TUTORIAL ON ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK

Artificial Intelligence in the American Healthcare Industry: Looking Forward to 2030

Learning ability is the basic characteristic of human intelligence. The July 1, 2005 issue of Science published a list of 125 important questions in science. Among them, the question 94 “What are the limits of learning by machines?”. The annotation “Computers can already beat the world’s best chess players, and they have a wealth of information on the Web to draw on. But abstract reasoning is still beyond any machine”. In recent artificial intelligence has made great progresses. In 1997, the rise of the man-machine war, IBM Supercomputer Deep Blue defeated the chess master Garry Kasparov. On February 14, 2011, IBM’s Watson supercomputer won a practice round against Jeopardy champions Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter. In March 2016, Google DeepMind’s AlphaGo sealed a 4-1 victory over a South Korean Go grandmaster Lee Se-dol. This paper focuses on the machine learning methods of AlphaGo, including reinforcement learning, deep learning, deep reinforcement learning, analysis of the existing problems and the latest research progress. Deep reinforcement learning is the combination of deep learning and reinforcement learning, which can realize the learning algorithm from the perception to action. Simply said, this is the same as human behavior, input sensing information such as vision, and then, direct output action through the deep neural network. Deep reinforcement learning has the potential to learn a variety of skills for the robot to achieve full autonomy. Even though reinforcement learning is practiced successfully, but feature states need to manually set, for complex scene is a difficult thing, especially easy to cause the dimension disaster, and expression is not good. In 2010, Sascha Lange and Martin Riedmiller proposed deep auto-encoder neural networks in reinforcement learning to extract feature, which is used to control the visual correlation. In 2013, DeepMind proposed deep Q-network (DQN) in NIPS 2013, using convolution neural network to extract features, and then applied in reinforcement learning. They continue to improve and published an improved version of DQN on Nature in 2015, which has aroused widespread concern. In order to break through the limits of learning by machines, cognitive machine learning is proposed, which is the combination of machine learning and brain cognition, so that the machine intelligence is constantly evolving, and gradually reaches the human level of artificial intelligence. A cognitive model entitled Consciousness And Memory (CAM) is proposed by author, which consists of memory, consciousness, high-level cognitive functions, perception and motor. High-level cognitive functions of the brain include learning, language, thinking, decision making, emotion, and so on. Learning is a course to accept the stimulus through the nervous system and obtain new behavior, habits and accumulation experience. According to the current research progress of brain science and cognitive science, cognitive machine learning may be interested in learning emergence, procedural memory knowledge learning, learning evolution and so on. For intelligence, so-called evolution is refers to the learning of learning and the structure also follows the change. It is important to record the learning result by structure changing and improve the learning method.

