Urban correction of global DEMs using building density for Nairobi, Kenya

Formulation of the problem. Water erosion of soils is the most widespread and dangerous soil degradation process in Ukraine. The development of an effective system of soil protection measures requires the use of spatially distributed mathematical models of soil erosion losses. This, in turn, highlights the problem of spatially distributed source data, which adequately reflect the spatial differentiation of factors of the erosion process, among which the main one is the relief. The purpose of the article. Assessing the adequacy of available spatially distributed source data, including cartographic and freely distributed global digital elevation models (DEMs), for spatially distributed quantitative assessment of soil erosion losses at the local level of territorial coverage is the aim of the article. Assessing from this point of view the scale of the original cartographic data, different global DEMs and their spatial resolution, as well as the degree of spatial generalization of the original data. Materials and methods. The solution of the set tasks was performed by the method of simulation modeling with the use of physical-statistical GIS-realized mathematical model of soil erosion-accumulation, developed at Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University. Source data arrays were tested with DEMs SRTM90 and SRTM30 with a spatial resolution of 3 and 1 angular seconds, respectively, and AW3D30 with a spatial resolution of 1 angular second, as well as with cartographic DEMs based on topographic maps of scale 1:10000 and 1:25000. For testing the initial data, three test plots with an area of 2.67, 0.59 and 0.21 km2 were selected. The plots are located in the Balta district of Odessa region on the southern spurs of the Podolska upland. Results. It is established that freely distributed global digital elevation models SRTM and AW3D30 in the conditions of flat terrain do not always allow to adequately display the structure of slope runoff and, accordingly, to correctly perform calculations of soil erosion losses. The maximum deviation of the average soil erosion losses calculated for the test plots using global DEMs from the soil losses calculated using the reference DEM for SRTM30 and AW3D30 was 27%, for SRTM90 – almost 70%. The distribution of soil losses over the area of test plots obtained using different global DEMs differs even more. When using DEM based on topographic maps, reducing the scale of the original maps from 1: 10000 to 1: 25000 leads to a decrease in the average value of soil erosion losses by about 20% due mainly to reducing the magnitude and area of distribution of maximum soil losses, and on slopes of complex shape also due to changes in the area of accumulation zones. The degree of spatial generalization of the initial data significantly affects the results of the assessment of soil erosion losses both in relation to the average values and their distribution over the area. For small areas, the use of raster cells larger than 50 m is impractical. Scientific novelty and practical significance. It has been shown for the first time that in the conditions of flat terrain at the local level of spatial coverage, the freely distributed global DEM SRTM and AW3D30 are not always hydrologically correct. The reasons and conditions of violation of this correctness are specified. It has been established that the global DEM AW3D30 has local instrumental errors that may make it impossible to use it. The most realistic values of soil erosion losses are provided by DEM SRTM with a spatial resolution of 1 angular second.

<p>With growing urbanisation and climate change, flooding is likely to become even more frequent and severe.  Therefore, it is essential to constantly monitor water level changes at a large scale. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images are often used for flood mapping as they allow a rather straightforward detection of water bodies, at almost all weather and illumination conditions. As the number of satellite observations and global digital elevation models (DEMs) are becoming more available, this mapping approach is gaining in popularity.</p><p>In this study, we propose three different approaches to retrieve water level maps based on the combination of satellite and topographic data, hereby referred to as the global Height Above Nearest Drainage (HAND), the local HAND and the local DEM methods.</p><p>The three approaches are based on the optimization of a threshold applied on the topography (HAND or DEM) data enabling a best fit with the SAR-extracted flood map. The optimized threshold values provide at the same time the normalized water levels (with respect to the drainage network). The water depth map is thus computed from the difference between the water level and the DEM. The global HAND method applies a single optimized threshold to the HAND map, over the entire area of interest. The local HAND method is based on the same concept but optimizes and applies the HAND threshold value locally, using a sliding window. The local DEM thresholding method employs the same principle as the second method but directly on the DEM.</p><p>We evaluate these methods using hydraulic model simulation results and ground truth data, and we carry out several experiments using various SAR images (Envisat, TerraSAR-X and Sentinel-1) and topographic datasets (SRTM, CopDEM and LiDAR).</p><p>The best results are obtained while combining a high-resolution image (e.g:TerraSAR-X) with: 1) a high-resolution dataset (e.g: LiDAR DEM), using the local DEM approach, or 2) a coarse-resolution dataset (e.g: Srtm DEM), using the global HAND approach. RMSDs on the derived water depth maps reach respectively 0.52m and 0.93m.</p>

