Trends in Machine and Deep Learning Techniques for Plant Disease Identification: A Systematic Review

Coastal aquifers are vital for sustaining ecosystems and providing freshwater for agriculture and domestic use. However, rising groundwater salinity in these regions demands innovative approaches for accurate modeling and prediction. In recent decades, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques have been extensively used across various water resource management fields, often yielding promising outcomes. This review examines the growing usage of ML and DL techniques in modeling groundwater salinity in coastal aquifers. The analysis is based on 104 peer-reviewed journal articles including the review articles indexed in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Scopus, and SpringerLink using keywords like "saltwater intrusion", "machine learning", “deep learning”, and "groundwater salinity". The review discusses recent advancements, challenges, and future directions for improving ML model accuracy and applicability. Studies reveal an increasing reliance on ML techniques to predict groundwater salinity and manage seawater intrusion across various coastal geological settings. Researchers have employed a range of ML models, from traditional methods like Artificial Neural Networks and Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference Systems to advanced DL-based models like Convolutional Neural Networks and Long Short-Term Memory Networks, often using ensemble methods to enhance accuracy. Key findings include the top-tier output of ensemble and optimized models, including Random Forest and Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm-XGBoost. These studies highlight the importance of model selection, input variable ranking, and computational efficiency, demonstrating ML's global relevance in environmental management. The review highlights the prospects of ML, DL, and ensemble models to redefine groundwater management in coastal aquifers, offering more effective and sustainable solutions to the challenges posed by groundwater salinity and saltwater intrusion. Future advancements will focus on further integrating DL, explainable artificial intelligence, and ensemble approaches, along with other innovative techniques, to explore sparsely studied variables, model new or unique study areas, and apply ML methods for managing groundwater salinity.

Cervical cancer is a highly prevalent malignancy affecting women worldwide, ranking as the seventh most common cancer globally. This study aims to systematically review and analyze cervical cancer survival predictions using machine learning (ML) algorithms. A comprehensive search was conducted across Scopus and PubMed databases in February 2024. Extracted articles were screened using Hubmeta software, with duplicates and non-relevant studies excluded. The final selection, comprising 24 articles, focused on survival predictions through ML techniques. These studies, published mostly post-2019, included datasets ranging from 75 to 9,462 cervical cancer patients and up to 91,294 squamous cell samples. The most commonly applied ML models were Random Forest (RF), Neural Networks (NN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Ensemble and Hybrid Learning, and Deep Learning (DL). The area under the curve (AUC) for these models ranged from 0.84 to 0.9875, demonstrating their strong predictive capabilities. Clinical patient records were the primary data source. Meta-analysis was performed on the extracted data using GraphPad Prism for descriptive statistics and One-Way ANOVA. No significant differences were found between group means, as evidenced by an R-squared value of 0.1459. This result indicates that the independent variable (year of study) explained only 14.59% of the variance in ML model performance. The study found that the use of ML models has increased over time, particularly with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) such as the ResNet50 model, which demonstrated superior accuracy metrics, including over 90% accuracy for the ResNet152 variant. These findings suggest that integrating multi-dimensional data with ML models holds significant potential for improving survival predictions in cervical cancer patients. Future research is recommended to develop tailored ML algorithms with even higher predictive accuracy for cervical cancer survival.

