• Home
  • Search
  • Uncertainty Analysis in Reactor Physics Modeling
  • Open Access IconOpen Access
  • Cite Icon5
  • https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/697057Copy DOI Icon

Uncertainty Analysis in Reactor Physics Modeling

Show More
  • Abstract
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increasing demand from nuclear research, industry, safety, and regulation for best estimate predictions to be provided with their confidence bounds. Consequently, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)/Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) has initiated an international uncertainty analysis in modeling (UAM) benchmark focused on uncertainty analysis in best-estimate coupled code calculations for design, operation, and safety analysis of light water reactors (LWRs). The title of this benchmark is “OECD/NEA UAM-LWR benchmark”. Reference systems and scenarios for coupled code analysis are defined to study the uncertainty effects for all stages of the system calculations. Measured data from plant operation are available for the chosen scenarios. The proposed technical approach is to establish a benchmark for uncertainty analysis in best-estimate modeling and coupled multiphysics and multiscale LWR analysis, using as bases a series of well-defined problems with complete sets of input specifications and reference experimental data. The objective is to determine the uncertainty in LWR system calculations at all stages of a coupled reactor physics/thermal hydraulics calculation. The full chain of uncertainty propagation from basic data, engineering uncertainties, across different scales (multi-scale), and physics phenomena (multiphysics) is tested on a number of benchmark exercises for which experimental data are available and for which the power plant details have been released. The principal idea is (a) to subdivide the complex system/scenario into several steps or exercises, each of which can contribute to the total uncertainty of the final coupled system calculation, (b) to identify input, output, and assumptions for each step, (c) to calculate the resulting uncertainty in each step and (d) to propagate the uncertainties in an integral system simulation for which high quality plant experimental data exist for the total assessment of the overall computer code uncertainty. The main scope covers uncertainty (and sensitivity) analysis (SA/UA) in best estimate modeling for design and operation of LWRs, including methods that are used for safety evaluations. As part of this effort, the development and assessment of different methods or techniques to account for the uncertainties in the calculations are to be investigated and reported to the participants. The general frame of the OECD/NEAUAM-LWR benchmark consists of three phases with different exercises for each phase: Phase I (neutronics phase), Phase II (core phase), and Phase III (system phase). The focus of Phase I is on propagating uncertainties in standalone neutronics calculations and consists of the following three exercises.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation of Multiphysics Simulation of the Pressurized Water Reactor Core

  • Mar 25, 2019
  • Nuclear Technology
  • Kaiyue Zeng +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Quantification and propagation of neutronics uncertainties of the Kozloduy-6 VVER-1000 fuel assembly using SCALE 6.2.1 within the NEA/OECD benchmark for uncertainty analysis in modelling of LWRs

  • Jul 17, 2019
  • Annals of Nuclear Energy
  • G.P Nyalunga +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Challenges and progress of uncertainty analysis for the pebble-bed high-temperature gas-cooled reactor

  • Jun 19, 2021
  • Progress in Nuclear Energy
  • Jiong Guo +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS OF SUB-EXERCISES IN UAM-SFR BENCHMARK WITH THE MCS CODE

  • Jan 01, 2021
  • EPJ Web of Conferences
  • Yunki Jo +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

Nuclear data uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the VHTRC benchmark using SCALE

  • Jul 04, 2017
  • Annals of Nuclear Energy
  • Friederike Bostelmann +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Evaluation and Uncertainty Analysis of the KRITZ-2 Critical Benchmark Experiments

  • Jul 01, 2012
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering
  • Ivan Kodeli +1
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations116

Uncertainty analysis in environmental modelling under a change of spatial scale

  • Jan 01, 1998
  • Gerard B M Heuvelink
  • Research Article

Statistical uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of intracellular signaling models - through approximate Bayesian computation and variance based global sensitivity analysis

  • Jan 01, 2016
  • Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
  • Eriksson Olivia +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations68

Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) uncertainty analysis for watershed water quality modeling and management

  • Jun 07, 2015
  • Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
  • Yi Zheng +1
  • Conference Article

Development of Single Pebble Benchmark Ex. I-2A for IAEA UAM CRP With MOOSE

  • Jul 22, 2018
  • Jinlin Niu +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Review of SCWR research in Japan

  • Nov 29, 2023
  • Frontiers in Nuclear Engineering
  • Yoshiaki Oka
  • Research Article
  • Citations251

Development Status of Accident-tolerant Fuel for Light Water Reactors in Korea

  • Dec 23, 2015
  • Nuclear Engineering and Technology
  • Hyun-Gil Kim +3
  • Research Article

Increased 238Pu Production in Proliferation-Resistant U-10Zr Fuel Produced from Reprocessed Uranium Containing Unseparated 237Np

  • Jan 05, 2025
  • Nuclear Technology
  • Eva M Lisowski +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Comparison of Health Status and Macroeconomic Indicators in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Countries Using Multidimensional Scaling and TOPSIS

  • Nov 11, 2019
  • Archives of Health Science and Research
  • S Haluk Özsari +1
  • Research Article

Сучасні методи дослідження гострої токсичності полютантів для представників водної і наземної екосистем та впровадження їх у практику наукового центру превентивної та регуляторної токсикології

  • Nov 11, 2022
  • Ukrainian Journal of Modern Toxicological Aspects
  • P.G Zhminko +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.