Unifying Search-Based and Compilation-Based Approaches to Multi-Agent Path Finding through Satisfiability Modulo Theories

We address conflict reasoning in generalizations of multi-agent path finding (MAPF). We assume items placed in vertices of an undirected graph with at most one item per vertex. Items can be relocated across edges while various constraints depending on the concrete type of MAPF must be satisfied. We recall a general problem formulation that encompasses known types of item relocation problems such as multi-agent path finding (MAPF) and token swapping (TSWAP). We show how to express new types of relocation problems in the general problem formulation. We thoroughly evaluate a novel solving method for item relocation that combines satisfiability modulo theory (SMT) with conflict-based search (CBS). CBS is interpreted in the SMT framework where we start with the basic model and refine the model with a collision resolution constraint whenever a collision between items occurs. The key difference between the standard CBS and the SMT-based modification of CBS (SMT-CBS) is that the standard CBS branches the search to resolve the collision while SMT-CBS iteratively adds a single disjunctive collision resolution constraint. Our experimental evaluation revealed that although SMT-CBS performs better than CBS in small densely occupied instances of variants of MAPF, it is outperformed on large sparsely occupied environments. The performed analysis shows that individual paths in large environments of relocation instances can be found faster using simple A*-based algorithm than by the SMT solver. On the other hand the SMT solver performs better when many conflicts between items need to be resolved.

A variant of multi-agent path finding in continuous space and time with geometric agents MAPF is addressed in this paper. The task is to navigate agents that move smoothly between predefined positions to their individual goals so that they do not collide. We introduce a novel solving approach for obtaining makespan optimal solutions called SMT-CBS based on satisfiability modulo theories (SMT). The new algorithm combines collision resolution known from conflict-based search (CBS) with previous generation of incomplete SAT encodings on top of a novel scheme for selecting decision variables in a potentially uncountable search space. We experimentally compare SMTCBS and the previous CCBS algorithm for MAPF <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">R</sup> .

In Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF), we are asked to plan collision-free paths for teams of moving agents. Among the leading methods for optimal MAPF is Conflict-Based Search (CBS), an algorithmic family which has received intense attention in recent years and for which large advancements in efficiency and effectiveness have been reported. Yet all of the recent CBS gains come from reasoning over pairs of agents only. In this paper, we show how to further improve CBS by reasoning about more than two agents at the same time. Our new cluster reasoning techniques allow us to generate stronger bounds for CBS and to identify more bypasses (alternative cost-equivalent paths), which reduce the number of nodes in the CBS conflict tree.

We study practical approaches to solving the token swapping (TSWAP) problem optimally in this paper. In TSWAP, we are given an undirected graph with colored vertices. A colored token is placed in each vertex. A pair of tokens can be swapped between adjacent vertices. The goal is to perform a sequence of swaps so that token and vertex colors agree across the graph. The minimum number of swaps is required in the optimization variant of the problem. We observed similarities between the TSWAP problem and multi-agent path finding (MAPF) where instead of tokens we have multiple agents that need to be moved from their current vertices to given unique target vertices. The difference between both problems consists in local conditions that state transitions (swaps/moves) must satisfy. We developed two algorithms for solving TSWAP optimally by adapting two different approaches to MAPF - conflict-based search (CBS) and SAT-based approach that uses multi-value decision diagrams (MDD-SAT). This constitutes the first attempt to design optimal solving algorithms for TSWAP. Experimental evaluation on various types of graphs shows that the reduction to SAT scales better than CBS in optimal TSWAP solving. It has been also demonstrated that TSWAP instances are easier to solve than corresponding similar MAPF instances.

Conflict-Based Search (CBS) is a leading two-level algorithm for optimal Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF). At its high level, CBS expands nodes by resolving conflicts. In recent years, admissible heuristics were added to the high level of CBS. We enhance all known heuristic functions for CBS by using information about the cost of resolving certain conflicts, with only a small computational overhead. We experimentally demonstrate that the improved heuristics contribute to making CBS even more efficient.