Summary A meticulous interpretation of steady-state or unsteady-state relative permeability (Kr) experimental data is required to determine a complete set of Kr curves. In this work, different machine learning (ML) models were developed to assist in a faster estimation of these curves from steady-state drainage coreflooding experimental runs. These ML algorithms include gradient boosting (GB), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and deep neural network (DNN) with a main focus on and comparison of the two latter algorithms (XGB and DNN). Based on existing mathematical models, a leading-edge framework was developed where a large database of Kr and capillary pressure (Pc) curves were generated. This database was used to perform thousands of coreflood simulation runs representing oil-water drainage steady-state experiments. The results obtained from these simulation runs, mainly pressure drop along with other conventional core analysis data, were used to estimate analytical Kr curves based on Darcy’s law. These analytically estimated Kr curves along with the previously generated Pc curves were fed as features into the ML model. The entire data set was split into 80% for training and 20% for testing. The k-fold cross-validation technique was applied to increase the model’s accuracy by splitting 80% of the training data into 10 folds. In this manner, for each of the 10 experiments, nine folds were used for training and the remaining fold was used for model validation. Once the model was trained and validated, it was subjected to blind testing on the remaining 20% of the data set. The ML model learns to capture fluid flow behavior inside the core from the training data set. In terms of applicability of these ML models, two sets of experimental data were needed as input; the first was the analytically estimated Kr curves from the steady-state drainage coreflooding experiments, while the other was the Pc curves estimated from centrifuge or mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) measurements. The trained/tested model was then able to estimate Kr curves based on the experimental results fed as input. Furthermore, to test the performance of the ML model when only one set of experimental data is available to an end user, a recurrent neural network (RNN) algorithm was trained/tested to predict Kr curves in the absence of Pc curves as an input. The performance of the three developed models (XGB, DNN, and RNN) was assessed using the values of the coefficient of determination (R2) along with the loss calculated during training/validation of the model. The respective crossplots along with comparisons of ground truth vs. artificial intelligence (AI)-predicted curves indicated that the model is capable of making accurate predictions with an error percentage between 0.2% and 0.6% on history-matching experimental data for all three tested ML techniques. This implies that the AI-based model exhibits better efficiency and reliability in determining Kr curves when compared to conventional methods. The developed ML models by no means replace the need to conduct drainage coreflooding or centrifuge experiments but act as an alternative to existing commercial platforms that are used to interpret experimental data to predict Kr curves. The two main advantages of the developed ML models are their capability of predicting Kr curves within a matter of a few minutes as well as with limited intervention from the end user. The results also include a comparison between classical ML approaches, shallow neural networks, and DNNs in terms of accuracy in predicting the final Kr curves. The research presented here is an extension of the state-of-the-art framework proposed by Mathew et al. (2021). However, the two main aspects of the current study are the application of deep learning for the prediction of Kr curves and the application of feature engineering. The latter not only reduces the training/testing time for the ML models but also enables the end user to obtain the final predictions with the least set of experimental data. The various models discussed in this research work currently focus on the prediction of Kr curves for drainage steady-state experiments; however, the work can be extended to capture the imbibition cycle as well.

A comprehensive review on detection of plant disease using machine learning and deep learning approaches

PurposeThere is great promise in use of machine learning (ML) for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of various medical conditions in ophthalmology and beyond. Applications of ML for ocular neoplasms are in early development and this review synthesizes the current state of ML in ocular oncology.MethodsWe queried PubMed and Web of Science and evaluated 804 publications, excluding nonhuman studies. Metrics on ML algorithm performance were collected and the Prediction model study Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool was used to evaluate bias. We report the results of 63 unique studies.ResultsResearch regarding ML applications to intraocular cancers has leveraged multiple algorithms and data sources. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were one of the most commonly used ML algorithms and most work has focused on uveal melanoma and retinoblastoma. The majority of ML models discussed here were developed for diagnosis and prognosis. Algorithms for diagnosis primarily leveraged imaging (e.g., optical coherence tomography) as inputs, whereas those for prognosis leveraged combinations of gene expression, tumor characteristics, and patient demographics.ConclusionsML has the potential to improve the management of intraocular cancers. Published ML models perform well, but were occasionally limited by small sample sizes owing to the low prevalence of intraocular cancers. This could be overcome with synthetic data enhancement and low-shot ML techniques. CNNs can be integrated into existing diagnostic workflows, while non-neural networks perform well in determining prognosis.