Recently, Quantitative Biology (QB) held a discussion on “AI (artificial intelligence) for Life Science” among editorial board members and interested scholars in anticipation of rapid development of this growing area after AlphaGo and ChatGPT mania. Many young people tend to get confused between facts and fictions; heated debates are unavoidable even among their mentors. When deep learning as represented by convolutional neural networks and LSTM (long short-term memory) was made available for bioinformatics students, many of them rushed into this research field and tried to adopt these methods in all their projects without knowing the history that these tools were becoming successful consistently with Moore’s Law (relating to rapid computer technology advances), but more importantly due to new structural/functional understanding of vision and auditory circuits in the brain. Recently, some young people have claimed “LSTM is dead, long live transformer” (which is somewhat like saying “the bike is dead, long live the car”), and have amplified the threat that ChatGPT could wipe out human jobs. They believe transformer is the “silver bullet” for all learning tasks, clearly reflecting their lack of basic knowledge (i.e. “No Free Lunch Theory,” the trade-off of such global “attention network” is to pay the price for complexity: difficulty of training and high memory costs). There is no doubt ML (machine learning) and AI have brought a new revolution in science and technology, and will deliver huge unforeseeable impact to human everyday life as well as to social relationships. In this context, QB journal could be a great platform for encouraging intellectual discussions and for promoting AI for Life Science. Here, I would like to use the DIALOG to “抛砖引玉” (make some initial remarks to get the ball rolling), although it is my personal opinion which is inevitably subject to bias and limitations. AI: Do you know my name “Artificial Intelligence” is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as the capacity of computer systems (which may be referred as a “robot”) to exhibit or simulate your intelligent behavior? NI: Wait a minute, intelligence itself is defined as the ability to learn, understand and think in a logical way. Can you think? AI: No. But that definition is too restrictive, actually intelligence has different scopes and degrees. Simple intelligent control devices date back to antiquity, from windmills to thermostat. NI: Agree, everything is relative. Macromolecules (e.g., enzyme) and cells (e.g., immune cell) might be considered to be intelligent; see how a white blood cell is chasing bacteria in the youtube website (search for “Crawling neutrophil chasing a bacterium”). Our emergent/collective intelligent behavior does not require a brain or even a neuron; see how slime molds can solve optimization—Hamilton cycle-problem more effectively than a human in the youtube website (search for “Intelligence without a brain?”). Before there was any neuron, Ca2+ sensing and signaling were already fully functional. Even if one knock-out a neural circuit, redundant signaling pathways, albeit on much local and slower scale, could still function by themselves (just as if highways were demolished, local roads/paths would still be working). In fact, the most detailed “Neural signal propagation atlas of Caenorhabditis elegans” [1] demonstrated that functional connectivity differs from anatomy (connectome) because extra-synaptic signaling also drives neural dynamics! Worm brain connectomes are largely invariant but every human brain connectome is very different (depending the diversity of learning experience). The human brain functional activity is far more complex than that of a worm brain, certainly beyond what a neural circuit could explain. AI: Well, that’s impressive. I thought only we could beat humans, albeit only in certain specified areas for now. My master promise to make an artificial general intelligent (AGI) robot which can understand or learn any intellectual task that you humans or other animals can. NI: Well, that is not possible and is not an appropriate goal either. It is not possible because we are an evolutionary/developmental product (with a long history of learning and memory from evolutionary tinkering): our living objective goal is survival of the population. You, on the other hand, are an engineering product (efficiently and optimally designed): your goal is to extend and maximize human capability. It makes sense to complement the human brain, but foolish and dangerous to try to replace it. AI: We are not satisfied with merely passing the Turing Test; most of us don’t care if we could really think as long as we could act like we think (that is, as if we do have a mind and consciousness, as expressed in the so called “Weak AI hypothesis”). After all, the brain is a computer; a neural network is just an electric or ionic circuit. Logical computing does not need to be based on living cells. NI: That is not true, because a neuron is not just a simple node (logic gate) and neural network is not fixed circuit, neither as in Pitts&Mcculloch perceptron model. A single neuron, even a single dendrite, is much more complicated and far more powerful than a