The article emphasizes that with all the positive aspects of thedevelopment of the information age or as it is also called post-industrial society,unfortunately, this period can also be called the era of modern information wars. Even inthe conditions of a real war, citizens and society in general still do not sufficientlyunderstand the threat posed by modern information technologies. Information warfare,most researchers agree that its formation and development of this phenomenon can betraced through a certain evolutionary progress, during which the impact on humanity ofvarious means of communication, their improvement and adaptation to the requirementsof their time were clearly traced. The first stage is associated with the era of Antiquity,the Middle Ages and partly the Modern Age until the 18th century. Already at that time,methods were successfully used that influenced the consciousness of citizens or soldiers.The second stage in the history of the concept of «information warfare» is primarilyassociated with the growing role of information in the life of states (the emergence of theprinting press, newspapers, radio, television, etc.). This period is characterized byserious shifts in the organization of information warfare and propaganda, thedevelopment of its methods and forms.The third stage in the history of information wars began with a period of fierceconfrontation in the world, which was called the «Cold War». The key elements inachieving goals in information warfare were the management of the target audience andthe formation of «public opinion» by manipulating information. The third millenniumbegan with the rapid development of information and communication technologies. Inaccordance with such successes in information and communication technologies, therapid pace of computerization and informatization of societies leads to the developmentof the fourth stage of information wars, in which the creation of such an informationspace is slowly turning into a theater of military operations, where each side of theconfrontation seeks to gain an advantage. Unlike military conflicts of the past, moderninformation warfare – the war for consciousness is not an auxiliary elementaccompanying hostilities. It takes place autonomously from armed confrontation (andeven denies it), has its own tools, strategies and goals. It is proven that information warfare is total in the sense that it is a war not ofarmies but of nations, requires the mobilization of all state resources, is waged in theglobal information space and uses the most destructive types of weapons – words andinformation. The article pays considerable attention to the analysis of informationwarfare from various points of view, in particular, to the manipulation of consciousnessand strategies of influence using media, studies human consciousness as a «penetrating»sphere of application of information weapons, etc. REFERENCES1. Horban, Yu. O. (2015). Informatsiina viina proty Ukrainy ta zasoby yii vedennia[Information war against Ukraine and its instruments]. Visnyk Natsionalnoiakademii derzhavnoho upravlinnia pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy – Bulletin of theNational Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine, 1,136–141 [in Ukrainian].2. Zhadko, V. O. (Ed.), Kharytonenko, O. I., & Poltavets, Yu. S. (Comps.). (2018).Hibrydna viina i zhurnalistyka. Problemy informatsiinoi bezpeky [Hybrid war andjournalism. Problems of information security]. Kyiv: Vyd-vo NPU imeniM. P. Drahomanova [in Ukrainian].3. Lasswell, H. D. (1927). Propaganda technique in the World War. New York, NY:Alfred A. Knopf.4. Hrytsiak, N. V., & Soloviov, S. H. (Eds.). (2015). Informatsiina skladovaderzhavnoi polityky ta upravlinnia [Information component of public policy andgovernance]. Kyiv: K.I.S. [in Ukrainian].5. Kurban, O. V. (2016). Suchasni informatsiini viiny v merezhevomu on-lineprostori [Modern information wars in the networked online space]. Kyiv: VIKNU[in Ukrainian].6. Pocheptsov, H. H., & Chukut, S. A. (2008). Informatsiina polityka [Informationpolicy] (2nd ed.). Kyiv: Znannia [in Ukrainian].7. Pocheptsov, H. H. (n.d.). Informatsiina viina: vyznachennia ta bazovi poniattia[Information war: Definitions and basic concepts]. Retrieved fromhttp://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/ethics/manipulation/informatsionnaya_voyna_opredeleniya_i_bazovye_ponyattay [in Ukrainian].8. Senchenko, O. M. (2014). Novitni viiny z vykorystanniam informatsiinopsykholohichnoi zbroi [Modern wars using information and psychologicalweapons]. Visnyk Knyzhkovoi palaty – Bulletin of the Book Chamber, 8, 1–6[in Ukrainian].9. Tymoshyk, M. S. (2018). Chomu Moskva boitsia ukrainskoho drukovanohoslova, abo Istoriia pro te, yak imperska vlada cherez zaboronu knyh znesyliuvaladukh rosiiskykh ukraintsiv [Why Moscow fears the Ukrainian printed word, orhow imperial power weakened the spirit of Russian Ukrainians through book bans]. Ukrainskyi informatsiinyi prostir – Ukrainian Information Space, 1, 257–259 [in Ukrainian].10. Hoffman, F. G. (1994). Decisive force: The new American way of war.Washington, DC: Potomac Books.11. Whyte, C., Thrall, A. T., & Mazanec, B. M. (Eds.). (2020). Information warfarein the age of cyber conflict. London: Routledge.12. Feshchenko, I. V. (2021). Informatsiina viina yak orhanichna skladovasuchasnoho zbroino-politychnoho konfliktu [Information war as an organiccomponent of modern armed-political conflict]. Filosofiia ta politolohiia vkonteksti suchasnoi kultury – Philosophy and Political Science in the Context ofModern Culture, 13(1), 96–103 [in Ukrainian].13. Sheptytska, L. B., Remeniak, O. V., & Zakharchyn, N. P. (2024). Dosvidinformatsiinykh viin v istorii ta suchasnosti yak obiekt doslidzhen suchasnoinauky ta osvity [Experience of information wars in history and modernity as anobject of research of contemporary science and education]. Problemyhumanitarnykh nauk – Problems of Humanities (History Series, Special issue),35–43. https://doi.org/10.24919/2312-2595.spec.3
Read more