- The Plant Disease Detection and Classification project is designed to help farmers identify crop diseases at an early stage using images of plant leaves. By applying advanced machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques, this system aims to automatically detect and classify various plant diseases with high accuracy. Early identification of plant diseases plays a vital role in improving crop yield, reducing unnecessary pesticide usage, and encouraging sustainable farming practices. Once a disease is detected, the system not only identifies it but also provides a brief description and recommends appropriate prevention and treatment methods. To enhance performance, the project uses data augmentation and normalization techniques—helping the model handle variations in lighting, angles, and environmental conditions. The system is trained on a diverse dataset containing images of both healthy and diseased leaves from different plant species, categorized into 38 different classes. The project incorporates various machine learning algorithms such as Support Vector Machines (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Trees, and Random Forests, as well as a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for deep learning. Among these, CNNs have shown outstanding performance due to their ability to learn spatial features from images effectively. While existing research has shown promising results, real-world challenges such as varying image quality, lighting conditions, and background clutter still affect accuracy. This project aims to overcome these issues by training on large, diverse datasets and fine-tuning model parameters. Ultimately, this project hopes to empower farmers with an intelligent tool to monitor crop health, make informed decisions, and contribute to food security through precision agriculture. Keywords: Plant Disease Detection, Automated Disease Detection System, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Data Augmentation, Data Normalization, Support Vector Machine, KNN Classifier, Convolutional Neural Network, Decision Trees, Random Forest

The emergence of machine learning (ML) techniques has significantly improved the accuracy and efficiency in materials characterization. This paper reviews the application of ML algorithms in microstructural analysis and defect detection processes of aluminum castings. By leveraging ML methods, multiple ML models were trained to automatically identify and classify different types of casting defects and microstructural features. Advanced image processing techniques, combined with convolutional neural networks (CNNs), enable the detection of casting defects such as shrinkage porosity, oxides and multiscale microstructure features (i.e., eutectic phases and secondary dendrite arm spacing of aluminum). This study highlights the advantages of the developed ML models in the accuracy and reduction of measurement time in the lab and reducing the reliance on manual analysis and subjective judgment. The findings emphasize the significant impact of ML techniques on metallurgical research and industrial applications, enhancing the reliability and performance of material analysis tools.

Systematic literature review of machine learning based software development effort estimation models

Systematic Review of Machine Learning in Diagnosis of Myeloproliferative Neoplasia

This study presents a comparative analysis of the classification performance of facial and emotion recognition systems using Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms. The primary objective of this work is to evaluate the applicability of emotion recognition in fields such as psychotherapy and crime analysis, using the FER-2013 dataset.The study was conducted with ML algorithms such as Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Decision Trees, and Gradient Boosting, as well as the DL algorithm, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Supported by the application of feature selection, preprocessing, and feature extraction techniques, the model’s performance was measured using standard metrics such as accuracy, precision, F1-score, and AUC-ROC.The experimental results showed that the highest classification accuracy (46.61%) was achieved with the CNN model. While the ML models generally offered lower accuracy, they provided advantages in terms of computational efficiency in specific scenarios.This study aims to contribute to the literature by providing a comparative analysis of ML and DL algorithms and by highlighting the effect of data preprocessing on performance. The findings set targets for future work, such as real-time system integration and hybrid model development.