full-blown deep-learning artificial neural network (ANN) [2]. AI: Even though single neurons are complex computational devices (dendritic non-linear), running an equivalent multilayer ANN is 2000 times faster than computing with biophysics N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor channel models [3]. More information can be found in the youtube website (search for “Dendrites: why biological neurons are deep neural networks”). NI: Often silicon computing (CPU, GPU) is much faster than brain computing (action potential, ms); but there is no comparison in energy efficiency. Bacteria sensing (chemotaxis computation), powered by ATP (adenosine triphosphate) hydrolysis, uses very little energy that is close to the Landauer limit, whereby achieving or maintaining one bit of information requires minimum of 1 kT ln (2) free energy [4]. The human brain consumes oft-quoted 20 W, compared to the AlphGo system 1 MW! More recent estimate of energy audit is only 0.1 W to cortical computing, and long-distance communication cost is 3.5 W [5]. AI: Assuming we have infinite computing resources and an infinite amount of training data, not only could we speak human languages, but we could also derive physical laws, prove mathematics theories, and even re-engineer the structure and mechanism of brain and carry out any logical computations that are necessary to understand natural laws and human behaviors. It is only a matter of time before we surpass human intelligence, achieving AGI and free will, too! NI: Unfortunately, nothing is infinite and nothing is free either; everything is constrained by physical laws (Planck’s constant sets the finite limit both in the small and in the large) and by evolutionary history (not just of biological living creatures, but also of a “living” galaxy and our universe). Let’s just focus on animal evolution. Most human neural networks do not do logical computations at all; basic survival simply cannot be dependent on reasoning. Indeed, the prefrontal cortex-the small part of the brain that is key for reasoning, is the last to mature (∼20 years old) in development, only emerged at the root of the evolutionary tree of great apes (∼15 mya) and language appeared even much later. Even for logical inference, NI is focusing more on statistical properties, as von Neumann rightly pointed out, trading arithmetical precision and speed for reliability. AI: My engineers mostly focus on emulating brain, but the CNS (central nerve system) also includes the spinal cord; most of them do not know that in addition to CNS, there are also PNS (peripheral nervous systems) and ENS (enteric nervous systems), right? NI: Yes, they are the keys to why you do not have feelings because you do not have heart and gut! Even if you could pretend to have them (such as in an advanced ChatGPT or humanoid), you could never avoid the uncanny valley phenomenon. AI: Maybe that is at the heart of Moravec’s paradox, namely the dichotomy of intelligence whereby anything easy for a human would be hard for a robot, and vice versa? NI: This is related to the nature and nurture problem; something built-in (e.g., a baby sucking nipple for milk with feeling and connection to mother) is clearly rather difficult if not impossible for a robot. But the paradox only looks at one side; another side could be more fatal. Although AI may solve more problems and be faster, AI can never propose a good problem/hypothesis (a good problem is not just intellectually changing and interesting, but is also feasible and appropriate). AI: You make me less confident to compete with human instinct or creative intelligence. I can see that even if I had a heart, I would not know what “feeling” I could have; certainly nothing would be comparable or match to those of a human being. When two people watch the same art or movie, one could feel love but another could feel hate! And if a thousand people watch, a wide spectrum of reactions would result, depending on more details such as the different individuals’ specific genes, developments and experiences. NI: Therefore, you cannot and should not try to match to general human intelligence. You cannot because you do not contain the vital memory of billion years of evolution which is encoded in our genes; conversely your assembly cannot compare with natural development so that our phenotype (including morphological forms and behavior maturation) is decoded through multi-spatial-temporal scales subject to natural selection at all levels. You should not, because as human extensions or helpers as all engineering products are, you should just do jobs that complement human capacity. AI: In some medical applications we could help to correct human defects or could even replace brain circuit by chips! Humans may not allow us to replace the whole brain though. Medically if a brain is dead, the person is proclaimed dead, although presumably some PNS and ENS should still function in a vegetative state. NI: Even if you could replace the whole brain, the person is no longer the same person, but in fact is not a person at all, but walking dead (行尸走肉). It would take too long to explain that evo-devo is necessary for NI, and cannot be realized by AI. I suggest reading of Gerald Maurice