Fiorenzo Moscatelli +11
  • Abstract

031 Investigating motor evoked potentials as a biomarker for disease severity in hereditary spastic paraplegia

  • May 15, 2018
  • Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • Sue-Faye Siow +5
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Application of a Brain-Computer Interface System with Visual and Motor Feedback in Limb and Brain Functional Rehabilitation after Stroke: Case Report.

  • Aug 16, 2022
  • Brain sciences
  • Wen Gao +10
  • Research Article

The influence of sex and training status on neuromuscular measures of the bicep brachii.

  • Nov 10, 2025
  • Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)
  • Hamid Amoozi +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Facilitation of Motor Evoked Potentials in Response to a Modified 30 Hz Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Protocol in Healthy Adults

  • Dec 12, 2021
  • Brain Sciences
  • Katarina Hosel +1
  • Abstract
  • Citations2

Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Biologically-Based Assay of Lower Extremity Impairment and Gait Velocity?

  • Sep 24, 2016
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Heather Peters
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

Short- and intermediate-interval cortical inhibition and facilitation assessed by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation

  • Dec 07, 2010
  • Journal of Neuroscience Methods
  • Laura Säisänen +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations36

Effects of non-target leg activation, TMS coil orientation, and limb dominance on lower limb motor cortex excitability

  • Nov 10, 2016
  • Brain Research
  • Marie-Claire Smith +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations24

Longitudinal electrophysiological changes after cervical hemi-contusion spinal cord injury in rats.

  • Nov 11, 2017
  • Neuroscience Letters
  • Zucheng Huang +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

The effects of voluntary control of respiration on the excitability of the primary motor hand area, evaluated by end-tidal CO2 monitoring

  • Jan 30, 2015
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Isamu Ozaki +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations19

Upregulating excitability of corticospinal pathways in stroke patients using TMS neurofeedback; A pilot study

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • NeuroImage: Clinical
  • W.D Liang +4
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.