Machine learning (ML) models provide more choices to patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) to more properly manage blood glucose (BG) levels. However, because of numerous types of ML algorithms, choosing an appropriate model is vitally important. In a systematic review and network meta-analysis, this study aimed to comprehensively assess the performance of ML models in predicting BG levels. In addition, we assessed ML models used to detect and predict adverse BG (hypoglycemia) events by calculating pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Explore databases were systematically searched for studies on predicting BG levels and predicting or detecting adverse BG events using ML models, from inception to November 2022. Studies that assessed the performance of different ML models in predicting or detecting BG levels or adverse BG events of patients with DM were included. Studies with no derivation or performance metrics of ML models were excluded. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was applied to assess the quality of included studies. Primary outcomes were the relative ranking of ML models for predicting BG levels in different prediction horizons (PHs) and pooled estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of ML models in detecting or predicting adverse BG events. In total, 46 eligible studies were included for meta-analysis. Regarding ML models for predicting BG levels, the means of the absolute root mean square error (RMSE) in a PH of 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes were 18.88 (SD 19.71), 21.40 (SD 12.56), 21.27 (SD 5.17), and 30.01 (SD 7.23) mg/dL, respectively. The neural network model (NNM) showed the highest relative performance in different PHs. Furthermore, the pooled estimates of the positive likelihood ratio and the negative likelihood ratio of ML models were 8.3 (95% CI 5.7-12.0) and 0.31 (95% CI 0.22-0.44), respectively, for predicting hypoglycemia and 2.4 (95% CI 1.6-3.7) and 0.37 (95% CI 0.29-0.46), respectively, for detecting hypoglycemia. Statistically significant high heterogeneity was detected in all subgroups, with different sources of heterogeneity. For predicting precise BG levels, the RMSE increases with a rise in the PH, and the NNM shows the highest relative performance among all the ML models. Meanwhile, current ML models have sufficient ability to predict adverse BG events, while their ability to detect adverse BG events needs to be enhanced. PROSPERO CRD42022375250; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=375250.

Chemical heuristics have been fundamental to the advancement of chemistry and materials science. These heuristics are typically established by scientists using knowledge and creativity to extract patterns from limited datasets. Machine learning offers opportunities to perfect this approach using computers and larger datasets. Here, we discuss the relationships between traditional heuristics and machine learning approaches. We show how traditional rules can be challenged by large-scale statistical assessment and how traditional concepts commonly used as features are feeding the machine learning techniques. We stress the waste involved in relearning chemical rules and the challenges in terms of data size requirements for purely data-driven approaches. Our view is that heuristic and machine learning approaches are at their best when they work together.

e17570 Background: Ovarian cancer(OC) is the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancy. Current challenges include lack of diagnostic tools, predictive biomarkers, and identifying appropriate surgical candidates. Machine learning(ML) is an emerging field that can make accurate projections by making inferences on data and may play a crucial role in OC.The objective of the current study was to review the literature on application of ML in OC and report the most commonly used algorithms and their performance in comparison to existing prediction tools and traditional regression models. Methods: This is a systematic review of published literature from January 1985 to March 2021 on the use of ML in OC. An extensive search of electronic library databases was conducted. Four independent reviewers screened the articles initially by title then full text. Quality was assessed using the MINORS criteria. P-values were generated using the Pearson’s Chi-squared(x2) test to compare performance of ML models with traditional statistics. No p-values were reported if only one study was available. Results: Among 4,295 articles screened, 88 studies on ML in OC were included. The mean age of OC patients was 54.7 years(11-90) and the most common stages at diagnosis were:Stage III (39.9%) and IV (34%). Applications of ML were in clinical datasets(33%, n = 29), preoperative diagnostics(30.7%, n = 27), serum biomarkers (21.6%, n = 19), genomics (12.5%, n = 11), and prediction of cytoreductive outcomes (2.3%, n = 2). The most commonly applied algorithms were Support Vector Machine [SVM](28%, n = 33)and Neural Networks[NN] (25.28%). Over the past decades, the number of publications on ML in OC increased three-fold from 20(1994-2010) to 67 (2011–2021). Only 9 (10%) studies compared ML techniques with existing prediction tools, or traditional regression models. Among 29 clinical dataset studies, 4 compared ML with traditional logistic regression(LR). Two studies reported better performance with ML compared to LR but not significant(accuracy: 0.88 vs 0.84, p = 0.15), one study performed comparably(accuracy: 0.1 vs 0.1) while one study performed worse(accuracy: 0.1 vs 0.97). Only one preoperative diagnostic study compared ML techniques with LR. SVM classifiers outperformed LR in classifying ovarian masses as benign or malignant(sensitivity: 0.88 vs. 0.70). One serum biomarker study compared LR with ML algorithms; LR performed better using two biomarkers for predicting OC(accuracy: 0.97 vs. 0.94). Among five studies reporting overall survival outcomes, only one study compared survival ML techniques using NN with LR and showed that NN classifiers outperformed LR in predicting overall survival(AUC: 0.72 vs. 0.62). Conclusions: This is the first systematic review exploring the literature on ML algorithms in OC. Most ML models outperformed traditional models. However, larger datasets would be required to validate findings.