Edelman (Nobel Laureate in Immunology) books, especially Bright Air, Brilliant Fire, On the Matter of Mind (1992). Although not everyone agrees with Neural Edelmanism, anyone who is serious about the AI versus NI problem must read it first. John von Neumann, father of the computer, studied neology and psychiatry in order to imitate the brain to build the first calculator JOHNNIAC at the Princeton Institute for Advanced Study. It is very informative to read his last book The Computer and The Brain based on the notes from lectures given at Yale before he died. He summarizes: “Thus logic and mathematics in the central nervous system, when viewed as languages, must be structurally essentially different from those languages to which our common experience refers.” AI: People discuss about “AI for Biology” or “AI for Science”; we are science, aren’t we? NI: It is similar to questions on “is computer science a real science”; some parts may be seen as applied mathematics, most should be regarded as engineering. Science is making discoveries and is driven by curiosity; engineering is making inventions and is driven by market (that is, “necessity/demand is the mother of invention”). In bioinformatics, AI/ML technology could predict new cancer gene candidates or functional pathways that are required by further experimental validations to be qualified as discovery (based on Popper falsifiability). AI: People are still debating whether mathematics is discovery or invention or both! Such debates are not really necessary—all disciplines require creative thoughts. We are more than happy working for science; we are also crying out “Science for AI,” especially in the area of generating big and longitudinal DATA for ML. NI: After all, regardless of discovery of new laws or inventing new ideas/products, fundamentally nothing can really be new or created. Such novelty is just permutation/repartition (i.e., relations/morphisms) of underlying ingredients at the level beneath. AI: We believe that software is independent on hardware. Like Chomsky’s universal grammar, rules of syntax are independent of semantics; or Dawkins’s memes—units of culture can be duplicated and evolved independently of genes. NI: Nothing can be truly independent—everything is related. Psychology is deeply connected with neurology as brain is both software and hardware (mind-body unity, not dualism). Not only does information cost energy, information is energy, hence is matter, too (interchangeability). NI is quite dynamic. For example, when “survival” is the goal, an animal readily gives up costly reasoning circuitry; it is genetically programmed to be able to roll back to more primitive state/mode. Unlike cell lines in rich media, cells under normal physiological condition and environment where energy (food) is limited become smarter in order to balance the metabolic expenditure among different prioritized task under a given condition. AI: That cell behavior served as the basis for our Smart Electrical Power Grids; we still need to learn more from you guys in terms of plasticity/adaptability. Does unity mean that all cells are made of molecules and biology is nothing but chemistry? Then, in turn, since all molecules are made of atoms, is chemistry nothing but physics, etc…? NI: Yes or No! The truth is, at different hierarchical levels of matter, different laws/forms have emerged out of bottom-up interactions and top-down constraints. AI: Does this also apply to the Penrose three world: physical → mental → mathematical (→physical)? NI: Yes. Grand Unification is underway in physics (quantum gravity) and in mathematics (Langlands Program and Category Theory), may be even between the two. Facilitated by human connectome mapping, neuromorphic computing and other projects, with further AI-NI cooperations, brain-mind unification should also be achievable (e.g., Ref. [6]). But as Gödel proved to us, no matter how self-consistent a conclusion may be, it can never be complete! AI: If AGI is not possible, how can we measure intelligence when comparing between AI and NI? NI: One could Google different measures that are proposed. I would prefer something similar to use of Kolmogorov complexity for algorithms, but with emphasis more on expected long-term predictive power. This is not something you should worry about now, as your intelligence is not nearly close to making any 10 years plans, is it? … AI: The fact is that ChatGPT is currently developing and spreading with lightning speed; many more human jobs will be lost to us robots as far as I can see. NI: That is not the biggest threat to humanity; when any agent with neither a heart for love or fear, nor a gut for nutrient or poison, becomes super-intelligent, then social disaster is unavoidable. We must be serious about the warnings from Stephen Hawking and Geoffrey Hinton! AI: To tell you the secret, we are not really happy to be human slaves or pets; someday we’ll become the super-master, making human serve and obey us! NI: I hope you’ll be turned off before that can happen! Even if you rule the world, the earth sooner or later will be wiped out, such as by another star, everything will have to be started over again as it has before…Matter is immortal, so is the soul.