Accuracy assessment of the global TanDEM-X digital elevation model in a mountain environment

TanDEM-X (TerraSAR-X add-on for Digital Elevation Measurements) is an Earth observation radar mission that consists of a SAR interferometer built by two almost identical satellites flying in close formation [1]–[4]. With a typical separation between the satellites of 120 to 500 m a global Digital Elevation Model (DEM) with 2 m relative height accuracy at 12 m posting is being generated. While the main mission phase for DEM data acquisition has been finished in 2014, the processing of the global TanDEM-X DEM will be concluded in autumn 2016. Final DEMs are well within specifications and feature a low percentage of void areas. Following the DEM data acquisition the capabilities of this unique mission for new scientific application have been demonstrated. In the meantime the continuation of the joint TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X mission was approved and will be dedicated to the generation of DEMs with even higher accuracy for selected areas and further scientific experiments.

There is a growing interest in investigating the accuracy of digital elevation model (DEM). However people usually have an unbalanced view on DEM errors. They emphasize DEM sampling errors, but ignore the impact of DEM resolution and terrian roughness on the accuracy of terrain representation. This research puts forward the concept of DEM terrain representation error (Et) and then investigates the generation, factors, measurement and simulation of DEM terrain representation errors. A multi-resolution and multi-relief comparative approach is used as the major methodology in this research. The experiment reveals a quantitative relationship between the error and the variation of resolution and terrain roughness at a global level. Root mean square error (RMS Et) is regressed against surface profile curvature (V) and DEM resolution (R) at 10 resolution levels. It is found that the RMS Et may be expressed asRMS Et=(0.0061·V+0.0052)·V+0.2415. This result may be very useful in forecasting DEM accuracy, as well as in determining the DEM resolution related to the accuracy requirement of particular application.

Reconstruction of time-varying tidal flat topography using optical remote sensing imageries

Over the last years the TanDEM-X mission acquired data for a second global digital elevation model (DEM) the TanDEM-X Change DEM. This new DEM is temporally independent of the former global TanDEM-X DEM and therefore yields the possibility of change detection. In order to decrease the phase noise level the interferometric processing for the Change DEM has been upgraded. This also allows a more accurate change detection. Currently, the processing of the global data is performed operationally. It includes the detection of terrain changes and first examples of detected terrain changes can be presented.

Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) contribute to geomorphological and hydrological applications. DEMs can be derived using different remote sensing-based datasets, such as Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) (e.g., Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) Phased Array type L-band SAR (PALSAR) and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) DEMs). In addition, there is also the Digital Surface Model (DSM) derived from optical tri-stereo ALOS Panchromatic Remote-sensing Instrument for Stereo Mapping (PRISM) imagery. In this study, we evaluated satellite-based DEMs, SRTM (Global) GL1 DEM V003 28.5 m, ALOS DSM 28.5 m, and PALSAR DEMs 12.5 m and 28.5 m, and their derived channel networks/orders. We carried out these assessments using Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) Digital Surface Models (DSMs) and Digital Terrain Models (DTMs) and their derived channel networks and Strahler orders as reference datasets at comparable spatial resolutions. We introduced a pixel-based method for the quantitative horizontal evaluation of the channel networks and Strahler orders derived from global DEMs utilizing confusion matrices at different flow accumulation area thresholds (ATs) and pixel buffer tolerance values (PBTVs) in both ±X and ±Y directions. A new Python toolbox for ArcGIS was developed to automate the introduced method. A set of evaluation metrics—(i) producer accuracy (PA), (ii) user accuracy (UA), (iii) F-score (F), and (iv) Cohen’s kappa index (KI)—were computed to evaluate the accuracy of the horizontal matching between channel networks/orders extracted from global DEMs and those derived from LiDAR DTMs and DSMs. PALSAR DEM 12.5 m ranked first among the other global DEMs with the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) and mean difference (MD) values of 4.57 m and 0.78 m, respectively, when compared to the LiDAR DTM 12.5 m. The ALOS DSM 28.5 m had the highest vertical accuracy with the lowest recorded RMSE and MD values of 4.01 m and −0.29 m, respectively, when compared to the LiDAR DSM 28.5 m. PALSAR DEM 12.5 m and ALOS DSM 28.5 m-derived channel networks/orders yielded the highest horizontal accuracy when compared to those delineated from LiDAR DTM 12.5 m and LiDAR DSM 28.5 m, respectively. The number of unmatched channels decreased when the PBTV increased from 0 to 3 pixels using different ATs.

Accurate elevation data are essential for effective oil palm plantation planning, hydrological modeling, and environmental management particularly in tropical regions characterized by complex topography and dense vegetation. While LiDAR-derived Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) offer high vertical precision, their acquisition costs often hinder adoption in resource-limited settings. Open-source DEMs provide accessible alternatives but are frequently affected by vegetation interference and coarse resolution, leading to reduced vertical accuracy. This study proposes a hybrid correction framework that integrates a random forest (RF) machine learning algorithm and a geographically weighted regression (GWR) a spatially adaptive statistical method to enhance the vertical accuracy of open-source DEMs for terrain-sensitive applications. The study used 377 high-precision Ground Control Points (GCPs) and LiDAR data to evaluate and correct six global DEMs: Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS), TerraSAR-X add-on for Digital Elevation Measurement (TanDEM-X), Copernicus GLO-30, Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), Forest And Buildings removed Copernicus DEM (FABDEM), Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) GDEM, and a high-resolution drone-derived DEM. RF was used to identify key topographic predictors, including aspect, slope, curvature, Topographic Position Index (TPI), and Terrain Ruggedness Index (TRI), while GWR applied spatially adaptive corrections to the RF residuals. The integrated RF–GWR model significantly improved the vertical accuracy across all DEMs. The post-correction R² values reached 0.914 for TanDEM-X, 0.910 for ALOS, and increased from 0.608 to 0.914 for Copernicus, with the residual standard deviations reduced by up to 75% and near-zero mean bias. These results highlight the model’s ability to correct both systematic and spatially varying elevation errors. The framework presents a scalable and alternative to LiDAR for use in precision agriculture, flood risk modeling, and infrastructure planning. Future work should explore integration with deep learning to improve the temporal responsiveness and operational scalability.

