Trauma Patient-Centered Discharge Plan Form: A Pilot Study.

Advanced practice providers (APPs) are essential to the provision of trauma care services, particularly in the wake of residency hour restrictions. Demand for these APPs fluctuates with cyclic patient arrivals; however, most trauma teams continue to staff APPs in a linear fashion. Failure to plan for variable arrivals may contribute to excessive patient wait times and emergency department overcrowding. This study used both qualitative and quantitative approaches to evaluate the impact of APP scheduling on patient wait time and to find schedules minimizing delays in reaching the needed care at the right time. A retrospective observation of the availability of APPs and the flow of 2,249 trauma patients at a Level 1 trauma center, using both visual overlays and computer modeling, allowed us to evaluate the baseline condition, two what-if schedules, and two model-generated schedules minimizing patient time without any additional APP hours. A visual overlay of APP staffing on 2010 patient arrivals indicated substantial times of mismatch. Trauma managers considered adding an APP during weekday evenings that would have resulted in a 14.8% increase in APP hours and yielded a 27% reduction in patient wait times according to our model. An alternate schedule was developed and implemented in 2012 with a 10.5% increase in APP hours and yielding a 73% reduction in wait times. We also delineated two schedule options with 57% and 78% reductions in wait time and no increase in APP work hours. Evaluating alternate shift times and assignments using visual overlays and computer modeling can provide APP staffing solutions with up to 78% reduction in trauma patient wait time without additional APP labor. Knowing that care at the right time is crucial to arriving patients, making sure APP staffing is synchronized with arriving patients is something trauma center managers cannot ignore. Care management study, level IV.

Involving family in the care of inpatients with serious mental illness is known to be beneficial. This study examined frequencies of involvement by family in the care and discharge planning for 179 psychiatric inpatients. Involvement by family in care and discharge planning was assessed from randomly selected medical records of inpatients with Medicaid and severe mental illness at two New York hospitals from 2012 to 2013. "Family" also included anyone close to the patient who provided support. Medicaid claims were reviewed for patient demographic and clinical characteristics and for postdischarge outpatient attendance data. Multiple regression models were used to test whether involvement by family was associated with comprehensive discharge planning (contacting outpatient providers, scheduling follow-up appointments, and forwarding a discharge summary to a provider) and initiation of outpatient treatment. Inpatient staff contacted a family member for 134 (75%) patients. Sixty-seven (37%) patients received comprehensive discharge planning, and 96 (53%) and 139 (78%) attended an outpatient appointment within 7 and 30 days of discharge, respectively. Inpatient staff contacting family, communicating about the patient's health and/or mental health, and communicating about the discharge plan were significantly associated with entry into follow-up care by 7 and 30 days postdischarge. Family phone calls and/or visits with patients, attendance at family therapy sessions, and communication with inpatient staff about services available to families were significantly associated with patients receiving comprehensive discharge planning. When analyses controlled for demographic and clinical factors, having any involvement between family members and inpatient staff was significantly associated with patients' attending an outpatient appointment by 7 days (odds ratio [OR]=2.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.28-6.08) or 30 days (OR=3.07, 95% CI=1.29-7.32) after discharge. The association of family involvement with comprehensive discharge planning and prompt entry into outpatient care underscores the importance of family contact and communication with staff during inpatient hospitalizations.

Insights identifying priorities from providers and patients to optimize a vascular surgery hospital discharge: A qualitative study.

Academic Time at a Level 1 Trauma Center: No Resident, No Problem?

Early unplanned hospital readmission after acute traumatic injury: the experience at a state-designated level-I trauma center

IntroductionAdvanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocols provide a common approach for trauma resuscitations. This was a quality review assessing compliance with ATLS protocols at a Level I trauma center; specifically whether the presence or absence of a trauma team leader (TTL) influenced adherence.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted on adult major trauma patients with acute injuries over a one-year period in a Level I Canadian trauma center. Data were collected from the Alberta Trauma Registry, and adherence to ATLS protocols was determined by chart review.ResultsThe study identified 508 patients with a mean Injury Severity Score of 24.5 (SD 10.7), mean age 39.7 (SD 17.6), 73.8% were male and 91.9% were involved in blunt trauma. The overall compliance rate was 81.8% for primary survey and 75% for secondary survey. The TTL group compared to non-TTL group was more likely to complete the primary survey (90.9% vs. 81.8%, p = 0.003), and the secondary survey (100% vs. 75%, p = 0.004). The TTL group was more likely than the non-TTL group to complete the following tasks: insertion of two large bore IVs (68.2% vs. 57.7%, p = 0.014), digital rectal exam (64.6% vs. 54.7%, p = 0.023), and head to toe exam (77% vs. 67.1%, p = 0.013). Mean times from emergency department arrival to diagnostic imaging were also significantly shorter in the TTL group compared to the non-TTL group, including times to pelvis xray (mean 68min vs. 107min, p = 0.007), CT chest (mean 133min vs. 172min, p = 0.005), and CT abdomen and pelvis (mean 136min vs. 173min, p = 0.013). Readmission rates were not significantly different between the TTL and non-TTL groups (3.5% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.642).ConclusionsWhile many studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of trauma systems on outcomes, few have explored the direct influence of the TTL on ATLS compliance. This study demonstrated that TTL involvement during resuscitations was associated with improved adherence to ATLS protocols, and increased efficiency (compared to non TTL involvement) to diagnostic imaging. Findings from this study will guide future quality improvement and education for early trauma management.

