• Home
  • Search
  • Two convex counterexamples: A discontinuous envelope function and a nondifferentiable nearest-point mapping
  • Cite Icon57
  • https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9939-1969-0259752-9Copy DOI Icon

Two convex counterexamples: A discontinuous envelope function and a nondifferentiable nearest-point mapping

  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Introduction. This paper gives counterexamples for two unrelated conjectures which pertain to convexity theory. Supposef is any function defined on a closed convex set C in finitedimensional Euclidean space. Its envelope function env f is defined as the pointwise supremum of all linear functions which f dominates everywhere. It is elementary and well known that env f is convex, and hence continuous in the relative interior of C. It is similarly known that env f is lower-semicontinuous on the boundary of C. Witsenhausen [14] uses and studies envelope functions. He suggested the following orally: CONJECTURE 1. Iff is continuous everywhere on C, then envf is also continuous everywhere on C. I provide a very simple counterexample in 3-space which shows that this is not true. Incidentally, though the proof is not on paper, I feel fairly certain that Witsenhausen's conjecture is correct in 2-space. If C is a closed convex set in finite-dimensional Euclidean space, then for any point x in the space there is a unique point P(x) in C which is nearest to x. The mapping P is called the projection onto C. (Many interesting results about this mapping are given in Phelps [9], [10].) It is easy to prove and well known that P is a contraction mapping, hence continuous. It is also easy to see that P need not have much in the way of differentiability properties, for if C is a polyhedron in 2-space, then it is easy to find points and directions at which P does not even have a two-sided directional derivative. The existence in general of a one-sided directional derivative, however, is not so easy to decide. This question does not seem to be raised in such natural places as Eggleston [4] and Valentine [11]. CONJECTURE 2. For all points and directions, P has a one-sided directional derivative. My mildly complicated counterexample is a set C (in 3-space), which is the convex hull of a countable infinity of points. I suspect that the conjecture is correct in 2-space. In n-space it would be interesting to know whether the set of points and directions at which the conjecture holds is dense in EnXSn-. If not, the convex set would have to be extremely jagged!

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Smooth Approximation of Lipschitz Maps and Their Subgradients

  • Dec 22, 2021
  • Journal of the ACM
  • Abbas Edalat
  • Research Article
  • Citations34

Extended Lorentz cones and mixed complementarity problems

  • Dec 03, 2014
  • Journal of Global Optimization
  • S Z Németh +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article

An Alternative Surface Measures Construction in Finite-Dimensional Spaces and its Consistency with the Classical Approach

  • Sep 18, 2017
  • Research Bulletin of the National Technical University of Ukraine "Kyiv Politechnic Institute"
  • Kateryna V Moravetska
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Optimality conditions in nondifferentiable programming and their applications to best approximations

  • Oct 01, 1982
  • Applied Mathematics & Optimization
  • Nagata Furukawa
  • Research Article
  • Citations98

Finding Best Approximation Pairs Relative to a Convex and Prox-Regular Set in a Hilbert Space

  • Jan 01, 2008
  • SIAM Journal on Optimization
  • D Russell Luke
  • Research Article
  • Citations15

Average distances in compact connected spaces

  • Dec 01, 1982
  • Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society
  • David Yost
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

A relaxed self-adaptive CQ algorithm for the multiple-sets split feasibility problem

  • Mar 17, 2014
  • Optimization
  • Songnian He +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations61

Convex sets with the Lipschitz fixed point property are compact

  • Jan 01, 1985
  • Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
  • P K Lin +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Closed convex sets and their best simultaneous approximation properties with applications

  • Aug 01, 2006
  • Optimization Letters
  • H Mohebi +1
  • Research Article

SIMULTANEOUS METRIC PROJECTIONS IN C(Q, Y ) WITH APPLICATIONS

  • Jan 10, 2009
  • Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics
  • Mahdi Iranmanesh +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

A note on non-support points, negligible sets, Gâteaux differentiability and Lipschitz embeddings

  • Dec 23, 2007
  • Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
  • Lixin Cheng +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Differentiability via one-sided directional derivatives

  • Jan 01, 1981
  • Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
  • Marián Fabián
  • Research Article
  • Citations35

Decomposition theorems for 3-convex subsets of the plane

  • Jul 01, 1974
  • Pacific Journal of Mathematics
  • Marilyn Breen
  • Research Article

A method for the approximate solution of quasi-static problems for hardening bodies

  • May 01, 2006
  • Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics
  • A.I Glushko +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Proper Holomorphic Maps in Euclidean Spaces Avoiding Unbounded Convex Sets

  • Mar 28, 2023
  • The Journal of Geometric Analysis
  • Barbara Drinovec Drnovšek +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.