To accurately assess landslide susceptibility and model debris flow paths, acquisition of high-resolution elevation data is essential. These data enable precise topographical analysis, considering factors like slope and curvature. But most of the time such high-resolution data will have inaccuracies due to vegetation, especially in tropical region. This study proposes a comprehensive approach that integrates field data and Structure from Motion (SfM) technology to rectify such DEM inaccuracies caused by dense vegetation. The goal is to enhance the accuracy of landslide simulations and volumetric analysis for effective post-disaster management. The Western Ghats, running parallel to India's western coast, has experienced a surge in rainfall-induced landslides, resulting in significant casualties in recent years. Notably, the Pettimudi village landslide in 2020 caused 70 deaths. The unique geomorphological features of the Western Ghats, such as concave curvature, colluvium deposits, and evidence of paleo landslides, contribute to the area's susceptibility. The study emphasizes the need for detailed assessment and mitigation strategies. The proposed method aims to improve the post-event high-resolution DEM accuracy by integrating field-collected elevation values and utilizing Agisoft Metashape software with the SfM algorithm. The rectification process involves combining elevation differences measured during a field study with photogrammetric elevation data. The field-collected elevation differences are crucial for rectifying these points, and enhancing the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) accuracy. The inaccessible source region is improved using a SfM-created DEM from drone footage, resulting in a more accurate post-event DEM. Correcting the 1 m DEM using an SfM-generated DEM proves challenging but significantly improves detail and accuracy, especially over the landslide source area. The impact of the rectification on accuracy is assessed by comparing volumes calculated from the initial DEM and the newly corrected DEM. The difference in volumes of debris depletion and accumulation, computed using initial and corrected DEMs, highlights variations, with depleted volumes being significantly larger due to the extensive depth increase over the landslide source region. These volumes are then utilized in Rapid Mass Movement Simulation (RAMMS) to validate the rectification process and enhance landslide impact predictions. Debris flow simulations in RAMMS, utilizing the rectified 1 m DEM, show specific outcomes at the landslide source region and toe of the landslide. The study emphasizes the importance of integrating SfM technology with field data to improve DEM accuracy, acknowledging the significance of additional field data for further refinement. The potential adoption of highly precise aerial imagery from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) surveys is suggested to further enhance the SfM DEM. Debris flow modeling with RAMMS serves as a vital step in validating the accuracy and reliability of the rectified elevation model. Keywords: Landslides, Western Ghats, Pettimudi, Digital elevation model (DEM), Structure-from-Motion (SfM) technology, Rapid Mass Movement Simulation (RAMMS)

Satellite-derived Digital Elevation Model (DEM) selection, preparation and correction for hydrodynamic modelling in large, low-gradient and data-sparse catchments

Digital Elevation Model (DEM) errors tend to be spatially correlated, inevitably affecting DEM-based topographic change detection. Traditional topographic change detection methods often ignore the spatial distribution of the DEM error. This paper aims to develop a workflow that considers the spatial autocorrelation of the error in topographic change detection. Firstly, the DEM of Difference (DoD) is obtained from two-period DEMs, and the Monte Carlo method is employed to evaluate the Spatially Distributed Errors (SDE) in DEMs. Secondly, DoD errors are calculated by propagation based on spatially distributed DEM errors. At the same time, its spatial distribution is quantified using the semi-variance function. Finally, topographic changes (erosion, deposition, and net changes) are calculated based on the spatial distribution analysis and significance detection. The results in two small catchments indicate that DEM errors are spatially correlated, increasing the volume calculation errors. However, using Standard Deviation of Errors (SDE) instead of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) can effectively reduce the sensitivity of the detection results in the significance threshold. When the significance threshold increases from 68% to 95%, the observations loss using the spatially distributed error is 4.67% −6.92% lower than that using the RMSE. The level of detection has little impact on the net topographic change and significantly influences gross erosion and deposition. In particular, the use of level of detection can effectively reduce the misclassification of erosion or deposition in stable topography areas. The proposed method can be effectively utilized in various applications like surface deformation monitoring, erosion monitoring, and sediment transport assessment.

TerraSAR-X add-on for Digital Elevation Measurements (TanDEM-X) mission is designed to generate 3-D images of the Earth as the first bistatic synthetic aperture radar (SAR). However, few quantitative studies of TanDEM-X digital elevation model (DEM) quality validation have been conducted specifically in China. This article presents an iterative method to generate high-resolution TanDEM-X DEMs and assesses the vertical accuracy with high-accuracy GPS observations, 1 arc second global DEMs available [Advanced Land Observing Satellite World 3-D-30 m v2.2, Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer Global Digital Elevation Model (ASTER GDEM) v3, Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) v3.1, NASADEM, and X-band SRTM], and TanDEM-X 90 m DEM. The results demonstrate remarkable elevation quality and consistency in coastal areas with root mean square error of 1.7 m and 90% linear error (LE90) of 0.4 m, whereas 3–4 times weaker accuracies in steep mountainous areas. A positive bias of 1–2 m for an overall LE90 measure exists in the dense vegetation and steep-slope mountainous areas. TanDEM-X DEM-based SAR interferometry deformation uncertainty simulation indicates a low or even negligible topographic error contribution of 2–4 mm in mountainous areas and less than 1 mm in coastal areas. It indicates that the TanDEM-X DEM performs better than other global DEMs overall and shows a better elevation consistence with SRTM C-band DEM in the coastal area. As an excellent source of up-to-date information, the TanDEM-X DEM are expected be an advantage for understanding dynamic land use changes and improving identification and delineation of coastal lands, mountainous landslides, and earthquakes disasters.