Objective: Major trauma is a major concern in public health and a leading cause of mortality worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the prehospital scene time interval (STI) and survival in emergency medical service (EMS)-assessed major trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: A retrospective observational study using the Pan-Asian Trauma Outcomes Study (PATOS) database was conducted. Adult trauma patients with injury severity scores (ISSs) greater than 15 who were admitted to the ICU were selected. EMS STIs were categorized into three groups: short (0–8 minutes), intermediate (9–16 minutes), and long (over 16 minutes). The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge, and the secondary outcome was good neurological outcome at hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to calculate odds ratios and confidence intervals, adjusting for age, sex, mechanism of injury, prehospital alertness, prehospital shock index, response time interval, and EMS intervention (airway, oxygen supplementation, and intravenous fluid administration). Sensitivity analysis for patients who underwent surgery or nontraumatic brain injury cases and interaction analysis by EMS intervention were performed. Results: Data from a total of 1,874 eligible patients were analyzed. Intermediate and long STIs showed significant associations with outcomes, with adjusted ORs (95% CI) of 1.21 (1.07–1.38) in the intermediate STI group and 1.74 (1.55–1.96) in the long STI group for survival and 1.37 (1.32–1.40) in the intermediate STI group and 1.31 (1.22–1.41) in the long STI group for neurological outcome. In the sensitivity analysis, the highest ORs were found in the intermediate STI group, with adjusted ORs (95% CI) of 1.40 (1.37–1.42) for survival and 1.32 (1.26–1.38) for neurological outcome. In the interaction analysis, EMS intervention showed a positive interaction effect with an intermediate STI on survival. Conclusion: In EMS-assessed adult major trauma patients admitted to the ICU, we found significant associations between STIs longer than 8 minutes and outcomes. EMS intervention has a positive interaction effect with an intermediate STI on survival. More research is needed to understand the implications of practice for major trauma in the field.

Background: Traumatic injury accounts for 7.8% of all deaths globally, and 30% to 40% of those deaths are due to hemorrhage. Shock Index (SI) has been found to be useful in the recognition of hemorrhage but no definite threshold for predicting mortality has been determined. Our aim was to determine whether a SI ≥ 1 in adult trauma patients was associated with increased in-hospital mortality compared to a SI < 1.
 Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were searched using controlled vocabulary, and retrospective observational studies were included. Studies were included if they reported in-hospital mortality in trauma patients aged ≥ 16 years, with a measurement of SI from the emergency department or trauma center, dividing patients in groups of SI ≥ 1 and SI < 1. Risk of bias was assessed by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the strength and quality of the body of evidence was assessed according to GRADE. Data was pooled using a random effects model.Results: We screened 1239 citations with an inter-rater reliability (Cohen’s kappa) of 0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.93). Thirteen comparative cohort studies including 639210 patients were included. All studies reported a significant higher in-hospital mortality in adult trauma patients with a SI ≥ 1 compared to those having a SI < 1 at first assessment in the emergency department or trauma center. Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled risk ratio (RR) of in-hospital mortality was RR 4.29 (95% confidence interval 3.00 - 6.12). The overall quality of evidence was low.
 Conclusion: This systematic review found a fourfold risk of in-hospital mortality in adult trauma patients with an initial SI ≥ 1 in the emergency department or trauma center.