BackgroundDespite the interest in machine learning (ML) algorithms for analyzing real-world data (RWD) in healthcare, the use of ML in predicting time-to-event data, a common scenario in clinical practice, is less explored. ML models are capable of algorithmically learning from large, complex datasets and can offer advantages in predicting time-to-event data. We reviewed the recent applications of ML for survival analysis using RWD in healthcare.MethodsPUBMED and EMBASE were searched from database inception through March 2023 to identify peer-reviewed English-language studies of ML models for predicting time-to-event outcomes using the RWD. Two reviewers extracted information on the data source, patient population, survival outcome, ML algorithms, and the Area Under the Curve (AUC).ResultsOf 257 citations, 28 publications were included. Random survival forests (N = 16, 57%) and neural networks (N = 11, 39%) were the most popular ML algorithms. There was variability across AUC for these ML models (median 0.789, range 0.6–0.950). ML algorithms were predominately considered for predicting overall survival in oncology (N = 12, 43%). ML survival models were often used to predict disease prognosis or clinical events (N = 27, 96%) in the oncology, while less were used for treatment outcomes (N = 1, 4%).ConclusionsThe ML algorithms, random survival forests and neural networks, are mainly used for RWD to predict survival outcomes such as disease prognosis or clinical events in the oncology. This review shows that more opportunities remain to apply these ML algorithms to inform treatment decision-making in clinical practice. More methodological work is also needed to ensure the utility and applicability of ML models in survival outcomes.

Early detection and diagnosis of plant diseases is critical for ensuring global food security and sustainable agricultural practices. This review comprehensively examines latest advancements in crop disease risk prediction, onset detection through imaging techniques, machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and edge computing technologies. Traditional disease detection methods, which rely on visual inspections, are time-consuming, and often inaccurate. While chemical analyses are accurate, they can be time consuming and leave less flexibility to promptly implement remedial actions. In contrast, modern techniques such as hyperspectral and multispectral imaging, thermal imaging, and fluorescence imaging, among others can provide non-invasive and highly accurate solutions for identifying plant diseases at early stages. The integration of ML and DL models, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transfer learning, has significantly improved disease classification and severity assessment. Furthermore, edge computing and the Internet of Things (IoT) facilitate real-time disease monitoring by processing and communicating data directly in/from the field, reducing latency and reliance on in-house as well as centralized cloud computing. Despite these advancements, challenges remain in terms of multimodal dataset standardization, integration of individual technologies of sensing, data processing, communication, and decision-making to provide a complete end-to-end solution for practical implementations. In addition, robustness of such technologies in varying field conditions, and affordability has also not been reviewed. To this end, this review paper focuses on broad areas of sensing, computing, and communication systems to outline the transformative potential of end-to-end solutions for effective implementations towards crop disease management in modern agricultural systems. Foundation of this review also highlights critical potential for integrating AI-driven disease detection and predictive models capable of analyzing multimodal data of environmental factors such as temperature and humidity, as well as visible-range and thermal imagery information for early disease diagnosis and timely management. Future research should focus on developing autonomous end-to-end disease monitoring systems that incorporate these technologies, fostering comprehensive precision agriculture and sustainable crop production.