Multi-Robot-Arm Motion Planning (M-RAMP) is a challenging problem featuring complex single-agent planning and multi-agent coordination. Recent advancements in extending the popular Conflict-Based Search (CBS) algorithm have made large strides in solving Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) problems. However, fundamental challenges remain in applying CBS to M-RAMP. A core challenge is the existing reliance of the CBS framework on conservative "complete" constraints. These constraints ensure solution guarantees but often result in slow pruning of the search space -- causing repeated expensive single-agent planning calls. Therefore, even though it is possible to leverage domain knowledge and design incomplete M-RAMP-specific CBS constraints to more efficiently prune the search, using these constraints would render the algorithm itself incomplete. This forces practitioners to choose between efficiency and completeness. In light of these challenges, we propose a novel algorithm, Generalized ECBS, aimed at removing the burden of choice between completeness and efficiency in MAPF algorithms. Our approach enables the use of arbitrary constraints in conflict-based algorithms while preserving completeness and bounding sub-optimality. This enables practitioners to capitalize on the benefits of arbitrary constraints and opens a new space for constraint design in MAPF that has not been explored. We provide a theoretical analysis of our algorithms, propose new "incomplete" constraints, and demonstrate their effectiveness through experiments in M-RAMP.

Multiagent path finding is the problem of finding paths for a set of agents—one for each agent—in a graph that the agents navigate simultaneously. Agents must navigate from their individual start to goal vertices without any collision. We argue that the prevalent treatment of path conflicts in the literature is incomplete for applications, such as computer games and crowd simulations, and extend the definition of path conflicts to accommodate cases where agents persist in their intermediate locations and even after reaching their goals. We show that an existing algorithm, conflict-based search (CBS), can be extended to handle these cases while preserving its optimality. Experiments show that our variant of CBS generates fewer nodes and runs faster than a competing algorithm.

Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) is an important problem with a variety of applications. Its aim is to find collision-free paths for agents having separate start and goal positions. This work proposes a new lexicographic bi-objective MAPF considering different task types, where agents are divided into two kinds to perform critical and acritical tasks. This is common in practical intelligent warehousing scenarios where a critical/acritical-task-performing agent (called c-agent and a-agent, respectively) may represent a full-load/no-load one or the one conducting urgent/non-urgent tasks. The primary objective is to minimize the sum-of-costs of c-agents, while the secondary objective is to minimize the sum-of-costs of a-agents. Two MAPF algorithms are modified to fit and solve the concerned problem for the first time. Moreover, four improvement strategies are embedded to the proposed algorithms and proved to be effective in solving MAPF problems with different task types.

The multi-agent path finding (MAPF) problem asks to find a set of paths on a graph such that when synchronously following these paths the agents never encounter a conflict. In the most widespread MAPF formulation, the so-called Classical MAPF, the agents’ sizes are neglected and two types of conflicts are considered: occupying the same vertex or using the same edge at the same time step. Meanwhile in numerous practical applications, e.g. in robotics, taking into account the agents’ sizes is vital to ensure that the MAPF solutions can be safely executed. Introducing large agents yields an additional type of conflict arising when one agent follows an edge and its body overlaps with the body of another agent that is actually not using this same edge (e.g. staying still at some distinct vertex of the graph). Until now it was not clear how harder the problem gets when such conflicts are to be considered while planning. Specifically, it was known that Classical MAPF problem on an undirected graph can be solved in polynomial time, however no complete polynomial-time algorithm was presented to solve MAPF with large agents. In this paper we, for the first time, establish that the latter problem is NP-hard and, thus, if P≠NP no polynomial algorithm for it can, unfortunately, be presented. Our proof is based on the prevalent in the field technique of reducing the seminal 3-SAT problem (which is known to be an NP-complete problem) to the problem at hand. In particular, for an arbitrary 3-SAT formula we procedurally construct a dedicated graph with specific start and goal vertices and show that the given 3-SAT formula is satisfiable iff the corresponding path finding instance has a solution.

Multi-agent pathfinding (MAPF) is an NP-hard problem. As such, dense maps may be very hard to solve optimally. In such scenarios, compilation-based approaches, via Boolean satisfiability (SAT) and answer set programming (ASP), have been shown to outperform heuristic-search-based approaches, such as conflict-based search (CBS). In this paper, we propose a new Boolean encoding for MAPF, and show how to implement it in ASP and MaxSAT. A feature that distinguishes our encoding from existing ones is that swap and follow conflicts are encoded using binary clauses, which can be exploited by current conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) solvers. In addition, the number of clauses used to encode swap and follow conflicts do not depend on the number of agents, allowing us to scale better. For MaxSAT, we study different ways in which we may combine the MSU3 and LSU algorithms for maximum performance. In our experimental evaluation, we used square grids, ranging from 20 x 20 to 50 x 50 cells, and warehouse maps, with a varying number of agents and obstacles. We compared against representative solvers of the state-of-the-art, including the search-based algorithm CBS, the ASP-based solver ASP-MAPF, and the branch-and-cut-and-price hybrid solver, BCP. We observe that the ASP implementation of our encoding, ASP-MAPF2 outperforms other solvers in most of our experiments. The MaxSAT implementation of our encoding, MtMS shows best performance in relatively small warehouse maps when the number of agents is large, which are the instances with closer resemblance to hard puzzle-like problems.