Deranged glucose metabolism after moderate to severe trauma with either high or low concentrations of blood glucose is associated with poorer outcome. Data on prehospital blood glucose concentrations and trauma are scarce. The primary aim was to describe the relationship between traumatic shock and prehospital blood glucose concentrations. The secondary aim was to determine the additional predictive value of prehospital blood glucose concentration for traumatic shock when compared with vital parameters alone. Retrospective analysis of the predefined, observational database of a nationwide Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (34 bases). Emergency trauma patients treated by Helicopter Emergency Medical Service between 2005 and 2013 were investigated. All adult trauma patients (≥18 years) with recorded blood glucose concentrations were enrolled. Primary outcome: upper and lower thresholds of blood glucose concentration more commonly associated with traumatic shock. Secondary outcome: additional predictive value of prehospital blood glucose concentrations when compared with vital parameters alone. Of 51 936 trauma patients, 20 177 were included. In total, 220 (1.1%) patients died on scene. Hypoglycaemia (blood glucose concentration 2.8 mmol l or less) was observed in 132 (0.7%) patients, hyperglycaemia (blood glucose concentration exceeding 15 mmol l) was observed in 265 patients (1.3%). Blood glucose concentrations more than 10 mmol l (n = 1308 (6.5%)) and 2.8 mmol l or less were more common in patients with traumatic shock (P < 0.0001). The Youden index for traumatic shock ((sensitivity + specificity) - 1) was highest when blood glucose concentration was 3.35 mmol l (P < 0.001) for patients with low blood glucose concentrations and 7.75 mmol l (P < 0.001) for those with high blood glucose concentrations. In logistic regression analysis of patients with spontaneous circulation on scene, prehospital blood glucose concentrations (together with common vital parameters: Glasgow Coma Scale, heart rate, blood pressure, breathing frequency) significantly improved the prediction of traumatic shock in comparison with prediction by common vital parameters alone (P < 0.0001). In adult trauma patients, low and high blood glucose concentrations were more common in patients with traumatic shock. Prehospital blood glucose concentration measurements in addition to common vital parameters may help identify patients at risk of traumatic shock.

The prevalence of obesity in the United States is up to 40% in adults. Obese patients with severe sepsis have a lower mortality rate compared with normal body mass index (BMI) patients. We hypothesized that trauma patients with severe sepsis and obese BMI will have a decreased mortality risk in comparison with normal BMI patients. The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017) was queried for adult trauma patients with documented BMI and severe sepsis. Patients were grouped based on BMI: non-obese trauma patients (nOTP) BMI <30kg/m2 and obese trauma patients (OTP) ≥30kg/m2. A multivariable logistic regression model was used for analysis of mortality. From 1246 trauma patients with severe sepsis, 566 (42.4%) were nOTP and 680 (57.6%) were OTP. OTP had increased length of stay (LOS) (19 vs 21 days, P < .001), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS (13 vs 18days, P < .001) and ventilator days (10 vs 11days, P < .001). After adjusting for covariates, when compared to normal BMI patients, patients who were overweight (OR 1.11 CI .875-1.41 P = .390), obese (OR .797 CI .59-1.06 P = .126), severely obese (OR .926 CI .63-1.36 P = .696) and morbidly obese (OR 1.448 CI 1.01-2.07 P = .04) all had a similar associated risk for mortality compared to patients with normal BMI. In adult trauma patients with severe sepsis, this national analysis demonstrated OTP had increased LOS, ICU LOS, and ventilator days compared to nOTP. However, patients with increasing degrees of obesity had similar associated risk of mortality compared to trauma patients with severe sepsis and a normal BMI.

PurposeControversy exists about whole-body computed tomography (CT) as a primary screening modality for suspected multiple trauma patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze time trends of CT examinations for trauma patients in relation to the Injury Severity Score (ISS).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 561 adult trauma patients (mean age = 54 years) who were admitted to the trauma room of our hospital, immediately followed by a CT examination, in 2009, 2013 und 2017. Review of electronic patient charts was performed to determine the cause of injury. ISS was either calculated upon hospital charts and CT imaging reports or documented in the TraumaRegister DGU® for trauma patients with ICU treatment or ISS ≥ 16.ResultsAn increasing number of CT examinations of acute trauma patients were performed at our hospital with 117 patients in 2009 compared to 192 in 2013 and 252 in 2017. Their mean age increased (50 years in 2009, 54 in 2013 and 55 in 2017;p = 0.046), whereas their mean ISS decreased over time (15.2 in 2009 compared to 12.1 in 2013 and 10.6 in 2017;p = 0.001), especially in women (15.1 in 2009, 11.8 in 2013 and 7.4 in 2017;p = 0.001 both), younger age groups (18 to 24 years:15.6 in 2009, 6.5 in 2013 and 8.9 in 2017; p = 0.033 and 25 to 49 years:15.0 in 2009, 11.2 in 2013 and 8.3 in 2017;p = 0.001) as well as motor vehicle collision (MVC) victims (16.2 in 2009, 11.8 in 2013 and 6.1 in 2017; p < 0.001). Trauma patients with a high ISS were especially more likely of older age (OR 1.02,p < 0.001) and with the type of incident being a fall (< 3 m: OR3.84,p < 0.001;>3 m: OR6.22,p < 0.001) compared to MVC.ConclusionPrevious studies suggesting a benefit of primary whole-body CT for trauma patients might not reflect the current patient population with decreasing ISS. Especially females, younger age groups and MVC patients might benefit from stricter selection criteria for receiving whole-body CT. Our results also emphasize the importance of prevention of fall or tumble for elderly people.