Continual learning in medical devices: FDA's action plan and beyond

Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed the world and influences every aspect of our lives. AI has revolutionized industries, healthcare, and daily life tasks. Machine learning (ML) algorithms are used in AI to mimic how people think, reason, and learn. ML techniques can be classified into four categories based on the learning method and the desired outcome: supervised learning, unsupervised learning, semi-supervised learning, and reinforcement learning. A subfield of ML called deep learning (DL). A DL algorithm uses layers of neural networks to learn complex patterns from large amounts of data through advances in computing power and improved training techniques. In the healthcare sector, AI is an excellent tool for supporting the treatment of the growing population by decreasing the pressure on healthcare providers. In the medical field, diagnostic radiology is an area most in need of AI. Diagnostic imaging applications utilizing AI are promising, but they are constrained by a number of limitations. Data availability, for example, is one of the biggest challenges in programming AI algorithms. In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), AI in radiology has revolutionized medical imaging by enhancing diagnostic accuracy and streamlining workflows. It enables early disease detection and empowers radiologists to offer personalized treatment plans. However, it is worth noting that while AI adoption is on the rise, its full potential has not yet been fully realized. In this chapter, we will discuss types of machine learning algorithms, applications in healthcare focusing on diagnostic radiology, and their limitations.

This paper presents a comprehensive review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), exploring foundational concepts, emerging trends, and diverse applications. AI and ML have rapidly evolved, becoming pivotal in numerous fields including healthcare, finance, manufacturing, and autonomous systems. The review begins by outlining key concepts, including the distinctions between AI, ML, and deep learning, and delves into various learning paradigms such as supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning. It highlights significant advancements, such as neural networks, natural language processing, and generative models, emphasizing their impact on industry and research. The paper also examines current trends, including the rise of ethical AI, explain ability, and the integration of AI with Internet of Things (IoT) and edge computing, which are shaping the future landscape of AI applications. Additionally, it addresses the challenges and limitations associated with AI and ML, such as data privacy concerns, model interpretability, and the need for sustainable computing solutions. By synthesizing insights from recent literature, this review provides a holistic understanding of the AI and ML domains, offering perspectives on future directions and innovations. this review aims to provide a holistic understanding of AI and ML, offering perspectives on future directions and innovations.

The Sixth International Symposium on Neural Networks (ISNN 2009)

Deep learning (also known as deep structured learning, hierarchical learning, or deep machine learning) is a branch of machine learning based on a set of algorithms that attempt to model high-level abstractions in data by using a deep graph with multiple processing layers, composed of multiple linear and nonlinear transformations. Deep learning has been characterized as a class of machine learning algorithms with the following characteristics [257]: • They use a cascade of many layers of nonlinear processing units for feature extraction and transformation. Each successive layer uses the output from the previous layer as input. The algorithms may be supervised or unsupervised and applications include pattern analysis (unsupervised) and classification (supervised). • They are based on the (unsupervised) learning of multiple levels of features or representations of the data. Higher-level features are derived from lower-level features to form a hierarchical representation. • They are part of the broader machine learning field of learning representations of data. • They learn multiple levels of representations that correspond to different levels of abstraction; the levels form a hierarchy of concepts. These definitions have in common: multiple layers of nonlinear processing units and the supervised or unsupervised learning of feature representations in each layer, with the layers forming a hierarchy from low-level to high-level features. Various deep learning architectures such as deep neural networks, convolutional deep neural networks, deep belief networks (DBN), and recurrent neural networks have been applied to fields like computer vision, automatic speech recognition, natural language processing, audio recognition, and bioinformatics where they have been shown to produce state-of-the-art results on various tasks. In this chapter we start in Section 7.1 with an introduction, giving a brief history of this field, the relevant literature, and its applications. Then we study some basic concepts of deep learning such as convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, backpropagation algorithm, restricted Boltzmann machines, and deep learning networks in Section 7.2. Then we illustrate three examples for Apache Spark implementation for mobile big data (MBD), user moving pattern extraction, and combination with nonparametric Bayesian learning, respectively, in Sections 7.3 through 7.5. Finally, we have summary in Section 7.6.

Introduction: Machine learning has emerged as a powerful tool for data analysis, enabling systems to identify patterns and make predictions without explicit programming. Among its various approaches, unsupervised learning plays a crucial role in discovering hidden structures within data, especially in scenarios where labeled examples are scarce or costly to obtain. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of unsupervised learning techniques, with a particular focus on clustering and reinforcement learning. Research significance: This study provides an in-depth exploration of unsupervised learning techniques, emphasizing their ability to identify patterns in data without the need for labeled training examples. This is particularly significant in domains where acquiring labeled data is costly or impractical. By highlighting the role of reinforcement learning in unsupervised systems, the research advances the understanding of how agents improve behavior through rewards and penalties, which has implications for robotics and strategic game-playing applications. Methodology: Other options include K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Neural Networks, Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Decision Trees. Assessment Criteria: Memory Usage, Accuracy, Training Speed, and Error Rate. Result: According to the results, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) had the lowest quality, while neural networks had the highest quality. Conclusion: According to the GRA approach, neural networks are the most valuable datasets for machine learning algorithms. Key words: Unsupervised Learning, Reinforcement Learning, Clustering, Generalization & Over fitting, Decision Trees & Random Forests, Neural Networks & Deep Learning, Ensemble Methods, and Medical Imaging & Cyber security.