Digital elevation models (DEMs) are the most obvious data sources in landslide susceptibility assessment. Many landslide casual factors are often generated from DEMs. Most studies on landslide susceptibility assessments rely on freely available DEMs. However, very little is known about the performance of different DEMs with varying spatial resolutions on the accurate assessment of landslide susceptibility. This study compared the performance of four different DEMs including 30 m Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM), 30–90 m Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM), 12.5 m Advanced Land Observation Satellite (ALOS) Phased Array Type L band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR), and 25 m Survey of Bangladesh (SOB) DEM in landslide susceptibility assessment in the Rangamati district in Bangladesh. This study used three different landslide susceptibility assessment techniques: modified frequency ratio (bivariate model), logistic regression (multivariate model), and random forest (machine-learning model). This study explored two scenarios of landslide susceptibility assessment: using only DEM-derived causal factors and using both DEM-derived factors as well as other common factors. The success and prediction rate curves indicate that the SRTM DEM provides the highest accuracies for the bivariate model in both scenarios. Results also reveal that the ALOS PALSAR DEM shows the best performance in landslide susceptibility mapping using the logistics regression and the random forest models. A relatively finer resolution DEM, the SOB DEM, shows the lowest accuracies compared to other DEMs for all models and scenarios. It can also be noted that the performance of all DEMs except the SOB DEM is close (72%–84%) considering the success and prediction accuracies. Therefore, anyone of the three global DEMs: ASTER, SRTM, and ALOS PALSAR can be used for landslide susceptibility mapping in the study area.

Accurate and precise topographic information from Digital Elevation Models (DEM) is of fundamental requirement for many geoscience and engineering applications. With a goal of providing accurate global topographic products, German Aerospace Centre (DLR) and Airbus Defence and Space developed X-band TanDEM-X mission. The TanDEM-X Global DEM is generated with a pixel spacing of 12×12 m from interferometric data acquired in strip map mode with a resolution of 3.3 m [1]. In this study, the vertical accuracy of TanDEM-X Global DEM is assessed by comparing it with various elevation datasets. The elevation datasets include DGPS measurements, SRTM 30m, and 90 m DEM, CartoSat DEM, LiDAR data, photogrammetry data, intermediate and fused DEMs’ derived from TanDEM-X CoSSC [2], ICESat elevations and the newly released TanDEM-X 90 m DEM. The study areas include Bihar (flat terrain), Mumbai (moderate and urban terrain), Godavari (moderate and hilly), Koyna (hilly and vegetated), Manali (rugged Himalayan) and Kartarniaghat Wild Life Sanctuary-KWLS (flat and forest) with different terrain conditions. Widely used statistical parameters such as mean, standard deviation (SD) and root mean square error (RMSE) are used for vertical accuracy assessment [3]. The minimum and maximum differences between elevations are also noted, which are useful in exploiting quality of DEM under evaluation. The accuracy of the TanDEM-X Global DEM is found to be less than 1.6 m, 4 m, 5 m, 13 m, 6 m for plain, moderate relief, hilly, Himalayan, vegetated terrains respectively. In vegetated areas (KWLS), we observed an 8 m difference in tree height estimation using TanDEM-X Global DEM and GPS measurement. Elevation and difference profiles were drawn to understand the vertical accuracy of these DEMs’. In all cases, the elevations of TanDEM-X Global DEM closely matched with heights derived from DGPS, ICESAT, LiDAR and photogrammetry data.