Discharge planning for the elderly can potentially reduce patient length of hospital stay, prevent rehospitalization, enhance patient outcomes and lessen the burden of care on the families. While increased numbers of elderly are being discharged earlier, there are few data on the process and effects of discharge planning protocols developed specifically for this population. The proposed study will attempt to answer the following questions regarding hospitalized elderly with selected DRG classifications: Are there significant differences between elderly patients who receive the hospital's general discharge planning procedure used for all categories of patients and elderly who receive the hospital's general discharge planning procedure plus a comprehensive discharge planning protocol specific to the elderly and implemented by a gerontological nurse specialist in: (1) Patient Outcomes (length of initial hospitalization; post-discharge morbidity; post-discharge health services; functional status; mental status; satisfaction with care; self-esteem; patient's perception of health status; and stress level); (2) Family Related Outcomes (primary care giver's functional status; mental status; care giving demands; stress level and family functioning); (3) Cost of Care Outcomes (charges for initial hospitalization, rehospitalizations, post-discharge health services; family related costs; and gerontological nurse specialist costs). The study design is a randomized clinical trial with a total of 280 elderly (2 groups of 140). The control group will receive routine discharge planning; the treatment group will receive routine discharge planning plus an elder-specific comprehensive discharge planning protocol. Data analysis will include frequency distributions and summary statistics. For each of the research questions, multivariate analysis of variance or chi-square statistics will be used.

Right Heart Function in Critically Ill Patients at Risk for Acute Right Heart Failure: A Description of Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Arterial Coupling, Ejection Fraction and Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index

Background Trauma centers are required to screen patients for alcohol use, and if necessary, intervene and refer to treatment (SBIRT). Similar screening for illicit drug use is recommended but not required. Urine drug screening (UDS) underestimates problematic substance use. This study aimed to estimate the types and rates of UDS false negatives (FN) compared to comprehensive testing by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) in trauma patients. Methods We performed a prospective cohort study of deidentified urine samples from adult trauma and burn activation patients. Both UDS and LC-MS comprehensive testing of >200 analytes were performed by a reference laboratory on all samples. Iatrogenic medications were excluded from the FN count. Crosstab analyses were conducted for UDS versus LC-MS outcomes to establish FN types and rates. We dichotomized the results by creating an “intentionality” variable (intentional injuries by self/others versus accidental injuries). A series of crosstabs with odds ratios considered intentionality by substance class and demographics. Statistically significant variables by Chi-Square were assessed by logistic regression. Results Psychoactive FN were detected in 56/100 urine samples analyzed; the most frequent included anticonvulsants (primarily gabapentin, N = 13), opioid agonists (N = 12), antihistamines (primarily diphenhydramine, N = 10), and phenethylamines (primarily bupropion, N = 5). Nonpsychoactive FN were detected in 70/100 samples; the most common were nicotine (N = 33), caffeine (N = 23), acetaminophen (N = 22), and antidepressants (N = 12). Of substance classes included in the UDS and also tested by LC-MS, FN occurred for opiates (3%), amphetamines (5%) and opioids (25%). Polypharmacy was associated with fall injuries in elderly patients. Cocaine (p = 0.015) and cannabinoids (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with intentionality. Conclusions Our results indicate that FN for potentially important psychoactive and nonpsychoactive substances are common when toxicologic testing is limited to routine UDS in trauma patients. We recommend expanding SBIRT in this patient population to include misuse of tobacco products, prescription analgesics, and over-the-counter antihistamines.

Opioids have been proven effective in pain management, but overprescription can lead to addiction and abuse. Although current guidelines regarding opioid prescription for chronic and acute pain are available, they fail to address the use of opioids for pain management in traumatic injury patients who undergo operations. The primary objective of this study was to examine opioid prescribing practices for US adult trauma patients who require surgical management, based on prior history of opioid use, type of surgical practice, and age. PubMed and Cochrane Journals were used to identify relevant articles between October 2010 and December 29, 2020. Our primary outcome was discrepancies of morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed to trauma patients. Significance was defined as p < 0.05. Eleven studies on US trauma patients prescribed opioids were evaluated, creating a total of 30,249 patients stratified by prior opioid use, age, and race. Patterns seen among patients with prior opioid use include higher MMEs prescribed, lower likelihoods of opioid discontinuation, higher mortality rates, and higher complication rates. Orthopedic surgeons prescribed higher values of MMEs than nonorthopedic surgeons. Higher incidences of opioid prescriptions are seen with orthopedic trauma surgery and prior opioid use by the patient. We recommend further development of national protocol implementation for acute pain management for the US trauma population. Systematic review, level III.