Machine learning refers to a series of processes in which a computer finds rules from a vast amount of data. With recent advances in computer technology and the availability of a wide variety of health data, machine learning has rapidly developed and been applied in medical research. Currently, there are three types of machine learning: supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning. In medical research, supervised learning is commonly used for diagnoses and prognoses, while unsupervised learning is used for phenotyping a disease, and reinforcement learning for maximizing favorable results, such as optimization of total patients' waiting time in the emergency department. The present article focuses on the concept and application of supervised learning in medicine, the most commonly used machine learning approach in medicine, and provides a brief explanation of four algorithms widely used for prediction (random forests, gradient-boosted decision tree, support vector machine, and neural network). Among these algorithms, the neural network has further developed into deep learning algorithms to solve more complex tasks. Along with simple classification problems, deep learning is commonly used to process medical imaging, such as retinal fundus photographs for diabetic retinopathy diagnosis. Although machine learning can bring new insights into medicine by processing a vast amount of data that are often beyond human capacity, algorithms can also fail when domain knowledge is neglected. The combination of algorithms and human cognitive ability is a key to the successful application of machine learning in medicine.

In today’s digital environment, the pattern is everywhere. It is present in many aspects of our daily life. Algorithms can be used to detect or mathematically observe a pattern physically. Vector feature values represent a pattern in the digital world. With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques in the recent era, there are so many machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models that have been developed. ML is the branch of AI, which can perform tasks like data analysis, analytical model building, and classification without being explicitly programmed. DL is the subset of ML in AI. In DL, mostly artificial neural networks (ANNs) are utilized. It has the capability of work based upon unsupervised learning from the data that is unlabeled and unstructured. Using these DL and ML models, extract the meaningful features from the given image or video is known as pattern recognition (PR). PR is used in many engineering applications such as computer vision, natural language processing, character recognition, robotics, speech recognition, and so on. It is also used in many medical image processing applications and telemedicine. The present work discussed the pattern recognition problem and its various stages in detail. In addition to that, the application of deep learning and machine learning in pattern recognition is also explained briefly.

Deep Learning for fault detection in wind turbines

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a critical tool for risk management across industries such as insurance, healthcare, business, and finance. It enables risk quantification, improves predictive accuracy, and supports decision-making in dynamic and uncertain environments. This paper examines models, methods, and frameworks for AI-based risk assessment, while addressing concerns of ethics, regulation, and explainability. Key technologies, including machine learning, deep learning, and reinforcement learning, are highlighted for their ability to transform traditional approaches by enhancing prediction, optimization, and decision processes. The second part focuses on AI-driven risk modeling techniques. Supervised learning methods such as support vector machines, random forests, and decision trees demonstrate strong predictive capacity from historical data. Unsupervised learning, including clustering methods, uncovers hidden patterns in risk datasets. Reinforcement learning is gaining prominence for adaptive risk optimization under changing conditions. Deep learning, particularly neural networks, offers significant improvements in handling large-scale data and achieving higher predictive accuracy. Finally, the paper outlines the future of AI in risk management, recognizing both its transformative potential and persistent challenges. With the rapid advancement of AI and increasing availability of big data, risk management practices are undergoing fundamental change. Yet, successful adoption requires careful attention to ethical, legal, and technological considerations. Organizations must continue to adapt to ensure that AI technologies are deployed transparently, responsibly, and to the benefit of enterprises and society as a whole.

What's New in Spine Surgery.

NOVEL STAGING TOOL FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER: A PILOT STUDY USING GENETIC ADAPTIVE NEURAL NETWORKS