**Read paper on the following link:** https://ifaamas.org/Proceedings/aamas2022/pdfs/p1464.pdf **Abstract:** With the rising demand of deploying robot teams in autonomous warehouses and factories, the Multi-agent Path Finding (MAPF) problem has drawn more and more attention. However, the classical MAPF problem focuses on navigating agent teams to reach single goal locations while avoiding collisions, and thus it cannot plan the case in which each agent is associated with a sequence of goal locations, and precedence constraints across goal sequences should be respected. Planning with these goal sequences and precedence constraints is important in real-world multi-agent systems. For example, a mobile robot needs to move an inventory pod to several stations for delivering different packages, which is captured by a sequence of goal locations, and another robot can only pick up a package after it has been delivered to the corresponding station, which can be modeled as precedence constraints across goal sequences. In this paper, we formalize the Multi-Agent Path Finding with Precedence Dependency (MAPF-PD) problem along with two algorithms to systematically solve this problem: Conflict-Based Search with Precedence Dependency (CBS-PD) is a complete and optimal algorithm; and Priority-Based Search with Precedence Dependency (PBS-PD) is an incomplete and suboptimal algorithm but shows great scalability and obtains near-optimal solutions in practice. Our experimental results show that our algorithms can scale to dozens of agents with hundreds of goal locations and precedence constraints.

With the rising demand for deploying robot teams in autonomous warehouses and factories, the Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) problem has drawn more and more attention. The classical MAPF problem and most of its variants focus on navigating agent teams to goal locations while avoiding collisions. However, they do not take into account any precedence constraints that agents should respect when reaching their goal locations. Planning with precedence constraints is important for real-world multi-agent systems. For example, a mobile robot can only pick up a package at a station after it has been delivered by another robot. In this paper, we study the Multi-Agent Path Finding with Precedence Constraints (MAPF-PC) problem, in which agents need to visit sequences of goal locations while satisfying precedence constraints between the goal locations. We propose two algorithms for solving this problem systematically: Conflict-Based Search with Precedence Constraints (CBS-PC) is complete and optimal, and Priority-Based Search with Precedence Constraints (PBS-PC) is incomplete but more efficient in finding near-optimal solutions in practice. Our experimental results show that CBS-PC scales to dozens of agents and hundreds of goal locations and precedence constraints, and PBS-PC scales to hundreds of agents, around one thousand goal locations, and hundreds of precedence constraints.

Multi-agent path finding (MAPF) is the problem of planning a set of non-colliding paths for a set of agents so that each agent reaches its individual goal location following its path. A mutex from classical planning is a constraint forbidding a pair of facts to be both true or a pair of actions to be executed simultaneously. In the context of MAPF, mutexes are used to rule out the simultaneous occurrence of a pair of agents in a pair of locations, which can prune the search space. Previously mutex propagation had been integrated into conflict-based search (CBS), a major search-based approach for solving MAPF optimally. In this paper, we introduce mutex propagation into the compilation-based (SAT-based) solver MDD-SAT, an alternative to search-based solvers. Our experiments show that, despite mutex propagation being computationally expensive, it prunes the search space significantly so that the overall performance of MDD-SAT is improved.

The task in the multi-agent path finding problem (MAPF) is to find paths for multiple agents, each with a different start and goal position, such that agents do not collide. A successful optimal MAPF solver is the conflict-based search (CBS) algorithm. CBS is a two level algorithm where special conditions ensure it returns the optimal solution. Solving MAPF optimally is proven to be NP-hard, hence CBS and all other optimal solvers do not scale up. We propose several ways to relax the optimality conditions of CBS trading solution quality for runtime as well as bounded-suboptimal variants, where the returned solution is guaranteed to be within a constant factor from optimal solution cost. Experimental results show the benefits of our new approach; a massive reduction in running time is presented while sacrificing a minor loss in solution quality. Our new algorithms outperform other existing algorithms in most of the cases.

Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) is the problem of finding non-colliding paths for multiple agents. The classical problem assumes that all agents are homogeneous, with a fixed size and behavior. However, in reality agents are heterogeneous, with different sizes and behaviors. In this paper, we generalize MAPF to G-MAPF for the case of heterogeneous agents. We then show how two previous settings of large agents and k-robust agents are special cases of G-MAPF. Finally, we introduce G-CBS, a variant of the Conflict-Based Search (CBS) algorithm for G-MAPF, which does not cause significant extra overhead.